1887
Volume 27, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1606-822X
  • E-ISSN: 2309-5067

Abstract

This paper reviews Yang’s (2024) analysis of the sentence-final negative WHAT in Chinese and argues that the sentence-final negative WHAT, which can be classified into two types — emphatic negation and quotative negation — should be analyzed as a suffix attached to the predicate in morphology. Specifically, the affixation of the sentence-final negative WHAT is a morphosyntactic operation that occurs in l-syntax, creating a complex word with the predicate. Additionally, both sentence-final negative WHAT and its reduplicated form should be analyzed in a unified way within morphology, with the base being as short as possible phonologically. The study also emphasizes the need for a negative force projection at the sentence periphery.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00251.tan
2025-09-26
2026-07-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lali.00251.tan.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00251.tan&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Abels, Klaus
    2003Successive cyclicity, anti-locality, and adposition stranding. Storrs: University of Connecticut. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cheung, Lawrence Yam-Leung
    2008The negative wh-construction. Los Angeles: UCLA. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Choi, Tsun Hei
    2024 Postverbal gwai in Cantonese: A syntactic approach to rhetorical questions. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics30(1). 41–50.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chung, Jui-Yi Zoey & Tsai, Dylan Wei-tien
    2020 On the syntactic cartography and pragmatic effects of non-canonical wh-questions: A comparative study of what in Hakka. Zhōngguó Yǔwén2020(2). 201–220.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Coniglio, Marco & Zegrean, Iulia
    2012 Splitting up force: Evidence from discourse particles. InAelbrecht, Lobke & Haegeman, Liliane & Nye, Rachel (eds.), Main clause phenomena: New horizons, 229–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.190.10con
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.190.10con [Google Scholar]
  6. D’Arcy, Alexandra
    2005Like: syntax and development. Toronto: University of Toronto. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Etxepare, Ricardo
    2010 From hearsay evidentiality to samesaying relations. Lingua120(3). 604–627. 10.1016/j.lingua.2008.07.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.07.009 [Google Scholar]
  8. 2013 Quotative expansions. InBaauw, Sergio & Drijkoningen, Frank & Meroni, Luisa & Pinto, Manuela (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2011: Selected papers from “Going Romance” Utrecht 2011, 93–124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/rllt.5.05etx
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.5.05etx [Google Scholar]
  9. Haddican, Bill & Zweig, Eytan
    2012 The syntax of manner quotative constructions in English and Dutch. Linguistic Variation12(1). 1–26. 10.1075/lv.12.1.01had
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.12.1.01had [Google Scholar]
  10. Haegeman, Liliane
    2014 West Flemish verb-based discourse markers and the articulation of the speech act layer. Studia Linguistica68(1). 116–139. 10.1111/stul.12023
    https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12023 [Google Scholar]
  11. Hale, Kenneth & Keyser, Samuel Jay
    1993 On argument structure and the lexical representation of syntactic relations. InHale, Kenneth & Keyser, Samuel Jay (eds.), The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 53–109. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hill, Virginia
    2007 Vocatives and the pragmatics-syntax interface. Lingua117(12). 2077–2105. 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.01.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.01.002 [Google Scholar]
  13. Huang, C.-T. James
    1982Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kayne, Richard S.
