1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Language and Linguistics
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of On the absence of exceptionally optional negative concord in Turkish
EPUB
PDF

Abstract

It has been proposed in recent theoretical analyses that there are at least two types of Negative Concord Items (NCIs henceforth) in Turkish. According to this view, the first type includes typical NCIs such as ‘no one/anyone’, ‘nothing/anything’ and ‘never’ that require the presence of sentential negation - in the structure at all times. These elements were shown to exhibit strict Negative Concord (NC) behavior and were semantically classified as generalized quantifiers. On the other hand, the second type of NCIs was claimed to involve such elements as the negative coordinator ‘neither…nor…’ that was argued to display exceptionally optional negative concord. The reason for this claim is that has various characteristics in terms of its meaning that are observed in various syntactic environments. More specifically, it was proposed that it can optionally co-occur with sentential negation, and therefore exhibits exceptionally optional negative concord in the language. In this paper, I shall demonstrate, however, that is in fact not an NCI and it is a linguistic element that has its own negative semantics. Specifically, it does not need the presence of negation regardless of whether negation appears overtly or covertly in the structure. In other words, does not actually appear in NC environments and the presence of sentential negation along with the coordinator is due to reasons orthogonal to its inherent characteristics. In that sense, the account proposed here is in line with those analyses where the co-occurrence of sentential negation along with the negative coordinator is accounted for through other phenomena.

© ILAS
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00259.gor
2026-04-21
2026-05-11

