1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Language and Linguistics
  4. Volume 25, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 25, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1606-822X
  • E-ISSN: 2309-5067
EPUB
PDF

Abstract

Abstract

One major difference between Chinese-type and German-type languages is that the former allows extensive types of argument drop, while the latter is quite limited beyond the existence of a null topic. This study argues (a) that it is necessary to distinguish among phenomena that have sometimes been referred to with the undifferentiating term “radical drop”; (b) that the null topic is restricted to root clauses (CP edge) based on its locality properties; (c) that the Chinese-type null topic requires licensing at the CP edge by Internal Merge; and (d) that the CP edge requirement may be lifted only under conditions of last resort. Evidence comes from our new observation of locality effects showing a contrast between overt and null topics. Specifically, while the option is available with an overt topic, null topics must be brought to the CP edge via Internal Merge.

© 2024 ILAS
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00147.yan
2024-01-02
2025-07-09

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/lali.00147.yan
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lali.00147.yan.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00147.yan&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Alexiadou, Artemis
    2006 Uniform and non-uniform aspects of pro-drop languages. InAckema, Peter & Brandt, Patrick & Schoorlemmer, Maaike & Weerman, Fred (eds.), Arguments and agreement, 127–158. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199285730.003.0005
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199285730.003.0005 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexiadou, Artemis & Anagnostopoulou, Elena
    1998 Parametrizing agr: Word order, verb-movement and EPP-checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory16(3). 491–539. 10.1023/A:1006090432389
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006090432389 [Google Scholar]
  3. Axel, Katrin
    2007 Studies on Old High German syntax: Left sentence periphery, verb placement and verb-second. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.112
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.112 [Google Scholar]
  4. Barbosa, Piliar
    2009 Two kinds of subject pro. Studia Linguistica63(1). 2–58. 10.1111/j.1467‑9582.2008.01153.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2008.01153.x [Google Scholar]
  5. Borer, Hagit
    1986 I-subjects. Linguistic Inquiry17(3). 375–416.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Chomsky, Noam
    1976 Conditions on rules of grammar. Linguistic Analysis21. 303–351.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. 1981 Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. 1982 Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. 1995 The minimalist program. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. 2000 Minimalist inquiries: The framework. InMartin, Roger & Michaels, David & Uriagereka, Juan (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. 2001 Derivation by phase. InKenstowicz, Michael (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cole, Melvyn Douglas
    2009 Null subjects: A reanalysis of the data. Linguistics47(3). 559–587. 10.1515/LING.2009.019
     https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2009.019 [Google Scholar]
  13. 2010 Thematic null subjects and accessibility. Studia Linguistica64(3). 271–320. 10.1111/j.1467‑9582.2010.01172.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2010.01172.x [Google Scholar]
  14. Emonds, Joseph
    1970 Root and structure-preserving transformations. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
     [Google Scholar]
  15. 1976 A transformational approach to English syntax: Root, structure-preserving, and local transformations. New York: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Frascarelli, Mara
    2007 Subjects, topics and the interpretation of referential pro. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory25(4). 691–734. 10.1007/s11049‑007‑9025‑x
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-007-9025-x [Google Scholar]
  17. Frascarelli, Mara & Hinterhölzl, Roland
    2007 Types of topics in German and Italian. InSchwabe, Kerstin. & Winkler, Susanne (eds.), On information structure, meaning and form: Generalizations across languages, 87–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.100.07fra
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.100.07fra [Google Scholar]
  18. van Gelderen, Elly
    2000 A history of English reflexive pronouns: Person, self, and interpretability. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.39
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.39 [Google Scholar]
  19. Haegeman, Liliane
    2006 Argument fronting in English, Romance CLLD and the left periphery. InZanuttini, Raffaella & Campos, Hector & Herburger, Elena & Portner, Paul (eds.), Crosslinguistic research in syntax and semantics: Negation, tense, and clausal architecture, 27–52. Washington, D.C: Georgetown University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. 2012 The syntax of MCP: Deriving the truncation account. InAelbrecht, Lobke & Haegeman, Liliane & Nye, Rachel (eds.), Main clause phenomena: New horizons, 113–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.190.05hae
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.190.05hae [Google Scholar]
  21. 2014 Locality and the distribution of main clause phenomena. InAboh, Enoch Obladé & Guasti, Maria Teresa & Roberts, Ian (eds.), Locality, 186–222. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945269.003.0008
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945269.003.0008 [Google Scholar]
  22. Holmberg, Anders
    2005 Is there a little pro? Evidence from Finnish. Linguistic Inquiry36(4). 533–564. 10.1162/002438905774464322
     https://doi.org/10.1162/002438905774464322 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hooper, Joan B. & Thompson, Sandra
    1973 On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry4(4). 465–497.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Huang, C.-T. James
