oa Latin h- and Tibetan འḥ

References

1. Bialek, Joanna
   2023 Old Literary Tibetan: A comprehensive grammatical description based on the Old Tibetan Annals. Marburg: Philipps-Universität Marburg. (Habilitationsschrift.)
   [Google Scholar]
2. Coblin, W. South
   1994 A compendium of phonetics in Northwest Chinese. Berkeley: Project on Linguistic Analysis, University of California.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Coblin, W. South
   2002 On certain functions of ’a-chung in early Tibetan transcriptional texts. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area25(2). 169–184. 10.32655/LTBA.25.2.09
   https://doi.org/10.32655/LTBA.25.2.09 [Google Scholar]
4. Coblin, W. South
   2006 Two notes on Táng-time Tibetan transcriptions of Chinese. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area29(2). 135–138. 10.32655/LTBA.29.2.06
   https://doi.org/10.32655/LTBA.29.2.06 [Google Scholar]
5. Gong, Xun
   2016 Prenasalized reflex of Old Tibetan <ld-> and related clusters in Central Tibetan. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale45(2). 127–147. 10.1163/19606028‑00452p02
   https://doi.org/10.1163/19606028-00452p02 [Google Scholar]
6. Hill, Nathan W.
   2005 Once more on the letter འ. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area28(2). 111–141. 10.32655/LTBA.28.2.04
   https://doi.org/10.32655/LTBA.28.2.04 [Google Scholar]
7. Hill, Nathan W.
   2009 Tibetan <ḥ-> as a plain initial and its place in Old Tibetan Phonology. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area32(1): 115–140. 10.32655/LTBA.32.1.03
   https://doi.org/10.32655/LTBA.32.1.03 [Google Scholar]
8. Hill, Nathan W.
   2010 An overview of Old Tibetan synchronic phonology. Transactions of the Philological Society108(2). 110–125. 10.1111/j.1467‑968X.2010.01234.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2010.01234.x [Google Scholar]
9. Hill, Nathan
   2013 Relative ordering of Tibetan sound changes affecting laterals. Language and Linguistics14(1). 193–209.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Hill, Nathan W.
    2019a The historical phonology of Tibetan, Burmese, and Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316550939
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316550939 [Google Scholar]
11. Hill, Nathan W.
    2019b The derivation of the Tibetan present prefix g- from ḥ-. Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae72(3). 325–332. 10.1556/062.2019.72.3.4
    https://doi.org/10.1556/062.2019.72.3.4 [Google Scholar]
12. Hill, Nathan W.
    2022 Worin besteht der Unterschied zwischen Präskription und Superskription in der tibetischen Orthographie?InCüppers, Christoph & Everding, Karl-Heinz & Schwieger, Peter (eds.), A life in Tibetan studies: Festschrift for Dieter Schuh at the occasion of his 80th birthday, 313–333. Lumbini: Lumbini International Research Institute.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Jäschke, Heinrich August
    1881 A Tibetan-English dictionary: With special reference to the prevailing dialects. London: The Secretary of State for India in Council.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Preiswerk, Thomas
    2014 Die Phonologie des Alttibetischen auf Grund der chinesischen Beamtennamen im chinesisch-tibetischen Abkommen von 822 n. Chr. Zentralasiatische Studien431. 7–158.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Róna-Tas, András
    1966 Tibeto-Mongolica: The Tibetan loanwords of Mongour and the development of the Archaic Tibetan dialects (Indo-Iranian Monographs 7). The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Róna-Tas, András
    1985 Wiener Vorlesungen zur Sprach- und Kulturgeschichte Tibets. Vienna: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien Universität Wien.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Schuessler, Axel
    2024 Sino-Tibetan *w in Tibetan and Old Chinese. Language and Linguistics25(1). 80–122. 10.1075/lali.00150.sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00150.sch [Google Scholar]
18. Uray, Géza
    1955 On the Tibetan letters ba and wa: Contribution to the origin and history of the Tibetan alphabet. Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae5(1/2). 101–122.
    [Google Scholar]