oa Thewo Tibetan’s /ta³³/ and /nə³³/

References

1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
   2004 Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199263882.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199263882.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
2. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
   (ed.) 2018 The Oxford handbook of evidentiality. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
3. Caiji Wenmao
   Caiji Wenmao 2020 The evidential category in Chengduo variety of Khams Tibetan. Minzu Yuwen 2020(). –.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Caplow, Nancy J.
   2017 Inference and deferred evidence in Tibetan. InGawne, Lauren & Hill, Nathan W. (eds.), Evidential systems of Tibetan languages, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110473742‑008
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110473742-008 [Google Scholar]
5. Daojie Ben & Sangta & Dawa Pengcuo
   2020 The grammatical categories of the classical Tibetan verbs. InRoumbal, Iana & Zhang, Yong & Huo, Mingming & Volodina, Tatiana (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Education, Language, Art and Inter-cultural Communication (ICELAIC 2020), –. Dordrecht: Atlantis Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. DeLancey, Scott
   1986 Evidentiality and volitionality in Tibetan. InChafe, Wallace L. & Johanna, Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, –. Norwood: Ablex.
   [Google Scholar]
7. DeLancey, Scott
   1990 Ergativity and the cognitive model of event structure in Lhasa Tibetan. Cognitive Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/cogl.1990.1.3.289
   https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.3.289 [Google Scholar]
8. DeLancey, Scott
   1997 Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology(). –. 10.1515/lity.1997.1.1.33
   https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1997.1.1.33 [Google Scholar]
9. DeLancey, Scott
   2012 Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology(). –. 10.1515/lity‑2012‑0020
   https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2012-0020 [Google Scholar]
10. DeLancey, Scott
    2018 Evidentiality in Tibetic. InAikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, –. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.27
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.27 [Google Scholar]
11. Ebihara, Shiho
    2013 Preliminary field report on dPa’ris dialect of Amdo Tibetan. Journal of Research Institute. –. (id.nii.ac.jp/1085/00001409/) (Accessed2022-12-05.)
    [Google Scholar]
12. Garrett, Edward John
    2001 Evidentiality and assertion in Tibetan. Los Angeles: University of California at Los Angeles. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
13. Gawne, Lauren
    2013 Lamjung Yolmo copulas in use: Evidentiality, reported speech and questions. Melbourne: University of Melbourne. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
14. Gawne, Lauren & Hill, Nathan W.
    (eds.) 2017 Evidential systems of Tibetan languages. Leiden: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110473742
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110473742 [Google Scholar]
15. Hale, Austin
    1980 Person markers: Finite conjunct and disjunct verb forms in Newari. InTrail, Ronald L. & Rathod, Harisingh T. & Chand, Geeta & Roy, Chaudhary & Shrestha, Indira & Tuladhar, Nirmal Man (eds.), Papers in South-East Asian linguistics, vol., –. Canberra: Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Haller, Felix
    2009 Switch reference in Tibetan. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Hein, Veronika
    2007 The mirative and its interplay with evidentiality in the Tibetan dialect of Tabo (Spiti). Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hengeveld, Kees & Olbertz, Hella
    2012 Didn’t you know? Mirativity does exist!. Linguistic Typology(). –. 10.1515/lity‑2012‑0018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2012-0018 [Google Scholar]
19. Hill, Nathan W.
    2012 “Mirativity” does not exist: ḥdug in “Lhasa” Tibetan and other suspects. Linguistic Typology(). –. 10.1515/lity‑2012‑0016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2012-0016 [Google Scholar]
20. Hill, Nathan W.
    2013 Contextual semantics of ‘Lhasa’ Tibetan evidentials. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hongladarom, Krisadawan
    1993 Evidentials in Tibetan: A dialogic study of the interplay between form and meaning. Bloomington: Indiana University. (Doctoral dissertation).
