oa Anaphor reconstruction in Japanese relative clauses

References

1. Abe, Jun
   1997 The locality of zibun and logophoricity. InInoue, Kazuko (ed.), Researching and verifying an advanced theory of human language (COE Research Report 1), 595–626. Chiba: Kanda University of International Studies. (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4d3n8VR​srgmNDBjYWI4OGQtYjUzMC00Y2JmLWIwMDEtYjJhNDgxMTM3N2Jj/view) (Accessed2020-09-25.)
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aikawa, Takako
   2002 [1999] Reflexives. InTsujimura, Natsuko (ed.), The handbook of Japanese linguistics, 154–190. Malden: Blackwell.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Aoun, Joseph E. & Li, Yen-hui Audrey
   2003 Essays on the representational and derivational nature of grammar: The diversity of wh-constructions. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/2832.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2832.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
4. Bhatt, Rajesh
   2002 The raising analysis of relative clauses: Evidence from adjectival modification. Natural Language Semantics10(1). 43–90. 10.1023/A:1015536226396
   https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015536226396 [Google Scholar]
5. Chomsky, Noam
   1993 A Minimalist Program for linguistic theory. InHale, Kenneth & Keyser, Samuel Jay (eds.), The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger (Current Studies in Linguistics 24), 1–52. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Clements, George. N.
   1975 The logophoric pronoun in Ewe: Its role in discourse. Journal of West African Languages10(2). 141–77.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Crain, Stephen & Thornton, Rosalind
   1998 Investigations in universal grammar: A guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Fukui, Naoki & Takano, Yuji
   2000 Nominal structure: An extension of the symmetry principle. InSvenonius, Peter (ed.), The derivation of VO and OV (Linguistics Today 31), 219–254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.31.09fuk
   https://doi.org/10.1075/la.31.09fuk [Google Scholar]
9. Gunji, Takao
   2002 Tango to bun no koozoo [Structures of words and sentences]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
10. Hara, Takaaki
    2001 Anaphoric expressions in Japanese. Linguistics in the Netherlands18(1). 113–125. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/avt.18.13ana
    https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.18.13ana [Google Scholar]
11. Hasegawa, Nobuko
    1988 Remarks on ‘zero pronominals’: In defense of Hasegawa (1984/85). InTawa, Wako & Nakayama, Mineharu (eds.), Proceedings of Japanese Syntax Workshop: Issues on empty categories, 50–76. New London: Connecticut College.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Hoji, Hajime
    1985 Logical form constraints and configurational structures in Japanese. Seattle: University of Washington. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
13. Hoshi, Koji
    2004 Remarks on N-final relativization in Japanese. English Language and Literature441. 113–147. Yokohama: Keio University.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Huang, C.-T. James & Liu, C.-S. Luther
    2001 Logophority, attitude, and ziji at the interface. InCole, Peter & Hermon, Gabriella & Huang, C.-T. James (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 33: Long distance reflexives, 141–195. Bingley: Emerald.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Ishii, Yasuo
    1991 Operators and empty categories in Japanese. Storrs: University of Connecticut. (Doctoral dissertation.) 10.1515/jjl‑1991‑0113
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jjl-1991-0113 [Google Scholar]
16. Ishizuka, Tomoko
    2010 Restrictive and non-restrictive relative clauses in Japanese: Antisymmetric approach. (Manuscript.)
    [Google Scholar]
17. Kameyama, Megumi
    1984 Subjective/logophoric bound anaphor zibun. InDrogo, Joseph & Mishra, Veena & Testen, David (eds.), CLS 20: Papers from the 20th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 228–238. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kameyama, Megumi
    1985 Zero Anaphora: The case of Japanese. Stanford: Stanford University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
19. Katada, Fusa
    1988 LF-binding of anaphors. InBorer, Hagit (ed.), WCCFL 7: Proceedings of the 7th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 171–186. Stanford: CSLI.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Katada, Fusa
    1991 The LF representation of anaphors. Linguistic Inquiry22(2). 287–313.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Kim, Ji-Hye & Yoon, James H.
    2009 Local-distance bound local anaphors in Korean – An empirical study of the Korean anaphor caki-casin. Lingua119(5). 733–755. 10.1016/j.lingua.2008.10.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.10.002 [Google Scholar]
22. Kishida, Maki
    2011 Reflexives in Japanese. College Park: University of Maryland. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kitao, Yasuyuki
    2009 The nature of relativization: A minimalist perspective. Osaka: Osaka University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
24. Kitao, Yasuyuki
    2011 The presence of head-raising and resumptive-stranding in Japanese relative clauses. Acta Linguistica Hungaria58(3). 313–335. 10.1556/ALing.58.2011.3.7
    https://doi.org/10.1556/ALing.58.2011.3.7 [Google Scholar]
25. Klein, Udo & Guntsetseg, Dolgor & von Heusinger, Klaus
    2012 Case in conflict: Embedded subjects in Mongolian. InLamers, Monique & de Swart, Peter (eds.), Case, word order and prominence: Interacting cues in language production and comprehension (Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics 40), 43–64. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑007‑1463‑2_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1463-2_3 [Google Scholar]
26. Kuno, Susumu
    1973 The structure of the Japanese language (Current Studies in Linguistics 3). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Kuno, Susumu
    1978 Danwa no bunpoo [Grammar of discourse]. Tokyo: Taishuukan.
28. Matsumoto, Yoshiko
    1997 Noun-modifying constructions in Japanese: A frame semantic approach (Studies in Language Companion Series 35). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.35
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.35 [Google Scholar]
29. McCawley, Noriko Akatsuka
    1976 Reflexivization: A transformational approach. InShibatani, Masayoshi (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, vol. 5: Japanese Generative Grammar, 51–116. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Morita, Hisashi
    2013 Optional movements derive Japanese relative clauses. US-China Foreign Language11(9). 645–658.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Murasugi, Keiko
    2000 An antisymmetry analysis of Japanese relative clauses. InAlexiadou, Artemis & Law, Paul & Meinunger, André & Wilder, Chris (eds.), The syntax of relative clauses (Linguistics Today 32), 231–264. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.32.07mur
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.32.07mur [Google Scholar]
32. Nakamura, Masaru
    1987 Parameterized extension of binding theory. InBrowning, M. A. & Czaykowska-Higgins, Ewa & Ritter, Elizabeth (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 9: The 25th anniversary of MIT Linguistics, 193–223. Cambridge: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Perlmutter, David
    1972 Evidence for shadow pronouns in French relativization. InPeranteau, Paul M. & Levi, Judith N. & Phares, Gloria C. (eds.), The Chicago which hunt: Papers from the Relative Clause Festival, a paravolume to papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 73–105. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Pollard, Carl & Sag, Ivan A.
    1992 Anaphors in English and the scope of binding theory. Linguistic Inquiry23(2). 261–303.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Schachter, Paul
    1973 Focus and relativization. Language49(1). 19–46. 10.2307/412101
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412101 [Google Scholar]