oa Benefactive and malefactive constructions in Taiwan Southern Min

References

1. Abraham, Roy C.
   (ed.) 1962 Dictionary of modern Yoruba. 2nd edn.London: Hodder & Stoughton.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Benkő, Loránd & Imre, Samu
   (eds.) 1972 The Hungarian language. The Hague: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110880236
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110880236 [Google Scholar]
3. Chappell, Hilary
   1986 Formal and colloquial adversity passives in Standard Chinese. Linguistics24(6). 1025–1052. doi:  10.1515/ling.1986.24.6.1025
   https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1986.24.6.1025 [Google Scholar]
4. Chappell, Hilary
   2000 Dialect grammar in two early modern Southern Min texts: A comparative study of dative kît 乞, comitaive câng 共and diminutive -guìa 仔. Journal of Chinese Linguistics28(2). 247–302.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Chappell, Hilary & Peyraube, Alain
   2006 The analytic causatives of early modern Southern Min in diachronic perspective. In Ho, Dah-an & Cheung, H. Samuel & Pan, Wuyun & Wu, Fuxiang (eds.), Linguistic studies in Chinese and neighboring languages: Festschrift in honor of Professor Pang-Hsin Ting on his 70th birthday, vol.21, 973–1011. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Cheng, Lisa L. -S. & Huang, C. -T. James & Li, Y. -H. Audrey & Tang, C. -C. Jane
   1999 Hoo, hoo, hoo: Syntax of the causative, dative, and passive constructions in Taiwanese. In Ting, Pang-Hsin (ed.), Contemporary studies on the Min dialects (Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series 14), 146–203. Berkeley: Project on Linguistic Analysis, University of California, Berkeley.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Cheng, Robert L.
   1985 A comparison of Taiwanese, Taiwan Mandarin, and Peking Mandarin. Language61(2). 352–377. doi:  10.2307/414149
   https://doi.org/10.2307/414149 [Google Scholar]
8. Chomsky, Noam
   1981 Lectures on government and binding (Studies in Generative Grammar 9). Dordrecht: Foris.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Creissels, Denis
   2010 Benefactive applicative periphrases: A typological approach. In Zúñiga, Fernando & Kittilä, Seppo (eds.), Benefactives and malefactives: Typological perspectives and case studies (Typological Studies in Language 92), 29–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/tsl.92.02cre
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.92.02cre [Google Scholar]
10. Fagerli, Ole Torfinn
    2001 Malefactive by means of GIVE . In Simonsen, Hanne Gram & Endresen, Rolf Theil (eds.), A cognitive approach to the verb: Morphological and constructional perspectives (Cognitive Linguistics Research 16), 203–222. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Goldberg, Adele E.
    1995 Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Hu, Wan-chuan & Huang, Ching-wen
    (eds.) 1995 Dajia Zhen Minnanyu gushi ji (yi) [Dajia Township collection of Southern Min stories, vol.11]. Fengyuan: Taichung County Cultural Center.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Hu, Wan-chuan & Huang, Ching-wen
    (eds.) 1997 Qingshui Zhen Minnanyu gushi ji (er) [Qingshui Township collection of Southern Min stories, vol.21]. Fengyuan: Taichung County Cultural Center.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hu, Wan-chuan & Wang, Cheng-hsiung
    (eds.) 1999 Da-an Xiang Minnanyu gushi ji (san) [Da-an Township collection of Southern Min stories, vol.31]. Fengyuan: Taichung County Cultural Center.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Huang, C. -T. James
    1999 Chinese passives in comparative perspective. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies29(4). 423–509.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Huang, C. -T. James & Li, Yen-Hui Audrey & Li, Yafei
    2009 The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9781139166935
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166935 [Google Scholar]
17. Kittilä, Seppo & Zúñiga, Fernando
    2010 Introduction: Benefaction and malefaction from a cross-linguistic perspective. In Zúñiga, Fernando & Kittilä, Seppo (eds.), Benefactives and malefactives: Typological perspectives and case studies (Typological Studies in Language 92), 1–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/tsl.92.01kit
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.92.01kit [Google Scholar]
18. Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A.
    1974 Co-verbs in Mandarin Chinese: Verbs or prepositions?Journal of Chinese Linguistics2(3). 257–278.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A.
