1887
Volume 19, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1606-822X
  • E-ISSN: 2309-5067
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

There is a general view that pro-drop only occurs in languages with either a ‘rich’ inflectional system ( Taraldsen 1978 ; Chomsky 1981 ; Jaeggli 1982 ; Suñer 1982 ), or in languages whose pronouns are agglutinating for case, number, or other nominal feature ( Huang 1989 ; Neeleman & Szendrői 2005 ). The Vietnamese language fits neither of these categories. The explanation of the phenomenon of ellipsis of terms of address and reference () in this paper is, therefore, not based on these morphological grounds. Rather, it is presented from a pragmatic perspective, which employs discourse analysis as its major methodology. The paper attempts to demonstrate the fact that although Vietnamese is not a pro-drop language in its traditional definition, ellipsis of in casual communication events among Vietnamese speakers is very common, and highly situational. In other words, these elliptic items in this case are referred to as references “in a form of situational (exophoric) presupposition” ( Halliday & Hasan 1976 : 145).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00007.ton
2018-01-05
2019-10-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abangma, Samson N.
    1990 The Pro-drop parameter in Denya. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics2. 165–182. (https://www.ucl.ac.uk/pals/research/linguistics/publications/wpl/90papers/UCLWPL2_9_Abangma) (Accessed2015-12-15.)
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Berger, Arthur Asa
    2000Media and communication research: An introduction to qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Butler, Susan & Atkinson, Ann & Moore, Alison
    2011Macquarie encyclopedic dictionary. Signature edn.Sydney: Australia’s Heritage Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Buu, Khai
    1994 How to say ‘you’ in Vietnamese. In Nguyen, Xuan Thu (ed.), Vietnamese studies in a multicultural world, 81–86. Melbourne: Vietnamese Language & Culture Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cao, Xuân Hạo
    1992 Some preliminaries to the syntactic analysis of the Vietnamese sentence. Mon-Khmer studies20. 137–151.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 2003Tiếng Việt, văn Việt, người Việt [ Vietnamese language, literature, and people ]. 3rd edn.Ho Chi Minh: Nhà Xuất Bản Trẻ [Youth Publishing House].
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 2004Tiếng Việt: Sơ thảo ngữ pháp chức năng [ A functional grammar of Vietnamese ]. Ho Chi Minh: Nhà Xuất Bản Khoa Học Xã Hội [Social Sciences Publishing House].
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chomsky, Noam
    1981Lectures on government and binding (Studies in Generative Grammar 9). Dordrecht: Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Clancy, Patricia M.
    1997 Discourse motivations for referential choice in Korean acquisition. In Sohn, Ho-min & Haig, John (eds.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics, vol.6, 639–659. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cooke, Joseph R.
    1968Pronominal reference in Thai, Burmese, and Vietnamese (University of California Publications in Linguistics 52). Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Do, Huu Chau
    2005Tuyển tập – tập 2 [ Readers collection – vol. 2 ]. Hanoi: Nhà Xuất Bản Giáo Dục [Education Publishing House].
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Grice, H. P.
    1975 Logic and conversation. In Cole, Peter & Morgan, Jerry L. (eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts, 41–58. London: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, Ruqaiya
    1976Cohesion in English (Volume 9 of English language series). London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hasegawa, Nobuko
    1984/1985 On the so-called “zero pronouns” in Japanese. The Linguistic Review4. 289–341.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Huang, C.-T. James
    1984 On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry15(4). 531–574.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 1989 Pro-drop in Chinese: A generalized control theory. In Jaeggli, Osvaldo A. & Safir, Kenneth J. (eds.), The null subject parameter (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol. 15), 185–214. Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑2540‑3_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2540-3_6 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hudson, Mutsuko Endo
    1994English grammar for students of Japanese: The study guide for those learning Japanese. Ann Arbor: Olivia and Hill Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Jaeggli, Osvaldo
    1982Topics in Roman syntax (Studies in Generative Grammar). Foris: Dordrecht.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Josephson, John R. & Josephson, Susan G.
