oa Formation of Modern Chinese speech-quotative nǐ shuō ‘you say’ and feedback-seeking nǐ shuō ‘you tell me’

References

1. Aijmer, Karin
   1997 I think – An English modal particle. InSwan, Toril & Westvik, Olaf Jansen (eds.), Modality in Germanic languages: Historical and comparative perspectives (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 99), 1–47. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110889932.1
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110889932.1 [Google Scholar]
2. Biber, Douglas & Johansson, Stig & Leech, Geoffrey & Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
   1999 Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Brinton, Laurel J.
   1996 Pragmatic markers in English: Grammaticalization and discourse functions (Topics in English Linguistics 19). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110907582
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110907582 [Google Scholar]
4. Brinton, Laurel J.
   2008 The comment clause in English: Syntactic origins and pragmatic development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511551789
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511551789 [Google Scholar]
5. Brinton, Laurel J.
   2015 Historical discourse analysis. InTannen, Deborah & Hamilton, Heidi E. & Schiffrin, Deborah (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis, 2nd edn., vol.11, 222–243. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Brinton, Laurel J.
   2017 The evolution of pragmatic markers in English: Pathways of change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316416013
   https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316416013 [Google Scholar]
7. Cao, Xiuling
   2010 Cong zhuwei jiegou dao huayu biaoji – “wo/ni V” de yufahua ji xiangguan wenti [From subject-predicate structure to discourse marker – Grammaticalization of Wo/Ni V]. Hanyu Xuexi [Chinese Language Learning] 2010(5). 38–50.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Chui, Kawai
   1994 Grammaticalization of the saying verb wa in Cantonese. Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics51. 1–13.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Dehé, Nicole
   2014 Parentheticals in spoken English: The syntax-prosody relation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139032391
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139032391 [Google Scholar]
10. Dixon, R. M. W.
    2006 Complement clauses and complementation strategies in typological perspective. InDixon, R. M. W. & Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds.), Complementation: A cross-linguistic typology (Explorations in Linguistic Typology 3), 1–48. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Dong, Xiufang
    2003 “X shuo” de cihuihua [On the lexicalization of X shuo]. Yuyan Kexue [Linguistic Sciences] 2(2). 46–57.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Dong, Xiufang
    2008 Shiji yupian zhong zhijie yinyu yu jianjie yinyu de hunyong xianxiang [Blending of direct discourse and indirect discourse in actual texts]. Yuyan Kexue [Linguistic Sciences] 7(4). 367–376.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Fischer, Olga
    2007 The development of English parentheticals: A case of grammaticalization?InSmit, Ute & Dollinger, Stephan & Hüttner, Julia & Kaltenböck, Gunther & Lutzky, Ursula (eds.), Tracing English through time: Explorations in language variation. A festschrift for Herbert Schendl on the occasion of his 65th birthday (Austrian Studies in English 95), 99–114. Vienna: Braumüller.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Fitzmaurice, Susan
    2004 Subjectivity, intersubjectivity and the historical construction of interlocutor stance: From stance markers to discourse markers. Discourse Studies6(4). 427–448. 10.1177/1461445604046585
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445604046585 [Google Scholar]
15. Frajzyngier, Zygmunt
    1995 A functional theory of complementizers. InBybee, Joan L. & Fleischman, Suzanne (eds.), Modality in grammar and discourse (Typological Studies in Language 32), 473–502. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.32.21fra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.32.21fra [Google Scholar]
16. Givón, Talmy
    1980 The binding hierarchy and the typology of complements. Studies in Language4(3). 333–377. 10.1075/sl.4.3.03giv
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.4.3.03giv [Google Scholar]
17. Gu, Feng
    2007 Cong yanshuo yi dongci dao yuqici – Shuo Shanggu Hanyu “yun” de yufahua [From saying verb to sentence-final particle: The grammaticalization of yun in Archaic Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language] 2007(3). 231–236.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Guan, Zhibin
    2011 Biao zhengxun de huayu biaoji “ni shuo” [On ni shuo as the discourse marker of inquiry]. Fuyang Shifan Xueyuan Xuebao (Shehui Kexue Ban) [Journal of Fuyang Teachers College (Social Science Edition)] 2011(3). 5–9. (Fuyang Teachers College was renamed as Fuyang Normal University from June 2019.)
