1887
Volume 18, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1606-822X
  • E-ISSN: 2309-5067
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

It is controversial whether a classifier (C) or measure word (M) in Chinese forms a constituent first with Num (numeral) or N in a [Num C/M N] phrase. This paper reviews evidence for the [Num C/M] constituency from modern Chinese and then provides evidence from historical and typological perspectives. Under the [Num C/M] constituency, not only the C/M word orders attested in Chinese history, but also all those attested elsewhere, can be straightforwardly accounted for by the head parameter, while such simplicity is unattainable under the [C/M N] constituency. In addition, fresh evidence is obtained from the internal word order within a complex numeral; e.g. ‘30’ is base-final, with () and base () entering into a multiplicative function, . The same multiplicative function exists between Num and C/M, e.g. ‘3 C flower’ = , and ‘3 dozen flower’ = . C/M and bases are thus unified as multiplicands, an insight further supported by the consistent correlation between the -final order and the C/M-final order throughout the history of Chinese. A closer examination of the 103 classifier languages in Greenberg (1990[1978]) further reveals that, among the 52 languages whose numeral systems and C/M word orders can be obtained, the synchronization between the numeral base and C/M is nearly universal. The base-C/M unification as multiplicands and base-C/M synchronization in word order strongly suggest that Num and C/M form a single constituent.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lali.18.1.02her
2017-01-12
2019-08-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adams, Karen Lee
    1989Systems of Numeral Classification in the Mon-Khmer, Nicobarese and Aslian Subfamilies of Austroasiatic (Pacific Linguistics B101). Canberra: ANU Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
    2000Classifiers: A Typology of Noun Categorization Devices (Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory). Oxford: Oxford University Press
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Au Yeung , Ben Wai Hoo.
    2005An Interface Program for Parameterization of Classifiers in Chinese. Kowloon: Hong Kong University of Science and Technology dissertation. doi: 10.14711/thesis‑b922442
    https://doi.org/10.14711/thesis-b922442 [Google Scholar]
  4. Au Yeung, Ben Wai Hoo
    2007 Multiplication basis of emergence of classifiers. Language and Linguistics8.4:835–861.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Behr, Wolfgang
    2009 Classifiers, lexical tone, determinatives: a look at their emergence and diachrony in Old Chinese and beyond. Paper presented atthe Diachrony of CLF Workshop, March 11, 2009. Wassenaar: Netherlands Institute of Advanced Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Borer, Hagit
    2005Structuring Sense, Volume1: In Name Only. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263929.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263929.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chan, Eugene S. L.
    2016 (ongoing). Numeral Systems of the World’s Languages. Available online atlingweb.eva.mpg.de/moved.php (accessed11 August 2011).
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chao, Yuen Ren.
    1968A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cheng, Lisa L.-S , & Rint Sybesma
    1998  Yi-wan tang , yi-ge tang : classified and massifiers. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies , New Series28.3:385–412.
  10. 1999 Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry30.4:509–542. doi: 10.1162/002438999554192
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438999554192 [Google Scholar]
  11. Chu, Fuzhang
    1994 Keji Hanyu zhong de shuming jiegou [The Num-N construction in Chinese for technology]. Hanyu Xuexi [Chinese Language Learning]3:40–41.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Comrie, Bernard
    2006 Numbers, language, and culture. Paper presented atthe 16th Jyväskylä Summer School, July 24–August 11, 2006. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 2011 Numeral bases. The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, ed.by Martin Haspelmath , Matthew S. Dryer , David Gill & Bernard Comrie . Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. Available online atwals.info/feature/131 (accessed3 August 2011).
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Croft, William
    1994 Semantic universals in classifier systems. Word45.2:145–171. doi: 10.1080/00437956.1994.11435922
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1994.11435922 [Google Scholar]
  15. Dai, Qing-Xia , & Xi-Jian Xu
    1992The Grammar of Kachin. Beijing: ZhongYang Minzu Xueyuan Chubanshe.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Dempsey, James Martin
    1995A Reconsideration of Some Phonological Issues Involved in Reconstructing Sino-Tibetan Numerals. Seattle: University of Washington dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Dryer, Matthew S.
    2013 Order of numeral and noun. The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, ed.by Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath . Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online atwals.info/feature/89 (accessed3 October 2011).
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Duanmu, San.
    2000The Phonology of Standard Chinese. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 2005 The tone-syntax interface in Chinese: some recent controversies. Proceedings of the Symposium Cross-Linguistic Studies of Tonal Phenomena: Historical Development, Tone-Syntax Interface, and Descriptive Studies, December 16–17, 2004, ed.by Shigeki Kaji , 231–264. Tokyo: Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa (ILCAA), Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Duojie Dongzhi
    2005 Zangyu Anduo fangyan zhong de liangci [The classifiers in Amdo Tibetan]. Hanzangyuxi Liangci Yanjiu [Studies of Classifiers in Sino-Tibetan], ed.by Jingfang Li & Suhua Hu , 47–54. Beijing: Central University for Nationalities Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Greenberg, Joseph H.
