1887
Volume 23, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1606-822X
  • E-ISSN: 2309-5067

Abstract

Abstract

This paper provides a first overview of verb stem alternation in Gongduk (eastern Bhutan, Trans-Himalayan). Verb stem alternation in Gongduk is conditioned both by morphophonology and by grammatical categories. This paper presents both the morphophonologically transparent as well as the phonologically opaque, paradigmatic stem alternation. The analysis provided in this paper identifies seven verb classes and a small number of irregular verbs. Additionally, this paper provides some diachronic observations on Gongduk verb stems and shows that different stem classes of Gongduk preserve derivational morphology (valence, direction) with cognates in other branches of the language family. Gongduk therefore provides important evidence for the historical investigation of derivational morphology and verb stem alternation in Trans-Himalayan.

Available under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00105.ger
2022-03-29
2022-05-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lali.00105.ger.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00105.ger&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bauman, James John
    1975Pronouns and pronominal morphology in Tibeto-Burman. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baxter, William H. & Sagart, Laurent
    2014Baxter-Sagart Old Chinese reconstruction (https://ocbaxtersagart.lsait.lsa.umich.edu/BaxterSagartOCbyMandarinMC2014-09-20.pdf) (Accessed2021-07-05.) (Version 1.1, 20September 2014.) 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945375.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945375.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  3. Benedict, Paul K.
    1972Sino-Tibetan: A conspectus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511753541
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753541 [Google Scholar]
  4. Caughley, Ross
    2000Dictionary of Chepang: A Tibeto-Burman language of Nepal (Pacific Linguistics 502). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics (The Australian National University).
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Coblin, W. South
    1976 Notes on Tibetan verbal morphology. T’oung Pao: International Journal of Chinese Studies62(1). 45–70. 10.1163/156853276X00034
    https://doi.org/10.1163/156853276X00034 [Google Scholar]
  6. DeLancey, Scott
    2003 Lhasa Tibetan. InThurgood, Graham & LaPolla, Randy J. (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 270–288. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Doornenbal, Marius
    2009A grammar of Bantawa: Grammar, paradigm tables, glossary and texts of a Rai language of Eastern Nepal (LOT Dissertation Series 222). Utrecht: LOT Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gerber, Pascal
    2019 Gongduk agreement morphology in functional and diachronic perspective. (Paper presented at theISBS Inaugural Conference, Magdalen College, University of Oxford, 10 January 2019.)
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 2020 Areal features in Gongduk, Bjokapakha and Black Mountain Mönpa phonology. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area43(1). 55–86. 10.1075/ltba.18015.ger
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.18015.ger [Google Scholar]
  10. Gerber, Pascal & Grollmann, Selin
    2018 What is Kiranti? A critical account. Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics11(1-2). 99–152. 10.1163/2405478X‑01101010
    https://doi.org/10.1163/2405478X-01101010 [Google Scholar]
  11. Grollmann, Selin & Gerber, Pascal
    2018 Linguistic evidence for a closer relationship between Lhokpu and Dhimal: Including some remarks on the Dhimalish subgroup. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale47(1). 1–96. 10.1163/19606028‑04701004
    https://doi.org/10.1163/19606028-04701004 [Google Scholar]
  12. Hill, Nathan W.
    2014 Grammatically conditioned sound change. Language and Linguistics Compass8(6). 211–229. 10.1111/lnc3.12073
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12073 [Google Scholar]
  13. Jacques, Guillaume
    2012 An internal reconstruction of Tibetan stem alternations. Transactions of the Philological Society110(2). 212–224. 10.1111/j.1467‑968X.2012.01293.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2012.01293.x [Google Scholar]
  14. 2016 How many *-s suffixes in Old Chinese?Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics9(2). 205–217. 10.1163/2405478X‑00902014
    https://doi.org/10.1163/2405478X-00902014 [Google Scholar]
  15. 2017 A reconstruction of Proto-Kiranti verb roots. Folia Linguistica Historica38. 177–215. 10.1515/flih‑2017‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flih-2017-0007 [Google Scholar]
  16. Jacques, Guillaume & Lahaussois, Aimée & Rai, Dhan Bahadur & Kumar, Yadav
    2015Khaling-Nepali-English verb dictionary (Version 1.0). (himalco.huma-num.fr/dictionaries/ViewDictionary.php?alphabet=ipa&dict=khaling&lang1=eng&langn=cmn&sortorder=sort_order.xml) (Accessed2021-07-07.)
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Jäschke, Heinrich August
    1881A Tibetan-English dictionary: With special reference to the prevailing dialects, to which is added an English-Tibetan vocabulary. London: Unger Brothers.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. King, John T.
    2009A grammar of Dhimal (Languages of the Greater Himalayan Region 8). Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lahaussois, Aimée
    2002Aspects of the grammar of Thulung Rai: An endangered Himalayan language. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
  20. LaPolla, Randy J.
    2003 Overview of Sino-Tibetan morphosyntax. InThurgood, Graham & LaPolla, Randy J. (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 22–42. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Matisoff, James A.