    [Google Scholar]
22. Hongladarom, Krisadawan
    2007 Evidentiality in Rgyalthang Tibetan. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Huber, Brigitte
    2000 Preliminary report on evidential categories in Lende Tibetan (Kyirong). Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Jin, Peng
    (ed.) 1983 Zangyu jianzhi. Beijing: The Ethnic Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Kalsang & Garfield, Jay & Speas, Margaret & de Villiers, Jill
    2013 Direct evidentials, case, tense and aspect in Tibetan: Evidence for a general theory of the semantics of evidential. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory(). –. 10.1007/s11049‑013‑9193‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-013-9193-9 [Google Scholar]
26. Lin, You-Jing
    2014 Thebo. InSun, Jackson T.-S. (ed.), Phonological profiles of little-studied Tibetic varieties, –. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Oisel, Guillaume
    2017 Re-evaluation of the evidential system of Lhasa Tibetan and its atypical functions. Himalayan Linguistics(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Powell, Abe
    2022 Mapping the spatial relationship between sub-basins and language variation in Thewo Tibetan. Himalayan Linguistics(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Renzeng Wangmu
    Renzeng Wangmu 2013 Diebu Zangyu yanjiu. Beijing: Minzu University of China Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Sangsrgyas Tshering
    Sangsrgyas Tshering 2020 The voicing of unvoiced obstruents in Thebo Tibetan. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale(). –. 10.1163/19606028‑bja10001
    https://doi.org/10.1163/19606028-bja10001 [Google Scholar]
31. Shao, Mingyuan
    2015 The direct and inferential evidentiality in Amdo Tibetan. In Editorial Committee ofHistorical Linguistics Research, Institute of Linguistics CASS (ed.), Lishi yuyanxue yanjiu, vol., –. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Sun, Jackson T.-S.
    1993 Evidentials in Amdo Tibetan. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Suzuki, Hiroyuki & Sonam Wangmo & Tsering Samdrup
    2021 A contrastive approach to the evidential system in Tibetic languages: Examining five varieties from Khams and Amdo. Gengo Kenkyu. –.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Tournadre, Nicolas
    2017 A typological sketch of evidential/epistemic categories in the Tibetic languages. InGawne, Lauren & Hill, Nathan W. (eds.), Evidential systems of Tibetan languages, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110473742‑004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110473742-004 [Google Scholar]
35. Tournadre, Nicholas & Konchok Jiatso
    2001 Final auxiliary verbs in literary Tibetan and in the dialects. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Tournadre, Nicolas & LaPolla, Randy J.
    2014 Towards a new approach to evidentiality: Issues and directions for research. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area(). –. 10.1075/ltba.37.2.04tou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.37.2.04tou [Google Scholar]
37. Tournadre, Nicolas & Suzuki, Hiroyuki
    2023 The Tibetic languages: An introduction to the family of languages derived from Old Tibetan. Paris: Lacito Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Tsering Samdrup & Suzuki, HiroyukiThe Organizing Committee of the 51st International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics
    2018 Evidential system in Mabzhi Tibetan of Amdo. InThe Organizing Committee of the 51st International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics (ed.), Proceedings of the 51st International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics, –. Kyoto: Kyoto University.
    [Google Scholar]
39. van Driem, George
    1998 Dzongkha. Leiden: Research School of Asian, African, and Amerindian Studies (CNWS), Leiden University.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Woodbury, Anthony C.
    1986 Interactions of tense and evidentiality: A study of Sherpa and English. InChafe, Wallace L. & Nichols, Johanna (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, –. Norwood: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Zeisler, Bettina
    2018 Don’t believe in a paradigm that you haven’t manipulated yourself!—Evidentiality, speaker attitude, and admirativity in Ladakhi. Himalayan Linguistics(). –. 10.5070/H917136797
    https://doi.org/10.5070/H917136797 [Google Scholar]
42. Zemp, Marius
    2020 Evidentials and their pivot in Tibetic and neighboring Himalayan languages. Functions of Language(). –. 10.1075/fol.20003.zem
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.20003.zem [Google Scholar]
43. Zhou Ta
    Zhou Ta 1996 Gansu Zangzu buluo de shehui yu lishi yanjiu. Lanzhou: Gansu Nationalities Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]