    1984 On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry15(4). 531–574.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. 1989 Pro-drop in Chinese: A generalized control theory. InJaeggli, Osvaldo & Safir, Kenneth (eds.), The null subject parameter, 185–214. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑2540‑3_6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2540-3_6 [Google Scholar]
  26. 1991 Remarks on the status of the null object. InFreidin, Robert (ed.), Principles and parameters in comparative grammar, 56–76. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Jaeggli, Osvaldo
    1982 Topics in Romance syntax. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Kao, Grant Hung-Ta
    2013 Subjunctive mood and main clause phenomena in Mandarin Chinese. Hsinchu: National Tsing Hua University. (MA thesis.)
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Kato, Mary
    1999 Strong and weak pronominals in the null subject parameter. Probus11(1). 1–37. 10.1515/prbs.1999.11.1.1
     https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.1999.11.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  30. Kiss, Katalin É.
    1995 Discourse configurational languages: Introduction. InKiss, Katalin É. (ed.), Discourse configurational languages, 3–27. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195088335.003.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195088335.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kuroda, Shige-Yuki
    1965 Generative grammatical studies in the Japanese language. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Li, Charles N., & Thompson, Sandra A.
    1976 Subject and topic: A new typology of language. InLi, Charles N. (ed.), Subject and topic, 458–489. New York: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. 1981 Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press. 10.1525/9780520352858
     https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520352858 [Google Scholar]
  34. Li, Yen-Hui Audrey
    2007 The theory of empty categories and the identification of empty categories in Chinese. Yuyan Kexue 2007(2). 37–47.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Miyagawa, Shigeru
    2010 Why agree? Why move? Unifying agreement-based and discourse-configurational languages. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Oku, Satoshi
    1998 A theory of selection and reconstruction in the minimalist perspective. Storrs: University of Connecticut. (Doctoral dissertation.)
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Otani, Kazuyo & Whitman, John
    1991 V-raising and VP-ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry221. 345–358.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Rizzi, Luigi
    1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. InHaegeman, Liliane (ed.), Elements of grammar: Handbook in generative syntax, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑5420‑8_7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7 [Google Scholar]
  39. Roberts, Ian
    2010 Agreement and head movement: Clitics, incorporation and defective goals. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262014304.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014304.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  40. Ross, John Robert
    1982 Pronoun-deleting processes in German. (Paper presented at theAnnual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, San Diego, California, 27–30 December 1982.)
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Rooth, Mats
    1985 Association with focus. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, Amherst. (Doctoral dissertation.)
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann
    1993 Argument-drop in old Icelandic. Lingua89(2–3). 247–280. 10.1016/0024‑3841(93)90054‑Z
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(93)90054-Z [Google Scholar]
  43. 2011 Conditions on argument drop. Linguistic Inquiry42(2). 267–304. 10.1162/LING_a_00042
     https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00042 [Google Scholar]
  44. Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. & Maling, Joan
    2008 Argument drop and the Empty Left Edge Condition (ELEC). Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax811. 1–27.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. 2010 The empty left edge condition. InPutnam, Michael T. (ed.), Exploring crash-proof grammars, 59–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lfab.3.04sig
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.3.04sig [Google Scholar]
  46. Taraldsen, Knut Tarald
    1978 On the NIC, vacuous application and the that-trace filter. Cambridge: MIT. (Manuscript.)
     [Google Scholar]
  47. 1980 On the nominative island condition, vacuous application, and the that-trace filter. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club. (Manuscript.)
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Tsao, Feng-fu
    1977 A functional study of topic in Chinese: The first step towards discourse analysis. Los Angeles: University of South California. (Doctoral dissertation.)
     [Google Scholar]
  49. 1990 Sentence and clause structure in Chinese: A functional perspective. Taipei: Student Book Co.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Xu, Liejiong
    1986 Free empty category. Linguistic Inquiry17(1). 75–93.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. 2006 Topicalization in Asian languages. InEveraert, Martin & van Riemsdijk, Henk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, vol.51, 137–174. Malden: Blackwell Pub. 10.1002/9780470996591.ch73
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996591.ch73 [Google Scholar]
  52. Xu, Liejiong & Liu, Danqing
    1998 Topic: Structural and functional analysis. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhang, Min
    2009 Hanyu huatihua jiegou xianzhi zhongde linjie tiaojian. In Editorial Committee of Essays on linguistics Center for Chinese Linguistics PKU (ed.), Essays on linguistics, vol.391, 523–572. Beijing: Commercial Press. (Special edition in honor of Prof. Noam Chomsky)
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00147.yan
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): MCP; null subject; null topic; pro drop; topic drop

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error