1887
Volume 21, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1606-822X
  • E-ISSN: 2309-5067
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The present study reports a novel case where a simple one-to-one category mapping may develop into a systematic one-to-two mapping over the course of second language acquisition. We examined the split in category mapping of the Mandarin unaspirated stops conditioned by tone by Korean-speaking learners of Mandarin Chinese (e.g. Mandarin /ta35/ to Korean lenis [ta] vs. Mandarin /ta55/ to Korean fortis [t’a]). Korean L2 learners and naïve listeners participated in identification tasks in which contours of Mandarin words containing unaspirated stops with short-lag VOTs were digitally manipulated. In word-initial position, learners showed a near-categorical perception from lenis to fortis as increased, while most stimuli were identified as fortis by naïve listeners. The effect of was much smaller in word-medial position, but the group difference remained the same, confirming the two groups’ differential use of phonetic cues for stop identification. Taken together, a substantial reorganization of perceptual cues, namely the promotion of concurrent with significant underweighting of VOT cues, seems to have taken place during L2 acquisition. The findings were discussed with reference to PAM-L2 whereby the knowledge of the L2 phonological system along with particular phonetic properties of the L2 sounds may have driven a perceptual regrouping of the L2 stop categories.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00057.san
2020-01-02
2020-01-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aoyama, Katsura & Flege, James Emil & Guion, Susan G. & Akahane-Yamada, Reiko & Yamada, Tsuneo
    2004 Perceived phonetic dissimilarity and L2 speech learning: The case of Japanese /r/ and English /l/ and /r/. Journal of Phonetics32(2). 233–250. 10.1016/S0095‑4470(03)00036‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(03)00036-6 [Google Scholar]
  2. Barr, Dale J. & Levy, Roger & Scheepers, Christoph & Tily, Harry J.
    2013 Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language68(3). 255–278. 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bates, Douglas & Maechler, Martin & Bolker, Ben & Walker, Steven
    2014 lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4 (R package version 1.0–6). (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html) (Accessed2017-04-01.)
  4. Belotel-Grenie, Agnès & Grenie, Michel
    1994 Phonation types analysis in Standard Chinese. (Paper presented at the3rd International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 94), Yokohama, 18–22 September 1994.)
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Best, Catherine T.
    1995 A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. InStrange, Winifred (ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research, 171–204. Baltimore: York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Best, Catherine T. & Tyler, Michael D.
    2007 Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. InBohn, Ocke-Schwen & Munro, Murray J. (eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege, 13–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.17.07bes
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.17.07bes [Google Scholar]
  7. Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David
    2017 Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (computer program). (www.praat.org/) (Accessed2017-04-01.)
  8. Bradlow, Ann R. & Pisoni, David B. & Akahane-Yamada, Reiko & Tohkura, Yoh’ichi
    1997 Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America101(4). 2299–2310. 10.1121/1.418276
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.418276 [Google Scholar]
  9. Chao, Kuan-Yi & Chen, Li-Mei
    2008 A cross-linguistic study of voice onset time in stop consonant productions. Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing13(2). 215–232.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Chao, Yuen Ren
    1968A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cho, Taehong & Jun, Sun-Ah & Ladefoged, Peter
    2002 Acoustic and aerodynamic correlates of Korean stops and fricatives. Journal of Phonetics30(2). 193–228. 10.1006/jpho.2001.0153
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2001.0153 [Google Scholar]
  12. Clayards, Meghan & Tanenhaus, Michael K. & Aslin, Richard N. & Jacobs, Robert A.
    2008 Perception of speech reflects optimal use of probablistic speech cues. Cognition108(3). 804–809. 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.04.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.04.004 [Google Scholar]
  13. Eom, Ik-sang
    1996 Cwungkwuke hankul phyokipepey kwanhan mwunceywa kaysen pangan [Issues on the Korean Romanization of Chinese and suggestions for improvement]. Cwungkwuk Ene Yenkwu [Journal of Chinese Linguistics in Korea] 4. 39–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Flege, James Emil
    1987 The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics15. 47–65. 10.1016/S0095‑4470(19)30537‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30537-6 [Google Scholar]
  15. Forster, Kenneth & Forster, Jonathan
    2003 DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers35(1). 116–124. 10.3758/BF03195503
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195503 [Google Scholar]
