1887
image of 語義非定性視角下的事件強迫 [Eventive coercion from the perspective of semantic underspecification]

抽象

本文旨在基於精細類型體系,從語義–語用界面剖析時間修飾語結構中的事件強迫(eventive coercion),探究漢語時間介詞「自……以來、……後/前」在選擇非時間/事件性論元所引發的強迫能力。我們認為漢語的時間介詞缺乏強大的強迫能力,其原因在於本身的詞彙語義結構:漢語的時間介詞蘊含更精細、嚴格的類型限制,且特定論元的語義受到文化背景知識的影響,顯示出語言間的差異性。兩者的組合互相影響制約,符合Pustejovsky (2012)的「協同組合性原則」。我們認為強迫是詞彙義驅動的結果,是語義層面的操作,且引發語義非定性;我們須在語用層面借助世界知識或語境知識,通過基於類型信息的弱條件式語用推理,才能得到最終解讀。因此,本文的研究在避免生成句法及生成詞庫理論分析所產生的生成過度/不足、計數等問題的同時,也更合理地解釋強迫解讀展示出的多樣性、靈活性。

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00261.wan
2026-05-18
2026-06-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/lali.00261.wan/lali.00261.wan.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00261.wan&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Altakhaineh, Abdel Rahman Mitib
    2016 What is a compound? The main criteria for compoundhood. Explorations in English Language and Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/exell‑2017‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/exell-2017-0007 [Google Scholar]
  2. Asher, Nicholas
    2011Lexical meaning in context: A web of words. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511793936
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511793936 [Google Scholar]
  3. 2015 Types, meanings and coercion in lexical semantics. Lingua. –. 10.1016/j.lingua.2015.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2015.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  4. Asher, Nicholas & Luo, Zhaohui
    2012 Formalization of coercions in lexical semantics. InChemla, Emmanuel & Homer, Vincent & Winterstein, Grégoire (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, –. Paris: Gesellschaft für Semantik.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Borer, Hagit
    2005aStructuring sense volume I: In name only. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263905.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263905.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  6. 2005bStructuring sense volume 2: The normal course of events. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263929.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263929.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brandtner, Regine & von Heusinger, Klaus
    2010 Nominalization in context — Conflicting readings and predicate transfer. InAlexiadou, Artemis & Rathert, Monika (eds.), The semantics of nominalizations across languages and frameworks, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110226546.25
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226546.25 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chierchia, Gennaro
    1998 Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics(). –. 10.1023/A:1008324218506
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008324218506 [Google Scholar]
  9. Davidson, Donald
    1967 The logical form of action sentences. InRescher, Nicholas (ed.), The logic of decision and action, –. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. (Reprinted inDavidson, Donald 1980 Essays on actions and events, –. Oxford: Clarendon Press.) 10.2307/jj.13027259.6
    https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.13027259.6 [Google Scholar]
  10. Grice, H. Paul
    1975 Logic and conversation. InCole, Peter & Morgan, Jerry (eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts, –. New York: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004368811_003
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003 [Google Scholar]
  11. Huang, Chu-Ren & Ahrens, Kathleen
    2003 Individuals, kinds and events: Classifier coercion of nouns. Language Sciences(). –. 10.1016/S0388‑0001(02)00021‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(02)00021-9 [Google Scholar]
  12. Krifka, Manfred
    1989Nominalreferenz und Zeitkonstitution: Zur Semantik von Massentermen, Pluraltermen und Aspektklassen. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Larson, Richard K.
    1988 On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Li, Qiang
    2013 Coercion of locatives in Mandarin Chinese. InLiu, Pengyuan & Su, Qi (eds.), Chinese lexical semantics: 14th Workshop, CLSW 2013, Zhengzhou, China, May 10–12, 2013, revised selected papers, –. Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑45185‑0_9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45185-0_9 [Google Scholar]
  15. Li, Qiang (李強) & Yuan, Yulin (袁毓林)
    2020 Generative lexicon theory for semantic interpretation and its application語義解釋的生成詞庫理論及其運用. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lieber, Rochelle & Štekauer, Pavol