    2003Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and philosophy of Sino-Tibetan reconstruction (University of California Publications in Linguistics 135). Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Michailovsky, Boyd
    1985 Tibeto-Burman dental suffixes: Evidence from Limbu (Nepal). InThurgood, Graham & Matisoff, James A. & Bradley, David (eds.), Linguistics of the Sino-Tibetan area: The state of the art, papers presented to Paul K. Benedict for his 71st birthday (Pacific Linguistics Series C87), 363–375. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics (The Australian National University).
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 1988La langue hayu (Collection Sciences du Langage). Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Opgenort, Jean Robert
    2004A grammar of Wambule: Grammar, lexicon, texts and cultural survey of a Kiranti tribe of Eastern Nepal (Languages of the Greater Himalayan Region 2). Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789047414131
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047414131 [Google Scholar]
  25. Plaisier, Heleen
    2007A Grammar of Lepcha (Languages of the Greater Himalayan Region 5). Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/ej.9789004155251.i‑256
    https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004155251.i-256 [Google Scholar]
  26. Post, Mark W. & Modi, Yankee
    2018 Not quite “middle”: Subject autonomy marking in Milang, Tani and Tibeto-Burman. (Talk given at theICSTLL 51, Kyoto University, 28 September 2018.)
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Rüfenacht, Sara
    2018Die kritische Betrachtung eines Klassifikationsvorschlags der Sprache Thangmi [The critical examination of a classification proposal of the Thangmi language]. Bern: University of Bern. (Bachelor’s thesis.)
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Rutgers, Roland
    1998Yamphu: Grammar, texts and lexicon (Languages of the Greater Himalayan Region 2). Leiden: Research School of Asian, African, and Amerindian Studies (CNWS), Leiden University.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Sagart, Laurent
    1999The roots of Old Chinese (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 184). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.184
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.184 [Google Scholar]
  30. Sotrug, Yeshy T.
    2015Linguistic evidence for madeskā kirãtī: The phylogenetic position of Dhimalish. Bern: University of Bern. (Master’s thesis.)
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Tolsma, Gerard Jacobus
    2006A grammar of Kulung (Languages of the Greater Himalayan Region 4). Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Turin, Mark
    2012A grammar of the Thangmi language: With an ethnolinguistic introduction to the speakers and their culture (Languages of the Greater Himalayan Region 6). Leiden: Brill. (2vols.)
    [Google Scholar]
  33. van Breugel, Seino
    2014A grammar of Atong (Brill’s Studies in South and Southwest Asian Languages 5). Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004258938
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004258938 [Google Scholar]
  34. van Driem, George
    1987A grammar of Limbu (Mouton Grammar Library 4). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110846812
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110846812 [Google Scholar]
  35. 1990 The fall and rise of the phoneme /r/ in Eastern Kiranti: Sound change in Tibeto-Burman. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies53(1). 83–86. 10.1017/S0041977X00021273
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X00021273 [Google Scholar]
  36. 1993aA grammar of Dumi (Mouton Grammar Library 10). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110880915
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110880915 [Google Scholar]
  37. 1993b The Proto-Tibeto-Burman verbal agreement system. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies56(2). 292–334. 10.1017/S0041977X00005528
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X00005528 [Google Scholar]
  38. 1998Dzongkha (Languages of the Greater Himalayan Region 1). Leiden: Research School of Asian, African, and Amerindian Studies (CNWS), Leiden University.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 2001Languages of the Himalayas: An ethnolinguistic handbook of the Greater Himalayan region containing an introduction to the symbiotic theory of language (Handbook of Oriental Studies. Section 2 South Asia 10). Leiden: Brill. (2vols.) 10.1163/9789004492530
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004492530 [Google Scholar]
  40. 2013 Biactantial agreement in the Gongduk transitive verb in the broader Tibeto-Burman context. InThornes, Timothy J. & Andvik, Erik & Hyslop, Gwendolyn & Jansen, Joana (eds.), Functional-historical approaches to explanation: In honor of Scott DeLancey (Typological Studies in Language 103), 69–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.103.04van
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.103.04van [Google Scholar]
  41. Watters, David E.
    2002A grammar of Kham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486883
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486883 [Google Scholar]
  42. Wolfenden, Stuart Norris
    1929Outlines of Tibeto-Burman linguistic morphology: With special reference to the prefixes, infixes and suffixes of classical Tibetan and the languages of the Kachin, Bodo, Nâgâ, Kuki-Chin and Burma groups (Prize Publication Fund XII). London: Royal Asiatic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00105.ger
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00105.ger
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): derivational morphology; Gongduk; stem alternation; Trans-Himalayan; verbal morphology
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error