1887
Volume 21, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1606-822X
  • E-ISSN: 2309-5067
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The authors identify a plural marker - in Chengdu Chinese that can apply to both count and mass nouns, encoding plurality as well as definiteness. This post-nominal - differs from the pre-nominal , as the latter is purely plural but not inherently definite. Our analysis shows that the pre-nominal functions as a quantifier, which occupies the [Spec, NumP] position, whereas the suffixal -, by virtue of being a plural marker, is base-generated in the Num0 position and move to D0 to encode both plurality and definiteness. Moreover, the two s can co-occur in one and the same nominal phrase, exhibiting the . The syntactic analysis of in Chengdu Chinese, coupled with the study of in Cantonese, has theoretical impacts on nominal phrase structures, in particular, on “plurality” and “definiteness”. First, plural markers in classifier languages contrast with those in number languages, as the former, but not the latter, defies numerical modification. Second, definiteness can be expressed by a non-D element, which may check its [+] feature either by undergoing an upward movement to D (or [Spec, DP]) or by agreeing with the [+] feature of a demonstrative. Third, the DP-NP distinction is strongly supported by our account of Chengdu Chinese.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00074.xio
2020-09-18
2020-11-30
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Acquaviva, Paolo
    2008Lexical plurals: A morphosemantic approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexiadou, Artemis
    2011 The aspectual properties of nominalization structures. InGalani, Alexandra & Hicks, Glyn & Tsoulas, George (eds.), Morphology and its interfaces (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 178), 195–278. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.178.11ale
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.178.11ale [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson, Stephen R.
    1992A-morphous morphology (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 62). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511586262
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511586262 [Google Scholar]
  4. Athanasiadou, Ifigeneia & Athanasopoulos, Panos
    2017 Plural mass nouns and the construal of individuation: Crosslinguistic evidence from verbal and nonverbal behaviour in labelling and non-labelling contexts. Cognitive Semantics3(1). 62–94. 10.1163/23526416‑00301003
    https://doi.org/10.1163/23526416-00301003 [Google Scholar]
  5. Au Yeung, Wai Hoo
    2005An interface program for parameterization of classifiers in Chinese. Hong Kong: The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. (Doctoral dissertation.) 10.14711/thesis‑b922442
    https://doi.org/10.14711/thesis-b922442 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bošković, Željko
    2005 On the locality of left branch extraction and the structure of NP. Studia Linguistica59(1). 1–45. 10.1111/j.1467‑9582.2005.00118.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2005.00118.x [Google Scholar]
  7. 2008 What will you have, DP or NP?InElfner, Emily & Walkow, Martin (eds.), NELS 37: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, vol.1, 101–114. Amherst: GLSA.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chacón, Dustin Alfonso
    2011 Head movement in the Bangla DP. Journal of South Asian Linguistics4(1). 3–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cheng, L.-S. Lisa & Sybesma, Rint
    1999 Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry30(4). 509–542. 10.1162/002438999554192
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438999554192 [Google Scholar]
  10. Chierchia, Gennaro
    1998 Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics6(4). 339–405. 10.1023/A:1008324218506
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008324218506 [Google Scholar]
  11. Corbett, Greville G.
    2000Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139164344
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164344 [Google Scholar]
  12. Doron, Edit & Müller, Ana
    2013 The cognitive basis of the mass-count distinction: Evidence from bare nouns. InCabredo Hofherr, Patricia & Zribi-Hertz, Anne (eds.), Crosslinguistic studies on noun phrase structure and reference, 73–101. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ghaniabadi, Saeed
    2012 Plural marking beyond count nouns. InMassam, Diane (ed.), Count and mass across languages, 112–128. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654277.003.0007
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654277.003.0007 [Google Scholar]
  14. Ghomeshi, Jila
    2003 Plural marking, indefiniteness, and the noun phrase. Studia Linguistica57(2). 47–74. 10.1111/1467‑9582.00099
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9582.00099 [Google Scholar]
  15. Giusti, Giuliana
    1995 A unified structural representation of (abstract) case and article: Evidence from Germanic. InHaider, Hubert & Olsen, Susan & Vikner, Sten (eds.), Studies in comparative Germanic syntax (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31), 77–93. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑8416‑6_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8416-6_3 [Google Scholar]
  16. 1997 The categorial status of determiners. InHaegeman, Liliane (ed.), The new comparative syntax, 95–123. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 2015Nominal syntax at the interfaces: A comparative analysis of languages with articles. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Her, One-Soon
    2012a Distinguishing classifiers and measure words: A mathematical perspective and implications. Lingua122(14). 1668–1691. 10.1016/j.lingua.2012.08.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.08.012 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2012b Structure of classifiers and measure words: A lexical functional account. Language and Linguistics13(6). 1211–1251.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Heycock, Caroline & Zamparelli, Roberto
    2005 Friends and colleagues: Plurality, coordination and the structure of DP. Natural Language Semantics13(3). 201–270. 10.1007/s11050‑004‑2442‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-004-2442-z [Google Scholar]
  21. Huang, Chu-Ren & Ahrens, Kathleen
    2003 Individuals, kinds and events: Classifier coercion of nouns. Language Sciences25(4). 353–373. 10.1016/S0388‑0001(02)00021‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(02)00021-9 [Google Scholar]
  22. Iljic, Robert
    1994 Quantification in Mandarin Chinese: Two markers of plurality. Linguistics32(1). 91–116. 10.1515/ling.1994.32.1.91
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1994.32.1.91 [Google Scholar]
  23. 2001 The problem of the suffix -men in Chinese grammar. Journal of Chinese Linguistics29(1). 11–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Julien, Marit
    2005Nominal phrases from a Scandinavian perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.87
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.87 [Google Scholar]
  25. Krifka, Manfred
    1995 Common nouns: A contrastive analysis of Chinese and English. InCarlson, Gregory N. & Pelletier, Francis Jeffry (eds.), The generic book, 398–411. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 2003 Bare NPs: Kind-referring, indefinites, both, or neither?InYoung, Robert B. & Zhou, Yuping (eds.), Proceedings of the 13th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (SALT XIII), 180–203. Ithaca: Cornell University.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Li, Yen-Hui Audrey
    1998 Argument determiner phrases and number phrases. Linguistic Inquiry29(4). 693–702. 10.1162/ling.1998.29.4.693
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.1998.29.4.693 [Google Scholar]
  28. 1999 Plurality in a classifier language. Journal of East Asian Linguistics8(1). 75–99. 10.1023/A:1008306431442
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008306431442 [Google Scholar]
  29. Liao, Wei-wen Roger
    2011The symmetry of syntactic relations. Los Angeles: University of Southern California. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Longobardi, Giuseppe
    1994 Reference and proper names: A theory of N-movement in syntax and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry25(4). 609–665.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Lyons, Christopher
    1999Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511605789
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605789 [Google Scholar]
  32. Matthews, Stephen & Yip, Virginia
    2011Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar. 2nd edn.London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Ojeda, Almerindo E.
