oa The grammaticalization of impossibility

References

1. Alleton, Viviane
   1977 Les verbes auxiliaires de mode en chinois moderne. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale1(1). 31–41.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Alleton, Viviane
   1984 Les auxiliaires de mode en chinois contemporain. Paris: Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bech, Gunnar
   1951 Grundzüge der semantischen Entwicklungsgeschichte der hochdeutschen Modalverba (Historisk-filologiske Meddelelser 32.6), 1–28. København: Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bybee, Joan
   2010 Language, usage and cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
5. Bybee, Joan & Perkins, Robert & Pagliuca, William
   1994 The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Chao, Yuen Ren
   1968 A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Cinque, Guglielmo
   1999 Adverbs and functional heads: A crosslinguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Comrie, Bernard
   1976 Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. De Smet, Hendrik
   2013 Spreading patterns: Diffusional change in the English system of complementation. New York: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. De Smet, Hendrik
    2020 What predicts productivity? Theory meets individuals. Cognitive Linguistics31(2). 251–278. 10.1515/cog‑2019‑0026
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2019-0026 [Google Scholar]
11. Declerck, Renaat
    1991 A comprehensive descriptive grammar of English. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Hansen, Erik & Heltoft, Lars
    2011 Grammatik over det Danske sprog. Copenhagen: Det Danske Sprog- og Litteraturselskab. (31vols.)
    [Google Scholar]
13. Heine, Bernd & Claudi, Ulrike & Hünnemeyer, Friederike
    1991 Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
    2004 Lexicalization and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal?InBisang, Walter & Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. & Wiemer, Björn (eds.), What makes grammaticalization—A look from its fringes and its components, 21–44. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197440.1.21
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197440.1.21 [Google Scholar]
15. Hofstede, Geert
    1984 Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hopper, Paul J.
    1991 On some principles of grammaticalization. InTraugott, Elizabeth Closs & Heine, Bernd (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, volume 1: Theoretical and methodological issues, 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hop [Google Scholar]
17. Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
    2003 Grammaticalization. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139165525
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165525 [Google Scholar]
18. Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo
    2010 From positivity to possibility, propriety and necessity: Semantic change in culture. Chinese Language and Discourse1(1). 66–92. 10.1075/cld.1.1.03jin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.1.1.03jin [Google Scholar]
19. Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo & Peng, Xinjia
    2016 The emergence of disjunction: A history of the constructionalization in Chinese. Cognitive Linguistics27(1). 101–136. 10.1515/cog‑2015‑0073
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2015-0073 [Google Scholar]
20. Lehmann, Christian
    1985 Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e Stile20(3). 303–318.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A.
    1981 Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Li, Renzhi
    2004 Modality in English and Chinese: A typological perspective. Boca Rota: Dissertation.com.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Lightfoot, David W.
    1979 Principles of diachronic syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Lin, T.-H. Jonah
    2012 Multiple-modal constructions in Mandarin Chinese and their finiteness properties. Journal of Linguistics48(1). 151–186. 10.1017/S0022226711000272
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226711000272 [Google Scholar]
25. Liu, Li
    2000 Xianqin hanyu zhudongci yanjiu. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Ma, Beijia
    2002 Yao de yufa hua. Yuyan Yanjiu 2002(4). 81–87.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Meisterernst, Barbara
    2008a Modal verbs in Han period Chinese, Part I: The syntax and semantics of kě and kě yǐ. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale37(1). 85–120. 10.1163/1960602808X00037
    https://doi.org/10.1163/1960602808X00037 [Google Scholar]
28. Meisterernst, Barbara
    2008b Modal verbs in Han period Chinese, Part II: Negative Markers in combination with the modal auxiliary verbs kě and kě yǐ. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale37(2). 197–222. 10.1163/1960602808X00073
    https://doi.org/10.1163/1960602808X00073 [Google Scholar]
29. Meisterernst, Barbara
    2011 From obligation to future? A diachronic sketch of the syntax and the semantics of the auxiliary verb dang. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale40(2). 137–188. 10.1163/1960602811X00015
    https://doi.org/10.1163/1960602811X00015 [Google Scholar]
30. Meisterernst, Barbara
    2020 A new approach to the development of deontic markers: In pre-modern Chinese. InXing, Janet Zhiqun (ed.), A typological approach to grammaticalization and lexicalization: East meets West, 191–230. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110641288‑008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110641288-008 [Google Scholar]
31. Narrog, Heiko
    2012 Modality, subjectivity, and semantic change: A cross-linguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199694372.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199694372.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
