oa Causative alternation in Zuo Tradition

References

1. Ackema, Peter & Marelj, Marijana
   2012 To have the empty Theta-role. InEveraert, Martin & Marelj, Marijana & Siloni, Tal (eds.), The Theta system: Argument structure at the interface, 227–250. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602513.003.0009
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602513.003.0009 [Google Scholar]
2. Bhatt, Rajesh
   2003 Causativization in Hindi. Amherst: University of Massachusetts. (Unpublished class handout, March 2003.)
   [Google Scholar]
3. Borer, Hagit
   2005 Structuring sense, volume 2: The normal course of events. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263929.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263929.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
4. Butt, Miriam
   2003 The morpheme that wouldn’t go away. Manchester: University of Manchester. (Unpublished seminar handout.)
   [Google Scholar]
5. Chierchia, Gennaro
   2004 A semantics for unaccusatives and its syntactic consequences. InAlexiadou, Artemis & Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Everaert, Martin (eds.), The unaccusativity puzzle: Explorations of the syntax-lexicon interface, 22–59. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0002
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
6. Chomsky, Noam
   1995 The minimalist program. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Chomsky, Noam
   1999 Derivation by phase (MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18). Cambridge: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Chou, Fa-kao
   1962 A historical grammar of Ancient Chinese, part II: Morphology. Taipei: Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Chou, Tsu-mo
   1966 Wen xue ji. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Dai, Qingxia
    2001 The historical development of the causative category in Tibeto-Burmese languages. Journal of Chinese Linguistics29(1). 1–10.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Downer, G. B.
    1959 Derivation by tone-change in Classical Chinese. Bulletin of the School of African and Oriental Studies22(1/3). 258–290. 10.1017/S0041977X00068701
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X00068701 [Google Scholar]
12. Durrant, Stephen & Li, Wai-yee & Schaberg, David
    (trans.) 2016 Zuo Tradition/Zuozhuan: Commentary on the “Spring and Autumn Annals”. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Folli, Raffaella & Harley, Heidi
    2005 Flavors of v: Consuming results in Italian and English. InKempchinsky, Paula & Slabakova, Roumyana (eds.), Aspectual inquiries, 95–120. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/1‑4020‑3033‑9_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3033-9_5 [Google Scholar]
14. Folli, Raffaella & Harley, Heidi
    2007 Causation, obligation, and argument structure: On the nature of little v. Linguistic Inquiry38(2). 197–238. 10.1162/ling.2007.38.2.197
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2007.38.2.197 [Google Scholar]
15. Gates, Jesse P. & Honkasalo, Sami & Lai, Yunfan
    2022 From transitive to intransitive and voiceless to voiced in Proto-Sino-Tibetan: New evidence from Stau, Geshiza, and Khroskyabs. Language and Linguistics23(2). 212–239. https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00104.gat
    [Google Scholar]
16. Grohmann, Kleanthes K.
    2003 Prolific domains: On the anti-locality of movement dependencies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.66
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.66 [Google Scholar]
17. Hale, Kenneth L. & Keyser, Samuel Jay
    1991 On the syntax of argument structure (Lexicon Project Working Papers 34). Cambridge: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hale, Kenneth L. & Keyser, Samuel Jay
    1993 On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. InHale, Kenneth & Keyser, Samuel Jay (eds.), The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 53–109. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Harley, Heidi Britton
    1995 Subjects, events, and licensing. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
20. Jackendoff, Ray
    1972 Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Jespersen, Otto
    1965 A modern English grammar on historical principles. London: Allen & Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Jin, Lixin
    2005a The perfect aspect suffix *-s in Chinese and Tibetan. Minzu Yuwen 2005(2). 1–6.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Jin, Lixin
    2005b Shanggu Hanyu shengmu qingzhuo jiaoti he dongci de ti. Yuwen Yanjiu 2005(4). 29–33.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Kratzer, Angelika
    1996 Severing the external argument from its verb. InRooryck, Johan & Zaring, Laurie (eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon, 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑8617‑7_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_5 [Google Scholar]
25. Larson, Richard K.
    1988 On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry19(3). 335–391.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka
    1995 Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka
    2005 Argument realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511610479
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610479 [Google Scholar]
28. Lin, T.-H. Jonah
    2001 Light verb syntax and the theory of phrase structure. Irvine: University of California. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
