Volume 20, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1606-822X
  • E-ISSN: 2309-5067



This paper investigates the position of adjectives in noun phrases in Truku Seediq, proposing that the two documented positions correspond to different semantics as well as a difference in syntax. While post-nominal adjectives, corresponding to basic word-order in Truku Seediq, may be either restrictive or descriptive, pre-nominal adjectives, seen as an innovation, are semantically restrictive. This paper also argues for a difference in syntactic structure for both kinds of adjectives, restrictive adjectives heading their own projection while descriptive adjectives are bare adjectives standing in a closer relationship to the modified noun. This paper further identifies a syntactic constraint for pre-nominal adjectival placement that applies regardless of restrictivity of the modifier, namely the presence of a possessive clitic to the right of the modified noun. Data collection is achieved through both a traditional elicitation method and an experimental task-based method. Data are further digitalized in order to ensure systematic searchability. The data thus collected are apt to support semantic analysis as well as an investigation of age-group-related variation. It is claimed that language contact with Mandarin Chinese may be one of the triggering factors for the development of a pre-nominal position for modifying adjectives in Truku Seediq.

Available under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.

Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Alexiadou, Artemis
    2001 Adjective syntax and noun raising: Word order asymmetries in the DP as the result of adjective distribution. Studia Linguistica55(3). 217–248. 10.1111/1467‑9582.00080
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9582.00080 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bouchard, Denis
    1998 The distribution and interpretation of adjectives in French: A consequence of bare phrase structure. Probus10(2). 139–183. 10.1515/prbs.1998.10.2.139
    https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.1998.10.2.139 [Google Scholar]
  3. Chang, Yung-li
    2000Saidekeyu cankao yufa [A reference grammar of Seediq]. Taipei: Yuanliu.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen, Ping
    2004 Identifiability and definiteness in Chinese. Linguistics42(6). 1129–1184. 10.1515/ling.2004.42.6.1129
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2004.42.6.1129 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2009 Aspects of referentiality. Journal of Pragmatics41(8). 1657–1674. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.03.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.03.002 [Google Scholar]
  6. Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Sybesma, Rint
    2014 The syntactic structure of noun phrases. In Huang, C.-T. James & Li, Audrey Y.-H. & Simpson, Andrew (eds.), The handbook of Chinese linguistics, 1st edn., 248–274. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118584552.ch10
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584552.ch10 [Google Scholar]
  7. Dixon, Robert M. W.
    1977 Where have all the adjectives gone?Studies in Language1(1). 19–80. 10.1075/sl.1.1.04dix
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.1.1.04dix [Google Scholar]
  8. Greenberg, Joseph H.
    1963 Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Greenberg, Joseph H. (ed.), Universals of language, 58–90. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gundel, Jeanette K. & Hedberg, Nancy & Zacharski, Ron
    1993 Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language69(2). 274–307. 10.2307/416535
    https://doi.org/10.2307/416535 [Google Scholar]
  10. Huang, Lilian Mei-Chin
    2000Taiyayu cankao yufa [A reference grammar of Atayal]. Taipei: Yuanliu.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Lyons, Christopher
    1999Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511605789
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605789 [Google Scholar]
  12. Martin, Fabienne
    2014 Restrictive vs. nonrestrictive modification and evaluative predicates. Lingua149. 34–54. 10.1016/j.lingua.2014.05.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.05.002 [Google Scholar]
  13. Myers-Scotton, Carol
    1993Duelling languages: Grammatical structure in codeswitching. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ochiai, Izumi
    2015 Adjectival expressions in Paran Seediq. (Paper presented at theThirteenth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, Taipei, 18 July, 2015.)
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Paul, Waltraud
    2005 Adjectival modification in Mandarin Chinese and related issues. Linguistics43(4). 757–793. 10.1515/ling.2005.43.4.757
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2005.43.4.757 [Google Scholar]
  16. Pecoraro, Ferdinand
    1977Essai de dictionnaire Taroko-Français [A tentative Taroko-French dictionary]. Paris: S.E.C.M.I.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 1979Eléments de grammaire Taroko [Elements of Taroko grammar]. Paris: Cahier d’Archipel.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Tang, Chih-Chen Jane
    2008 Functional extension vs. grammaticalization: A typological study of modification markers in Formosan nominals. Language and Linguistics9(4). 917–966.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Thomason, Sarah Grey & Kaufman, Terrence
    1992Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Tsukida, Naomi
    1999 Locative, existential and possessive clauses in Seediq. In Zeitoun Elizabeth & Li, Paul Jen-kuei (eds.), Selected papers from the Eighth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, 599–636. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 2005 Seediq. In Adelaar, K. Alexander & Himmelmann, Nikolaus (eds.), The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar, 291–325. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Zeitoun, Elizabeth
    2000 Notes on a possessive construction in the Formosan languages. Oceanic Linguistics Special Publications29. 241–257.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error