1887
Volume 24, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1606-822X
  • E-ISSN: 2309-5067

Abstract

Abstract

This study, based on the analysis of historical corpus data, investigates the diachronic development of the Mandarin modal auxiliary and establishes implications both for the grammaticalization of modals and for grammaticalization theory in general. Specifically, our study shows the following results: (1) The grammaticalization of is characterized by coalescence, paradigmaticization, obligatorification, fixation, desemanticization, decategorialization and divergence. (2) Underlying mechanisms at work are structural reanalysis, later followed by syntactic expansion and host-class expansion. (3) The grammaticalization of on the one hand confirms the diachronic path proposed in previous studies, viz., from root possibility to epistemic possibility; within the development of root possibility, however, it demonstrates a distinct path—from participant-external possibility to participant-internal possibility; it is suggested that an important driving force behind this peculiar development path is the Chinese cultural preference for collectivism. (4) The lexical source of modal is a verb-complement sequence (rather than a single full verb).

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00144.liu
2023-09-14
2024-06-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lali.00144.liu.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00144.liu&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Alleton, Viviane
    1977 Les verbes auxiliaires de mode en chinois moderne. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale1(1). 31–41.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 1984Les auxiliaires de mode en chinois contemporain. Paris: Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bech, Gunnar
    1951Grundzüge der semantischen Entwicklungsgeschichte der hochdeutschen Modalverba (Historisk-filologiske Meddelelser 32.6), 1–28. København: Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bybee, Joan
    2010Language, usage and cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bybee, Joan & Perkins, Robert & Pagliuca, William
    1994The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chao, Yuen Ren
    1968A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cinque, Guglielmo
    1999Adverbs and functional heads: A crosslinguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Comrie, Bernard
    1976Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. De Smet, Hendrik
    2013Spreading patterns: Diffusional change in the English system of complementation. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 2020 What predicts productivity? Theory meets individuals. Cognitive Linguistics31(2). 251–278. 10.1515/cog‑2019‑0026
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2019-0026 [Google Scholar]
  11. Declerck, Renaat
    1991A comprehensive descriptive grammar of English. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hansen, Erik & Heltoft, Lars
    2011Grammatik over det Danske sprog. Copenhagen: Det Danske Sprog- og Litteraturselskab. (31vols.)
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Heine, Bernd & Claudi, Ulrike & Hünnemeyer, Friederike
    1991Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
    2004 Lexicalization and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal?InBisang, Walter & Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. & Wiemer, Björn (eds.), What makes grammaticalization—A look from its fringes and its components, 21–44. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197440.1.21
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197440.1.21 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hofstede, Geert
    1984Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hopper, Paul J.
    1991 On some principles of grammaticalization. InTraugott, Elizabeth Closs & Heine, Bernd (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, volume 1: Theoretical and methodological issues, 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hop [Google Scholar]
  17. Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
    2003Grammaticalization. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139165525
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165525 [Google Scholar]
  18. Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo
    2010 From positivity to possibility, propriety and necessity: Semantic change in culture. Chinese Language and Discourse1(1). 66–92. 10.1075/cld.1.1.03jin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.1.1.03jin [Google Scholar]
  19. Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo & Peng, Xinjia
    2016 The emergence of disjunction: A history of the constructionalization in Chinese. Cognitive Linguistics27(1). 101–136. 10.1515/cog‑2015‑0073
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2015-0073 [Google Scholar]
  20. Lehmann, Christian
    1985 Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e Stile20(3). 303–318.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A.
    1981Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Li, Renzhi
    2004Modality in English and Chinese: A typological perspective. Boca Rota: Dissertation.com.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lightfoot, David W.
    1979Principles of diachronic syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lin, T.-H. Jonah
    2012 Multiple-modal constructions in Mandarin Chinese and their finiteness properties. Journal of Linguistics48(1). 151–186. 10.1017/S0022226711000272
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226711000272 [Google Scholar]
  25. Liu, Li
    2000Xianqin hanyu zhudongci yanjiu. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Ma, Beijia
    2002 Yao de yufa hua. Yuyan Yanjiu 2002(4). 81–87.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Meisterernst, Barbara
    2008a Modal verbs in Han period Chinese, Part I: The syntax and semantics of and kě yǐ. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale37(1). 85–120. 10.1163/1960602808X00037
    https://doi.org/10.1163/1960602808X00037 [Google Scholar]
  28. 2008b Modal verbs in Han period Chinese, Part II: Negative Markers in combination with the modal auxiliary verbs and kě yǐ. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale37(2). 197–222. 10.1163/1960602808X00073
