1887
Volume 20, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1606-822X
  • E-ISSN: 2309-5067
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Previous studies on Chinese dialect variation have mostly focused on the description of dialects, the regions where these dialects are spoken, attitudes towards dialects, and acoustic differences across dialects. The present study draws on experimental evidence concerning a vowel difference in two Taiwan Southern Min (TSM) dialects to provide more understanding on how non-contrastive, dialectal variations may affect speakers’ processing of speech. The variation of interest is a phonemic difference, [ə] and [ɔ], in the vowel inventory in two TSM dialects, in which the difference signals a lexical contrast in one dialect (e.g. [ə-a] ‘oyster’ vs. [ɔ-a] ‘taro’) but not in the other ([ɔ-a] ‘oyster, taro’). A long-term repetition-priming experiment investigating the word recognition involving the two vowels revealed a dialect effect on TSM speakers’ word recognition in accordance with prior exposure, native-ness and variant frequency. Implications of the findings are provided.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00048.lu
2019-09-24
2019-10-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ang, Ui-jin
    2003Yinbian de dongji yu fangxiang: Zhang-Quan jingzheng yu Taiwan putungqiang de xingcheng [The motivation and direction of sound change: On the competition of Minnan dialects Chang-chou and Chuan-chou, and the emergence of general Taiwanese]. Hsinchu: National Tsing Hua University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2013 Taiwan de yuzhong fenbu yu fenqu. [The distribution and regionalization of varieties in Taiwan]. Language and Linguistics14(2). 315–369.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Baayen, R. & Davidson, D. & Bates, D.
    2008 Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language59. 390–412. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005 [Google Scholar]
  4. Babel, Molly & Johnson, Keith
    2010 Accessing psycho-acoustic perception and language-specific perception with speech sounds. Laboratory Phonology1. 179–205. 10.1515/labphon.2010.009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/labphon.2010.009 [Google Scholar]
  5. Babel, Molly & Russell, Jamie
    2015 Expectations and speech intelligibility. Journal of Acoustical Society of America137. 2823–2833. 10.1121/1.4919317
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4919317 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bates, Douglas & Mächler, Martin & Bolker, Benjamin & Walker, Steve
    2015 Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software67(1). 1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  7. Boersma, Paul
    2001 Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International5. 341–345.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Boomershine, Amanda & Hall, Kathleen Currie & Hume, Elizabeth & Johnson, Keith
    2008 The impact of allophony versus contrast on speech perception. InAvery, Peter & Dresher, Elan & Rice, Keren (eds.), Contrast in Phonology, 145–171. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, Shu-chuan
    2009 Taiwan Minnanyu yuanyin xitong ji yin-yang rushengdiao de bianyi yu bianhua-Taiwan Minnanyu de zibiao diaocha fenxi [The vowel system change and the Yin-/Yang-entering tonal variations in Taiwanese Hokkien]. Journal of Taiwanese Languages and Literature3. 157–178.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 2010 Taiwan Minnanyu xinxing de yuyin bianyi-Taibeishi, Zhanghuashi ji Tainanshi yuanyin xitong yu yangru yuandiao de diaocha fenxi [New sound variation in Taiwan Southern Min: Vowel systems and the lower register entering tone in Taipei, Changhua, and Tainan]. Language and Linguistics11(2). 425–468.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris
    1968The sound pattern of English. Cambridge: Harper & Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Chuang, Yu-Ying
    2017The effect of phonetic variation on word recognition in Taiwan Mandarin. Taipei: National Taiwan University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Chung, Karen Steffen
    2006 Hypercorrection in Taiwan Mandarin. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication16. 197–214. 10.1075/japc.16.2.04chu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.16.2.04chu [Google Scholar]
  14. Chung, Raung-fu
    1996The segmental phonology of Southern Min in Taiwan. Taipei: Crane Publishing Co., Ltd..
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Clements, G. N.
    2003 Feature economy in sound systems. Phonology20. 287–333. 10.1017/S095267570400003X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S095267570400003X [Google Scholar]
  16. Connine, Cynthia M. & Blasko, Dawn G. & Titione, Debra
    1993 Do the beginnings of spoken words have a special status in auditory word recognition?Journal of Memory and Language32. 193–210. 10.1006/jmla.1993.1011
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1993.1011 [Google Scholar]
  17. Connine, Cynthia M. & Pinnow, Eleni
    2006 Phonological variation in spoken word recognition: Episodes and abstractions. The Linguistic Review23. 235–245. 10.1515/TLR.2006.009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TLR.2006.009 [Google Scholar]
  18. Connine, Cynthia M. & Titone, Debra & Deelman, Thomas & Blasko, Dawn
    1997 Similarity mapping in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language37. 463–480. 10.1006/jmla.1997.2535
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2535 [Google Scholar]
  19. Fon, Janice & Hung, Jui-mei & Huang, Yi-Hsuan & Hsu, Hui-ju
    2011 Dialectal variations on syllable-final nasal mergers in Taiwan Mandarin. Language and Linguistics12(2). 273–311.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Fox, John
    2003 Effect displays in R for generalised linear models. Journal of Statistical Software8(15). 1–27. 10.18637/jss.v008.i15
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v008.i15 [Google Scholar]
  21. Garcia, Christina & Campos-Astorkiza, Rebeka
    2015 Allophonic perception in Spanish: The case of intervocalic /s/ voicing. (Paper presented atthe Phonetics and Phonology in Europe 2015, Cambridge, 29–30 June 2015.)