29. Marantz, Alec
    1984 On the nature of grammatical relations. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Marantz, Alec
    1995 Cat as a phrasal idiom: Consequences of late insertion in distributed morphology. Cambridge: MIT. (Manuscript.)
    [Google Scholar]
31. Marelj, Marijana
    2004 Middles and argument structure across languages. Utrecht: Utrecht University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
32. Matisoff, James A.
    2003 Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and philosophy of Sino-Tibetan reconstruction. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. McKoon, Gail & Macfarland, Talke
    2000 Externally and internally caused change of state verbs. Language76(4). 833–858. 10.2307/417201
    https://doi.org/10.2307/417201 [Google Scholar]
34. Mei, Tsu-Lin
    1988 Three examples of internal reconstruction in Chinese. Zhongguo Yuwen 1988(3). 169–181.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Mei, Tsu-Lin
    2008 Consonant combinations in oracle bone inscriptions. Zhongguo Yuwen 2008(3). 195–207.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Mei, Tsu-Lin
    2012 The causative *s- and nominalizing *-s in Old Chinese and related matters in Proto-Sino-Tibetan. Language and Linguistics13(1). 1–28.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Mei, Tsu-LinEditorial Committee of Lishi Yuyanxue Yanjiu
    2013 The *-s suffix in Sino-Tibetan and its reflex in Old Chinese: Derivation by tone change revisited. InEditorial Committee of Lishi Yuyanxue Yanjiu (ed.), Lishi Yuyanxue Yanjiu, vol.61, 1–10. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Miyagawa, Shigeru
    2001 Causatives. InTsujimura, Natsuko (ed.), The handbook of Japanese linguistics, 236–268. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Perlmutter, David M.
    1978 Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. InJaeger, Jeri J. & Woodbury, Anthony C. & Ackerman, Farrell & Chiarello, Christine & Gensler, Orin & Kingston, John & Sweetser, Eve & Thompson, Henry & Whistler, Kenneth (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, 157–190. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. 10.3765/bls.v4i0.2198
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v4i0.2198 [Google Scholar]
40. Pesetsky, David
    1995 Zero syntax. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Pulleyblank, Edwin G.
    1973 Some further evidence regarding Old Chinese *-s and its time of disappearance. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies (BSOAS)36(2). 368–373. 10.1017/S0041977X00134342
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X00134342 [Google Scholar]
42. Ramchand, Gillian Catriona
    2008 Verb meaning and the lexicon: A first-phase syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486319
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486319 [Google Scholar]
43. Rappaport Hovav, Malka, & Levin, Beth
    2012 Lexicon uniformity and the causative alternation. InEveraert, Martin & Marelj, Marijana & Siloni, Tal (eds.), The Theta system: Argument structure at the interface, 150–176. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602513.003.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602513.003.0006 [Google Scholar]
44. Reinhart, Tanya
    2002 The Theta system: An overview. Theoretical Linguistics28(3). 229–290. 10.1515/thli.28.3.229
    https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.28.3.229 [Google Scholar]
45. Reinhart, Tanya
    2016 Concepts, syntax, and their interface: The Theta system. Cambridge: The MIT Press. (Edited byEveraert, Martin & Marelj, Marijana & Reuland, Eric.) 10.7551/mitpress/9780262034135.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262034135.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
46. Reinhart, Tanya & Siloni, Tal
    2005 The lexicon-syntax parameter: Reflexivization and other arity operations. Linguistic Inquiry36(3). 389–436. 10.1162/0024389054396881
    https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389054396881 [Google Scholar]
47. Sagart, Laurent
    1999 The roots of Old Chinese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.184
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.184 [Google Scholar]
48. Sagart, Laurent & Baxter, William
    2012 Reconstructing the* s-prefix in Old Chinese. Language and Linguistics13(1). 29–59.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Saksena, Anuradha
    1982 Topics in the analysis of causatives: With an account of Hindi paradigms. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Sun, Yuwen
    2015 Hanyu biandiao gouci kaobian. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Wang, Li
    1980 Hanyu shigao. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Wang, Li
    1982 Tongyuan zidian. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Wang, William S.-Y.
    2016 Chinese Linguistics. InChan, Sin-wai (ed.), The Routledge encyclopedia of the Chinese language, 152–183. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Wright, Saundra K.
    2002 Transitivity and change of state verbs. InLarson, Julie & Paster, Mary (eds.), BLS 28: General session and parasession on field linguistics, 339–350. Washington, D.C.: Linguistic Society of America. 10.3765/bls.v28i1.3849
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v28i1.3849 [Google Scholar]
55. Wuyun, Saina
    . Forthcoming. A distributed morphology account of tonal change in Middle Chinese. (Manuscript.)
    [Google Scholar]
56. Zhengzhang, Shangfang
    2019 Shanggu yinxi. 2nd edn.Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]