1887
Volume 19, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1606-822X
  • E-ISSN: 2309-5067

Abstract

Abstract

Idiomatic expressions are generally manifested as lexically fixed. Yet some expressions allow lexical variations in their open slots and thus show certain degree of productivity in actual use. How young children acquire the productive use of idiomatic expressions, however, has rarely been addressed in current literature. The present study explores the developmental trajectory in learning idiom productivity by targeting the quadra-syllabic schematic idioms in Chinese. Results of two Graded Acceptability Judgment tests showed that acquisition of the selective productivity of schematic idioms may undergo an interactive process shaped by its token frequency, structural complexity, inherent semantic relation and the chunk effect of its open morphemes at different age levels. Findings in the studies are further discussed in relation to the emergentist model in idiom learning.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00004.liu
2018-01-05
2024-12-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lali.00004.liu.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00004.liu&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Ahrens, Kathleen
    1995 The meaning of double object construction in Chinese. In Camacho, Jose & Choueiri, Lina (eds.), Proceedings of NACCL 6, vol.11, 1–14. Los Angeles: GSIL Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ambridge, Ben & Theakston, Anna L. & Lieven, Elena V. M. & Tomasello, Michael
    2006 The distributed learning effect for children’s acquisition of an abstract syntactic construction. Cognitive Development21(2). 174–193. doi:  10.1016/j.cogdev.2005.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2005.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  3. Ambridge, Ben & Kidd, Evan & Rowland, Caroline F. & Theakston, Anna L.
    2015 The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition. Journal of Child Language42(2). 239–273. doi:  10.1017/S030500091400049X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S030500091400049X [Google Scholar]
  4. Barlow, Michael & Kemmer, Suzanne
    (eds.) 2000Usage-based models of language. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bock, Kathryn J.
    1986 Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology18(3). 355–387. doi:  10.1016/0010‑0285(86)90004‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(86)90004-6 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bowerman, Melissa & Croft, William
    2008 The acquisition of the English causative alternation. In Bowerman, Melissa & Brown, Penelope (eds.), Crosslinguistic perspectives on argument structure: Implications for learnability, 279–307. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bybee, Joan
    1998 The emergent lexicon. In Gruber, M. Catherine & Higgins, Derrick & Olson, Kenneth S. & Wysocki, Tamra (eds.), CLS 34–2: The panels, 421–435. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 2006 From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language82(4). 711–733. doi:  10.1353/lan.2006.0186
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0186 [Google Scholar]
  9. 2007Frequency of use and the organization of language. New York: Oxford University Press. doi:  10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301571.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301571.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bybee, Joan L. & Hopper, Paul J.
    (eds.) 2001Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (Typological Studies in Language 45). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/tsl.45
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.45 [Google Scholar]
  11. Cacciari, Cristina & Levorato, Maria Chiara
    1989 How children understand idioms in discourse. Journal of Child Language16(2). 387–405. doi:  10.1017/S0305000900010473
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900010473 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cain, Kate & Oakhill, Jane & Lemmon, Kate
    2005 The relation between children’s reading comprehension level and their comprehension of idioms. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology90(1). 65–87. doi:  10.1016/j.jecp.2004.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2004.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  13. CCL
    CCL 2003–2016Beijing Daxue Zhongguo Yuyanxue Yanjiu Zhongxin: Xiandai Hanyu Yuliaoku [ Center for Chinese Linguistics PKU: Corpus of Modern Mandarin Chinese ] (ccl.pku.edu.cn/corpus.asp) (Accessed2016-06-01.)
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen, Helen Kai-yun
    2001A construction grammar approach to Chinese four-character idiomatic expressions. Taipei: National Taiwan University. (Master’s thesis.)
