1887
Volume 21, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1606-822X
  • E-ISSN: 2309-5067
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Greenberg (1990a: 292) suggests that classifiers () and numeral bases tend to harmonize in word order, i.e. a numeral (Num) with a base-final [] order appears in a -final [Num ] order, e.g. in Mandarin Chinese, (three hundred) ‘300’ and (three dog) ‘three dogs’, and a base-initial [] Num appears in a -initial [ Num] order, e.g. in Kilivila (Eastern Malayo-Polynesian, Oceanic), (hundred three) ‘300’ and (-three fish) ‘three fish’. In non-classifier languages, base and noun (N) tend to harmonize in word order. We propose that harmonization between and N should also obtain. A detailed statistical analysis of a geographically and phylogenetically weighted set of 400 languages shows that the harmonization of word order between numeral bases, classifiers, and nouns is statistically highly significant, as only 8.25% (33/400) of the languages display violations, which are mostly located at the meeting points between head-final and head-initial languages, indicating that language contact is the main factor in the violations to the probabilistic universals.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00069.all
2020-09-18
2020-11-30
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
    2000Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Allan, Edward J.
    1976 Dizi. In Bender, M. Lionel (ed.), The non-Semitic languages of Ethiopia (Occasional Papers Series, Committee on Ethiopian Studies, Monograph 5), 377–392. East Lansing: African Studies Center, Michigan State University.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Au Yeung, Ben Wai Hoo
    2005An interface program for parameterization of classifiers in Chinese. Kowloon: Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. (Doctoral dis­sertation.) 10.14711/thesis‑b922442
    https://doi.org/10.14711/thesis-b922442 [Google Scholar]
  4. 2007 Multiplication basis of emergence of classifiers. Language and Linguistics8(4). 835–861.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Baumgartner, Neil I.
    1998 A grammar sketch of Western (Cambodian) Cham. In Thomas, David (ed.), Papers in Southeast Asian linguistics no. 15: Further Chamic studies (Pacific Linguistics Series A-89), 1–20. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics (The Australian National University).
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Besnier, Niko
    2002 [2000]Tuvaluan: A Polynesian language of the Central Pacific. London: Routledge. (First published in 2000.) 10.4324/9780203027127
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203027127 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bickel, Balthasar
    2014 Linguistic diversity and universals. In Enfield, Nick J. & Kockelman, Paul & Sidnell, Jack (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic anthropology, 102–127. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139342872.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139342872.006 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bisang, Walter
    1999 Classifiers in East and Southeast Asian languages: Counting and beyond. In Gvozdanovic, Jadranka (ed.), Numeral types and changes worldwide, 113–186. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110811193.113
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110811193.113 [Google Scholar]
  9. Blust, Robert
    2009The Austronesian languages. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics (The Australian National University).
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Borer, Hagit
    2005Structuring sense, volume 1: In name only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Borgman, Donald M.
    1990 Sanuma. In Derbyshire, Desmond C. & Pullum, Geoffrey K. (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages, vol.2, 15–248. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bril, Isabelle
    2002Le nêlêmwa (Nouvelle-Calédonie): Analyse syntaxique et sémantique. Paris: Peeters.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Chan, Eugene S. L.
    2018Numeral systems of the world’s languages. (https://mpi-lingweb.shh.mpg.de/numeral/) (Accessed2018-07-27.)
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Cinque, Guglielmo & Krapova, Iliyana
    2007 A note on Bulgarian numeral classifiers. In Alboiu, Gabriela & Avram, Andrei A. & Avram, Laurentia Georgeta & Isac, Daniela (eds.), Pitar Moş: A building with a view. Papers in honour of Alexandra Cornilescu, 45–51. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Comrie, Bernard
    2013 Numeral bases. In Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (https://wals.info/chapter/131) (Accessed2018-07-27.)
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Corbett, Greville G.
    2003a Agreement: Canonical instances and the extent of the phenomenon. In Booij, Geert E. & DeCesaris, Janet & Ralli, Angela & Scalise, Sergio (eds.), Topics in morphology: Selected papers form the Third Mediterranean Morphology Meeting, 109–128. Barcelona: Institut Universitari de Lingüistica Aplicada, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 2003b Agreement: Terms and boundaries. In Griffin, William Earl (ed.), The role of agreement in natural language: Proceedings of the 5th Annual Texas Linguistics Society Conference, 109–122. Austin: Texas Linguistics Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 2003c Agreement: The range of the phenomenon and the principles of the Surrey Database of Agreement. Transactions of the Philological Society101(2). 155–202. 10.1111/1467‑968X.00117
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.00117 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2013 Number of genders. In Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (https://wals.info/chapter/30) (Accessed2018-07-27.)