  16. Francis, Alexander L. & Baldwin, Kate & Nusbaum, Howard C.
    2000 Effects of training on attention to acoustic cues. Perception and Psychophysics62(8). 1668–1680. 10.3758/BF03212164
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212164 [Google Scholar]
  17. Francis, Alexander L. & Ciocca, Valter & Wong, Natalie King Yu & Leung, Wilson Ho Yin & Chu, Phoebe Cheuk Yan
    2006 Extrinsic context affects perceptual normalization of lexical tone. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America119(3). 1712–1726. 10.1121/1.2149768
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2149768 [Google Scholar]
  18. Han, Jeong-Im
    1996The phonetics and phonology of “tense” and “plain” consonants in Korean. Ithaca: Cornell University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Han, Mieko S. & Weitzman, Raymond S.
    1970 Acoustic features of Korean /P, T, K/, /p, t, k/ and /ph, th, kh/. Phonetica22(2). 112–128. 10.1159/000259311
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000259311 [Google Scholar]
  20. Holliday, Jeffrey J.
    2014 The perceptual assimilation of Korean obstruents by native Mandarin listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America135(3). 1585–1595. 10.1121/1.4863653
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4863653 [Google Scholar]
  21. 2016 Second language experience can hinder the discrimination of nonnative phonological contrasts. Phonetica73(1). 33–51. 10.1159/000443312
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000443312 [Google Scholar]
  22. Iverson, Paul & Hazan, Valerie & Bannister, Kerry
    2005 Phonetic training with acoustic cue manipulations: A comparison of methods for teaching English /r/-/l/ to Japanese adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America118(5). 3267–3278. 10.1121/1.2062307
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2062307 [Google Scholar]
  23. Iverson, Paul & Kuhl, Patricia K. & Akahane-Yamada, Reiko & Diesch, Eugen & Tohkura, Yoh’ichi & Kettermann, Andreas & Siebert, Claudia
    2003 A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non-native phonemes. Cognition87(1). B47–B57. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(02)00198‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00198-1 [Google Scholar]
  24. Jun, Sun-Ah
    1993The phonetics and phonology of Korean prosody. Columbus: Ohio State University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kang, Yoonjung
    2014 Voice Onset Time merger and development of tonal contrast in Seoul Korean stops: A corpus study. Journal of Phonetics45. 76–90. 10.1016/j.wocn.2014.03.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2014.03.005 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kim, Mi-Ryoung & Beddor, Patrice Speeter & Horrocks, Julie
    2002 The contribution of consonantal and vocalic information to the perception of Korean initial stops. Journal of Phonetics30(1). 77–100. 10.1006/jpho.2001.0152
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2001.0152 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kim, Midam
    2004 Correlation between VOT and F0 in the perception of Korean stops and affricates. (Paper presented at the the8th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (INTERSPEECH-2004), Jeju Island, 4–8 October 2004.)
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kim, So Ya
    2006 Hangugeo pyeongeum gyeongeum gieume daehan jungguginui jigakjeog beomju yeongu [A study on the perception of Korean lenis, fortis, and aspirated stops by Mandarin speakers]. Icwung Enehak [Bilingual Research] 32. 52–79.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Kim, Yong Ok
    1987Tongyanghak ettehkey hal kesinka [How to do oriental studies]. Seoul: Tongnamu.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Ko, Mi-Sook
    2000 Hancwung pwuncelumsowa chopwuncelumsowauy kwankyey yenkwu [A study on the relationship between segments and suprasegmental features]. Cwungkwuk Ene Yenkwu [Journal of Chinese Linguistics in Korea] 12. 235–256.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Kuang, Jianjing
    2017 Covariation between voice quality and pitch: Revisiting the case of Mandarin creaky voice. The Journal of the Acoustical Society America142(3). 1693–1706. 10.1121/1.5003649
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5003649 [Google Scholar]
  32. Ladefoged, Peter & Maddieson, Ian
    1996The sounds of the world’s languages. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Lee, Hyunjung & Politzer-Ahles, Stephen & Jongman, Allard
    2013 Speakers of tonal and non-tonal Korean dialects use different cue weightings in the perception of the three-way laryngeal stop contrast. Journal of Phonetics41(2). 117–32. 10.1016/j.wocn.2012.12.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2012.12.002 [Google Scholar]
  34. Levy, Erika S. & Strange, Winifred
    2008 Perception of French vowels by American English adults with and without French language experience. Journal of Phonetics36(1). 141–157. 10.1016/j.wocn.2007.03.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2007.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  35. Lindau, Mona
    1985 The story of /r/. InFromkin, Victoria A. (ed.), Phonetic linguistics: Essays in honor of Peter Ladefoged, 157–168. Orlando: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Lisker, Leigh & Abramson, Arthur S.
