1887
Volume 25, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1606-822X
  • E-ISSN: 2309-5067

Abstract

抽象的

Daniel & Moravcsik (2005)認為連類複數標記與真性複數標記同形的原因在於:連類複數標記由真性複數標記發展而來。本文通過對揭陽閩語的分析,證明存在另一種方向的演變路徑:連類複數標記也可發展為真性複數標記。揭陽閩語中來源於第三人稱代詞複數形式「伊儂」(他們)的複數標記具有雙重標記身份,既可用作連類複數標記後附於指人專有名詞,也可用作真性複數標記後附於指人普通名詞。「伊儂」由連類複數標記演變為真性複數標記的關鍵在於:「親屬類普通名詞+複數標記」結構中的親屬稱謂具有雙重屬性,使得連類複數出現了可分析為真性複數的橋樑語境,「伊儂」的真性複數標記身份由此獲得。本文對於兩類複數之間的關係以及複數標記的歷史演變問題,均具有較為重要的類型學意義。

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00161.she
2024-07-02
2025-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lali.00161.she.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00161.she&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Chierchia, Gennaro
    1998a Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of “semantic parameter”. InRothstein, Susan (ed.), Events and grammar, 53–103. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑3969‑4_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3969-4_4 [Google Scholar]
  2. 1998b Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics6(4). 339–405. 10.1023/A:1008324218506
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008324218506 [Google Scholar]
  3. Corbett, Greville G.
    2000Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139164344
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164344 [Google Scholar]
  4. Croft, William
    2003Typology and universals. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Daniel, Michael & Moravcsik, Edith
    2005 The associative plural. InHaspelmath, Martin & Dryer, Matthew S. & Gil, David & Comrie, Bernard (eds.), The world atlas of language structure (WALS), 150–153. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Huang, Diancheng (黃典誠)
    1980 Minyu ren zi de benzi閩語人字的本字. Fangyan方言 1980(4). 312–313.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Huang, Ruiling & Sheng, Yimin
    2022 Referential Types of bare nouns and anti-grammaticalization of prefixes: A case study of 阿a33 in Chaoshan Southern Min dialect. Paper presented at the35th Paris Meeting on East Asian Linguistics (JLAO35), Paris, 7–9 July 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Jiang, Haowen (江豪文)
    2019A typological study of plural expressions – Associative plurals and inclusory constructions in Austronesian languages of Taiwan複數表達的類型學研究——臺灣南島語的連類複數與包含結構. Beijing: Peking University. (Postdoctoral working paper.)
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Li, Rulong (李如龍)
    1999 Minnan fangyan de daici閩南方言的代詞. In Li, Rulong (李如龍) & Chang, Song Hing (張雙慶) (eds.), Daici代詞, 263–288. Guangzhou: Jinan University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Liu, Danqing (劉丹青)
    (ed.) 2008A handbook for grammatical investigation and research語法調查研究手冊. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 2011 Linguistic inventory typology: A proposal for a new approach of linguistic typology語言庫藏類型學構想. Dangdai Yuyanxue當代語言學 2011(4). 289–303.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Mauri, Caterina & Sansò, Andrea
    2019 Nouns & co. Converging evidence in the analysis of associative plurals. Language Typology and Universals72(4). 603–626. 10.1515/stuf‑2019‑0023
    https://doi.org/10.1515/stuf-2019-0023 [Google Scholar]
  13. Mei, Tsu-Lin (梅祖麟)
    2000 Minnanyu fushu rencheng daici xingcheng heyin de niandai閩南語複數人稱代詞形成合音的年代. In Ting, Pang-hsin (丁邦新) & Yue, Anne O. (余靄芹) (eds.), In memory of Professor Li Fang-Kuei: Essays of linguistic change and the Chinese dialects語言變化與漢語方言─李方桂先生紀念文集, 261–269. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics (Preparatory Office), Academia Sinica.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Michaelis, Susanne Maria & Haspelmath, Martin
    2013 The associative plural. InMichaelis, Susanne Maria & Maurer, Philippe & Haspelmath, Martin & Huber, Magnus (eds.), The atlas of pidgin and creole language structures, 92–95. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Moravcsik, Edith A.
    2003 A semantic analysis of associative plurals. Studies in Language27(3). 469–503. 10.1075/sl.27.3.02mor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.27.3.02mor [Google Scholar]
  16. Pan, Wuyun (潘悟雲) & Chen, Zhongmin (陳忠敏)
    1995 On nong (儂)釋儂. Journal of Chinese Linguistics中國語言學報23(2). 129–147.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Payne, Thomes E.
    2011Describing morphosyntax: A guide for field linguists. Beijing: World Publishing Corporation. (Alternative title: 如何描述形態句法.)
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Reina, Javier Caro
    2020 Differential object marking with proper names in Romance languages, InKempf, Luise & Nübling, Damaris & Schmuck, Mirjam (eds.), Linguistik der Eigennamen, 225–258. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110685886‑009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110685886-009 [Google Scholar]
  19. Shao, Huijun (邵慧君)
    2004 On nong (儂) and its development「儂」字稱代演化軌跡探論. Zhongguo Yuwen中國語文 2004(1). 46–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Si, Qisheng (施其生)
    1999 Shantou fangyan dedaici汕頭方言的代詞. In Li, Rulong (李如龍) & Chang, Song Hing (張雙慶) (eds.), Daici代詞, 289–324. Guangzhou: Jinan University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Sheng, Yimin (盛益民)
    2019 Singularization of plural personal pronouns and the origin of singular suffix nong (儂) in Chinese dialects: Semantic innovation and its implications on the pronominal system in Southeast Chinese dialects從複數單數化看漢語方言人稱代詞單數後綴「儂」的來源. Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics12(1). 29–51.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 2021 Wuyu Shaoxing (Keqiao) fangyan cankao yufa吳語紹興(柯橋)方言參考語法. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Xiong, Jiajuan & Huang, Chu-Ren
    2019 Plurality and definiteness in Chengdu Chinese. Language and Linguistics21(4). 652–684.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Yang, Yonglogn (楊永龍)
    2014 The typological feature and a diachronical comparison study of the plural marker mu ‘們’ in Gangou dialect of Qinghai province青海甘溝話複數標記「們」[mu]的類型特徵及歷史比較. Lishi Yuyanxue Yanjiu歷史語言學研究81. 239–254.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhang, Min (張敏)
    1998 Renzhi yuyanxue yu Hanyu mingci duanyu認知語言學與漢語名詞短語. Beijing: China Social Sciences Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Zhang, Xiaojing (張曉靜) & Chen, Zeping (陳澤平)
    2015 Hebei Wuyi fangyan fushubiaoji men河北武邑方言複數標記「們」. Zhongguo Yuwen中國語文 2015(2). 153–157.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00161.she
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00161.she
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error