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Corbett, Greville G. & Fedden, Sebastian
    2016 Canonical gender. Journal of Linguistics52(3). 495–531. 10.1017/S0022226715000195
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226715000195 [Google Scholar]
  21. Derbyshire, Desmond C. & Payne, Doris L.
    1990 Noun classification systems of Amazonian languages. In Payne, Doris L. (ed.), Amazonian linguistics: Studies in lowland South American languages, 243–271. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Diniz-Filho, José Alexandre F. & Soares, Thannya N. & Lima, Jacqueline S. & Dobrovolski, Ricardo & Landeiro, Victor Lemes & de Campos Telles, Mariana Pires & Rangel, Thiago F. & Bini, Luis Mauricio
    2013 Mantel test in population genetics. Genetics and Molecular Biology36(4). 475–485. 10.1590/S1415‑47572013000400002
    https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-47572013000400002 [Google Scholar]
  23. Donohue, Mark
    2007 Word order in Austronesian from north to south and west to east. Linguistic Typology11(2). 349–391. 10.1515/LINGTY.2007.026
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LINGTY.2007.026 [Google Scholar]
  24. Dryer, Matthew S.
    1998 Why statistical universals are better than absolute universals. Papers from the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 123–145. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 2013 Order of numeral and noun. In Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The word atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (https://wals.info/chapter/89) (Accessed2018-07-27.)
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Epps, Patience & Bowern, Claire & Hansen, Cynthia A. & Hill, Jane H. & Zentz, Jason
    2012 On numeral complexity in hunter-gatherer languages. Linguistic Typology16(1). 41–109. 10.1515/lity‑2012‑0002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2012-0002 [Google Scholar]
  27. Evans, Nicholas & Levinson, Stephen C.
    2009 The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences32(5). 429–448. 10.1017/S0140525X0999094X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999094X [Google Scholar]
  28. Fedden, Sebastian & Corbett, Greville G.
    2017 Gender and classifiers in concurrent systems: Refining the typology of nominal classification. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics2(1). 1–47. (Article 34.) 10.5334/gjgl.177
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.177 [Google Scholar]
  29. Fleisch, Axel
    2000Lucazi grammar: A morphosemantic analysis (Grammatical Analyses of African Languages 15). Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Frank, Paul Stephen
    1985A grammar of Ika. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Gil, David
    2013 Numeral classifiers. In Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (https://wals.info/chapter/55) (Accessed2018-07-27.)
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Greenberg, Joseph H.
    1990a Generalizations about numeral systems. In Denning, Keith M. & Kemmer, Suzanne (eds.), On language: Selected writings of Joseph H. Greenberg, 271–309. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 1990b Numeral classifiers and substantival number: Problems in the genesis of a linguistic type. In Denning, Keith M. & Kemmer, Suzanne (eds.), On language: Selected writings of Joseph H. Greenberg, 166–193. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Grinevald, Colette
    2000 A morphosyntactic typology of classifiers. In Senft, Gunter (ed.), Systems of nominal classification, 50–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 2015 Classifiers, linguistics of. In Wright, James D. (ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences, 2nd edn., 811–818. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 10.1016/B978‑0‑08‑097086‑8.53003‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.53003-7 [Google Scholar]
  36. Her, One-Soon
    2012 Distinguishing classifiers and measure words: A mathematical perspective and implications. Lingua122(14). 1668–1691. 10.1016/j.lingua.2012.08.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.08.012 [Google Scholar]
  37. 2017a Deriving classifier word order typology, or Greenberg’s Universal 20A and Universal 20. Linguistics55(2). 265–303. 10.1515/ling‑2016‑0044
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2016-0044 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2017b Structure of numerals and classifiers in Chinese: Historical and typological perspectives and cross-linguistic implications. Language and Linguistics18(1). 26–71.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Her, One-Soon & Hsieh, Chen-Tien
    2010 On the semantic distinction between classifiers and measure words in Chinese. Language and Linguistics11(3). 527–551.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Her, One-Soon & Tang, Marc & Li, Bing-Tsiong
    2019 Word order of numeral classifiers and numeral bases: Harmonization by multiplication. Language Typology and Universals72(3). 421–452. 10.1515/stuf‑2019‑0017
    https://doi.org/10.1515/stuf-2019-0017 [Google Scholar]
  41. Her, One-Soon & Tsai, Hui-Chin
    2020 Left is right, right is not: On the constituency of the classifier phrase in Chinese. Language and Linguistics21(1). 1–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Jacques, Guillaume
    2017 The morphology of numerals and classifiers in Japhug. In Ding, Picus Sizhi & Pelkey, Jamin (eds.), Sociohistorical linguistics in Southeast Asia: New horizons for Tibeto-Burman studies in honor of David Bradley, 135–148. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004350519_009
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004350519_009 [Google Scholar]
  43. Jany, Carmen
    2009Chimariko grammar: Areal and typological perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press. 10.1525/9780520945197
    https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520945197 [Google Scholar]
  44. Jiang, Li Julie & Hu, Suhua
    2010 On bare classifier phrases. In Clemens, Lauren Eby & Liu, Chi-Ming Louis (eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL-22) & the 18th Annual Meeting of the International Association of Chinese Linguistics (IACL-18), vol.2, 230–241. Cambridge: Harvard University.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Kilarski, Marcin
    2013Nominal classification: A history of its study from the classical period to the present (Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 121). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sihols.121
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.121 [Google Scholar]
  46. 2014 The place of classifiers in the history of linguistics. Historiographia Linguistica41(1). 33–78. 10.1075/hl.41.1.02kil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.41.1.02kil [Google Scholar]
  47. Kiryu, Kazuyuki
    2009 On the rise of the classifier system in Newar. In Nagano, Yasuhiko (ed.), Issues in Tibeto-Burman historical linguistics (Senri Ethnological Studies 75), 51–69. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Klamer, Marian
    2014 Numeral classifiers in the Papuan languages of Alor and Pantar: A comparative perspective. In Klamer, Marian & Kratochvíl, František (eds.), Number and quantity in East Nusantara: Papers from 12-ICAL, vol.1, 103–122. Canberra: Asia-Pacific Linguistics (The Australian National University). (https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/11917) (Accessed2020-03-25.)