    1990[1972] Numerical classifiers and substantival number: problems in the genesis of a linguistic type. On Language. Selected Writings of Joseph H. Greenberg, ed.by Keith Denning & Suzanne Kemmer , 166–193. Stanford: Stanford University Press. First published 1972 inWorking Papers on Language Universals9:2–39.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 1990[1974] Studies in numerical system: double numeral system. On Language. Selected Writings of Joseph H. Greenberg, ed.by Keith Denning & Suzanne Kemmer , 194–206. Stanford: Stanford University Press. First published 1974 inWorking Papers on Language Universals14:75–89.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 1990[1975] Dynamic aspects of word order in numeral classifier. On Language. Selected Writings of Joseph H. Greenberg, ed.by Keith Denning & Suzanne Kemmer , 227–240. Stanford: Stanford University Press. First published 1975 inWord Order and Word Order Change, ed.by Charles N. Li , 27–46. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 1990[1978] Generalizations about numeral systems. On Language. Selected Writings of Joseph H. Greenberg, ed.by Keith Denning & Suzanne Kemmer , 271–309. Originally published inUniversals of Human Language: Word Structure, ed.by Joseph H. Greenberg , Charles A. Fergson & Edith A. Moravcsik , Vol3, 249–295. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Gu, Yang , & Da Wu.
    2005 Cong Jingpoyu han Yiyu de liangci duanyu kan mingci duanyu de zhishe tezheng [Implications of Jingpho and Yi classifier phrase on noun phrase referentiality]. Hanzangyuxi Liangci Yanjiu [Studies of Classifiers in Sino-Tibetan], ed.by Jingfang Li & Suhua Hu , 55–89. Beijing: Central University for Nationalities Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. He, Chuansheng
    2015 Complex numerals in Mandarin Chinese are constituents. Lingua164:189–214. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2015.06.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2015.06.014 [Google Scholar]
  27. Her, One-Soon
    2012a Distinguishing classifiers and measure words: a mathematical perspective and implications. Lingua122.14:1668–1691. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2012.08.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.08.012 [Google Scholar]
  28. 2012b Structure of classifiers and measure words: a lexical functional account. Language and Linguistics13.6:1211–1511.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Her, One-Soon , & Chen-Tien Hsieh
    2010 On the semantic distinction between classifiers and measure words in Chinese. Language and Linguistics11.3:527–551.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Hsieh, Miao-Ling
    2008The Internal Structure of Noun Phrases in Chinese (Taiwan Journal of Linguistics: Book Series in Chinese Linguistics). Taipei: Crane.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Hu, Houxuan
    (ed.) 1983Jiaguwen Heji [The Great Collection of the Oracle Inscriptions]. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Hua, Qiang
    2011Jiaguwen Bijiao Yanjiu [A Comparative Study of Oracle Bones]. Xian: Sanqin Shushe.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Huang, C.-T. James.
    1982Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. Cambridge: MIT dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Huang, C.-T. James , Y.-H. Audrey Li , & Yafei Li
    2009The Syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139166935
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166935 [Google Scholar]
  35. Huang, C.-T. James , & Masao Ochi
    2011 Classifiers and nominal structure: a parametric approach and its consequences. Universals and Variation: Proceedings of Glow-in-Asia VIII 2010, ed.by Ming-le Gao , 191–197. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Huang, Chu-Ren.
    1989Mandarin Chinese NP de: A Comparative Study of Current Grammatical Theories. Taipei: Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Huang, Shengzhang
    1961 Lianghan shidai de liangci [Classifiers in the two-Han period]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language]1961.8:21–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Huang, Zaijun
    1964 Cong jiawen jinwen liangci de yingyong kaocha Hanyu liangci de qiyuan yu fazhan [A study of the origin and development of classifiers in Chinese from the perspectives of the use of classifiers in oracle bone and bronze inscriptions]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language]6:432–441.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Ikoro, Suanu M.
    1994 Numeral classifiers in Kana. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics15:7–28. doi: 10.1515/jall.1994.15.1.7
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jall.1994.15.1.7 [Google Scholar]
  40. Ionin, Tania , & Ora Matushansky
    2006 The composition of complex cardinals. Journal of Semantics23:315–360. doi: 10.1093/jos/ffl006
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffl006 [Google Scholar]
  41. Jenks, Peter
    2010 Evidence for the syntactic diversity of numeral classifiers. LSA Annual Meeting Extended Abstracts 2010 Washington, DC: Linguistic Society of America.
  42. 2011The Hidden Structure of Thai Noun Phrases. Cambridge: Harvard University dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Jiang, Julie Li.