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Ching, Eugene
    1964Four-syllable expressions in Chinese (Issue 7 of Report, Ohio State University Project on Linguistic Analysis). Columbus: Ohio State University Research Foundation.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Croft, William & Cruse, D. Alan
    2004Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9780511803864
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864 [Google Scholar]
  17. Culicover, Peter W. & Jackendoff, Ray
    1999 The view from the periphery: The English comparative correlative. Linguistic Inquiry30(4). 543–571. doi:  10.1162/002438999554200
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438999554200 [Google Scholar]
  18. Diessel, Holger & Tomasello, Michael
    2005 A new look at the acquisition of relative clauses. Language81(4). 882–906. doi:  10.1353/lan.2005.0169
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2005.0169 [Google Scholar]
  19. Ellis, Nick C.
    2002 Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition24(2). 143–188. doi:  10.1017/S0272263102002024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002024 [Google Scholar]
  20. Fillmore, Charles J. & Kay, Paul & O’Connor, Mary Catherine
    1988 Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language64(3). 501–538. doi:  10.2307/414531
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414531 [Google Scholar]
  21. Gan, Lihao
    2008 “Bu A bu B” de goushiyi yu yuyi de xiaojiqingxiang – jiyu renzhi yu yuyong de fenxi [Constructional meaning and pragmatic tendency of bu-A-bu-B pattern]. Xiuci Xuexi [ Rhetoric Learning ] 2008(2). 56–60.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Gibbs, Raymond W.
    1987 Linguistic factors in children’s understanding of idioms. Journal of Child Language14(3). 569–586. doi:  10.1017/S0305000900010291
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900010291 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gibbs, Raymond W. & Nayak, Nandini P.
    1989 Psycholinguistic studies on the syntactic behavior of idioms. Cognitive Psychology21(1). 100–138. doi:  10.1016/0010‑0285(89)90004‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(89)90004-2 [Google Scholar]
  24. Glucksberg, Sam
    1993 Idiom meanings and allusional content. In Cacciari, Cristina & Tabossi, Patrizia (eds.), Idioms: Processing, structure, and interpretation, 3–26. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Goldberg, Adele E.
    1995Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 2005 Argument realization: The role of constructions, lexical semantics and discourse factors. In Östman, Jan-Ola & Fried, Mirjam (eds.), Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions, 17–43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/cal.3.03gol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.3.03gol [Google Scholar]
  27. 2006Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 2013 Constructionist approaches. In Hoffmann, Thomas & Trousdale, Graeme (eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar, 15–31. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Goldberg, Adele E. & Casenhiser, Devin
    2008 Construction learning and second language acquisition. In Robinson, Peter & Ellis, Nick C. (eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition, 197–215. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Hilpert, Martin
    2014Construction grammar and its application to English (Edinburgh Textbooks on the English Language – Advanced). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Hoffmann, Thomas & Trousdale, Graeme
    (eds.) 2013The Oxford handbook of construction grammar. New York: Oxford University Press. doi:  10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hsieh, Shelley Ching-Yu & Hsu, Chun-Chieh Natalie
    2010 Idiom comprehension in Mandarin-speaking children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research39(6). 505–522. doi:  10.1007/s10936‑009‑9145‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-009-9145-z [Google Scholar]
  33. Jackendoff, Ray
    1997 Twistin’ the night away. Language73(3). 534–559. doi:  10.2307/415883
    https://doi.org/10.2307/415883 [Google Scholar]
  34. Ji, Meng
    2007 From etymology to modern phraseology: A corpus-based study of structural variants of Chinese idioms in naturally-occurring contexts. Journal of Chinese Language and Computing17(2). 67–82.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Kaschak, Michael P. & Glenberg, Arthur M.
    2000 Constructing meaning: The role of affordances and grammatical constructions in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language43(3). 508–529. doi:  10.1006/jmla.2000.2705
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2705 [Google Scholar]
  36. Katz, Jerrold J. & Postal, Paul M.
    1963 Semantic interpretation of idioms and sentences containing them. In Zimmermann, Henry J. & Harvey, George G. (eds.), Quarterly Progress Report No. 70 (MIT Research Laboratory of Electronics), 275–282.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Kay, Paul & Fillmore, Charles J.
