oa Egophoric marking and person indexation in Japhug

References

1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra
   2004 Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aikhenvald, Alexandra
   2012 The essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology16(3). 435–485. 10.1515/lity‑2012‑0017
   https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2012-0017 [Google Scholar]
3. Aikhenvald, Alexandra
   2015 Evidentials: Their links with other grammatical categories. Linguistic Typology19(2). 239–277. 10.1515/lingty‑2015‑0008
   https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2015-0008 [Google Scholar]
4. Bendix, Edward
   1974 Indo-Aryan and Tibeto-Burman contact as seen through Nepali and Newari verb tenses. International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics3(1). 42–59.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Creissels, Denis
   2008 Person variations in Akhvakh verb morphology: Functional motivation and origin of an uncommon pattern. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung61(4). 309–325.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Curnow, Timothy Jowan
   2002 Conjunct/disjunct systems in Barbacoan languages. In Castillo, Jeannie (ed.), Proceedings from the fourth Workshop on American Indigenous Languages (Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics 11), 3–12. Santa Barbara: UCSB, Department of Linguistics.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Daudey, Henriëtte
   2014 Volition and control in Wadu Pumi. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area37(1). 75–103. 10.1075/ltba.37.1.03dau
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.37.1.03dau [Google Scholar]
8. DeLancey, Scott
   1990 Ergativity and the cognitive model of event structure in Lhasa Tibetan. Cognitive Linguistics1(3). 289–321. 10.1515/cogl.1990.1.3.289
   https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.3.289 [Google Scholar]
9. DeLancey, Scott
   2012 Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology16(3). 529–564. 10.1515/lity‑2012‑0020
   https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2012-0020 [Google Scholar]
10. DeLancey, Scott
    2018 Evidentiality in Tibetic. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Floyd, Simeon
    2018 Egophoricity and argument structure in Cha’palaa. In Floyd, Simeon & Norcliffe, Elisabeth & San Roque, Lila (eds.), Egophoricity, 269–304. Amsterdam: Benjamin. 10.1075/tsl.118.09flo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.118.09flo [Google Scholar]
12. Floyd, Simeon & Norcliffe, Elisabeth & San Roque, Lila
    (eds.) 2018 Egophoricity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.118
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.118 [Google Scholar]
13. Garrett, Edward & Bateman, Leah
    2007 Symbiosis between documentary linguistics and linguistic pragmatics. In Austin, Peter K. & Bond, Oliver & Nathan, David (eds.), Proceedings of Conference on Language Documentation and Linguistic Theory, 83–93. London: School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Gawne, Lauren
    2013 Lamjung Yolmo copulas in use: Evidentiality, reported speech and questions. Melbourne: University of Melbourne. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
15. Gawne, Lauren
    2017 Egophoric evidentiality in Bodish languages. In Hill, Nathan W. & Gawne, Lauren (eds.), Evidential systems of Tibetan languages, 61–94. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110473742‑003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110473742-003 [Google Scholar]
16. Hale, Austin
    1980 Person markers: Finite conjunct and disjunct verb forms in Newari. In Trail, R. L. (ed.), Papers in South-East Asian linguistics, vol.71, 95–106. Canberra: Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Hill, Nathan W.