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Levshina, Natalia
    2015How to do linguistics with R: Data exploration and statistical analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (https://benjamins.com/catalog/z.195) (Accessed2020-​04-07.) 10.1075/z.195
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.195 [Google Scholar]
  50. Lewis, M. Paul
    (ed.) 2009Ethnologue: Languages of the world. Dallas: SIL International. (https://www.ethnologue.com/16/) (Accessed2020-05-05.)
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Mano, Miho
    2012 Compositional mechanisms of Japanese numeral classifiers. In Manurung, Ruli & Bond, Francis (eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, 620–625. Depok: Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Indonesia.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Matisoff, James A.
    1995 Sino-Tibetan numerals and the play of prefixes. Bulletin of the National Museum of Ethnology20(1). 105–251.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Meakins, Felicity & Nordlinger, Rachel
    2014A grammar of Bilinarra: An Australian aboriginal language of the Northern Territory (Pacific Linguistics 640). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781614512745
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614512745 [Google Scholar]
  54. Ostapirat, Weera
    2000 Proto-Kra. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area23(1). 1–251.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. 2005 Kra-Dai and Austronesian: Notes on phonological correspondences and vocabulary distribution. In Sagart, Laurent & Blench, Roger & Sanchez-Mazas, Alicia (eds.), The peopling of East Asia: Putting together archaeology, linguistics and genetics, 1st edn., 107–131. London: Routledge Curzon. 10.4324/9780203343685_chapter_7
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203343685_chapter_7 [Google Scholar]
  56. Pensalfini, Robert J.
    1997Jingulu grammar, dictionary, and texts. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Piantadosi, Steven T. & Gibson, Edward
    2014 Quantitative standards for absolute linguistic universals. Cognitive Science38(4). 736–756. 10.1111/cogs.12088
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12088 [Google Scholar]
  58. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2020R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. (https://www.R-project.org/) (Accessed2020-​03-25.)
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Seifart, Frank
    2005The structure and use of shape-based noun classes in Miraña (North West Amazon). Nijmegen: Radboud University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Shakya, Daya R.
    1997 Classifiers and their syntactic functions in Nepal Bhasa. Himalaya (The Journal of the Association for Nepal and Himalayan Studies) 17(1). 1–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Sheskin, David J.
    2011Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures. 5th edn.Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Sullivan, Gail M. & Feinn, Richard
    2012 Using effect size—or why the P value is not enough. Journal of Graduate Medical Education4(3). 279–282. 10.4300/JGME‑D‑12‑00156.1
    https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-12-00156.1 [Google Scholar]
  63. Sussex, Roland & Cubberley, Paul
    2009The Slavic languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Toyota, Junichi
    2009 When the mass was counted: English as classifier and non-classifier language. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics6(1). 118–130. (www.skase.sk/Volumes/JTL13/pdf_doc/07.pdf) (Accessed2020-03-26.)
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Velupillai, Viveka
    2012An introduction to linguistic typology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.176
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.176 [Google Scholar]
  66. Vittrant, Alice
    2002 Classifier systems and noun categorization devices in Burmese. In Chew, Patrick (ed.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: Special session on Tibeto-Burman and Southeast Asian linguistics, 129–148. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Watters, David E.
    2002A grammar of Kham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486883
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486883 [Google Scholar]
  68. Williams-van Klinken, Catharina & Hajek, John & Nordlinger, Rachel
    2002Tetun Dili: A grammar of an East Timorese language (Pacific Linguistics 528). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics (The Australian National University).
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Yamamoto, Kasumi & Keil, Frank
    2000 The acquisition of Japanese numeral classifiers: Linkage between grammatical forms and conceptual categories. Journal of East Asian Linguistics9(4). 379–409. 10.1023/A:1008308724059
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008308724059 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00069.all
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00069.all
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): classifier , harmonization , noun , numeral , numeral base and word order
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error