1887
Volume 22, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1606-822X
  • E-ISSN: 2309-5067
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

A degree sentence such as conveys both reciprocity and equivalence and hence are termed “Reciprocal Equatives” (RE). Building on Schwarz’s (2007) pioneer study, I suggest an account for this degree construction that covers a wider range of data. To the extent that the proposal is on the right track, it provides new support for building in plurality in the domain of degrees, an idea that has been put forward by Beck (20102014) and Dotlačil & Nouwen (2016).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00083.hsi
2021-03-17
2021-05-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alrenga, Peter & Kennedy, Christopher
    2014No more shall we part: Quantifiers in English comparatives. Natural Language Semantics22(1). 1–53. 10.1007/s11050‑013‑9099‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-013-9099-4 [Google Scholar]
  2. Barwise, Jon & Cooper, Robin
    1981 Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy4(2). 159–219. 10.1007/BF00350139
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00350139 [Google Scholar]
  3. Beck, Sigrid
    2000 The semantics of different: Comparison operator and relational adjective. Linguistics and Philosophy23(2). 101–139. 10.1023/A:1005566722022
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005566722022 [Google Scholar]
  4. 2001 Reciprocals are definites. Natural Language Semantics9(1). 69–138. 10.1023/A:1012203407127
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012203407127 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2010 Quantifiers in than-clauses. Semantics and Pragmatics3. 1–72. (Article 1.) 10.3765/sp.3.1
    https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.3.1 [Google Scholar]
  6. 2013 Lucinda driving too fast again – The scalar properties of ambiguous than-clauses. Journal of Semantics30(1). 1–63. 10.1093/jos/ffr011
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffr011 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2014 Plural predication and quantified ‘than’-clauses. InCrnič, Luka & Sauerland, Uli (eds.), The art and craft of semantics: A festschrift for Irene Heim, vol.1 (MITWPL 70), 91–115. Cambridge: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Brisson, Christine M.
    1998Distributivity, maximality, and floating quantifiers. New Brunswick: Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 2003 Plurals, all, and the nonuniformity of collective predication. Linguistics and Philosophy26(2). 129–184. 10.1023/A:1022771705575
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022771705575 [Google Scholar]
  10. Champollion, Lucas
    2016 Ten men and women got married today: Noun coordination and the intersective theory of conjunction. Journal of Semantics33(3). 561–622. 10.1093/jos/ffv008
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffv008 [Google Scholar]
  11. Chao, Yuen Ren
    1968A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen, Liping
    2005Dou-(dis)harmony in Chinese. InBateman, Leah & Ussery, Cherlon (eds.), NELS 35: Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, vol.1, 127–142. Amherst: GLSA, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 2008Dou: Distributivity and beyond. New Brunswick: Rutgers University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen
    1995 On dou-quantification. Journal of East Asian Linguistics4(3). 197–234. 10.1007/BF01731509
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01731509 [Google Scholar]
  15. Chierchia, Gennaro
    1998a Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of “semantic parameter”. InRothstein, Susan (ed.), Events and grammar (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 70), 53–103. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑3969‑4_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3969-4_4 [Google Scholar]
  16. 1998b Reference to kinds across language. Natural Language Semantics6(4). 339–405. 10.1023/A:1008324218506
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008324218506 [Google Scholar]
  17. Dayal, Veneeta
    2004 Number marking and (in)definiteness in kind terms. Linguistics and Philosophy27(4). 393–450. 10.1023/B:LING.0000024420.80324.67
    https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LING.0000024420.80324.67 [Google Scholar]
  18. Dotlačil, Jakub & Nouwen, Rick
    2016 The comparative and degree pluralities. Natural Language Semantics24(1). 45–78. 10.1007/s11050‑015‑9119‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-015-9119-7 [Google Scholar]
  19. Fitzgibbons, Natalia & Sharvit, Yael & Gajewski, Jon
    2008 Plural superlatives and distributivity. InFriedman, Tova & Ito, Satoshi (eds.), Proceedings of the 18th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (SALT 18), 302–318. Ithaca: Cornell University.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Gajewski, Jon
    2002 On analyticity in natural language. Cambridge: MIT. (Manuscript.) (https://jon-gajewski.uconn.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/1784/2016/08/analytic.pdf) (Accessed2020-09-01.)
