1887
Volume 20, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1606-822X
  • E-ISSN: 2309-5067

Abstract

抽象

霍爾語是四川境內較少人知的語群,屬於漢藏語系羌語支嘉戎語組。本文首度詳細介紹中部霍爾語格西話動詞的時-體範疇。保守的嘉戎語組語言,動詞均採「三分式」時-體系統,一般以方向前綴區別完整體與非完整體,以不同的詞幹標記過去與非過去時。相較於這種保守的形態格局,格西話動詞的時-體系統有數項重要的創新:(一)動詞詞幹交替大幅簡化,標註時間的功能基本喪失;(二)方向前綴從體標記轉成「相對過去時」標記,可通用的相對過去前綴開始逐步取代其他前綴,且有聚焦於動作結果的延伸功能;(三)以贅語式造出一般非完整體及「持續體」構造。這些重要的創新既源自內部衍變的機制,也明顯受到本地主流藏語的接觸影響。

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00040.tia
2019-06-14
2025-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lali.00040.tia.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00040.tia&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bybee, Joan L. & Dahl, Östen
    1989 The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world. Studies in Language13(1). 51–103. 10.1075/sl.13.1.03byb
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.13.1.03byb [Google Scholar]
  2. Bybee, Joan L. & Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William
    1994The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Comrie, Bernard
    1976Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dahl, Östen
    1985Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. DeLancey, Scott
    2012 Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology16(3). 529–564. 10.1515/lity‑2012‑0020
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2012-0020 [Google Scholar]
  6. Gates, Jesse
    2013 Intelligibility, identity, and structure in Western rGyalrongic. (Talk presented at the3rd Workshop on Sino-Tibetan Languages of Sichuan, Paris, 2–4, September 2013.)
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gengawengmu (根呷翁姆)
    Gengawengmu (根呷翁姆) 2010 Daofuyu diaocha (xia)道孚語調查(下) [Investigations on Daofu language (Part 2)]. Sichuan Minzu Xueyuan Xuebao四川民族學院學報 [Journal of Sichuan University for Nationalities] 19(4). 7–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hill, Nathan W.
    2012 “Mirativity” does not exist: ḥdug in “Lhasa” Tibetan and other suspects. Linguistic Typology16(3). 389–433. 10.1515/lity‑2012‑0016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2012-0016 [Google Scholar]
  9. Huang, Bufan (黃布凡)
    1991 Daofuyu道孚語 [The Daofu language]. In Dai, Qingxia (戴慶廈) (ed.), Zangmianyu shiwu zhong藏緬語十五種 [Fifteen Tibeto-Burman languages], 1–45. Beijing: Beijing Yanshan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 2007 Lawurongyu yanjiu拉塢戎語研究 [A study of Lavrong language]. Beijing: The Ethnic Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Jacques, Guillaume (向柏霖)
    2008 Jiarongyu yanjiu嘉戎語研究 [A study of the rGyalrong language]. Beijing: The Ethnic Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Jacques, Guillaume
    2017 rGyalrong language. In Sybesma, Rint & Behr, Wolfgang & Gu, Yueguo & Handel, Zev & Huang, C. -T. James & Myers, James (eds.), Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics, vol.31, 583–589. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Jacques, Guillaume & Lai, Yunfan & Antonov, Anton & Lobsang Nima
    2017 Stau (Ergong, Horpa). In Thurgood, Graham & LaPolla, Randy J. (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 2nd edn., 597–613. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Lai, Yunfan
    2015 The person agreement system of Wobzi Lavrung (Rgyalrongic, Tibeto-Burman). Transactions of the Philological Society113(3). 271–285. 10.1111/1467‑968X.12051
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.12051 [Google Scholar]
  15. Lazard, Gilbert
    1999 Mirativity, evidentiality, mediativity, or other?Linguistic Typology3(1). 91–109. 10.1515/lity.1999.3.1.91
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1999.3.1.91 [Google Scholar]
  16. Lin, You-Jing
    2003 Tense and aspect morphology in the Zhuokeji rGyalrong verb. Cahiers de Linguistique-Asie Orientale [East Asian Languages and Linguistics] 32(2). 245–286. 10.3406/clao.2003.1633
    https://doi.org/10.3406/clao.2003.1633 [Google Scholar]
  17. Sun, Jackson T.-S.
    2000a Parallelisms in the verb morphology of Sidaba rGyalrong and Lavrung in rGyalrongic. Language and Linguistics1(1). 161–190.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 2000b Stem alternations in Puxi verb inflection: Toward validating the rGyalrongic subgroup in Qiangic. Language and Linguistics1(2). 211–232.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Sun, Jackson T.-S. (孫天心)
    2008 Caodeng Jiarongyu dongci de shi-te fanchou草登嘉戎語動詞的時-體範疇 [Verbal tense-aspect categories in Caodeng rGyalrong], Hanzangyu Xuebao漢藏語學報 [Journal of Sino-Tibetan Linguistics] 21. 135–146.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Sun, Jackson T.-S. (孫天心) & Shi, Danluo (石丹羅)
    2002 Caodeng Jiarongyu yu “rentong dengdi” xiangguan de yufa xianxiang草登嘉戎語與「認同等第」相關的語法現象 [Empathy hierarchy in Caodeng rGyalrong grammar]. Language and Linguistics3(1). 79–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Sun, Jackson T.-S. (孫天心) & Tian, Qianzi (田阡子) & Chiu, Chenhao (邱振豪)
    2017 Shangdonggu Huoeryu de fashengtai diuli上東谷霍爾語的發聲態對立 [Contrastive phonation in Upper Donggu Horpa]. The Journal of Chinese Linguistics45(1). 1–19.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00040.tia
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00040.tia
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error