    2012 “Mirativity” does not exist: hdug in “Lhasa” Tibetan and other suspects. Linguistic Typology16(3). 389–433. 10.1515/lity‑2012‑0016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2012-0016 [Google Scholar]
18. Hill, Nathan W. & Gawne, Lauren
    2017 The contribution of Tibetan languages to the study of evidentiality. In Hill, Nathan W. & Gawne, Lauren (eds.), Evidential systems of Tibetan languages, 1–38. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110473742‑001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110473742-001 [Google Scholar]
19. Jacques, Guillaume
    2012 Agreement morphology: The case of Rgyalrongic and Kiranti. Language and Linguistics13(1). 83–116.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Jacques, Guillaume
    2014 Clause linking in Japhug Rgyalrong. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area37(2). 264–328. 10.1075/ltba.37.2.05jac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.37.2.05jac [Google Scholar]
21. Jacques, Guillaume
    2016a Complementation in Japhug. Linguistics of the Tibeto Burman Area39(2). 222–281. 10.1075/ltba.39.2.02jac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.39.2.02jac [Google Scholar]
22. Jacques, Guillaume
    2016b From ergative to comparee marker: Multiple reanalyses and polyfunctionality. Diachronica33(1). 1–30. 10.1075/dia.33.1.01jac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.33.1.01jac [Google Scholar]
23. Jacques, Guillaume
    2017 Japhug. In Thurgood, Graham & LaPolla, Randy (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 2nd edn., 614–634. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Jacques, Guillaume & Antonov, Anton & Lai, Yunfan & Nima, Lobsang
    2017 Stau (Ergong, Horpa). In Thurgood, Graham & Randy LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 2nd edn., 597–613. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Lin, Youjing
    2003 Tense and aspect morphology in the Zhuokeji rGyalrong verb. Cahiers de Linguistique-Asie Orientale32(2). 245–286. 10.3406/clao.2003.1633
    https://doi.org/10.3406/clao.2003.1633 [Google Scholar]
26. Michailovsky, Boyd & Mazaudon, Martine & Michaud, Alexis & Guillaume, Séverine & François, Alexandre & Adamou, Evangelia
    2014 Documenting and researching endangered languages: The Pangloss Collection. Language Documentation and Conservation81. 119–135.
    [Google Scholar]
27. San Roque, Lila & Floyd, Simeon & Norcliffe, Elisabeth
    2017 Evidentiality and interrogativity. Lingua186–1871. 120–143. 10.1016/j.lingua.2014.11.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.11.003 [Google Scholar]
28. San Roque, Lila & Loughnane, Robin
    2012 The New Guinea Highlands evidentiality area. Linguistic Typology16(1). 111–167. 10.1515/lity‑2012‑0003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2012-0003 [Google Scholar]
29. Sun, Jackson T.-S.
    2000 Parallelisms in the Verb Morphology of Sidaba rGyalrong and Lavrung in rGyalrongic. Language and Linguistics1(1). 161–190.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Sun, Jackson T.-S.
    2003 Caodeng rGyalrong. In Thurgood, Graham & LaPolla, Randy (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 490–502. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Sun, Jackson T.-S.
    2018 Evidentials and person. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra (ed.), Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 47–63. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Tournadre, Nicolas
    1996 L’ergativité en tibétain [Ergativity in Tibetan]. Louvain: Péeters.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Tournadre, Nicolas
    2008 Arguments against the concept of ‘conjunct’/ ‘disjunct’ in Tibetan. In Huber, Brigitte & Volkart, Marianne & Widmer, Paul (eds.), Chomolangma, Demawend und Kasbek: Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65. Geburtstag [Chomolangma, Demawend and Kasbek: Festschrift for Roland Bielmeier on his 65th birthday], 281–308. Halle: International Institute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Tournadre, Nicolas & LaPolla, Randy
    2014 Towards a new approach to evidentiality. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area37(2). 240–263. 10.1075/ltba.37.2.04tou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.37.2.04tou [Google Scholar]
35. Van Driem, George
    1993 A grammar of Dumi. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110880915
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110880915 [Google Scholar]
36. Widmer, Manuel & Zemp, Marius
    2017 The epistemization of person markers in reported speech. Studies in Language41(1). 33–75. 10.1075/sl.41.1.02wid
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.41.1.02wid [Google Scholar]
37. Yukawa, Yasutoshi
    1971 Chibettogo no jutsubu no rinkaku [Outline of Tibetan predicates]. Gengogaku no kihon mondai [Basic problems in linguistics], 178–204. Tokyo: Taishūkan Shoten.
    [Google Scholar]