32. Nisbett, Richard E.
    2003 The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently…and why. New York: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Palmer, Frank Robert
    2001 Mood and modality. 2nd edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139167178
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167178 [Google Scholar]
34. Peyraube, Alain
    1996 Recent issues in Chinese historical syntax. InHuang, C.-T. James & Li, Yen-hui Audrey (eds), New horizons in Chinese linguistics, 161–213. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑1608‑1_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1608-1_6 [Google Scholar]
35. Peyraube, Alain
    1999 On the modal auxiliaries of possibility in Classical Chinese. InWang, H. Samuel & Cao, Feng-fu & Lian, Chin-fa (eds.), Selected papers from the Fifth International Conference on Chinese Linguistics, 27–52. Taipei: Crane Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Peyraube, Alain
    2001 On the modal auxiliaries of volition in Classical Chinese. InChappell, Hilary (ed.), Sinitic grammar: Synchronic and diachronic perspectives, 172–188. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Peyraube, Alain & Li, Ming
    2012 The semantic historical development of modal verbs of volition in Chinese. InXing, Janet Zhiqun (ed.), Newest trends in the study of grammaticalization and lexicalization in Chinese, 149–168. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110253009.149
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110253009.149 [Google Scholar]
38. Pulleyblank, Edwin G.
    1995 Outline of classical Chinese grammar. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Roberts, Ian & Roussou, Anna
    2003 Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486326
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486326 [Google Scholar]
40. Shinzato, Rumiko
    2008 From “emergence” to “ability”: A case of Japanese naru and dekiru. InAdams, Nikki & Cooper, Adam & Parrill, Fey & Wier, Thomas (eds), CLS 40–1: Proceedings from the Main Session of the Fortieth Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 365–379. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Sparvoli, Carlotta
    2015 Modals and negation: A semantic explanation of the modal suppletion strategy in Chinese. Chinese as a Second Language Research4(2). 163–193. 10.1515/caslar‑2015‑0010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/caslar-2015-0010 [Google Scholar]
42. Takahashi, Kiyoko
    2008 Grammaticalization paths of the Thai verb dây: A corpus-based study. InSidwell, Paul & Tadmor, Uri (eds.), Papers from the 16th Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 2006 (SEALS XVI), 122–132. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
    1989 On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language65(1). 31–55. 10.2307/414841
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414841 [Google Scholar]
44. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
    1995 Subjectification in grammaticalisation. InStein, Dieter & Wright, Susan (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511554469.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554469.003 [Google Scholar]
45. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
    2010 (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. InDavidse, Kristin & Vandelanotte, Lieven & Cuyckens, Hubert (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, 29–74. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110226102.1.29
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226102.1.29 [Google Scholar]
46. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. & Dasher, Richard B.
    2002 Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Triandis, Harry C. & McCusker, Christopher & Hui, C. Harry
    1990 Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology59(5). 1006–1020. 10.1037/0022‑3514.59.5.1006
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.1006 [Google Scholar]
48. van der Auwera, Johan & Plungian, Vladimir A.
    1998 Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology2(1). 79–124. 10.1515/lity.1998.2.1.79
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1998.2.1.79 [Google Scholar]
49. van der Auwera, Johan & Kehayov, Petar & Vittrant, Alice
    2009 Acquisitive modals. InHogeweg, Lotte & de Hoop, Helen & Malchukov, Andrej L. (eds.), Cross-linguistic semantics of tense, aspect, and modality, 271–302. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.148.11auw
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.148.11auw [Google Scholar]
50. Wiemer, Björn
    2014 Quo vadis grammaticalization theory? Why complex language change is like words. Folia Linguistica48(2). 425–467. 10.1515/flin.2014.015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2014.015 [Google Scholar]
51. Zhan, Weidong & Guo, Rui & Chen, Yirong
    2003 The CCL Corpus of Chinese Texts: 700 million Chinese characters, the 11th century B.C.–present. (Available online at thewebsite of Center for Chinese Linguistics (CCL) of Peking University.) (ccl.pku.edu.cn:8080/ccl_corpus) (Accessed2020-05-03.)
    [Google Scholar]
52. Zhu, Guanming
    2005 The evolution of the modal auxiliary “bixu”. Yuyan Kexue 2005(3). 57–67.
    [Google Scholar]