1887
Volume 23, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1606-822X
  • E-ISSN: 2309-5067

Abstract

Abstract

I critique traditional simplex approaches to Tangut Grade by primary reference to Xun Gong’s new suggestion that Grade I/II syllables were contrastively uvularized. Such proposals are rooted in the categories of philological Middle Chinese (MC), but the Grades are at the same time incommensurate with MC in reflecting the effects of apicalization, labiodentalization, and other changes affecting vocalism across northern late medieval Chinese languages (NLMC). Attention to these details suggests that Tangut Grade concerned vowel quality , not simplex diagnostic segments or features. Gong’s correspondence between Tangut Grade I/II K- and Rgyalrong Q- also has parallels in NLMC and will require a narrower solution within proposed Qiangic.

Available under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00107.smi
2022-03-29
2022-05-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lali.00107.smi.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00107.smi&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Baxter, William H.
    1992A handbook of Old Chinese phonology (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 64). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110857085
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110857085 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baxter, William H. & Sagart, Laurent
    2014Old Chinese: A new reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945375.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945375.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  3. Branner, David Prager
    2006 Simon Schaank and the evolution of Western beliefs about traditional Chinese phonology. InBranner, David Prager (ed.), The Chinese rime tables: Linguistic philosophy and historical-comparative phonology (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 271), 151–167. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.271.10bra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.271.10bra [Google Scholar]
  4. Chan, Abraham
    2004 Early Middle Chinese: Towards a new paradigm. T’oung Pao: International Journal of Chinese Studies90(1). 122–162. 10.1163/1568532042523149
    https://doi.org/10.1163/1568532042523149 [Google Scholar]
  5. Chao, Yuen Ren
    1941 Distinctions within Ancient Chinese. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies5(3-4). 203–233. 10.2307/2717913
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2717913 [Google Scholar]
  6. Coblin, W. South
    1990 Notes on Sanghabhara’s Mahamayuri transcriptions. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale19(2). 195–251. 10.3406/clao.1990.1329
    https://doi.org/10.3406/clao.1990.1329 [Google Scholar]
  7. 1991aStudies in Old Northwest Chinese (Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series 4). Hong Kong: Chinese University Press. (Published on behalf of Project on Linguistic Analysis, University of California, Berkeley.)
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 1991b Thoughts on dentilabialization in the Tang-time dialects of Shazhou. T’oung Pao: International Journal of Chinese Studies77(1). 88–107. 10.1163/156853291X00136
    https://doi.org/10.1163/156853291X00136 [Google Scholar]
  9. 1994A compendium of phonetics in northwest Chinese. (Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series 7). Hong Kong: Chinese University Press. (Published on behalf of Project on Linguistic Analysis, University of California, Berkeley.)
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 1999 Thoughts on the identity of the Chinese ’Phags-pa dialect. InSimmons, Richard VanNess (ed.), Issues in Chinese dialect description and classification (Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series 15), 84–144. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press. (Published on behalf of Project on Linguistic Analysis, University of California, Berkeley.)
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 2000a A diachronic study of Míng Guānhuà phonology. Monumenta Serica: Journal of Oriental Studies48(1). 267–335. 10.1080/02549948.2000.11731346
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02549948.2000.11731346 [Google Scholar]
  12. 2000b A brief history of Mandarin. Journal of the American Oriental Society120(4). 537–552. 10.2307/606615
    https://doi.org/10.2307/606615 [Google Scholar]
  13. 2000c Late apicalization in Nankingese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics28(1). 52–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 2001 ’Phags-pa Chinese and the standard reading pronunciation of Early Míng: A comparative study. Language & Linguistics2(2). 1–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 2007A handbook of ’Phags-pa Chinese (ABC Chinese Dictionary Series). Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Csongor, B.
