1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Language and Linguistics
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of 未來不等於非現實語氣 [Future is not irrealis mood]
EPUB
PDF

Abstract

抽象的

台灣南島語言在構詞上沒有顯性的時制範式，但有不同形式的未來標記，在時間系統上呈現非未來和未來二分。過去文獻因為這些未來標記具有情態性，認為非未來/未來的區分可由真實/非真實事態的區分來推導，主張它們代表非現實語氣且台灣南島語言是所謂的非現實語氣顯著語言。本文根據泰雅語的第一手語料、以及詳細檢視鄒語和邵語的材料，證明這些語言的未來標記是帶有未來性的情態詞，不適宜分析為非現實語氣這個語法範疇。迥異於跨語言非現實語氣的表現，這些未來標記在各種非真實環境不是不能出現就是侷限於未來性，它們也不能出現或不必然使用在反事實條件句的結論句。跨南島語來看，台灣南島語言與具有現實/非現實語氣範式的大洋洲語言在焦點和語氣的有無上形成顯著對比。在理論分析的意義上，真實性是結合時間與情態的廣義語法範疇，但在這三個台灣南島語言，未來標記的功能僅為非現實語氣的下位詞。釐清未來標記不等於非現實語氣後，未來更多的研究可關注其他可能表達非真實事態的標記及時制的有無。

© ILAS
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00176.che
2024-09-20
2024-10-06

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/lali.00176.che
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/lali.00176.che/lali.00176.che.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00176.che&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Aldridge, Edith
    2016 Ergativity from subjunctive in Austronesian languages. Language and Linguistics(). –. 10.1177/1606822X1561349
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1606822X1561349 [Google Scholar]
  2. Barbour, Julie
    2011 Exploring mood in Neverver. Oceanic Linguistics(). –. 10.1353/ol.2011.0012
     https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2011.0012 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bhat, D. N. S.
    1999 The prominence of tense, aspect and mood. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.49
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.49 [Google Scholar]
  4. Blust, Robert
    2003 Three notes on early Austronesian morphology. Oceanic Linguistics(). –. 10.1353/ol.2003.0018
     https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2003.0018 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2013 The Austronesian languages. Revised edn. (https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/10191/6/Blust-2013-AustronesianLanguages.pdf) (Accessed2024-06-18.)
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bugenhagen, Robert D.
    1993 The semantics of irrealis in Austronesian languages of Papua New Guinea: A cross-linguistic study. InReesink, Ger P. (ed.), Topics in descriptive Austronesian linguistics (Semaian 11), –. Leiden: Vakgroep Talen en Culturen van Zuidoost-Azië en Oceanië.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bybee, Joan L.
    1998 “Irrealis” as a grammatical category. Anthropological Linguistics(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bybee, Joan L. & Pagliuca, William & Perkins, Revere D.
    1991 Back to the future. InTraugott, Elizabeth Closs & Heine, Bernd (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, vol., –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.19.2.04byb
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.2.04byb [Google Scholar]
  9. Bybee, Joan L. & Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William
    1994 The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Cable, Seth
    2017 The implicatures of optional past tense in Tlingit and the implications for ‘discontinuous past’. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. –. 10.1007/s11049‑016‑9355‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-016-9355-7 [Google Scholar]
  11. Chafe, Wallace
    1995 The realis-irrealis distinction in Caddo, the Northern Iroquoian languages, and English. InBybee, Joan & Fleischman, Suzanne (eds.), Modality in grammar and discourse, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.32.15cha
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.32.15cha [Google Scholar]
  12. Chang, Henry Y. (張永利) & Pan, Chia-jung (潘家榮)
    2018 Zouyu yufa gailun鄒語語法概論. 2nd edn.Taipei: Council of Indigenous Peoples.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Chang, Henry Y. (張永利) & Zheng, Zheng-zong (鄭政宗)
    2010 Yuanzhuminzu yuyan xianshangcidian (Zouyu)原住民族語言線上辭典(鄒語). Taipei: The Council of Indigenous Peoples. (https://e-dictionary.ilrdf.org.tw/tsu/download.htm) (Accessed2024-04-12.)
