1887
Volume 25, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1606-822X
  • E-ISSN: 2309-5067

Abstract

Abstract

This paper investigates future interpretations in Mandarin declarative root clauses without overt future modals, i.e., Mandarin futurates. Mandarin futurates require future time adverbs and schedulable eventualities, which denote future readings relative to the utterance time or a context-determined past time. Moreover, Mandarin futurates presuppose the existence of a plan in the context and are incompatible with a single perfective aspect marker . To account for these facts, I argue that a covert future modal is present in futurates and extend the formal analysis for English simple futurates to Mandarin with necessary modifications.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00154.he
2024-04-02
2024-10-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lali.00154.he.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00154.he&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Dixon, Robert M. W.
    1998 Dependencies between grammatical systems. Language74(1). 56–80. 10.1353/lan.1998.0165
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1998.0165 [Google Scholar]
  2. Altshuler, Daniel
    2020 Tense and temporal adverbs: “I learned last week that there would now be an earthquake”. InGutzmann, Daniel & Matthewson, Lisa & Meier, Cécile & Rullmann, Hotze & Zimmermann, Thomas Ede (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to semantics, 1–31. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118788516.sem005
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118788516.sem005 [Google Scholar]
  3. Beaver, David I. & Clark, Brady Z.
    2008Sense and sensitivity: How focus determines meaning. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444304176
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444304176 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bennett, Michael & Partee, Barbara H.
    2004[1972] Toward the logic of tense and aspect in English. InPartee, Barbara H. (ed.), Compositionality in formal semantics: Selected papers by Barbara H. Partee, 59–109. Oxford: Blackwell. (Originally published in 1972 as a technical report for System Development Corporation, and reproduced by the Indiana University Linguistics Club in 1978.)
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bittner, Maria
    2014Temporality: Universals and variation. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118584002
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584002 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bochnak, M. Ryan
    2016 Past time reference in a language with optional tense. Linguistics and Philosophy39(4). 247–294. 10.1007/s10988‑016‑9191‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-016-9191-6 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2019 Future reference with and without future marking. Language and Linguistics Compass13(1). 1–22. 10.1111/lnc3.12307
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12307 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bochnak, M. Ryan & Hohaus, Vera & Mucha, Anne
    2019 Variation in tense and aspect, and the temporal interpretation of complement clauses. Journal of Semantics36(3). 407–452. 10.1093/jos/ffz008
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffz008 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cable, Seth
    2017 The implicatures of optional past tense in Tlingit and the implications for ‘discontinuous past’. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory35(3). 635–681. 10.1007/s11049‑016‑9355‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-016-9355-7 [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen, Sihwei
    2018Finding semantic building blocks: Temporal and modal interpretation in Atayal. Vancouver: University of British Columbia. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Chung, Sandra & Timberlake, Alan
    1985 Tense, aspect, and mood. InShopen, Timothy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, volume III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 202–258. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Comrie, Bernard
    1976Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Copley, Bridget
    2002The semantics of the future. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 2009The semantics of the future. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203880258
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203880258 [Google Scholar]
  15. Dahl, Östen
    1985Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Dai, Yaojing
    1994 “Le” zai biaoshi weilai yiyi juzi zhong de yongfa. InYu, Zhihong (ed.), Xiandai yuyanxue: Lilun jianshe de xin sikao, 114–122. Beijing: Language and Culture Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Dowty, David R.
    1979Word meaning and Montague grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in generative semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑9473‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9473-7 [Google Scholar]
  18. 1982 Tenses, time adverbs, and compositional semantic theory. Linguistics and Philosophy5(1). 23–55. 10.1007/BF00390692
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00390692 [Google Scholar]
  19. Giannakidou, Anastasia & Mari, Alda
    2018 A unified analysis of the future as epistemic modality. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory36(1). 85–129. 10.1007/s11049‑017‑9366‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-017-9366-z [Google Scholar]
  20. Hamblin, Charles L.
    1973 Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language10(1). 41–53.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. He, Yuyin
    2020Time in Mandarin: The fingerprints of tense and finiteness. Cambridge: Harvard University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Jóhannsdóttir, Kristín & Matthewson, Lisa
    2007 Zero-marked tense: The case of Gitxsan. InElfner, Emily J. & Walkow, Martin (eds.), NELS 37: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, vol.11, 299–309. Amherst: GLSA.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Karttunen, Lauri
    1977 Syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics and Philosophy1(1). 3–44. 10.1007/BF00351935
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00351935 [Google Scholar]
  24. Klein, Wolfgang
    1994Time in language. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Klein, Wolfgang & Li, Ping & Hendriks, Henriette