  21. Hackl, Martin
    2000Comparative quantifiers. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Heim, Irene
    2006 Little. InGibson, Masayuki & Howell, Jonathan (eds.), Proceedings of the 16th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (SALT 16), 35–58. Ithaca: Cornell University.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Heim, Irene & Kratzer, Angelika
    1998Semantics in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Huang, Shi-Zhe
    1996Quantification and predication in Mandarin Chinese: A case study of dou. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Križ, Manuel
    2016 Homogeneity, non-maximality, and all. Journal of Semantics33(3). 493–539. 10.1093/jos/ffv006
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffv006 [Google Scholar]
  26. Lasersohn, Peter
    1999 Pragmatic halos. Language75(3). 522–551. 10.2307/417059
    https://doi.org/10.2307/417059 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lee, Thomas Hun-Tak
    1986Studies on quantification in Chinese. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Lin, Jo-wang
    1998 Distributivity in Chinese and its implications. Natural Language Semantics6(2). 201–243. 10.1023/A:1008299031574
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008299031574 [Google Scholar]
  29. 2014 The adjective of quantity duo ‘many/much’ and differential comparatives in Mandarin Chinese. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics1(2). 163–191. 10.1075/ijchl.1.2.01lin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.1.2.01lin [Google Scholar]
  30. Link, Godehard
    1983 The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice-theoretical approach. InBäuerle, Rainer & Schwarze, Christoph & von Stechow, Arnim (eds.), Meaning, use, and interpretation of language, 302–323. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110852820.302
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110852820.302 [Google Scholar]
  31. Matushansky, Ora
    2008 More of the same. (Paper presented atGLOW 31, Newcastle upon Tyne, 26–28 March 2008.)
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Paris, Marie-Claude
    2008 On parts of speech in Chinese: Gen. The Linguistic Review25(3–4). 347–366.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Partee, Barbara H. & Rooth, Mats
    1983 Generalized conjunction and type ambiguity. InBäuerle, Rainer & Schwarze, Christoph & von Stechow, Arnim (eds.), Meaning, use, and interpretation of language, 361–383. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110852820.361
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110852820.361 [Google Scholar]
  34. Reinhart, Tanya
    1997 Quantifier scope: How labor is divided between QR and choice functions. Linguistics and Philosophy20(4). 335–397. 10.1023/A:1005349801431
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005349801431 [Google Scholar]
  35. Rett, Jessica
    2008Degree modification in natural language. New Brunswick: Rutgers University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Schwarz, Bernhard
    2007 Reciprocal equatives. InMcNally, Louise & Puig-Waldmüller, Estela (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 11, 568–582. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Schwarzschild, Roger
    1996Pluralities (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 61). Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑017‑2704‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2704-4 [Google Scholar]
  38. Schwarzschild, Roger & Wilkinson, Karina
    2002 Quantifiers in comparatives: A semantics of degree based on intervals. Natural Language Semantics10(1). 1–41. 10.1023/A:1015545424775
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015545424775 [Google Scholar]
  39. Solt, Stephanie
    2015 Q-adjectives and the semantics of quantity. Journal of Semantics32(2). 221–273. 10.1093/jos/fft018
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/fft018 [Google Scholar]
  40. Sternefeld, Wolfgang
    1998 Reciprocity and cumulative predication. Natural Language Semantics6(3). 303–337. 10.1023/A:1008352502939
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008352502939 [Google Scholar]
  41. Winter, Yoad
    1997 Choice functions and the scopal semantics of indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy20(4). 399–467. 10.1023/A:1005354323136
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005354323136 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00083.hsi
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error