    [Google Scholar]
19. Guo, Rui
    2009 Xiandai Hanyu he Gudai Hanyu zhong de jieci xuankong he jieci shanchu [Preposition stranding and deletion in Mandarin and Classic Chinese]. InGuo, Xi-liang & Lu, Guo-yao (eds.), Zhongguo yuyanxue (Di er ji) [Chinese linguistics (Volume 2)], 23–36. Jinan: Shandong Education Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Harris, Alice C. & Campbell, Lyle
    1995 Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 74). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620553
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620553 [Google Scholar]
21. Heine, Bernd
    2013 On discourse markers: Grammaticalization, pragmaticalization, or something else?Linguistics51(6). 1205–1247. 10.1515/ling‑2013‑0048
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2013-0048 [Google Scholar]
22. Heine, Bernd
    2016 Extra-clausal constituents and language contact: The case of discourse markers. InKaltenböck, Gunther & Keizer, Evelien & Lohmann, Arne (eds.), Outside the clause: Form and function of extra-clausal constituents (Studies in Language Companion Series 178), 243–272. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.178.09hei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.178.09hei [Google Scholar]
23. Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
    2002 World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511613463
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613463 [Google Scholar]
24. Heine, Bernd & Kaltenböck, Gunther & Kuteva, Tania & Long, Haiping
    2013 An outline of discourse grammar. InBischoff, Shannon T. & Jany, Carmen (eds.), Functional approaches to language (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 248), 155–206. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110285321.155
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110285321.155 [Google Scholar]
25. Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania & Kaltenböck, Gunther
    2014 Discourse grammar, the dual process model, and brain lateralization: Some correlations. Language and Cognition6(1). 146–180. 10.1017/langcog.2013.3
    https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2013.3 [Google Scholar]
26. Heine, Bernd & Kaltenböck, Gunther & Kuteva, Tania & Long, Haiping
    2017 Cooptation as a discourse strategy. Linguistics55(4). 813–855. 10.1515/ling‑2017‑0012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2017-0012 [Google Scholar]
27. Hooper, Joan B.
    1975 On assertive predicates. InKimball, John P. (ed.), Syntax and semantics, vol.41, 91–124. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Hopper, Paul J.
    1991 On some principles of grammaticalization. InTraugott, Elizabeth Closs & Heine, Bernd (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization: Volume I. Theoretical and methodological issues (Typological Studies in Language 19:1), 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hop [Google Scholar]
29. Hu, Wenjing
    2011 “Ni shuo” de yuyi yanbian ji qi yinfa de yuyong gongneng [The semantic evolution of ni shuo and its pragmatic functions]. Qiqihaer Daxue Xuebao (Zhexue Shehui Kexue Ban) [Journal of Qiqihar University (Philosophy & Social Science Edition)] 2011(3). 134–137.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Huang, Shuanfan
    2013 Chinese grammar at work (Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse 1). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scld.1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scld.1 [Google Scholar]
31. Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K.
    2002 The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316423530
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316423530 [Google Scholar]
32. Kou, Xin & Yuan, Yulin
    2019 Gongyongyi dui guanxi xiaoju jiegou leixing he jiedu qingxiang de yingxiang – Cong Xiandai Hanyu gongju, cailiao, chusuo chengfen guanxihua de xianzhi tiaojian tanqi [The role of telic features in the formation and interpretation of relative clauses: Constraints on oblique relativization in Mandarin Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language] 2019(6). 693–708.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Kuteva, Tania & Heine, Bernd & Hong, Bo & Long, Haiping & Narrog, Heiko & Rhee, Seongha
    2019 World lexicon of grammaticalization. 2nd edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316479704
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316479704 [Google Scholar]
34. Lehmann, Christian
    1985 Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e Stile20(3). 303–318.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Li, Xin
    2013 Hanyu kouyu huayu biaoji “woshuo/nishuo” yanjiu [Studies of the Chinese oral discourse marker woshuo/nishuo]. Jinzhou: Bohai University. (Master’s thesis.)