    2000 Aspect and assertion in Mandarin Chinese. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory18(4). 723–770. 10.1023/A:1006411825993
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006411825993 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kratzer, Angelika
    1977 What ‘must’ and ‘can’ must and can mean. Linguistics and Philosophy1(3). 337–355. 10.1007/BF00353453
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00353453 [Google Scholar]
  27. 1981 The notional category of modality. InEikmeyer, Hans J. & Rieser, Hannes (eds.), Words, worlds, and contexts: New approaches in word semantics, 38–74. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110842524‑004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110842524-004 [Google Scholar]
  28. 1991 Modality. Invon Stechow, Arnim & Wunderlich, Dieter (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of contemporary research, 639–650. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 1998 More structural analogies between pronouns and tenses. InStrolovitch, Devon & Lawson, Aaron (eds.), SALT 8: Proceedings of the Eighth Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference, 92–110. Ithaca: CLC Publications, Cornell University. 10.3765/salt.v8i0.2808
    https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v8i0.2808 [Google Scholar]
  30. Lakoff, George
    1971 Presupposition and relative well-formedness. InSteinberg, Danny D. & Jakobovits, Leon A. (eds.), Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology, 329–340. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Lin, Jo-wang
    2000 On the temporal meaning of the verbal -le in Chinese. Language and Linguistics1(2). 109–133.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 2006 Time in a language without tense: The case of Chinese. Journal of Semantics23(1). 1–53. 10.1093/jos/ffh033
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffh033 [Google Scholar]
  33. Malchukov, Andrej L.
    2009 Incompatible categories: Resolving the “present perfective paradox”. InHogeweg, Lotte & de Hoop, Helen & Malchukov, Andrej L. (eds.), Cross-linguistic semantics of tense, aspect, and modality, 13–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.148.02mal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.148.02mal [Google Scholar]
  34. Matthewson, Lisa
    2006 Temporal semantics in a superficially tenseless language. Linguistics and Philosophy29(6). 673–713. 10.1007/s10988‑006‑9010‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-006-9010-6 [Google Scholar]
  35. 2012 On the (non-)future orientation of modals. InGuevara, Ana Aguilar & Chernilovskaya, Anna & Nouwen, Rick (eds.), SuB 16: Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung161, vol.21, 431–446. Cambridge: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Mucha, Anne
    2015Temporal interpretation and cross-linguistic variation: A formal semantic analysis of temporal and aspectual reference in Hausa and Medumba. Potsdam: University of Potsdam. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Ogihara, Toshiyuki
    1996Tense, attitudes, and scope. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑8609‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8609-2 [Google Scholar]
  38. Pancheva, Roumyana & von Stechow, Arnim
    2004 On the present perfect puzzle. InMoulton, Keir & Wolf, Matthew (eds.), NELS 34: Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, vol.21, 469–483. Amherst: GLSA.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Partee, Barbara Hall
    1973 Some structural analogies between tenses and pronouns in English. The Journal of Philosophy70(18). 601–609. 10.2307/2025024
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2025024 [Google Scholar]
  40. Reis Silva, Amélia & Matthewson, Lisa
    2007 An instantaneous present tense in Blackfoot. InDeal, Amy Rose (ed.), SULA 4: Proceedings of the 4th Conference on the Semantics of Under-Represented Languages in the Americas (University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 35), 191–214. Amherst: GLSA.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Rullmann, Hotze & Huijsmans, Marianne & Matthewson, Lisa & Todorović, Neda
    2022 Why plain futurates are different. Linguistic Inquiry54(1). 197–208. 10.1162/ling_a_00435
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00435 [Google Scholar]
  42. Soh, Hooi Ling & Gao, Meijia
    2008 Mandarin sentential -le, perfect and English already. InDölling, Johannes & Heyde-Zybatow, Tatjana & Schäfer, Martin (eds.), Event structures in linguistic form and interpretation, 447–473. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110925449.447
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110925449.447 [Google Scholar]
  43. Sun, Hongyuan
    2014Temporal construals of bare predicates in Mandarin Chinese. Nantes & Leiden: University of Nantes & Leiden University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Thomas, Guillaume
    2014 Nominal tense and temporal implicatures: Evidence from Mbyá. Natural Language Semantics22(4). 357–412. 10.1007/s11050‑014‑9108‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-014-9108-2 [Google Scholar]
  45. Thomason, Richmond H.
    1970 Indeterminist time and truth-value gaps. Theoria36(3). 264–281. 10.1111/j.1755‑2567.1970.tb00427.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.1970.tb00427.x [Google Scholar]
  46. Tonhauser, Judith
    2011 The Paraguayan Guaraní future marker –ta: Formal semantics and cross-linguistic comparison. InMusan, Renate & Rathert, Monika (eds.), Tense across languages, 207–231. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110267020.207
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110267020.207 [Google Scholar]
  47. Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan
    2008 Tense anchoring in Chinese. Lingua118(5). 675–686. 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.09.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.09.002 [Google Scholar]
  48. Wu, Jiun-Shiung
    2003Modeling temporal progression in Mandarin: Aspect markers and temporal relations. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Wurmbrand, Susi
    2014 Tense and aspect in English infinitives. Linguistic Inquiry45(3). 403–447. 10.1162/LING_a_00161
    https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00161 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00154.he
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00154.he
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): aspect; modality; simple futurates; tense & tenselessness
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error