oa The inventory structure of Person in the Chinese dialect of Puxian

References

1. Bhat, D. N.
   2004 Pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Brewer, Marilynn B. & Gardner, W.
   1996 Who is this we? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology71(1). 83–93. 10.1037/0022‑3514.71.1.83
   https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.83 [Google Scholar]
3. Brown, R. & Gilman, A.
   1960 The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Sebeok, T. A. (ed.), Style in Language, 253–276. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen C.
   1987 Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
5. Cai, Guomei
   2006 Puxian fangyan yanjiu [Studies on the Puxian dialect]. Fuzhou: Fujian Normal University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
   [Google Scholar]
6. Chen, Yanlin
   2004 Quanzhou fangyan de daici [Pronouns in the Quanzhou dialect]. Shanghai: Shanghai Normal University. (MA thesis.)
   [Google Scholar]
7. Clements, George N.
   1975 The logophoric pronoun in Ewe: Its role in discourse. Journal of West African Languages10(2). 141–177.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cole, Peter & Hermon, Cabriella & Yanti
   2015 Grammar of binding in the languages of the world: Innate or learned?Cognition1411. 138–160. 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.04.005
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.04.005 [Google Scholar]
9. Cysouw, Michael
   2009 The paradigmatic structure of person marking. (Oxford Studies in Typologies and Linguistic Theory). New York: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Davis, Wayne A.
    2012 Meaning, implicature, and linguistic variability. Intercultural Pragmatics9(2). 245–269. 10.1515/ip‑2012‑0014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2012-0014 [Google Scholar]
11. Deo, Ashwini
    2015 Diachronic semantics. Annual Review of Linguistics11. 179–197. 10.1146/annurev‑linguist‑030514‑125100
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-125100 [Google Scholar]
12. Dixon, R. M. W.
    2010 Basic linguistic theory, vol.11. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Filimonova, Elena
    (ed.) 2005 Clusivity: Typological and case studies of the inclusive-exclusive distinction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.63
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.63 [Google Scholar]
14. Grice, H. Paul
    1989 Studies in the ways of words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Greenberg, Joseph H.
    1963 Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Greenberg, Joseph H. (ed.), Universals of human language, 58–90. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Haiman, John
    1983 Iconic and economic motivation. Language59(4). 781–819. 10.2307/413373
    https://doi.org/10.2307/413373 [Google Scholar]
17. Haspelmath, Martin
    2007 Pre-established categories don’t exist: Consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic Typology11(1). 119–132. 10.1515/LINGTY.2007.011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LINGTY.2007.011 [Google Scholar]
18. Haspelmath, Martin
    2008 A frequentist explanation of some universals of reflexive marking. Linguistic Discovery6(1). 40–63. 10.1349/PS1.1537‑0852.A.331
    https://doi.org/10.1349/PS1.1537-0852.A.331 [Google Scholar]
19. Haspelmath, Martin
    2010a Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in cross-linguistic studies. Language86(3). 663–687. 10.1353/lan.2010.0021
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2010.0021 [Google Scholar]
20. Haspelmath, Martin
    2010b Framework-free grammatical theory. In Heine, Bernd & Narrog, Heiko (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 1st edn., 341–365. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. He, Wei
    1989 Huojia fangyan yanjiu [Research on the Huojia dialect]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Hirose, Yukio
    2002 Viewpoint and the nature of the Japanese reflexive zibun . Cognitive Linguistics13(4). 357–401. 10.1515/cogl.2002.023
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2002.023 [Google Scholar]
23. Hollmann, Willem & Siewierska, Anna
    2007 A construction grammar account of possessive constructions in Lancashire dialect: Some advantages and challenges. English Language & Linguistics11(2). 407–424. 10.1017/S1360674307002304
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674307002304 [Google Scholar]
