oa The use of the Korean first person possessive pronoun nay vis-à-vis wuli

References

1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
   2012 Possession and ownership: A cross-linguistic perspective. InAikhenvald, Alexandra & Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Possession and ownership: A cross-linguistic typology, 1–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199660223.003.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199660223.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
2. Chambers, J. K.
   1992 Linguistic correlates of gender and sex. English World-Wide13(2). 173–218. 10.1075/eww.13.2.02cha
   https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.13.2.02cha [Google Scholar]
3. Choi, Hyun-Bae
   1961 Wulimalpon [Grammar of our language]. Seoul: Cengummwunhwasa.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Choi, In Ji
   2012 Ilinching pokswu taymyengsauy celchacek uymiwa kwanleynseng [The procedural meaning of first person plural pronouns and relevance]. Enehak [The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal] 20(2). 171–197.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Christofaki, Rodanthi
   2018 Expressing the self in Japanese: Indexical expressions in the service of indexical thoughts. InHuang, Minyao & Jaszczolt, Kasia M. (eds.), Expressing the self: Cultural diversity and cognitive universals, 72–87. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198786658.003.0005
   https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198786658.003.0005 [Google Scholar]
6. Dixon, R. M. W.
   2010 Basic linguistic theory volume 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Durieux, Frank
   1990 The meanings of the specifying genitive in English: A cognitive analysis (Antwerp Papers in Linguistics 66). Antwerp: Department of Linguistics, University of Antwerp.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Grice, H. Paul
   1989 Studies in the way of words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Heine, Bernd
   2006 Possession: Cognitive sources, forces, and grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Helmbrecht, Johannes
    2015 A typology of non-prototypical uses of personal pronouns: Synchrony and diachrony. Journal of Pragmatics881. 176–189. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.10.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.10.004 [Google Scholar]
11. Holmes, Janet
    1992 An introduction to sociolinguistics. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Horn, Lawrence
    1984 Towards a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. InSchiffrin, Deborah (ed.), Meaning, form, and use in context: Linguistic applications (Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1984), 11–42. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Horn, Lawrence
    1989 A natural history of negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Jaszczolt, Kasia M.
    2013 First-person reference in discourse: Aims and strategies. Journal of Pragmatics48(1). 57–70. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.018
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.018 [Google Scholar]
15. Jaszczolt, Kasia M.
    2016 Meaning in linguistic interaction: Semantics, metasemantics, philosophy of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602469.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602469.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
16. Kempson, Ruth
    1977 Semantic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Kim, Cheon-Hak
    2012 Soyu kwankyeywa soyu kwuseng [Possessive relations and possessive constructions]. Hankwuke uymihak [Korean Semantics] 391. 125–148.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kim, Jung-Nam
    2003 Hankwuke taymyengsa wuli uy uymiwa yongpep [The meaning and usage of the Korean pronoun wuli]. Hankwuke uymihak [Korean Semantics] 131. 257–274.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Kim, Myung-Hee
    1987 {Uy}uy uymi kinung. [The semantic function of {uy}]. Ene [Korean Journal of Linguistics] 12(2). 248–260.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark
    1980 Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Lee, Han-Gyu
    2007 Hankwuke taymyengsa wuli [A pragmatic and sociocultural approach to the so-called 1st person pronoun wuli in Korean]. Tamhwawa inci [Discourse and Cognition] 14(3). 155–178.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Lee, Hong-Sik
    2007 Oylaye/oykwuke sayong mich swunhwae swuyong silthay cosa [A study on the use of foreign/ loan words and the acceptance of refined words]. Seoul: National Institute of the Korean Language. (Project report 11-1370252-000097-01.)
    [Google Scholar]
23. Lee, Hye-Kyung
    2015 The corpus-pragmatic analysis of wuli. Tamhwawa inci [Discourse and Cognition] 22(3). 59–78.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Lee, Hye-Kyung
    2018 Self-referring in Korean with reference to Korean first-person markers. InHuang, Minyao & Jaszczolt, Kasia M. (eds.), Expressing the self: Cultural diversity and cognitive universals, 58–71. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Lee, Iksop & Ramsey, Robert
    2001 The Korean language. New York: State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Levinson, Stephan
    2000 Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
27. Miller, George & Johnson-Laird, Philip
    1976 Language and perception. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. 10.4159/harvard.9780674421288
    https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674421288 [Google Scholar]
28. Mok, Jung-Su
    2007 Hankwuke cosa {uy}uy mwunpepcek ciwiwa uymi kinungey tayhaye [On the grammatical status and the semantic function of the Korean particle {uy}]. Kwukekyoyuk [The Education of Korean Language] 1231. 437–470.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Nikiforidou, Kiki
    1991 The meanings of the genitive: A case study in semantic structure and semantic change. Cognitive Linguistics2(2). 149–205. 10.1515/cogl.1991.2.2.149
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1991.2.2.149 [Google Scholar]
30. Poutsma, Hendrik
    1916 A grammar of late modern English: For the use of continental, especially Dutch, students. Part 2: The parts of speech. Groningen: P. Nordhoff.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Quirk, Randolph & Greenbaum, Sidney & Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
    1985 A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Shin, Ki-Hyun
    2000 Grammaticalisation of social relationship. (Paper presented at2000 Summer Conference of the Society of Modern Grammar, Daegu, 27 May 2000.)
    [Google Scholar]
33. Siewierska, Anna
    2004 Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511812729
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812729 [Google Scholar]
34. Sinclair, Melinda & Winckler, Walter
    1991 Relevance theory: Explaining verbal communication. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus181. 1–97.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Sohn, Ho-Min
    1999 The Korean language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Sohn, Ho-Min
    2013 Korean. Seoul: Korea University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre
    1986 Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Tanaka, Hiroaki
    2012 Scalar implicature in Japanese: Contrastive wa and intersubjectivity. (Paper presented at the1st International Conference of the American Pragmatics Association (AMPRA), Charlotte, 19–21 October 2012.)
    [Google Scholar]
39. Tayler, John R.
    1989 Linguistic categorization: Prototypes in linguistic theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Tayler, John R.
    1996 Possessives in English: An exploration in cognitive grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Van der Vegt, Wouter
    2014 Attitudes towards English loanwords in Dutch news broadcasts: The influence of gender and age. Leiden: Leiden University. (Master’s thesis.)
    [Google Scholar]
42. Yoon, Jae-Hak
    2003 Tanswucek yongpepuy wuli [Singular wuli we]. Enewa cengpo [Language and Information] 7(2). 1–30.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Yoon, Jae-Hak
    2009 Soyuuy uymiyuheng: Hanyeng soyukwumwun uymichai. [Types of possessive meanings: Semantic differences between Korean and English possessives]. Enewa cengpo [Language and Information] 13(1). 93–125.
    [Google Scholar]