    1964 A cross-language study of voicing in initial stop: Acoustic measurements. Word20. 384–422. 10.1080/00437956.1964.11659830
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1964.11659830 [Google Scholar]
  37. Liu, Huei-Mei & Tseng, Chin-Hsing & Tsao, Feng-Ming
    2000 Perceptual and acoustic analysis of speech intelligibility in Mandarin-speaking young adults with cerebral palsy. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics14(6). 447–464. 10.1080/026992000415877
    https://doi.org/10.1080/026992000415877 [Google Scholar]
  38. Lotto, Andrew J. & Kluender, Keith R.
    1998 General contrast effects in speech perception: Effect of preceding liquid on stop consonant identification. Perception & Psychophysics60(4). 602–619. 10.3758/BF03206049
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206049 [Google Scholar]
  39. Maeng, Joooeck & Kwon, Yongsil
    2008 Hankwukin haksupcauy cwungkwuke phayelumey tayhan cikakyangsang yenkwu [A study on the perception of Mandarin stops by Korean learners]. Cwungkwukhak Yenkwu [The Journal of Chinese Studies] 44. 73–92.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Mann, Virginia A.
    1980 Influence of preceding liquid on stop-consonant perception. Perception & Psychophysics28(5). 407–412. 10.3758/BF03204884
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204884 [Google Scholar]
  41. Maye, Jessica & Gerken, LouAnn
    2000 Learning phonemes without minimal pairs. InHowell, S. Catherine & Fish, Sarah A. & Keith-Lucas, Thea (eds.), BUCLD 24: Proceedings of the 24th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 522–533. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Maye, Jessica & Weiss, Daniel J. & Aslin, Richard N.
    2008 Statistical phonetic learning in infants: Facilitation and feature generalization. Developmental Science11(1). 122–134. 10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2007.00653.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00653.x [Google Scholar]
  43. Moore, Corinne & Jongman, Allard
    1997 Speaker normalization in the perception of Mandarin Chinese tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America102(3). 1864–1877. 10.1121/1.420092
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.420092 [Google Scholar]
  44. Oglesbee, Eric Nathanael
    2008Multidimensional stop categorization in English, Spanish, Korean, Japanese, and Canadian French. Bloomington: Indiana University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Park, Hanyong & de Jong, Kenneth J.
    2008 Perceptual category mapping between English and Korean prevocalic obstruents: Evidence from mapping effects in second language identification skills. Journal of Phonetics36(4). 704–723. 10.1016/j.wocn.2008.06.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2008.06.002 [Google Scholar]
  46. R Development Core Team
    R Development Core Team 2016 R: A language and environment for statistical computing (computer program). (www.r-project.org/) (Accessed2017-04-01.)
  47. Rochet, Bernard L. & Fei, Yanmei
    1991 Effect of consonant and vowel context on Mandarin Chinese VOT: Production and perception. Canadian Acoustics19(4). 105–106.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Schmidt, Anna Marie
    1996 Cross-language identification of consonants. Part 1. Korean perception of English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America99. 3201–3211. 10.1121/1.414804
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.414804 [Google Scholar]
  49. Silva, David J.
    1992The phonetics and phonology of stop lenition in Korean. Ithaca: Cornell University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
  50. 2006 Acoustic evidence for the emergence of tonal contrast in contemporary Korean. Phonology23(2). 287–308. 10.1017/S0952675706000911
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675706000911 [Google Scholar]
  51. Wong, Patrick C. M. & Diehl, Randy L.
    2003 Perceptual normalization for inter- and intratalker variation in Cantonese level tones. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research46(2). 413–421. 10.1044/1092‑4388(2003/034)
    https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2003/034) [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00057.san
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00057.san
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): f0 , PAM-L2 , perceptual reorganization , stop category mapping and VOT
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error