24. Horn, Laurence R.
    2013 I love me some datives: Expressive meaning, free datives, and F-implicature. In Gutzmann, Daniel & Gärtner, Hans-Martin (eds.), Beyond expressives: Explorations in use-conditional meaning, of current research in the semantics/pragmatics interface, 151–199. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004183988_006
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004183988_006 [Google Scholar]
25. Huang, Yan
    1994 The syntax and pragmatics of anaphora: A study with special reference to Chinese (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 70). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511554292
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554292 [Google Scholar]
26. Ingram, David
    1978 Typology and universals of personal pronouns. In Greenberg, Joseph H. & Ferguson, Charles A. & Moravcsik, Edith A. (eds.), Universals of human language, vol.31, 213–247. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. König, Ekkehard & Gast, Volker
    2006 Focused assertion of identity: A typology of intensifiers. Linguistic Typology10(2). 223–276. 10.1515/LINGTY.2006.008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LINGTY.2006.008 [Google Scholar]
28. König, Ekkehard & Siemund, Peter
    2000a Locally free self-forms, logophoricity and intensification in English. English Language and Linguistics4(2). 183–204. 10.1017/S1360674300000228
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674300000228 [Google Scholar]
29. König, Ekkehard , & Siemund, Peter
    2000b The development of complex reflexives and intensifiers in English. Diachronica17(1). 39–84. 10.1075/dia.17.1.04kon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.17.1.04kon [Google Scholar]
30. Kuno, Susumu
    1987 Functional syntax: Anaphora, discourse, and empathy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. LaPolla, Randy J.
    1993 Arguments against “subject” and “direct object” as viable concepts in Chinese. Bulletin of the Institute of History & Philology631. 759–813.
    [Google Scholar]
32. LaPolla, Randy J. & Yang, Jiangling
    2004 Reflexive and middle marking in Dulong-Rawang. Himalayan Linguistics21. 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Li, Rulong & Chen, Zhangtai
    1991 Lun Minfangyan neibu de zhuyao chayi [Discussion on the main differences among Min dialects]. In Chen, Zhangtai & Li, Rulong (eds.), Minyu yanjiu [Studies on Min], 58–138. Beijing: Yuwen Chubanshe.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Liu, Danqing
    2011 Yuyan kucang leixingxue gouxiang [Linguistic inventory typology: A proposal for a new approach of linguistic typology]. Dangdai Yuyanxue [Contemporary Linguistics] 2011(4). 289–303.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Lu, Zhaojun
    2011 Shanxi Jiaocheng fangyan daici yanjiu [Studies on pronouns in Shanxi Jiaocheng dialect]. Shaanxi: Shaanxi Normal University.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Nichols, Johanna
    2007 What, if anything, is typology?Linguistic Typology11(1). 231–238. 10.1515/LINGTY.2007.017
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LINGTY.2007.017 [Google Scholar]
37. Norman, Jerry
    1988 Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Oshima, David Y.
    2004  Zibun revisited: Empathy, logophoricity, and binding. In Tur, Sylwia & Levi, Susannah (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th NWLC, (University of Washington Working Papers in Linguistics 23), 175–189. Seattle: University of Washington.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Oshima, David Y.
    2006 Perspectives in reported discourse. Stanford: Stanford University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
40. Parker, Frank & Riley, Kathryn & Meyer, Charles F.
    1990 Untriggered reflexive pronouns in English. American Speech65(1): 50–69. 10.2307/455936
    https://doi.org/10.2307/455936 [Google Scholar]
41. Saussure, Ferdinand de
    1983 Course in general linguistics. London: Duckworth. (Translation of Harris 1983.)
    [Google Scholar]
42. Siewierska, Anna
    2004 Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511812729
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812729 [Google Scholar]
43. Wu, Jianming
    2010 The function of pronominal expressions in Puxian. Lancaster: Lancaster University. (Doctoral dissertation).
    [Google Scholar]
44. Wu, Jianming
    2013a Puxianhua de rencheng linshuyu [Pronominal possessors in Puxian dialect]. Yuyan Yanjiu Jikan [Collective Papers on Linguistic Researches] 101. 280–290.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Wu, Jianming
    2013b Rencheng “juhejiegou” lilun de Hanyu shijiao [Sinitic perspective on the paradigmatic structure of person marking]. Dangdai Yuyanxue [Contemporary Linguistics] 2013(4). 393–404.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Wu, Yunji
    2005 Synchronic and diachronic study of the grammar of the Chinese Xiang dialects. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110927481
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110927481 [Google Scholar]