    1994Abductive inference: Computation, philosophy, technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511530128
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511530128 [Google Scholar]
  20. Krippendorff, Klaus
    1989 Content analysis. In Barnouw, Erik & Gerbner, George & Schramm, Wilbur & Worth, Tobia L. & Gross, Larry (eds.), International encyclopedia of communication, vol.1, 403–407. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 2004Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. 2nd edn.Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Le, Bien
    1999Từ loại tiếng Việt hiện đại [ Word classes in modern Vietnamese ]. 4th edn.Hanoi: Nhà Xuất Bản Giáo Dục [Education Publishing House].
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Le, Phuc Thien
    2011Transnational variation in linguistic politeness in Vietnamese: Australia and Vietnam. Melbourne: Victoria University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Luong, Hy V.
    1990Discursive practices and linguistic meanings: The Vietnamese system of person reference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.11
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.11 [Google Scholar]
  25. Mayring, Philipp
    2000 Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative social research1(2). Art. 20. (nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0002204) (Accessed2015-12-15.)
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Nariyama, Shigeko
    2003Ellipsis and reference tracking in Japanese (Studies in Language Companion Series 66). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.66
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.66 [Google Scholar]
  27. Neeleman, Ad & Szendrői, Kriszta
    2005 Pro drop and pronoun. In Alderete, John & Han, Chung-hye & Kochetov, Alexei (eds.), Proceedings of the 24th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 299–307. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Nguyen, Dinh Hoa
    1957Verbal and non-verbal patterns of respect-behavior in Vietnamese society: Some metalinguistic data. New York: New York University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Nguyen, Hanh thi
    2009 The recommendation sequence in Vietnamese family talk: Negotiation of asymmetric access to authority and knowledge. In Nguyen, Hanh thi & Kasper, Gabriele (eds.), Talk-in-interaction: Multilingual perspectives, 57–87. Honolulu: National Foreign Language Resource Center, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 2015 Source marking in represented talk and thought in Vietnamese narratives. Text & Talk35(6). 731–757. doi: 10.1515/text‑2015‑0019
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2015-0019 [Google Scholar]
  31. Nguyen, Kim Than
    1997Nghiên cứu ngữ pháp tiếng Việt [ A Vietnamese grammar study ]. Hanoi: Nhà Xuất Bản Giáo Dục [Education Publishing House].
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Nguyen, Thi Ly Kha
    2007 Từ xưng hô thuộc hệ thống nào? [What system do terms of address belong to?] Tạp chí Ngôn ngữ và Đời sống [ Language and Life Magazine ] 144(10). 40–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Pham, Van Tinh
    1999 Về khái niệm tỉnh lược [The concept of ellipses]. Ngôn ngữ [ Languages ] 9. 56–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. 2003 Tỉnh lược đồng sở chỉ trong hội thoại [Co-referential ellipses in conversations]. Ngôn ngữ [ Languages ] 10. 18–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 2005 Hiện tượng tỉnh lược dựa trên các yếu tố ngầm định [Ellipses based on implicit factors]. InKỷ yếu Hội thảo Quốc tế Ngôn ngữ học Liên Á lần thứ 6 [ Proceedings of the 6th Pan-Asiatic International Symposium on Linguistics ], 533–538. Hanoi: Nhà Xuất Bản Khoa Học Xã Hội [Social Sciences Publishing House].
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Sells, Peter
    1998 Structural relationships within complex predicates. In Park, Byung-Soo & Yoon, James (eds.), Proceedings of ICKL 11, 115–147. Seoul: International Circle of Korean Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre
    1986Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Suñer, Margarita
    1982 Big PRO and little pro . (Paper read at the1st Workshop on Spanish Syntax, Burnaby, June 1982.)
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Taraldsen, Tarald
    1978 On the NIC, vacuous application and the that-trace filter. Cambridge: MIT. (Manuscript.) (Reproduced in 1980 by the Indiana University Linguistics Club as On the nominative island condition, vacuous application, and the that-trace filter.)
  40. Thompson, Laurence C.
    1965A Vietnamese grammar. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Yokokawa, Hirokazu
    1996 Nihongobun rikaini okeru implicit argument to bunmyaku kooka [Understanding implicit arguments and the effect of context in Japanese]. InProceedings of the 2nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Natural Language Processing, 285–288. Kyoto: The Association for Natural Language Processing.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00007.ton
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00007.ton
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): ellipsis , grammatical person , terms of address and Vietnamese
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error