oa From reciprocity to competition

References

1. Alpatov, Vladimir M. & Nedjalkov, Vladimir P.
   2007 Reciprocal, sociative, and competitive constructions in Japanese. InNedjalkov, Vladimir P. (ed.), Reciprocal constructions (Typological Studies in Language 71), vol.31, 1021–1094. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.71.36alp
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.71.36alp [Google Scholar]
2. Bentley, Delia & Cruschina, Silvio
   2018 The silent argument of broad focus: Typology and predictions. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics3(1). 1–37. (Article no. 118.) 10.5334/gjgl.677
   https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.677 [Google Scholar]
3. Besnier, Niko
   2000 Tuvaluan: A Polynesian language of the Central Pacific. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bußmann, Hadumod
   2002 Lexikon der Sprachwissenschaft [Lexicon of linguistics]. Stuttgart: Alfred Kröner Verlag.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Creissels, Denis & Nouguier-Voisin, Sylvie
   2008 Valency-changing operations in Wolof and the notion of “co-participation”. InKönig, Ekkehard & Gast, Volker (eds.), Reciprocals and reflexives: Theoretical and typological explorations, 289–305. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Dalrymple, Mary & Kanazawa, Makoto & Kim, Yookyung & McHombo, Sam & Peters, Stanley
   1998 Reciprocal expressions and the concept of reciprocity. Linguistics and Philosophy21(2). 159–210. 10.1023/A:1005330227480
   https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005330227480 [Google Scholar]
7. Fleischman, Suzanne
   1983 From pragmatics to grammar: Diachronic reflections on complex pasts and futures in Romance. Lingua60(2-3). 183–214. 10.1016/0024‑3841(83)90074‑8
   https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(83)90074-8 [Google Scholar]
8. Haspelmath, Martin
   2010 Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language86(3). 663–687. 10.1353/lan.2010.0021
   https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2010.0021 [Google Scholar]
9. Hong, Chai-Song
   2007 Phulangsue sanghophyociuy yuhyengloncek thukseng [Typological characteristics of French reciprocal marking]. Seoul: Seoul National University. (Manuscript.)
   [Google Scholar]
10. Hopper, Paul
    1987 Emergent grammar. InAske, Jon & Beery, Natasha & Michaelis, Laura & Filip, Hana (eds.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General session and parasession on grammar and cognition, 139–157. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. 10.3765/bls.v13i0.1834
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v13i0.1834 [Google Scholar]
11. Jendraschek, Gerd
    2007 La notion modale de possibilité en basque: Morphologie, syntaxe, sémantique, variations diachronique et sociolinguistique [The modal notion of possibility in Basque: Morphology, syntax, semantics, diachronic and sociolinguistic variation]. Paris: L’Harmattan.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Jendraschek, Gerd
    2014 Future tense, prospective aspect, and irrealis mood as part of the situation perspective: Insights from Basque, Turkish, and Papuan. InDe Brabanter, Philippe & Kissine, Mikhail & Sharifzadeh, Saghie (eds.), Future times, future tenses, 138–164. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679157.003.0007
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679157.003.0007 [Google Scholar]
13. Johanson, Lars
    1994 Türkeitürkische Aspektotempora [Aspect-tenses in Turkey Turkish]. InThieroff, Rolf & Ballweg, Joachim (eds.), Tense systems in European languages, 247–266. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
14. King, Alan Roy
    1993 Communicative grammar of the Basque verb (selected aspects). London: Queen Mary University of London. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
15. König, Ekkehard & Kokutani, Shigehiro
    2006 Towards a typology of reciprocal constructions: Focus on German and Japanese. Linguistics44(2). 271–302. 10.1515/LING.2006.010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2006.010 [Google Scholar]
16. Koo, Myung-Chul & Lehmann, Christian
    2010 Modality in the Korean suffix -keyss. Language Research46(1). 83–102. (s-space.snu.ac.kr/bitstream/10371/86452/1/4.%202223073.pdf) (Accessed2022-10-05.)
    [Google Scholar]
17. Lander, Yury & Arkadiev, Peter
    2016 On the right of being a comparative concept. Linguistic Typology20(2). 403–416. 10.1515/lingty‑2016‑0014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2016-0014 [Google Scholar]
18. Langacker, Ronald W.
    1990 Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics1(1). 5–38. 10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.5
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.5 [Google Scholar]
19. Lichtenberk, Frantisek
    2000 Reciprocals without reflexives. InFrajzyngier, Zygmunt & Curl, Traci S. (eds.), Reciprocals: Forms and functions (Typological Studies in Language 41), vol.21, 31–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.41.03lic
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.41.03lic [Google Scholar]
20. Moyse-Faurie, Claire
    2008 Constructions expressing middle, reflexive and reciprocal situations in some Oceanic languages. InKönig, Ekkehard & Gast, Volker (eds.), Reciprocals and reflexives: Theoretical and typological explorations, 105–168. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
21. National Institute of Korean Language
    National Institute of Korean Language 2021 Pyocwun kwuke taysacen [Korean standard dictionary]. (https://stdict.korean.go.kr/main/main.do) (Accessed2021-04-22.)
    [Google Scholar]
22. Nedjalkov, Vladimir P.
    (ed.) 2007 Reciprocal constructions (Typological Studies in Language 71). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.71
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.71 [Google Scholar]
23. Park, Jin-Ho
    2007 Yuhyengloncek kwancemeyse pon hankwuke taymyengsa cheykyeyuy thukcing [The pronominal system of Korean viewed from a typological perspective]. Kwukehak [Journal of Korean Linguistics] 501. 115–147.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Sohn, Ho-Min
    1999 The Korean language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
    2010 (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. InDavidse, Kristin & Vandelanotte, Lieven & Cuyckens, Hubert (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization (Topics in English Linguistics 66), 29–71. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110226102.1.29
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226102.1.29 [Google Scholar]
26. Wunderlich, Dieter
    2014 Variations of double nominative in Korean and Japanese. InGerland, Doris & Horn, Christian & Latrouite, Anja & Ortmann, Albert (eds.), Meaning and grammar of nouns and verbs, 339–372. Düsseldorf: Düsseldorf University Press.
    [Google Scholar]