1887
Volume 20, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1606-822X
  • E-ISSN: 2309-5067

Abstract

Abstract

Japhug, like other Gyalrong languages, is one of the very few languages with both a full-fledged person indexation system and an egophoric evidential category. A detailed account of the uses and meanings of the Egophoric and its interaction with person is thus of interest to the typology of evidential systems. This paper describes the uses of Egophoric marking in Japhug and of the other two evidential categories with which it contrasts (Factual and Sensory), as well as their interaction with person indexation. Due to the limited distribution of the Egophoric in Japhug (it only occurs in present contexts), the present paper exclusively focuses on the uses of evidentials with stative verbs in present (imperfective) contexts, where minimal pairs are available in the corpus.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00047.jac
2019-09-24
2019-10-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lali.00047.jac.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00047.jac&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra
    2004Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2012 The essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology16(3). 435–485. 10.1515/lity‑2012‑0017
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2012-0017 [Google Scholar]
  3. 2015 Evidentials: Their links with other grammatical categories. Linguistic Typology19(2). 239–277. 10.1515/lingty‑2015‑0008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2015-0008 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bendix, Edward
    1974 Indo-Aryan and Tibeto-Burman contact as seen through Nepali and Newari verb tenses. International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics3(1). 42–59.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Creissels, Denis
    2008 Person variations in Akhvakh verb morphology: Functional motivation and origin of an uncommon pattern. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung61(4). 309–325.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Curnow, Timothy Jowan
    2002 Conjunct/disjunct systems in Barbacoan languages. InCastillo, Jeannie (ed.), Proceedings from the fourth Workshop on American Indigenous Languages (Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics 11), 3–12. Santa Barbara: UCSB, Department of Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Daudey, Henriëtte
    2014 Volition and control in Wadu Pumi. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area37(1). 75–103. 10.1075/ltba.37.1.03dau
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.37.1.03dau [Google Scholar]
  8. DeLancey, Scott
    1990 Ergativity and the cognitive model of event structure in Lhasa Tibetan. Cognitive Linguistics1(3). 289–321. 10.1515/cogl.1990.1.3.289
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.3.289 [Google Scholar]
  9. 2012 Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology16(3). 529–564.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 2018 Evidentiality in Tibetic. InAikhenvald, Alexandra (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Floyd, Simeon
    2018 Egophoricity and argument structure in Cha’palaa. InFloyd, Simeon & Norcliffe, Elisabeth & San Roque, Lila (eds.), Egophoricity, 269–304. Amsterdam: Benjamin. 10.1075/tsl.118.09flo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.118.09flo [Google Scholar]
  12. Floyd, Simeon & Norcliffe, Elisabeth & San Roque, Lila
    (eds.) 2018Egophoricity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.118
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.118 [Google Scholar]
  13. Garrett, Edward & Bateman, Leah
    2007 Symbiosis between documentary linguistics and linguistic pragmatics. InAustin, Peter K. & Bond, Oliver & Nathan, David (eds.), Proceedings of Conference on Language Documentation and Linguistic Theory, 83–93. London: School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gawne, Lauren
    2013Lamjung Yolmo copulas in use: Evidentiality, reported speech and questions. Melbourne: University of Melbourne. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 2017 Egophoric evidentiality in Bodish languages. InHill, Nathan W. & Gawne, Lauren (eds.), Evidential systems of Tibetan languages, 61–94. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110473742‑003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110473742-003 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hale, Austin
    1980 Person markers: Finite conjunct and disjunct verb forms in Newari. InTrail, R. L. (ed.), Papers in South-East Asian linguistics, vol.7, 95–106. Canberra: Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hill, Nathan W.
    2012 “Mirativity” does not exist: hdug in “Lhasa” Tibetan and other suspects. Linguistic Typology16(3). 389–433. 10.1515/lity‑2012‑0016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2012-0016 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hill, Nathan W. & Gawne, Lauren