    1952 Chinese in the Uighur script of the T’ang period. Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae [An International Journal of Oriental Studies] 2(1). 73–121.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 1962 Chinese glosses in Uighur texts written in Brahmi. Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae [An International Journal of Oriental Studies] 15(1). 49–53.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gong, Hwang-cherng
    1994 A hypothesis of three grades and vowel length distinction in Tangut. Ajia Afurika gengo bunka kenkyū [Journal of Asian and African Studies] (46-47). 305–314.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 2002 Shi’er shijimo Hanyu xibei fangyin yunmu xitong de gouni [Reconstruction of the syllable finals system of late 12th century northwestern Chinese]. Han-Zangyu yanjiu lunwenji [Collected papers on Sino-Tibetan linguistics] (Language and Linguistics Monograph Series C2-2), 331–377. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics (Preparatory Office), Academia Sinica.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Gong, Xun
    2020 Uvulars and uvularization in Tangut phonology. Language & Linguistics21(2). 175–212. 10.1075/lali.00060.gon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00060.gon [Google Scholar]
  21. Jacques, Guillaume
    2007Textes tangoutes I: Nouveau recueil sur l’amour parental et la piété filiale (Languages of the World. Text Collections 25). Munich: Lincom Europa. (https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00174952v2) (Accessed2019-05-01.)
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 2014Esquisse de phonologie et de morphologie historique du tangoute [A sketch of the historical phonology and morphology of Tangut] (The Languages of Asia Series 12). Leiden: Global Oriental. 10.1163/9789004264854
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004264854 [Google Scholar]
  23. Karlgren, Bernhard
    1915Études sur la phonologie Chinoise [Studies on Chinese phonology], vol.1. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 1922 The reconstruction of Ancient Chinese. T’oung Pao: International Journal of Chinese Studies21(1). 1–42. 10.1163/156853222X00015
    https://doi.org/10.1163/156853222X00015 [Google Scholar]
  25. Lau, D. C. & Ho, Che Wah & Chen, Fong Ching
    2000Zhuangzi zhuzi suoyin [A concordance to the Zhuangzi] (The ICS Ancient Chinese Texts Concordance Series: Philosophical works 43). Hong Kong: Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Li, Fang-Kuei
    1971 Shangguyin yanjiu [Studies on archaic Chinese phonology]. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies9(1-2). 1–61.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Li, Fanwen
    1997Xia-Han zidian [Tangut-Chinese dictionary]. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Li, Rong
    1952Qieyun yinxi [The sound system of the Qieyun]. Beijng: Chinese Academy of Sciences.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Maspero, Henri
    1920 Le dialecte de Tch’ang-ngan sous les T’ang [The dialect of Chang’an duing the Tang]. Bulletin de l’École française d’Extrême-Orient [Bulletin of the French School of the Far East] 20(2). 1–119. 10.3406/befeo.1920.5549
    https://doi.org/10.3406/befeo.1920.5549 [Google Scholar]
  30. Miyake, Marc Hideo
    2012 Complexity from compression: A sketch of Pre-Tangut. InPopova, Irina (ed.), Тангуты в Центральной Азии: Cборник статей в честь 80-летия профессора Е. И. Кычанова [Tanguts in Central Asia: A collection of articles marking the 80th birthday of Professor E. I. Kychanov], 244–261. Moscow: Oriental Literature.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. 2015 Grading Tangut rhymes: An exercise in futility? (Presentation at theTangut Studies Workshop, Centre for the Study of Manuscript Cultures, University of Hamburg, 14 December 2015.) (https://www.academia.edu/35181570/Grading_Tangut_rhymes_an_exercise_in_futility) (Accessed2019-05-01.)
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Norman, Jerry
    1994 Pharyngealization in early Chinese. Journal of the American Oriental Society114(3). 397–408. 10.2307/605083
    https://doi.org/10.2307/605083 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2006 Modern Chinese and the rime tables. InBranner, David Prager (ed.), The Chinese rime tables: Linguistic philosophy and historical-comparative phonology (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 271), 183–188. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.271.13nor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.271.13nor [Google Scholar]
  34. Peng, Xiang-qian
    2012Xixiawen “Mengzi” zhengli yanjiu [Organization and study of the Tangut Mengzi]. Shanghai: Shanghai Classics Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Pulleyblank, Edwin G.