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen, Sihwei
    2018 Finding semantic building blocks: Temporal and modal interpretation in Atayal. Vancouver: University of British Columbia. (Doctoral dissertation.) 10.14288/1.0373089
     https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0373089 [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen, Sihwei & Hohaus, Vera & Laturnus, Rebecca & Louie, Meagan & Matthewson, Lisa & Rullmann, Hotze & Simchen, Ori & Turner, Claire K. & Vander Klok, Jozina
    2017 Past possibility cross-linguistically: Evidence from twelve languages. InArregui, Ana & Rivero, Maria Luisa & Salanova, Andres (eds.), Modality across syntactic categories, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198718208.003.0012
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198718208.003.0012 [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen, Sihwei & Jiang, Haowen
    2020 Ways of talking about the past: The semantics of -in- and =in in Bunun. InChang, Henry Y. & Huang, Hui-chuan J. (eds.), Papers from the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association 25 (JSEALS Special Publication 5), –. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Chung, Sandra & Timberlake, Alan
    1985 Tense, aspect, and mood. InShopen, Timothy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol., –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Comrie, Bernard
    1985 Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139165815
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165815 [Google Scholar]
  19. Condoravdi, Cleo
    2002 Temporal interpretation of modals: Modals for the present and for the past. InBeaver, David I. & Casillas Martínez, Luis D. & Clark, Brady Z. & Kaufmann, Stefan (eds.), The construction of meaning, –. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Dahl, Östen
    1985 Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. de Haan, Ferdinand
    2012 Irrealis: Fact or fiction?Language Sciences(). –. 10.1016/j.langsci.2011.06.016
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2011.06.016 [Google Scholar]
  22. Egerod, Søren
    1999 Atayal-English dictionary. 2nd edn.Copenhagen: The Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Elliott, Jennifer R.
    2000 Realis and irrealis: Forms and concepts of the grammaticalisation of reality. Linguistic Typology(). –. 10.1515/lity.2000.4.1.55
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2000.4.1.55 [Google Scholar]
  24. Enç, Murvet
    1996 Tense and modality. InLappin, Shalom (ed.), The handbook of contemporary semantic theory, –. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Huang, Shuanfan & Huang, Huei-ju
    2003 On the status of reality marking in Tsou. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics(). –. 10.6519/TJL.2003.1(2).1
     https://doi.org/10.6519/TJL.2003.1(2).1 [Google Scholar]
  26. Huang, Huei-ju
    2003 The tense, aspect and reality in Tsou and Saisiyat. Taipei: National Taiwan University. (Master’s thesis.)
     [Google Scholar]
  27. 2010 The syntax and pragmatics of clausal constituents in Tsou discourse. Taipei: National Taiwan University. (Doctoral dissertation.) 10.6342/NTU.2010.01342
     https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2010.01342 [Google Scholar]
  28. Huang, Lillian M. (黃美金)
    1995 A study of Mayrinax syntax汶水泰雅語語法. Taipei: Crane.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. 2000 Taiyayu cankaoyufa泰雅語參考語法. Taipei: Yuan-Liou.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Huang, Lillian M. (黃美金) & Hayung, Tali’ (吳新生)
    2018 Taiyayu yufa gailun泰雅語語法概論. 2nd edn.Taipei: Council of Indigenous Peoples.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. 2012 Yuanzhuminzu yuyan xianshangcidian (Taiyayu)原住民族語言線上辭典 (泰雅語). Taipei: The Council of Indigenous Peoples. (https://e-dictionary.ilrdf.org.tw/tay/download.htm) (Accessed2024-04-12.)
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K.
    2002 The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316423530
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316423530 [Google Scholar]
  33. Iatridou, Sabine
    2000 The grammatical ingredients of counterfactuality. Linguistic Inquiry(). –. 10.1162/002438900554352
     https://doi.org/10.1162/002438900554352 [Google Scholar]
  34. Jean, Shih Lang (簡史朗)
    2018 Shaoyu yufa gailun邵語語法概論. 2nd edn.Taipei: Council of Indigenous Peoples.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Jean, Shih Lang (簡史朗) & Kilash, Ama (石阿松)
    2010 Yuanzhuminzu yuyan xianshangcidian (Shaoyu)原住民族語言線上辭典 (邵語). Taipei: The Council of Indigenous Peoples. (https://e-dictionary.ilrdf.org.tw/ssf/download.htm) (Accessed2024-04-12.)