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/lali.00259.gor
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/lali.00259.gor/lali.00259.gor.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00259.gor&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Biberauer, Theresa & Zeijlstra, Hedde
    2012 Negative concord in Afrikaans: Filling a typological gap. Journal of Semantics(). –. 10.1093/jos/ffr010
     https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffr010 [Google Scholar]
  2. Corblin, Francis & Déprez, Vivane & de Swart, Henriëtte & Tovena, Lucia
    2004 Negative concord. InCorblin, Francis & de Swart, Henriëtte (eds.), Handbook of French semantics, –. Stanford: CSLI.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. de Swart, Henriëtte
    2010 Expression and interpretation of negation: An OT typology. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑90‑481‑3162‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3162-4 [Google Scholar]
  4. 2020 Double negation readings. InDéprez, Viviane & Espinal, M. Teresa (eds.), The Oxford handbook of negation, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198830528.013.26
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198830528.013.26 [Google Scholar]
  5. Deny, Jean
    1921 Grammaire de la langue turque (dialecte osmanli). Paris: Éditions E. Leroux. (Reprinted in 2012 asTürk Dili Grameri, translated byElöve, Ali Ulvi. İstanbul: Kabalcı Kitabevi.)
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Espinal, M. Teresa & Tubau, Susagna & Borràs-Comes, Joan & Prieto, Pilar
    2016 Double negation in Catalan and Spanish: Interaction between syntax and prosody. InLarrivée, Pierre & Lee, Chungmin (eds.), Negation and polarity: Experimental perspectives, –. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑17464‑8_7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17464-8_7 [Google Scholar]
  7. Fălăuş, Anamaria
    2020 Negation and alternatives: Interaction with focus constituents. InDéprez, Viviane & Espinal, M. Teresa (eds.), The Oxford handbook of negation, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198830528.013.18
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198830528.013.18 [Google Scholar]
  8. Fălăuş, Anamaria & Nicolae, Andreea C.
    2016 Fragment answers and double negation in strict negative concord languages. InMoroney, Mary & Little, Carol-Rose & Collard, Jacob & Burgdorf, Dan (eds.), SALT 26: Proceedings of the 26th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference, –. Austin: University of Texas at Austin. 10.3765/salt.v26i0.3813
     https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v26i0.3813 [Google Scholar]
  9. Gajić, Jovana
    2018 Niti — real negative coordination inside a strict negative concord language?Invan Alem, Astrid & Ionova, Anastasiia & Pots, Cora (eds.), ConSOLE XXVI: Proceedings of the 26th Conference of the Student Organization of Linguistics in Europe, –. Leiden: Leiden University Centre for Linguistics (LUCL).
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Gencan, Tahir Nejat
    1979 Dilbilgisi. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Giannakidou, Anastasia
    2000 Negative…concord?Natural Language & Linguistic Theory(). –. 10.1023/A:1006477315705
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006477315705 [Google Scholar]
  12. 2006 N-words and negative concord. InEveraert, Martin & van Riemsdijk, Henk C. (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, vol., –. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470996591.ch45
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996591.ch45 [Google Scholar]
  13. Giannakidou, Anastasia & Zeijlstra, Hedde
    2017 The landscape of negative dependencies: Negative concord and N-words. InEveraert, Martin & van Riemsdijk, Henk C. (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to syntax, 2nd edn., vol., –. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom102
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom102 [Google Scholar]
  14. Göksel, Aslı
    1987 Distance restrictions on syntactic processes. InBoeschoten, Hendrik E. & Verhoeven, Ludo Th. (eds.), Studies on modern Turkish: Proceedings of the Third Conference on Turkish Linguistics, –. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Gračanin-Yüksek, Martina
    2023 Negation that isn’t. Languages(). –. (Article 250.) 10.3390/languages8040250
     https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8040250 [Google Scholar]
  16. Haspelmath, Martin
    2025 Negindefinites and negative concord: Concepts, terms and analyses. Invan der Auwera, Johan & Gianollo, Chiara (eds.), Negative concord: A hundred years on, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783111202273‑003
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111202273-003 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hendriks, Petra
    2003 “Either” as a focus particle. Groningen: University of Groningen. (Manuscript.) (https://www.let.rug.nl/hendriks/papers/either03.pdf) (Accessed2025-01-14.)
  18. Jäger, Agnes
    2010 Anything is nothing is something: On the diachrony of polarity types of indefinites. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory(). –. 10.1007/s11049‑010‑9113‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-010-9113-1 [Google Scholar]
  19. Jeretič, Paloma
    2017 Turkish ‘neither…nor’ and optional negative concord. New York: New York University. (Manuscript.)
     [Google Scholar]
  20. 2018 Hybrid and optional negative concord in Turkish: A unified analysis. IULC Working Papers(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. 2022 Exceptionally optional negative concord with Turkish neither…nor. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory(). –. 10.1007/s11049‑022‑09556‑z
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-022-09556-z [Google Scholar]
  22. Jespersen, Otto
    1922 Language: Its nature, development and origin. London: George Allen & Unwin.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Kamali, Beste
    2017 Negative concord in Turkish polar questions. (Paper presented at theCom(parative) Syn(tax) Meetings, Leiden University, 23 March 2017.)
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Kelepir, Meltem
    1999 Scope of negation: Evidence from Turkish NPIs and quantifiers. InSaito, Mamoru & Abe, Yasukai & Aoyagi, Hiroshi & Harimoto, M. & Murasugi, Keiko & Suzuki, Tatsuya (eds.), Proceedings of GLOW in Asia II, –. Nagoya: Center for Linguistics, Nanzan University.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. 2001 Topics in Turkish syntax: Clausal structure and scope. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Kural, Murat
    1993 Scrambling and mixed positions in Turkish. InBroderick, Kimberley (ed.), Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society, –. Amherst: GLSA.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Labelle, Marie & Espinal, M. Teresa
    2014 Diachronic changes in negative expressions: The case of French. Lingua. –. 10.1016/j.lingua.2014.04.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.04.002 [Google Scholar]
  28. Laka, Itziar
    1990 Negation in syntax: On the nature of functional categories and projections. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Lewis, Geoffrey L.
    1967 Turkish grammar. London: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Miyagawa, Shigeru & Nishioka, Nobuaki & Zeijlstra, Hedde
    2016 Negative sensitive items and the discourse-configurational nature of Japanese. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics(). –. (Article no. 33.) 10.5334/gjgl.6
     https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.6 [Google Scholar]
  31. Neeleman, Ad & Vermeulen, Reiko
    2012 Types of focus and their interaction with negation. InNeeleman, Ad & Vermeulen, Reiko (eds.), The syntax of topic, focus, and contrast: An interface-based approach, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781614511458.227
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511458.227 [Google Scholar]
  32. Nişanyan, Sevan
    2025 Nişanyan dictionary. (https://www.nisanyansozluk.com/kelime/ne) (Accessed2025-01-20.) (Revised and expanded 7th edition.)
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Penka, Doris
    2011 Negative indefinites. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Progovac, Ljiljana
    1994 Negative and positive polarity: A binding approach (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511554308
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554308 [Google Scholar]
  35. Surányi, Balázs
    2006 Quantification and focus in negative concord. Lingua(). –. 10.1016/j.lingua.2004.08.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2004.08.007 [Google Scholar]
  36. Szabolcsi, Anna
    2018a Two types of quantifier particles: Quantifier-phrase internal vs. heads on the clausal spine. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics(). –. (Article no. 69.) 10.5334/gjgl.538
     https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.538 [Google Scholar]
  37. 2018b Strict and non-strict negative concord in Hungarian: A unified analysis. InBartos, Huba & den Dikken, Marcel & Bánréti, Zoltán & Váradi, Tamás (eds.), Boundaries crossed, at the interfaces of morphosyntax, phonology, pragmatics and semantics, –. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑90710‑9_15
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90710-9_15 [Google Scholar]
  38. Şener, Serkan
    2007 Cyclic NCI movement. InBainbridge, Erin & Agbayani, Brian (eds.), Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth Western Conference on Linguistics (WECOL 2006), vol., –. Fresno: California State University, Fresno.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Şener, Serkan & İşsever, Selçuk
    2003 The interaction of negation with focus: Ne…ne… phrases in Turkish. Lingua(). –. 10.1016/S0024‑3841(03)00014‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(03)00014-7 [Google Scholar]
  40. van der Auwera, Johan
    2021 Quirky negative concord: Croatian, Spanish and French ni’s. Jezikoslovlje(). –. 10.29162/jez.2021.5
     https://doi.org/10.29162/jez.2021.5 [Google Scholar]
  41. Zeijlstra, Hedde
    2004 Sentential negation and negative concord. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam. (Doctoral dissertation.)
     [Google Scholar]
  42. 2008 Negative concord is syntactic agreement. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam. (Manuscript.)
     [Google Scholar]
  43. 2010 On French negation. InKwon, Iksoo & Pritchett, Hannah & Spence, Justin (eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS35): General session and parasession on negation, –. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. 10.3765/bls.v35i1.3631
     https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v35i1.3631 [Google Scholar]
  44. 2013 Not in the first place. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00259.gor
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: exceptionally optional negative concord ; Turkish ; (strict) negative concord ; ne… ne… (‘neither… nor’) coordination ; lexical semantics

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error