    2007 A short note on where vs. place. InMaschi, Roberta & Penello, Nicoletta & Rizzolatti, Piera (eds.), Miscellanea di studi linguistici offerti a Laura Vanelli da amici e allievi padovani, 245–257. Udine: Forum.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Lü, Shuxiang
    (ed.) 1980Xiàndài Hànyǔ bābǎi cí. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Matthews, Stephen & Yip, Virginia
    1994Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Miyagawa, Shigeru
    2017Agreement beyond Phi. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/10958.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10958.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2022Syntax in the treetops. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/14421.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/14421.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  19. Nakashima, Takanori
    2018aMismatches between forms and interpretations in minimalist syntax. Sendai: Tohoku University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 2018b Some syntactic character of rhetorical questions. Explorations in English Linguistics321. 67–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Pan, Victor Junnan
    2014 Deriving special questions in Mandarin Chinese: A comparative study. InPark, Jong- Un & Lee, Il- Jae (eds.), 2014 Comparative Syntax: Proceedings of the 16th Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar, 349–368. Seoul: The Korean Generative Grammar Circle.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 2015 Mandarin peripheral construals at the syntax-discourse interface. The Linguistic Review32(4). 819–868. 10.1515/tlr‑2015‑0005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2015-0005 [Google Scholar]
  23. 2019Architecture of the periphery in Chinese: Cartography and minimalism. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315158228
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315158228 [Google Scholar]
  24. Paul, Waltraud
    2014 Why particles are not particular: Sentence-final particles in Chinese as heads of a split CP. Studia Linguistica68(1). 77–115. 10.1111/stul.12020
    https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12020 [Google Scholar]
  25. 2015New perspectives on Chinese syntax. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110338775
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110338775 [Google Scholar]
  26. Rizzi, Luigi
    1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. InHaegeman, Liliane (ed.), Elements of grammar: Handbook in generative syntax, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑5420‑8_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7 [Google Scholar]
  27. 2006 On the form of chains: criterial positions and ECP effects. InCheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Corver, Norbert (eds.), Wh-movement: Moving on, 97–133. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 2010 On some properties of criterial freezing. InPanagiotidis, E. Phoevos (ed.), The complementizer phase: Subjects and operators, vol.11, 17–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199584352.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199584352.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  29. Speas, Margaret
    2004 Evidentiality, logophoricity and the syntactic representation of pragmatic features. Lingua114(3). 255–276. 10.1016/S0024‑3841(03)00030‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(03)00030-5 [Google Scholar]
  30. Speas, Peggy & Tenny, Carol L.
    2003 Configurational properties of point of view roles. InDi Sciullo, Anna Maria (ed.), Asymmetry in grammar volume 1: Syntax and semantics, 315–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.57.15spe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.57.15spe [Google Scholar]
  31. Tang, Sze-Wing
    2010Formal Chinese syntax. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 2015Yuèyǔ Yǔfǎ Jiǎngyì. Hong Kong: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 2020 Cartographic syntax of performative projections: Evidence from Cantonese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics29(1). 1–30. 10.1007/s10831‑019‑09202‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-019-09202-7 [Google Scholar]
  34. 2022a On the grammar of the negative expression shenme in Chinese. Yǔyánxué Lùncóng11. 31–57.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 2022b On the syntax of rhetorical questions: Evidence from Cantonese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics31(3). 305–349. 10.1007/s10831‑022‑09241‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-022-09241-7 [Google Scholar]
  36. 2024 An analysis of metalinguistic negation in Cantonese and its typological implications. InXu, Dan & Wang, Cong (eds.), Chinese Language Contact and Typology (Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series 30), 105–134. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Tenny, Carol L.
    2006 Evidentiality, experiencers, and the syntax of sentience in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics15(3). 245–288. 10.1007/s10831‑006‑0002‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-006-0002-x [Google Scholar]
  38. Tsai, Wei-tien Dylan
    2011 On atypical wh-expressions in Chinese. InEditorial Committee of Essays on Linguistics, Center for Chinese Linguistics, PKU (ed.), Essays on Linguistics, vol.431, 194–208. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Wang, Changsong
    2017 A study on noncanonical wh-particles from the prosody-syntax interface — A case study of “shenme” in “V ‘shenme’(V)/(NP)” construction. Yùnlǜ Yǔfǎ Yánjiū2017(1). 73–100.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Xia, Xue & Zhan, Weidong
    2015 A study of “X shenme” and related constructions used for negation. Zhōngwén Xìnxī Xuébào2015(5). 1–8.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Yang, Barry C.-Y.
    2021 Two types of peripheral adjunct WHATs. Concentric47(1). 61–92. 10.1075/consl.00023.yan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/consl.00023.yan [Google Scholar]
  42. 2024 Revisiting sentence-final adjunct WHAT. Language and Linguistics25(1). 162–186.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhu, Jun
    2014 Expressive function of rhetorical question format “X +shenme +X” in negative position. Hànyǔ Xuéxí2014(3). 20–27.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00251.tan
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error