1887
Volume 24, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1606-822X
  • E-ISSN: 2309-5067

Abstract

Abstract

Mandarin degree adjectives can give rise to a degree achievement reading with the perfective marker . In this paper, I argue that de-adjectival degree achievements in Mandarin are inchoative statives, whose core meaning component is a reflexive comparative that compares the present state with a previous state in some property of the same individual. My new analysis better captures the facts that de-adjectival degree achievements show variable telicity, that they give rise to stative readings with duration phrases, and that they are compatible with time as a comparative standard. Because the comparison is between two states at different times, a degree-achievement reading can be inferred even though the predicate is stative in semantics.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00128.zha
2022-12-12
2023-01-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lali.00128.zha.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00128.zha&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bochnak, M. Ryan
    2015 Degree achievements in a degree-less language. InPasquereau, Jérémy (ed.), Proceedings of The Eighth Semantics of Underrepresented Languages in the Americas (SULA 8), 17–32. Scotts Valley: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Comrie, Bernard
    1976Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dowty, David R.
    1979Word meaning and Montague grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in generative semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Pub. Co. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑9473‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9473-7 [Google Scholar]
  4. Erlewine, Michael Yoshitaka
    2018 Clausal comparison without degree abstraction in Mandarin Chinese. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory36(2). 445–482. 10.1007/s11049‑017‑9383‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-017-9383-y [Google Scholar]
  5. Grano, Thomas
    2012 Mandarin hen and universal markedness in gradable adjectives. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory30(2). 513–565. 10.1007/s11049‑011‑9161‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9161-1 [Google Scholar]
  6. Grano, Thomas, & Kennedy, Chris
    2012 Mandarin transitive comparatives and the grammar of measurement. Journal of East Asian Linguistics21(3). 219–266. 10.1007/s10831‑012‑9090‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-012-9090-y [Google Scholar]
  7. Hale, Ken & Keyser, Samuel Jay
    1998 The basic elements of argument structure. InHarley, Heidi (ed.), Papers from the UPenn/MIT Roundtable on Argument Structure and Aspect (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 32), 73–118. Cambridge: MIT.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hay, Jennifer & Kennedy, Christopher & Levin, Beth
    1999 Scalar structure underlies telicity in “degree achievements”. InMatthews, Tanya & Strolovitch, Devon (eds.), Proceedings of the 9th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (SALT 9), 127–144. Ithaca: Cornell University. 10.3765/salt.v9i0.2833
    https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v9i0.2833 [Google Scholar]
  9. Katz, Graham
    2000 A semantic account of the stative adverb gap. InFabricius-Hansen, Cathrine & Lang, Ewald & Maienborn, Claudia (eds.), Approaching the grammar of adjuncts: Proceedings of the Oslo conference, September 22 – 25, 1999 (ZAS Papers in Linguistics 17), 135–151. Berlin: ZAS. 10.21248/zaspil.17.2000.44
    https://doi.org/10.21248/zaspil.17.2000.44 [Google Scholar]
  10. Kearns, Kate
    2007 Telic senses of deadjectival verbs. Lingua117(1). 26–66. 10.1016/j.lingua.2005.09.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2005.09.002 [Google Scholar]
  11. Kennedy, Christopher
    2007 Vagueness and grammar: The semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy30(1). 1–45. 10.1007/s10988‑006‑9008‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-006-9008-0 [Google Scholar]
  12. Kennedy, Christopher & Levin, Beth
    2008 Measure of change: The adjectival core of degree achievements. InMcNally, Louise & Kennedy, Christopher (eds.), Adjectives and adverbs: Syntax, semantics and discourse, 156–182. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kennedy, Christopher & McNally, Louise
    2005 Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language81(2) 345–381. 10.1353/lan.2005.0071
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2005.0071 [Google Scholar]
  14. Koontz-Garboden, Andrew
    2007aStates, changes of state, and the monotonicity hypothesis. Stanford: Stanford University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 2007b Aspectual coercion and the typology of change of state predicates. Journal of Linguistics43(1). 115–152. 10.1017/S0022226706004464
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226706004464 [Google Scholar]
  16. Li, Xiao
    2015 Degreeless comparatives: The semantics of differential verbal comparatives in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Semantics32(1). 1–38. 10.1093/jos/fft013
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/fft013 [Google Scholar]
  17. Lin, Jimmy
    2004 Are degree achievements really achievements?InHuang, Shuan Fan (ed.), Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Chinese Languages and Linguistics (IsCLL-9). Taipei: Graduate Institute of Linguistics, National Taiwan University.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Lin, Jo-Wang
    2003a Aspectual selection and negation in Mandarin Chinese. Linguistics41(3). 425–459. 10.1515/ling.2003.015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2003.015 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2003b Temporal reference in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics12(3). 259–311. 10.1023/A:1023665301095
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023665301095 [Google Scholar]