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hsieh, Feng-fan
    2006 High infidelity: The non-mapping of Japanese accent onto Taiwanese tone. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics52. 1–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hsu, Hui-ju
    2016 Biandong zhong de Taiyu: Taiyu /o/ yinsu sanzhong zhuyao duyin de xianzhuang fenxi. [The dynamics of Taiwanese – the analysis of the Taiwanese phoneme /o/]. Dongwu Zhongwen Xuebao [Soochow Journal of Chinese Studies] 31. 303–328.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Jaeger, Jeri J.
    1980 Testing the psychological reality of phonemes. Language and Speech23. 233–253. 10.1177/002383098002300302
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098002300302 [Google Scholar]
  25. 1986 Concept formation as a tool for linguistic research. InOhala, John J. & Jaeger, Jeri J. (eds.), Experimental Phonology, 211–237. Orlando: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Johnson, Keith & Babel, Molly
    2010 On the perceptual basis of distinctive features: Evidence from the perception of fricatives by Dutch and English speakers. Journal of Phonetics38. 127–136. 10.1016/j.wocn.2009.11.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2009.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kenstowicz, Michael & Kisseberth, Charles
    1979Generative phonology: Description and theory. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Keuleers, Emmanuel & Diependaele, Kevin & Brysbaert, Marc
    2010 Practice effects in large-scale visual word recognition studies: A lexical decision study on 14,000 Dutch mono-and disyllabic words and nonwords. Frontier in Psychology1. No.174. 1–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Kuznetsova, Alexandra & Brockhoff, Per Bruun & Christensen, Rune Haubo Bojesen
    2016 lmerTest: Test in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software82(13). 1–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lee, Chao-Yang
    2007 Does horse activate mother? Processing lexical tone in form priming. Language and Speech50. 101–123. 10.1177/00238309070500010501
    https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309070500010501 [Google Scholar]
  31. Lenth, Russell V.
    2016 Least-squares means: The R package lsmeans, Journal of Statistical Software69(1). 1–33. 10.18637/jss.v069.i01
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v069.i01 [Google Scholar]
  32. Lu, Yu-An
    2014 Mandarin fricatives redux: The psychological reality of phonological representations. Journal of East Asian Linguistics23. 43–69. 10.1007/s10831‑013‑9111‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-013-9111-5 [Google Scholar]
  33. Mackenzie, Sara & Olson, Erin & Clayards, Meghan & Wagner, Michael
    2014 Allophonic variation in English /l/: Production, perception, and segmentation. (Paper presented at the2014 Canadian Linguistic Association conference, St. Catharines, 24–26 May 2014.)
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Pallier, Christophe & Colomé, Angels & Sebastián-Gallés, Núria
    2001 The influence of native-language phonology on lexical access: Examplar-based versus abstract lexical entries. Psychological Science12. 445–449. 10.1111/1467‑9280.00383
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00383 [Google Scholar]
  35. Patterson, D. & Connine, Cynthia M.
    2001 Variant frequency in flap production: A corpus analysis of variant frequency in American English flap production. Phonetica58. 254–275. 10.1159/000046178
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000046178 [Google Scholar]
  36. Radeau, Monique & Morais, Jose & Segui, Juan
    1995 Phonological priming between monosyllabic spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance21(6). 1297–1311.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Ranbom, Larissa J. & Cynthia M. Connine
    2007 Lexical representation of phonological variation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language57. 273–298. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.04.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.04.001 [Google Scholar]
  38. Schneider, Walter. & Eschman, Amy. & Zuccolotto, Anthony
    2002E-Prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Sumner, Meghan & Samuel, Arthur G.
    2005 Perception and representation of regular variation: The case of final /t/. Journal of Memory and Language52. 322–338. 10.1016/j.jml.2004.11.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.11.004 [Google Scholar]
  40. 2007 Lexical inhibition and sublexical facilitation are surprisingly long lasting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition33(4). 769–790.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 2009 The effect of experience on the perception and representation of dialect variants. Journal of Memory and Language60. 487–501. 10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  42. Tsay, Jane & Myers, James
    2013CCU Taiwanese Spoken Corpus. (lngproc.ccu.edu.tw/SouthernMinCorpus/) (Accessed2019-05-03)
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Whalen, D. H. & Best, Catherin T. & Irwin, Julia R.
    1997 Lexical effects in the perception and production of American English /p/ allophones. Journal of Phonetics25. 501–528. 10.1006/jpho.1997.0058
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1997.0058 [Google Scholar]
  44. Wickham, Hadley
    2009ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag. 10.1007/978‑0‑387‑98141‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00048.lu
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00048.lu
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): dialectal variation , repetition priming , Taiwanese Southern Min and word recognition
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error