    2005 The paradox of mass plurals. InMufwene, Salikoko S. & Francis, Elaine J. & Wheeler, Rebecca S. (eds.), Polymorphous linguistics: Jim McCawley’s legacy, 389–410. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Rijkhoff, Jan
    1999 When can a language have adjectives? An implicational universal. InVogel, Petra M. & Comrie, Bernard (eds.), Approaches to the typology of word classes, 217–257. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 2002The noun phrase. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237822.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237822.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  36. Roehrs, Dorian
    2009Demonstratives and definite articles as nominal auxiliaries. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.140
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.140 [Google Scholar]
  37. Rothstein, Susan
    2017Semantics for counting and measuring: Key topics in semantics and pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9780511734830
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9780511734830 [Google Scholar]
  38. Rullmann, Hotze & You, Aili
    2006 General number and the semantics and pragmatics of indefinite bare nouns in Mandarin Chinese. InVon Heusinger, Klaus & Turner, Ken (eds.), Where semantics meets pragmatics, 175–196. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Steindl, Ulrike
    2010Grammatical issues in the Chinese classifier system: The case of classifier reduplication. Vienna: Universität Wien. (Master’s thesis.)
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Stowell, Tim
    1989 Subjects, specifiers and X-bar theory. InBaltin, Mark R. & Kroch, Anthony S. (eds.). Alternative conceptions of phrase structure, 232–262. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 1991 Determiners in NP and DP. InLeffel, Katherine & Bouchard, Denis (eds.), Views on phrase structure (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25), 37–56. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑3196‑4_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3196-4_3 [Google Scholar]
  42. Szabolcsi, Anna
    1983 The possessor that ran away from home. The Linguistic Review3(1). 89–102. 10.1515/tlir.1983.3.1.89
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1983.3.1.89 [Google Scholar]
  43. 1992 Combinatory grammar and projection from the lexicon. InSag, Ivan A. & Szabolcsi, Anna (eds.), Lexical matters (CSLI Lecture Notes 24), 241–268. Stanford: CSLI.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. 1994 The noun phrase. InKiefer, Ferenc & Kiss, Katalin E. (eds.), The syntactic structure of Hungarian (Syntax and Semantics 27), 179–274. New York: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004373174_004
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004373174_004 [Google Scholar]
  45. Tang, Sze-Wing
    2001 Nominal predication and focus anchoring. InJäger, Gerhard & Strigin, Anatoli & Wilder, Chris & Zhang, Niina (eds.), Papers on predicative constructions: Proceedings of the Workshop on Secondary Predication (ZAS Papers in Linguistics 22), 159–172. Berlin: Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Tsoulas, George
    2006 Plurality of mass nouns and the grammar of number. (Paper presented at the29th GLOW Colloquium, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 6–8 April 2006.)
    [Google Scholar]
  47. 2009 On the grammar of number and mass terms in Greek. InHalpert, Clair & Hartman, Jeremy & Hill, David (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics: Proceedings of the 2007 Workshop in Greek Syntax and Semantics at MIT, vol.57, 333–348. Cambridge: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Vinet, Marie-Thérèse & Liu, Xiaoyan
    2008 Plurality in Chinese with a restricted class of noun-classifier words. InClarke, Sarah & Hirayama, Manami & Kim, Kyumin & Suh, Eugenia (eds.), Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 28: Proceedings of the International Conference on East Asian Linguistics, 357–373. Toronto: Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Watanabe, Akira
    2017 The mass/count distinction in Japanese from the perspective of partitivity. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics2(1). 1–26. (Article 98). 10.5334/gjgl.116
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.116 [Google Scholar]
  50. Wei, Ting-Chi
    2007 Nominal predicates in Mandarin Chinese. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics5(2). 85–130.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Yang, Rong
    2001Common nouns, classifiers, and quantification in Chinese. New Brunswick: Rutgers University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Zhang, Niina Ning
    2013Classifier structures in Mandarin Chinese. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110304992
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110304992 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00074.xio
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00074.xio
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Cantonese , Chengdu Chinese , definiteness , di , plurality and ɕiɛ
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error