    1999 Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What’s X doing Y? construction. Language75(1). 1–33. doi:  10.2307/417472
    https://doi.org/10.2307/417472 [Google Scholar]
  38. Langacker, Ronald W.
    2000 A dynamic usage-based model. In Barlow, Michael & Kemmer, Suzanne (eds.), Usage-based models of language, 1–64. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Laval, Virginie
    2003 Idiom comprehension and metapragmatic knowledge in French children. Journal of Pragmatics35(5). 723–739. doi:  10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00137‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00137-6 [Google Scholar]
  40. Levorato, Maria Chiara & Cacciari, Cristina
    1992 Children’s comprehension and production of idioms: The role of context and familiarity. Journal of Child Language19(2). 415–433. doi:  10.1017/S0305000900011478
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900011478 [Google Scholar]
  41. Lieven, Elena V. & Tomasello, Michael
    2008 Children’s first language acquisition from a usage-based perspective. In Robinson, Peter & Ellis, Nick C. (eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition, 168–196. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Liu, Li & Cheung, Hin Tat
    2014 Acquisition of Chinese quadra-syllabic idiomatic expressions: Effects of semantic opacity and structural symmetry. First Language34(4). 336–353. doi:  10.1177/0142723714544409
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723714544409 [Google Scholar]
  43. Liu, Ying & Peng, Danling
    1997 Meaning access of Chinese compounds and its time course. In Chen, Hsuan-Chih (ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages, 219–232. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. McGlone, Mathew S. & Glucksberg, Sam & Cacciari, Cristina
    1994 Semantic productivity and idiom comprehension. Discourse Processes17(2). 167–190. doi:  10.1080/01638539409544865
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539409544865 [Google Scholar]
  45. Moon, Rosamund
    1998Fixed expressions and idioms in English: A corpus-based approach (Oxford Studies in Lexicography and Lexicology). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Myers, James
    2006 Processing Chinese compounds: A survey of the literature. In Libben, Gary & Jarema, Gonia (eds.), The representation and processing of compound words, 169–196. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Nippold, Marilyn A. & Duthie, Jill K.
    2003 Mental imagery and idiom comprehension: A comparison of school-age children and adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research46(4). 788–799. doi:  10.1044/1092‑4388(2003/062)
    https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2003/062) [Google Scholar]
  48. Nippold, Marilyn A. & Martin, Stephanie Tarrant
    1989 Idiom interpretation in isolation versus context: A developmental study with adolescents. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research32(1). 59–66. doi:  10.1044/jshr.3201.59
    https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3201.59 [Google Scholar]
  49. Pinker, Steven
    1994The language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York: W. Morrow & Co. doi:  10.1037/e412952005‑009
    https://doi.org/10.1037/e412952005-009 [Google Scholar]
  50. Shi, Shi
    1979Hanyu chengyu yanjiu [ Chinese idioms ]. Chengdu: Sichuan People Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Taylor, John R.
    2002Cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. 2012The mental corpus: How language is represented in the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:  10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199290802.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199290802.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  53. Theakston, Anna L.
    2004 The role of entrenchment in children’s and adults’ performance on grammaticality judgment tasks. Cognitive Development19(1). 15–34. doi:  10.1016/j.cogdev.2003.08.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2003.08.001 [Google Scholar]
  54. Tomasello, Michael
    2000 Do young children have adult syntactic competence?Cognition74(3). 209–253. doi:  10.1016/S0010‑0277(99)00069‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00069-4 [Google Scholar]
  55. 2003Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Tomasello, Michael & Brooks, Patricia J.
    1998Young children’s earliest transitive and intransitive constructions. Cognitive Linguistics9(4). 379–395.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Zhang, Bin
    2002Xinbian xiandai Hanyu [New Modern Chinese]. Shanghai: Fudan University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00004.liu
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00004.liu
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): emergentist; partial productivity; schematic idioms
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error