1887
Volume 23, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1606-822X
  • E-ISSN: 2309-5067

Abstract

Abstract

This article proposes a new account for the typologically uncommon grammaticalization path from an adjective meaning ‘tight’ to a progressive aspect marker in Cantonese. I take a formal approach to explain the cognitive foundations in such a grammaticalization path by using formal semantic theories and tools. There are two components in the meaning of the progressive aspect, i.e. temporal inclusion and dynamism. The meaning ‘tight’ is transferred from the spatial domain to describe the close succession of events, which gives rise to the dynamic meaning component. Furthermore, this eventual dynamism is mapped to the temporal domain, which corresponds to the regular partition of the time interval with an infinitesimal measure in the semantics proposed by Deo (2009). My analysis is extended to explain the Cantonese habitual marker with an original meaning ‘open’, and to the use of morphological reduplication to express the imperfective aspect in languages from the Austronesian and Pama-Nyungan families. The theoretical contribution of this article is that the grammaticalization paths of certain aspect markers share a common cognitive foundation in terms of space, events, and time, but they may take different trajectories of evolution that target different parts of a functional morpheme with complex meanings.

Available under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00103.don
2022-03-29
2022-05-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lali.00103.don.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00103.don&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bonomi, Andrea
    1997 Aspect, quantification and when-clauses in Italian. Linguistics and Philosophy20(5). 469–514. 10.1023/A:1005388230492
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005388230492 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bybee, Joan & Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William
    1994The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chappell, Hilary
    1992 Towards a typology of aspect in Sinitic languages. Zhongguo jingnei yuyan ji yuyanxue diyiji: Hanyu fangyan [Chinese languages and linguistics I: Chinese dialects] (Symposium Series of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, No. 2), 67–106. Taipei: Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cheung, Hung-nin Samuel
    1972Xianggang Yueyu yufa de yanjiu [Studies on Cantonese grammar as spoken in Hong Kong]. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Comrie, Bernard
    1976Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Deo, Ashwini
    2009 Unifying the imperfective and the progressive: Partitions as quantificational domains. Linguistics and Philosophy32(5). 475–521. 10.1007/s10988‑010‑9068‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-010-9068-z [Google Scholar]
  7. 2015 The semantic and pragmatic underpinnings of grammaticalization paths: The progressive to imperfective shift. Semantics and Pragmatics8. 1–52. (Article 14.) 10.3765/sp.8.14
    https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.8.14 [Google Scholar]
  8. de Swart, Henriëtte
    1998 Aspect shift and coercion. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory16(2). 347–385. 10.1023/A:1005916004600
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005916004600 [Google Scholar]
  9. Dong, Hongyuan
    2018Semantics of Chinese questions: An interface approach. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781351021586
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351021586 [Google Scholar]
  10. Eckardt, Regine
    2006Meaning change in grammaticalization: An enquiry into semantic reanalysis. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199262601.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199262601.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  11. Graff, Delia & Williamson, Timothy
    2017[2002]Vagueness. Abingdon: Routledge. (First published in 2002 byDartmouth Publishing Company and Ashgate Publishing.) 10.4324/9781315235158
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315235158 [Google Scholar]
  12. Hershberger, Ruth
    1964 A tentative grammatical statement of the simple clause in Gugu-Yalanji. InOates, William J. & Oates, Lynette F. (eds.), Gugu-Yalanji and Wik-Munkan language studies (Occasional Papers in Aboriginal Studies 2), 24–48. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Johnston, Raymond Leslie
    1980Nakanai of New Britain: The grammar of an Oceanic language (Pacific Linguistics Series B-70). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, The Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kennedy, Christopher & McNally, Louise
    2005 Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language81(2). 345–381. 10.1353/lan.2005.0071
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2005.0071 [Google Scholar]
  15. Kwok, Helen
    1971A linguistic study of the Cantonese verb (Centre of Asian Studies Occasional Papers and Monographs 5). Hong Kong: Centre of Asian Studies, University of Hong Kong.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lin, Jo-Wang
    2006 Time in a language without tense: The case of Chinese. Journal of Semantics23(1). 1–53. 10.1093/jos/ffh033
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffh033 [Google Scholar]
  17. Lister-Turner, R. & Clark, J. B.
    n.d.A grammar of the Motu language of Papua. 2nd edn.Sydney: A. H. Pettifer, Government Printer.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Matthews, Stephen & Yip, Virginia
    1994Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Mei, Tsu-Lin
    1981 Xiandai Hanyu wanchengmao jushi he ciwei de laiyuan [The origin of the sentence-type of perfective aspect and the perfective suffix in Modern Chinese]. Yuyan Yanjiu [Studies in Language and Linguistics] 1980(1). 65–77.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Moravcsik, Edith A.
    1978 Reduplicative constructions. InGreenberg, Joseph H. & Ferguson, Charles A. & Moravcsik, Edith A. (eds.), Universals of human language, vol. 3: Word structure, 297–334. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Palmer, Bill
    2009Kokota grammar (Oceanic Linguistics Special Publication 35). Honolulu: University of Hawaiʻi Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Patz, Elisabeth
    2002A grammar of the Kuku Yalanji language of north Queensland (Pacific Linguistics 527). Melbourne: Pacific Linguistics, The Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Sayers, Barbara J. & Godfrey, Marie P.
    1964 Outline description of the alphabet and grammar of a dialect of Wik-Munkan spoken at Coen, North Queensland. InOates, William J. & Oates, Lynette F. (eds.), Gugu-Yalanji and Wik-Munkan Language Studies (Occasional Papers in Aboriginal Studies 2), 49–78. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Spaelti, Philip
    1997Dimensions of variation in multi-pattern reduplication. Santa Cruz: University of California, Santa Cruz. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Dasher, Richard B.
    2001Regularity in semantic change (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 97). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486500
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486500 [Google Scholar]
  26. Zeitoun, Elizabeth & Chu, Tai-hwa & Lalo a tahesh kaybaybaw
    2015A study of Saisiyat morphology (Oceanic Linguistics Special Publication 40). Honolulu: University of Hawaiʻi Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00103.don
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00103.don
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error