    1981 Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Lin, Huei-Ling
    2011 Pure unaccusatives with Hoo I in Taiwan Southern Min. Lingua121(14). 2035–2047. doi:  10.1016/j.lingua.2011.07.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2011.07.006 [Google Scholar]
21. Lin, Huei-Ling
    2012 A non-uniform analysis of ka7 constructions in Taiwan Southern Min. Language and Linguistics13(4). 743–766.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Lin, Huei-Ling
    2016 Non-disposal ka in Taiwan Southern Min. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics14(1). 1–27.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Mei, Tsu-Lin
    2005 Minnanhua h‘geiyu’ de benzi jiqi yufa gongneng de laiyuan [The origin of Southern Min h‘give’ and the source of its grammatical function]. In Ho, Dah-an & Tzeng, Ovid J. -L. (eds.). POLA FOREVER: Festschrift in honor of Professor William S-Y. Wang on his 70th birthday, 163–173. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Ministry of Education in Taiwan
    Ministry of Education in Taiwan 2008 Taiwan Minnanyu luomazi pinyin fuhao fangan shiyong shouce [User guide of Taiwan Southern Min romanization proposal]. 2nd edn.Taipei: Ministry of Education in Taiwan. (web.ffjh.tyc.edu.tw/tai5gi2/tshiutsheh.pdf). (Accessed2016-01-04.)
    [Google Scholar]
25. Ministry of Education in Taiwan
    Ministry of Education in Taiwan 2008–2011 Taiwan Minnanyu changyongci cidian [Taiwan Southern Min dictionary of common words]. (twblg.dict.edu.tw/holodict_new/index.html) (Accessed2016-01-04.)
    [Google Scholar]
26. Ogawa, Akio
    1997 On the syntax and semantics of the German dative. In Matsumura, Kazuto & Tooru, Hayasi (eds.), The dative and related phenomena, 1–30. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobô.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Peng, Guozhen & Chappell, Hilary
    2011  Ya33 ‘give’ as a valency increaser in Jinghpo nuclear serialization: From benefactive to malefactive. Studies in Language35(1). 128–167. doi:  10.1075/sl.35.1.05pen
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.35.1.05pen [Google Scholar]
28. Pinker, Steven
    1989 Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Radetzky, Paula & Smith, Tomoko Yamashita
    2010 An areal and cross-linguistic study of benefactive and malefactive constructions. In Zúñiga, Fernando & Kittilä, Seppo (eds.), Benefactives and malefactives: Typological perspectives and case studies (Typological Studies in Language 92), 97–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/tsl.92.04rad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.92.04rad [Google Scholar]
30. Rowlands, E. C.
    1969 Teach yourself Yoruba. London: The English Universities Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Shibatani, Masayoshi
    1996 Applicatives and benefactives: A cognitive account. In Shibatani, Masayoshi & Thompson, Sandra A. (eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning, 157–194. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Smith, Tomoko Yamashita
    2005 Affectedness constructions: How languages indicate positive and negative events. Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
33. Takami, Ken-ichi
    2003 A semantic constraint on the benefactive double object construction. English Linguistics20(1). 197–224. doi:  10.9793/elsj1984.20.197
    https://doi.org/10.9793/elsj1984.20.197 [Google Scholar]
34. Teng, Shou-hsin
    1982 Disposal structures in Amoy. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philosophy53(2). 331–352.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan
    2007 Four types of affective constructions in Chinese. (Paper presented atthe 5th Workshop on Formal Syntax and Semantics (FOSS-5) & the Taiwan Languages and Teaching Conference, Kaohsiung, 21–22 April 2007.)
    [Google Scholar]
36. Tsao, Feng-fu
    2003 Taiwan Minnanyu de ka ziju. [On ka sentences in Taiwan Southern Min]. In Dai, Zhao-ming (ed.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Chinese Dialect Grammar, 114–136. Harbin: Heilongjiang People’s Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Van Valin Jr., Robert D. & LaPolla, Randy J.
    1997 Syntax: Structure, meaning, and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9781139166799
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166799 [Google Scholar]
38. Wei, Pei-chuan
    1997 Lun gudai Hanyu zhong jizhong chuzhishi zai fazhan zhong de fen yu he [On the development of various disposal constructions in ancient Chinese]. In Tseng, Chiu-yu (ed.), Zhongguo jingnei yuyan ji yuyanxue disiji: Yuyan leixing [Chinese languages and linguistics IV: Typological studies of languages in China] (Symposium Series of the Institute of History and Philosophy, Academia Sinica, No. 2), 555–594. Taipei: Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Yang, Hsiu-fang
    1991 Taiwan Minnanyu yufa gao [A draft for a grammar of Taiwanese Southern Min]. Taipei: Daan Press.
    [Google Scholar]