    2011 Introduction: Status and definition of compounding. InLieber, Rochelle & Štekauer, Pavol (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, –. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199695720.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199695720.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  17. Lin, T.-H. Jonah & Liu, C.-Y. Cecilia
    2005 Coercion, event structure, and syntax. Nanzan Linguistics. –.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Luo, Zhaohui
    2010 Type-theoretical semantics with coercive subtyping. InLi, Nan & Lutz, David (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT 20), –. Washington, D.C.: Linguistic Society of America. 10.3765/salt.v20i0.2580
    https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v20i0.2580 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2012a Formal semantics in modern type theories with coercive subtyping. Linguistics and Philosophy(). –. 10.1007/s10988‑013‑9126‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-013-9126-4 [Google Scholar]
  20. 2012b Common nouns as types. InDenis Bechet, & Dikovsky, Alexander (eds.), Logical aspects of computational linguistics: 7th International Conference, LACL 2012, Nantes, France, July 2–4, 2012 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science 7351), –. Heidelberg: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑31262‑5_12
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31262-5_12 [Google Scholar]
  21. Maienborn, Claudia
    2017 Konzeptuelle Semantik. InStaffeldt, Sven & Hagemann, Jörg (eds.), Semantiktheorien: Lexikalische Analysen im Vergleich, –. Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 2021 Revisiting Olga, the beautiful dancer: An intersective A-analysis. InRhyne, Joseph & Lamp, Kaelyn & Dreier, Nicole & Kwon, Chloe (eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (SALT 30), –. Washington, D.C.: Linguistic Society of America. 10.3765/salt.v30i0.4805
    https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v30i0.4805 [Google Scholar]
  23. Nunberg, Geoffrey
    1979 The non-uniqueness of semantic solutions: Polysemy. Linguistics and Philosophy(). –. 10.1007/BF00126509
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00126509 [Google Scholar]
  24. 1995 Transfers of meaning. Journal of Semantics(). –. 10.1093/jos/12.2.109
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/12.2.109 [Google Scholar]
  25. Pustejovsky, James
    1995The generative lexicon. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/3225.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3225.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  26. 2011 Coercion in a general theory of argument selection. Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/ling.2011.039
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2011.039 [Google Scholar]
  27. 2012 Co-compositionality in grammar. InWerning, Markus & Hinzen, Wolfram & Machery, Edouard (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compositionality, –. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Shen, Jiaxuan (沈家煊)
    1995 “Youjie” yu “wujie”「有界」與「無界」. Zhongguo Yuwen中國語文(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Song, Zuoyan
    2012 Event coercion of Mandarin Chinese temporal connective hou ‘after’. InManurung, Ruli & Bond, Francis (eds.), Proceedings of 26th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation 2012 (PACLIC 26), –. Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Song, Zuoyan (宋作豔)
    2014 A comparative study of event coercion between Chinese and English漢英事件強迫之比較研究. Language and Linguistics語言暨語言學(). –. 10.1177/1606822X13506157
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1606822X13506157 [Google Scholar]
  31. 2015 Shengcheng ciku lilun yu Hanyu shijianqiangpoxianxiang yanjiu生成詞庫理論與漢語事件強迫現象研究. Beijing: Peking University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. von Stechow, Arnim
    2002 German seit ‘since’ and the ambiguity of the German perfect. InKaufmann, Ingrid & Stiebels, Barbara (eds.), More than words: A Festschrift for Dieter Wunderlich, –. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Tian, Liangbin (田良斌) & Sun, Wentong (孫文統) & Zhuang, Huibin (莊會彬)
    2021 An exo-skeletal model to the chi shitang structure「吃食堂」類結構的外框架模型詮釋. Xiandai Waiyu現代外語(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Wang, Shan & Huang, Chu-Ren
    2012 Type construction of event nouns in Mandarin Chinese. InManurung, Ruli & Bond, Francis (eds.), Proceedings of 26th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation 2012 (PACLIC 26), –. Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Wang, Vincent Jixin
    2019Bedeutungsanpassung bei temporalen Modifikatoren. Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00261.wan
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error