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Klein, Wolfgang
    1994 Time in language. London: Routledge. 10.1002/9781444309645.ch1
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444309645.ch1 [Google Scholar]
  37. Krajinović, Ana
    2020 Tense, mood, and aspect expressions in Nafsan (South Efate) from a typological perspective: The perfect aspect and the realis/irrealis mood. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne. (Doctoral dissertation.) 10.13140/RG.2.2.36354.50884
     https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.36354.50884 [Google Scholar]
  38. Kratzer, Angelika
    2012 Modals and conditionals. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199234684.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199234684.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  39. Lazard, Gilbert
    2006 More on counterfactuality, and on categories in general. Linguistic Typology(). –. 10.1515/LINGTY.2006.003
     https://doi.org/10.1515/LINGTY.2006.003 [Google Scholar]
  40. Li, Paul Jen-kuei
    2011 Thao texts and songs. (Language and Linguistics Monograph Series 44). Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Lichtenberk, Frantisek
    1983 A grammar of Manam. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. 2016 Modality and mood in Oceanic. InNuyts, Jan & van der Auwera, Johan (eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and mood, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591435.013.15
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591435.013.15 [Google Scholar]
  43. Lynch, John & Ross, Malcolm & Crowley, Terry
    2011[2002] The Oceanic languages. London & New York: Routledge. (Originally published in 2002 by Curzon Press.)
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Matthewson, Lisa
    2006 Temporal semantics in a superficially tenseless language. Linguistics and Philosophy. –. 10.1007/s10988‑006‑9010‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-006-9010-6 [Google Scholar]
  45. McGregor, William B. & Wagner, Tamsin
    2006 The semantics and pragmatics of irrealis mood in Nyulnyulan languages. Oceanic Linguistics(). –. 10.1353/ol.2007.0005
     https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2007.0005 [Google Scholar]
  46. Mithun, Marianne
    1995 On the relativity of irreality. InBybee, Joan & Fleischman, Suzanne (eds.), Modality in grammar and discourse, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.32.16mit
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.32.16mit [Google Scholar]
  47. Nuyts, Jan & van der Auwera, Johan
    (eds.) 2016 The Oxford handbook of modality and mood. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591435.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591435.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  48. Palmer, Frank R.
    2001 Mood and modality. 2nd edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139167178
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167178 [Google Scholar]
  49. Pan, Chia-jung
    2012 A grammar of Lha’alua, an Austronesian language of Taiwan. Townsville: James Cook University. (Doctoral dissertation.) 10.25903/k90s‑yp38
     https://doi.org/10.25903/k90s-yp38 [Google Scholar]
  50. Portner, Paul
    2009 Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199292424.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199292424.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  51. 2018 Mood. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199547524.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199547524.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  52. Roberts, John R.
    1990 Modality in Amele and other Papuan languages. Journal of Linguistics(). –. 10.1017/S0022226700014717
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700014717 [Google Scholar]
  53. Ross, Malcolm
    2009 Proto Austronesian verbal morphology: A reappraisal. InAdelaar, Alexander & Pawley, Andrew (eds.), Austronesian historical linguistics and culture history: A festschrift for Robert Blust, –. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. 2015 Reconstructing Proto Austronesian verb classes. Language and Linguistics(). –. 10.1177/1606822X15569162
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1606822X15569162 [Google Scholar]
  55. Rullmann, Hotze, & Matthewson, Lisa
    2018 Towards a theory of modal-temporal interaction. Language(). –. 10.1353/lan.2018.0018
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2018.0018 [Google Scholar]
  56. Sansò, Andrea
    2020 Routes towards the irrealis. Transactions of the Philological Society(). –. 10.1111/1467‑968X.12197
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.12197 [Google Scholar]
  57. Sun, Hongyuan
    2014 Temporal construals of bare predicates in Mandarin Chinese. Utrecht: LOT.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Sun, Jackson T.-S.