    https://doi.org/10.1163/1960602808X00073 [Google Scholar]
  29. 2011 From obligation to future? A diachronic sketch of the syntax and the semantics of the auxiliary verb dang. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale40(2). 137–188. 10.1163/1960602811X00015
    https://doi.org/10.1163/1960602811X00015 [Google Scholar]
  30. 2020 A new approach to the development of deontic markers: In pre-modern Chinese. InXing, Janet Zhiqun (ed.), A typological approach to grammaticalization and lexicalization: East meets West, 191–230. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110641288‑008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110641288-008 [Google Scholar]
  31. Narrog, Heiko
    2012Modality, subjectivity, and semantic change: A cross-linguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199694372.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199694372.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  32. Nisbett, Richard E.
    2003The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently…and why. New York: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Palmer, Frank Robert
    2001Mood and modality. 2nd edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139167178
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167178 [Google Scholar]
  34. Peyraube, Alain
    1996 Recent issues in Chinese historical syntax. InHuang, C.-T. James & Li, Yen-hui Audrey (eds), New horizons in Chinese linguistics, 161–213. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑1608‑1_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1608-1_6 [Google Scholar]
  35. 1999 On the modal auxiliaries of possibility in Classical Chinese. InWang, H. Samuel & Cao, Feng-fu & Lian, Chin-fa (eds.), Selected papers from the Fifth International Conference on Chinese Linguistics, 27–52. Taipei: Crane Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 2001 On the modal auxiliaries of volition in Classical Chinese. InChappell, Hilary (ed.), Sinitic grammar: Synchronic and diachronic perspectives, 172–188. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Peyraube, Alain & Li, Ming
    2012 The semantic historical development of modal verbs of volition in Chinese. InXing, Janet Zhiqun (ed.), Newest trends in the study of grammaticalization and lexicalization in Chinese, 149–168. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110253009.149
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110253009.149 [Google Scholar]
  38. Pulleyblank, Edwin G.
    1995Outline of classical Chinese grammar. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Roberts, Ian & Roussou, Anna
    2003Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486326
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486326 [Google Scholar]
  40. Shinzato, Rumiko
    2008 From “emergence” to “ability”: A case of Japanese naru and dekiru. InAdams, Nikki & Cooper, Adam & Parrill, Fey & Wier, Thomas (eds), CLS 40–1: Proceedings from the Main Session of the Fortieth Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 365–379. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Sparvoli, Carlotta
    2015 Modals and negation: A semantic explanation of the modal suppletion strategy in Chinese. Chinese as a Second Language Research4(2). 163–193. 10.1515/caslar‑2015‑0010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/caslar-2015-0010 [Google Scholar]
  42. Takahashi, Kiyoko
    2008 Grammaticalization paths of the Thai verb dây: A corpus-based study. InSidwell, Paul & Tadmor, Uri (eds.), Papers from the 16th Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 2006 (SEALS XVI), 122–132. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
    1989 On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language65(1). 31–55. 10.2307/414841
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414841 [Google Scholar]
  44. 1995 Subjectification in grammaticalisation. InStein, Dieter & Wright, Susan (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511554469.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554469.003 [Google Scholar]
  45. 2010 (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. InDavidse, Kristin & Vandelanotte, Lieven & Cuyckens, Hubert (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, 29–74. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110226102.1.29
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226102.1.29 [Google Scholar]
  46. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. & Dasher, Richard B.
    2002Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Triandis, Harry C. & McCusker, Christopher & Hui, C. Harry
    1990 Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology59(5). 1006–1020. 10.1037/0022‑3514.59.5.1006
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.1006 [Google Scholar]
  48. van der Auwera, Johan & Plungian, Vladimir A.
    1998 Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology2(1). 79–124. 10.1515/lity.1998.2.1.79
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1998.2.1.79 [Google Scholar]
  49. van der Auwera, Johan & Kehayov, Petar & Vittrant, Alice
    2009 Acquisitive modals. InHogeweg, Lotte & de Hoop, Helen & Malchukov, Andrej L. (eds.), Cross-linguistic semantics of tense, aspect, and modality, 271–302. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.148.11auw
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.148.11auw [Google Scholar]
  50. Wiemer, Björn
    2014Quo vadis grammaticalization theory? Why complex language change is like words. Folia Linguistica48(2). 425–467. 10.1515/flin.2014.015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2014.015 [Google Scholar]
  51. Zhan, Weidong & Guo, Rui & Chen, Yirong
    2003The CCL Corpus of Chinese Texts: 700 million Chinese characters, the 11th century B.C.–present. (Available online at thewebsite of Center for Chinese Linguistics (CCL) of Peking University.) (ccl.pku.edu.cn:8080/ccl_corpus) (Accessed2020-05-03.)
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Zhu, Guanming
    2005 The evolution of the modal auxiliary “bixu”. Yuyan Kexue 2005(3). 57–67.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00144.liu
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00144.liu
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error