    [Google Scholar]
36. Long, Haiping
    2017 Xiandai hanyu biao tixing “woshuo” de xingcheng [On the formation of Modern Chinese attention-getting ni shuo]. InWu, Fuxiang & Chen, Qianrui (eds.), Yufahua yu yufa yanjiu (Ba) [Grammaticalization and Grammatical Studies (volume VIII)], 267–280. Beijing: Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Long, Haiping & Heine, Bernd & Ruan, Gui-Jun & Wu, Mengyue
    2018 The grammaticalizational relation between two Modern Chinese wo xiang ‘I think’ constructions. Language Sciences661. 212–225. 10.1016/j.langsci.2017.10.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2017.10.003 [Google Scholar]
38. Long, Haiping & Xu, Xiaoxian & Wu, Mengyue & Ursini, Francesco-Alessio
    2019 Formation of the Modern Chinese clause-taking imperative ni kan ‘you see’: A conjoining pathway account. Lingua2321. 1–24. (Article 102745.) 10.1016/j.lingua.2019.102745
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2019.102745 [Google Scholar]
39. Long, Haiping & Wu, Fang & Ursini, Francesco-Alessio & Qin, Zhijun
    2021 On the formation of a conjecturing clause-taking predicate in Modern Chinese: A conjoining account of huaiyi. Functions of Language28(2). 183–207. 10.1075/fol.19029.lon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.19029.lon [Google Scholar]
40. Noonan, Michael
    2007 Complementation. InShopen, Timothy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, volume 2: Complex constructions, 2nd edn., 52–150. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511619434.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619434.002 [Google Scholar]
41. Norde, Muriel
    2009 Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207923.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207923.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
42. Quirk, Randolph & Greenbaum, Sidney & Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
    1985 A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Sheng, Jiyan
    2013 Ye tan huayu biaoji “ni shuo” [A study of the discourse marker ni shuo]. Hanyu Xuexi [Chinese Language Learning] 2013(3). 31–36.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Thompson, Sandra A.
    2002 “Object complements” and conversation towards a realistic account. Studies in Language26(1). 125–163. 10.1075/sl.26.1.05tho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.26.1.05tho [Google Scholar]
45. Thompson, Sandra A. & Mulac, Anthony
    1991 A quantitative perspective on the gramaticization of epistemic parentheticals in English. InTraugott, Elizabeth Closs & Heine, Bernd (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization: Volume II. Types of grammatical markers (Typological Studies in Language 19:2), 313–329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.19.2.16tho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.2.16tho [Google Scholar]
46. Van Bogaert, Julie
    2011 I think and other complement-taking mental predicates: A case of and for constructional grammaticalization. Linguistics49(2). 295–332. 10.1515/ling.2011.009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2011.009 [Google Scholar]
47. Wang, Yu-Fang & Katz, Aya & Chen, Chih-Hua
    2003 Thinking as saying: Shuo (‘say’) in Taiwan Mandarin conversation and BBS talk. Language Sciences25(5). 457–488. 10.1016/S0388‑0001(03)00020‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(03)00020-2 [Google Scholar]
48. Xian, Lixia
    2012 Huayu biaoji “nishuo” de yujing ji qi gongneng [The context and functions of discourse marker ni shuo ‘you say’]. Sichuan Shifan Daxue Xuebao (Shehui Kexue Ban) [Journal of Sichuan Normal University (Social Sciences Edition)] 2012(5). 50–56.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Xu, Yulong
    2012 Mingci duanyu de kejixing yu guanxihua – Yixiang leixingxue shiye xia de Ying Han duibi yanjiu [Noun phrase accessibility and relativization in Chinese and English: A contrastive study from the perspective of linguistic typology]. Waiyu Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu (Waiguo Yuwen Shuangyuekan) [Foreign Language Teaching and Research (Bimonthly)] 44(5). 643–657.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Yao, Zhanlong
    2008 “Shuo, xiang, kan” de zhuguanhua ji qi youyin [The subjectivization and its incentives on shuo, xiang, kan]. Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies] 2008(5). 47–53.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Yu, Xiaodong
    2015 “Nishuo” huayu biaoji yanjiu [Study on the discourse marker of ni shuo]. Jilin: Jilin University. (Master’s thesis.)
    [Google Scholar]
52. Zhang, Jinjuan & Xiao, Renfei
    2016 Hanyu kouyu huihua zhong yinyu guanlingci de fushuo xianxiang [The repetition of quotation-introducing elements in conversational Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language] 2016(3). 315–328.
    [Google Scholar]