    2017 The contribution of Tibetan languages to the study of evidentiality. InHill, Nathan W. & Gawne, Lauren (eds.), Evidential systems of Tibetan languages, 1–38. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110473742‑001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110473742-001 [Google Scholar]
  19. Jacques, Guillaume
    2012 Agreement morphology: The case of Rgyalrongic and Kiranti. Language and Linguistics13(1). 83–116.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 2014 Clause linking in Japhug Rgyalrong. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area37(2). 264–328. 10.1075/ltba.37.2.05jac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.37.2.05jac [Google Scholar]
  21. 2016a Complementation in Japhug. Linguistics of the Tibeto Burman Area39(2). 222–281. 10.1075/ltba.39.2.02jac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.39.2.02jac [Google Scholar]
  22. 2016b From ergative to comparee marker: Multiple reanalyses and polyfunctionality. Diachronica33(1). 1–30. 10.1075/dia.33.1.01jac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.33.1.01jac [Google Scholar]
  23. 2017 Japhug. InThurgood, Graham & LaPolla, Randy (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 2nd edn., 614–634. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Jacques, Guillaume & Antonov, Anton & Lai, Yunfan & Nima, Lobsang
    2017 Stau (Ergong, Horpa). InThurgood, Graham & Randy LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 2nd edn., 597–613. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lin, Youjing
    2003 Tense and aspect morphology in the Zhuokeji rGyalrong verb. Cahiers de Linguistique-Asie Orientale32(2). 245–286. 10.3406/clao.2003.1633
    https://doi.org/10.3406/clao.2003.1633 [Google Scholar]
  26. Michailovsky, Boyd & Mazaudon, Martine & Michaud, Alexis & Guillaume, Séverine & François, Alexandre & Adamou, Evangelia
    2014 Documenting and researching endangered languages: The Pangloss Collection. Language Documentation and Conservation8. 119–135.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. San Roque, Lila & Floyd, Simeon & Norcliffe, Elisabeth
    2017 Evidentiality and interrogativity. Lingua186–187. 120–143. 10.1016/j.lingua.2014.11.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.11.003 [Google Scholar]
  28. San Roque, Lila & Loughnane, Robin
    2012 The New Guinea Highlands evidentiality area. Linguistic Typology16(1). 111–167. 10.1515/lity‑2012‑0003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2012-0003 [Google Scholar]
  29. Sun, Jackson T.-S.
    2000 Parallelisms in the Verb Morphology of Sidaba rGyalrong and Lavrung in rGyalrongic. Language and Linguistics1(1). 161–190.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 2003 Caodeng rGyalrong. InThurgood, Graham & LaPolla, Randy (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 490–502. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. 2018 Evidentials and person. InAikhenvald, Alexandra (ed.), Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 47–63. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Tournadre, Nicolas
    1996L’ergativité en tibétain [Ergativity in Tibetan]. Louvain: Péeters.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 2008 Arguments against the concept of ‘conjunct’/ ‘disjunct’ in Tibetan. InHuber, Brigitte & Volkart, Marianne & Widmer, Paul (eds.), Chomolangma, Demawend und Kasbek: Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65. Geburtstag [Chomolangma, Demawend and Kasbek: Festschrift for Roland Bielmeier on his 65th birthday], 281–308. Halle: International Institute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Tournadre, Nicolas & LaPolla, Randy
    2014 Towards a new approach to evidentiality. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area37(2). 240–263. 10.1075/ltba.37.2.04tou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.37.2.04tou [Google Scholar]
  35. Van Driem, George
    1993A grammar of Dumi. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110880915
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110880915 [Google Scholar]
  36. Widmer, Manuel & Zemp, Marius
    2017 The epistemization of person markers in reported speech. Studies in Language41(1). 33–75. 10.1075/sl.41.1.02wid
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.41.1.02wid [Google Scholar]
  37. Yukawa, Yasutoshi
    1971 Chibettogo no jutsubu no rinkaku [Outline of Tibetan predicates]. Gengogaku no kihon mondai [Basic problems in linguistics], 178–204. Tokyo: Taishūkan Shoten.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00047.jac
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00047.jac
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): conjunct/disjunct , Egophoric , Factual , Hybrid Indirect Speech , mirative , person indexation and Sensory
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error