    2007 The irrealis category in rGyalrong. Language and Linguistics(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Teng, Stacy Fang-ching
    2008 A reference grammar of Puyuma, an Austronesian language of Taiwan (Pacific Linguistics 595). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Tonhauser, Judith
    2011 The Paraguayan Guaraní future marker -ta: Formal semantics and cross linguistic comparison. InMusan, Renate & Rathert, Monika (eds.), Tense across languages, –. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110267020.207
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110267020.207 [Google Scholar]
  61. Ultan, Russell
    1978 The nature of future tenses. InGreenberg, Joseph H. (ed.), Universals of human language, vol., –. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. van Gijn, Rik & Gipper, Sonja
    2009 Irrealis in Yurakare and other languages: On the cross-linguistic consistency of an elusive category. InHogeweg, Lotte & de Hoop, Helen & Malchukov, Andrej L. (eds.), Cross-linguistic semantics of tense, aspect and modality, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.148.07gij
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.148.07gij [Google Scholar]
  63. Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
    2005 The semantics and pragmatics of composite mood marking: The non-Pama-Nyungan languages of northern Australia. Linguistic Typology(). –. 10.1515/lity.2005.9.2.223
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2005.9.2.223 [Google Scholar]
  64. von Prince, Kilu
    2019 Counterfactuality and past. Linguistics and Philosophy. –. 10.1007/s10988‑019‑09259‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-019-09259-6 [Google Scholar]
  65. von Prince, Kilu & Krajinović, Ana & Krifka, Manfred
    2022 Irrealis is real. Language(). –. 10.1353/lan.2022.0009
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2022.0009 [Google Scholar]
  66. von Prince, Kilu & Krajinović, Ana & Krifka, Manfred & Guérin, Valérie & Franjieh, Michael
    2019 Mapping irreality: Storyboards for eliciting TAM contexts. InGattnar, Anja & Hörnig, Robin & Störzer, Melanie & Featherston, Sam (eds.), Proceedings of Linguistic Evidence 2018: Experimental Data Drives Linguistic Theory, –. Tübingen: University of Tübingen.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Wang, Shan-Shan
    2004 An ergative view of Thao syntax. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i at Mānoa. (Doctoral dissertation.)
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Weng, Cuixia (翁翠霞)
    2000 A contrastive study of tense, mood and aspect systems in Tsou and Thao鄒語和邵語的時、態、貌系統之比較與研究. Chiayi: National Chung Cheng University. (Master’s thesis.)
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Yang, Gloria Fan-pei
    2001 Evidentiality in Tsou. Taipei: National Taiwan University. (Master’s thesis.)
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Zeitoun, Elizabeth
    2000 Zouyu cankao yufa鄒語參考語法. Taipei: Yuan-Liou.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. 2005 Tsou. InAdelaar, Alexander & Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. (eds.), The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar, –. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203821121
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203821121 [Google Scholar]
  72. 2024 Tense, aspect, and mood in Formosan languages. InLi, Paul Jen-kuei & Zeitoun, Elizabeth & De Busser, Rik (eds.), Handbook of Formosan languages online: The indigenous languages of Taiwan, vol., –. Boston: Brill.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Zeitoun, Elizabeth & Huang, Lillian M.
    1997 Toward a typology of tense, aspect and modality in Formosan language: A preliminary study. InTseng, Chiu-yu (ed.), Proceedings of the IsCCL4, Symposium Series of the Institute of History and Philology, –. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. 2000 Concerning ka-, an overlooked marker of verbal derivation in Formosan languages. Oceanic Linguistics(). –. 10.1353/ol.2000.0023
     https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2000.0023 [Google Scholar]
  75. Zeitoun, Elizabeth & Huang, Lillian M. & Yeh, Marie M. & Chang, Anna H. & Wu, Joy J.
    1996 The temporal, aspectual, and modal systems of some Formosan languages: A typological perspective. Oceanic Linguistics(). –. 10.2307/3623029
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3623029 [Google Scholar]
  76. Zeitoun, Elizabeth & Teng, Stacy F.
    2016 Reassessing the position of Kanakanavu and Saaroa among the Formosan languages. Oceanic Linguistics(). –. 10.1353/ol.2016.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2016.0001 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00176.che
Loading
未來不等於非現實語氣 [Future is not irrealis mood]
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00176.che
/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00176.che
/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00176.che
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: 未來 ; 語氣 ; mood ; irrealis ; tense ; Formosan ; 情態 ; modality ; future ; 時制 ; 台灣南島語 ; 非現實

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error