    1962 The consonantal system of Old Chinese. Asia Major: New Series9(1). 58–144.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 1965 The transcription of Sanskrit K and KH in Chinese. Asia Major: New Series11(2). 199–210.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. 1977–1978 The final consonants of Old Chinese. Monumenta Serica: Journal of Oriental Studies33(1). 180–206. 10.1080/02549948.1977.11745046
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02549948.1977.11745046 [Google Scholar]
  38. 1979 Some examples of colloquial pronunciation from the Southern Liang dynasty. InBauer, Wolfgang (ed.), Studia Sino-Mongolica: Festschrift für Herbert Franke [Sino-Mongolian Studies: Festschrift for Herbert Franke] (Münchener Ostasiatische Studien [Munich East Asian Studies] 25), 315–328. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 1984Middle Chinese: A study in historical phonology. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 1991Lexicon of reconstructed pronunciation in Early Middle Chinese, Late Middle Chinese, and Early Mandarin. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 1996 Prosody or pharyngealization in Old Chinese? The origin of the distinction between Type A and Type B syllables. Journal of the American Oriental Society116(1). 105–107. 10.2307/606377
    https://doi.org/10.2307/606377 [Google Scholar]
  42. Schaank, S. H.
    1897 Ancient Chinese phonetics. T’oung Pao: International Journal of Chinese Studies8(4). 361–377. 10.1163/156853297X00293
    https://doi.org/10.1163/156853297X00293 [Google Scholar]
  43. 1897 Ancient Chinese phonetics: II. T’oung Pao: International Journal of Chinese Studies8(5). 457–486. 10.1163/156853297X00383
    https://doi.org/10.1163/156853297X00383 [Google Scholar]
  44. 1898 Ancient Chinese phonetics: III. T’oung Pao: International Journal of Chinese Studies9(1). 28–57. 10.1163/156853298X00021
    https://doi.org/10.1163/156853298X00021 [Google Scholar]
  45. Schuessler, Axel
    2006 The Qièyùn system ‘Divisions’ as the result of vowel warping. InBranner, David Prager (ed.), The Chinese rime tables: Linguistic philosophy and historical-comparative phonology (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 271), 83–96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.271.06sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.271.06sch [Google Scholar]
  46. Shen, Ruiqing
    2017 Děng 等 (Division and rank). InSybesma, Rint & Behr, Wolfgang & Gu, Yueguo & Handel, Zev & Huang, C.-T. James & Myers, James (eds.), Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics, vol.2, 13–20. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Shen, Zhongwei
    2008 Apicalization and its related changes before and after the Menggu ziyun. Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics2(2). 15–33. 10.1163/2405478X‑90000037
    https://doi.org/10.1163/2405478X-90000037 [Google Scholar]
  48. Takata, Tokio
    1988Tonkō shiryō ni yoru Chūgokugo shi no kenkyū: 9–10 seiki no Kasei hōgen [The history of Chinese via the Dunhuang materials: Hexi dialects of the 9th and 10th centuries]. Tokyo: Sōbunsha.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. The Commercial Press
    The Commercial Press 1983–1986Yingyin Wenyuange Siku quanshu [Photographic reprinting of the Wenyuan Pavilion Siku quanshu]. Taipei: The Commercial Press. (1,500vols.)
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Vovin, Alexander & McCraw, David
    2011 Old Turkic kinship terms in early Middle Chinese. Türk Dili Araştırmaları Yıllığı Belleten [Annual Bulletin of Turkish Language Studies] 59(1). 105–116.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Weng, Dujian
    1935Daozang zimu yinde [Combined indexes to the authors and titles of books in two collections of Taoist literature] (Harvard-Yenching Institute Sinological Index Series 25). Beijing: Yenching University. (Reprinted in 1966, Taipei: Cheng Wen.)
    [Google Scholar]
  52. West, Andrew
    2008Radical index to Li Fanwen’s Tangut dictionary (1997 edition). (www.babelstone.co.uk/Tangut/XHZD_Index.pdf) (Accessed2019-05-01.)
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Zeng, Yunqian
    1927 Qieyun wu sheng wushiyi niu kao [On five sound categories and fifty-one onsets in the Qieyun]. Dongbei Daxue Xueshu Jikan [Journal of Northeastern University] 1927(1). 14–21.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00107.smi
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00107.smi
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): division; grade; rank; Tangut; uvularization
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error