  20. 2006 Time in a language without tense: The case of Chinese. Journal of Semantics23(1). 1–53. 10.1093/jos/ffh033
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffh033 [Google Scholar]
  21. 2009 Chinese comparatives and their implicational parameters. Natural Language Semantics17(1). 1–27. 10.1007/s11050‑008‑9033‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-008-9033-3 [Google Scholar]
  22. Liu, Chen-Sheng Luther
    2011 The Chinese bi comparative. Lingua121(12). 1767–1795. 10.1016/j.lingua.2011.07.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2011.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  23. Marín, Rafael & McNally, Louise
    2011 Inchoativity, change of state, and telicity: Evidence from Spanish reflexive psychological verbs. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory29(2). 467–502. 10.1007/s11049‑011‑9127‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9127-3 [Google Scholar]
  24. McNally, Louise
    2017 On the scalar properties and telicity of degree achievements. InFernández-Soriano, Olga & Castroviejo, Elena & Pérez-Jiménez, Isabel (eds.), Boundary, phases and interfaces: Case studies in honor of Violeta Demonte, 173–192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.239.09mcn
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.239.09mcn [Google Scholar]
  25. Piñón, Christopher
    1997 Achievements in an event semantics. InLawson, Aaron (ed.), Proceedings of the 7th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (SALT 7), 276–293. Ithaca: Cornell University. 10.3765/salt.v7i0.2781
    https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v7i0.2781 [Google Scholar]
  26. 2008 Aspectual composition with degrees. InMcNally, Louise & Kennedy, Christopher (eds.), Adjectives and adverbs: Syntax, semantics and discourse, 183–219. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Rotstein, Carmen & Winter, Yoad
    2004 Total adjectives vs. partial adjectives: Scale structure and higher-order modifiers. Natural Language Semantics12(3). 259–288. 10.1023/B:NALS.0000034517.56898.9a
    https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NALS.0000034517.56898.9a [Google Scholar]
  28. Smith, Carlota S.
    1994 Aspectual viewpoint and situation type in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics3(2). 107–146. 10.1007/BF01736124
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01736124 [Google Scholar]
  29. 1997The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑5606‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5606-6 [Google Scholar]
  30. Soh, Hooi Ling & Nomoto, Hiroki
    2015 Degree achievements, telicity and the verbal prefix men- in Malay. Journal of Linguistics51(1). 147–183. 10.1017/S002​2226​7140​0019X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S002​2226​7140​0019X [Google Scholar]
  31. Svenonius, Peter & Kennedy, Christopher
    2006 Northern Norwegian degree questions and the syntax of measurement. InFrascarelli, Mara (ed.), Phases of interpretation (Studies in Generative Grammar 91), 133–162. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197723.3.133
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197723.3.133 [Google Scholar]
  32. Sybesma, Rint
    1997 Why Chinese verb-le is a resultative predicate. Journal of East Asian Linguistics6(3). 215–261. 10.1023/A:1008238319773
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008238319773 [Google Scholar]
  33. Tai, James H-Y.
    1984 Verbs and times in Chinese: Vendler’s four categories. InTesten, David & Mishra, Veena & Drogo, Joseph (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Lexical Semantics, 289–296. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Tham, Shiao Wei
    2013 Change of state verbs and result state adjectives in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Linguistics49(3). 647–701. 10.1017/S0022226713000261
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226713000261 [Google Scholar]
  35. Ting, Jen
    2006 The middle construction in Mandarin Chinese and the presyntactic approach. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics32(1). 89–117.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Tsujimura, Natsuko
    2001 Degree words and scalar structure in Japanese. Lingua111(1). 29–52. 10.1016/S0024‑3841(00)00027‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(00)00027-9 [Google Scholar]
  37. van Valin, Robert D. & LaPolla, Randy J.
    1997Syntax: Structure, meaning, and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139166799
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166799 [Google Scholar]
  38. Vendler, Zeno
    1957 Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review66(2). 143–160. 10.2307/2182371
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2182371 [Google Scholar]
  39. Wechsler, Stephen
    2005 Resultatives under the ‘event-argument homomorphism’ model of telicity. InErteschik-Shir, Nomi & Rapoport, Tova (eds.), The syntax of aspect: Deriving thematic and aspectual interpretation, 255–273. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280445.003.0012
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280445.003.0012 [Google Scholar]
  40. Yoon, Youngeun
    1996 Total and partial predicates and the weak and strong interpretations. Natural Language Semantics4(3). 217–236. 10.1007/BF00372820
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00372820 [Google Scholar]
  41. Zwarts, Joost & Hendriks, Petra & de Hoop, Helen
    2005 Comparative paths to an optimal interpretation. InMaier, Emar & Bary, Corien & Huitink, Janneke (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn Und Bedeutung, vol. 9, 553–563. Nijmegen: Nijmegen Centre of Semantics.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00128.zha
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00128.zha
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): degree achievements; inchoative statives; reflexive comparatives; scale-structure
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error