    2012Nominal Arguments and Language Variation. Cambridge: Harvard University dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Jiang, Renping
    2007Jishuci he Xushuci de Leixingxue Yanjiu [A Typological Study of Cardinals and Ordinals]. Nanchang: Nanchang University MA thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Jiang, Ying
    2006Hanzangyuxi Mingliangci Yanjiu [A Study of Nominal Classifiers in Sino-Tibetan]. Beijing: Central University for Nationalities dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Kubo, Miori
    1996 Some considerations on noun classes and numeral classifiers: a study of (pseudo-) partitives in Japanese and English. Keio Studies in Theoretical Linguistics I, ed.by Yuji Nishiyama & Yukio Otsu , 89–124. Tokyo: Institute of Cultural and Linguistic Studies, Keio University.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Kung, Susan Smythe
    2006 Numeral classifiers in Lhiimaqalhqama’. Texas Linguistic Society IX: The Morphosyntax of Underrepresented Languages, ed.by Frederick Hoyt , Nikki Seifert , Alexandra Teodorescu , Jessica White & Stephen Wechsler , 185–202. Stanford: CSLI Publications. Available online atcslipublications.stanford.edu/TLS/ (accessed18 September 2011).
    [Google Scholar]
  48. LaPolla, Randy, J.
    2003 Overview of Sino-Tibetan morphosyntax. The Sino-Tibetan Languages, ed.by Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla . London & New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Li, Charles N. , & Sandra A. Thompson
    1981Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Li, Wendan
    2000 The pragmatic function of numeral-classifiers in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics32.8:1113–1133. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00086‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00086-7 [Google Scholar]
  51. Li, XuPing
    2009 Semantics of pre-classifier adjectives. Proceedings of ConSOLE XVI, ed.by Sylvia Blaho , Camelia Constantinescu & Bert Le Bruyn , 117–134. Leiden: Universiteit Leiden. Available online atmedia.leidenuniv.nl/legacy/console16-li.pdf (accessed18 September 2011).
    [Google Scholar]
  52. 2011On the Semantics of Classifiers in Chinese. Ramat Gan: Bar-Ilan University dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Li, Yen-Hui Audrey
    1998 Argument determiner phrases and number phrases. Linguistic Inquiry29.4:693–702. doi: 10.1162/ling.1998.29.4.693
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.1998.29.4.693 [Google Scholar]
  54. 2014 Structure of noun phrases: left or right?Taiwan Journal of Linguistics12.2:1–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Li, Yuming
    2000 Kaobeixing minglingci zai Hanzangyuxi lianci fazhan zhong de diwei [The status of echo classifiers in the development of classifiers in Sino-Tibetan]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language]2000.1:27–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Lin, Jo-wang
    1997 Noun phrase structure Mandarin Chinese: DP or NP?Chinese Languages and Linguistics3:401–434.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Liu, Hongyong
    2006The Structure of Complex Nominals: Classifiers, Possessives and Relatives. Shatin: The Chinese University of Hong Kong dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Liu, Shiru
    1965We-jin Nanbeichao Liangci Yanjiu [A Study of Classifiers in Wejin Nanbeichao]. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Löbel, Elisabeth
    2001 Classifiers and semi-lexicality: functional and semantic selection. Semi-Lexical Categories: the Function of Content Words and the Content of Function Words, ed.by Norbert Corver & Henk van Riemsdijk , 223–272. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110874006.223
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110874006.223 [Google Scholar]
  60. Ma, Aimin
    2011 Hanyu jiaoxue zhong ying zhuyi mingliangci de fenlei wenti [Nominal classifiers should be properly classified for pedagogical purposes]. Xiandai Yuwen [Modern Chinese]3:37–39.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Matisoff, James A.
    1997Sino-Tibetan Numerals and the Play of Prefixes (Pacific Linguistics B-114). Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. McFarland, Teresa Ann.
    2009The Phonology and Morphology of Filomeno Mata Totonac. Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Newman, Paul
    2000The Hausa Language: An Encyclopedic Reference Grammar. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Pan, Yukun
    2005Xi-Zhou Jinwen Yuxu Yanjiu [Studies in the Syntax of Western Zhou Bronze Inscriptions]. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Paris, Marie-Claude
    1981Problèmes de Syntaxe et de Sémantique en Linguistique Chinoise. Paris: Collège de France, Institut des Hautes Etudes Chinoises.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Peyraube, Alain
    1998 On the history of classifiers in Archaic and Medieval Chinese. Studia Linguistica Serica, ed.by Benjamin K. T’sou , 131–145. Hong Kong: Language Information Sciences Research Centre, City University of Hong Kong.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Pittayaporn, Pittayawat
    2009The Phonology of Proto-Tai. Ithaca: Cornell University dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Senft, Gunter
    1986Kilivila: The Language of the Trobriand Islanders. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110861846
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110861846 [Google Scholar]
  69. 2000 What do we really know about nominal classification systems?Systems of Nominal Classification, ed.by Gunter Senft , 11–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Simpson, Andrew
    2005 Classifiers and DP structure in Southeast Asia. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax, ed.by Guglielmo Cinque & Richard Kayne , 806–838. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Sun, Chaofen
    1996Word-Order Change and Grammaticalization in the History of Chinese. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Tai, James H-Y. , & Lianqing Wang
    1990 A semantic study of the classifier Tiao. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association25.1:35–56.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Tang, Chih-Chen Jane
    1990a A note on the DP analysis of Chinese noun phrases. Linguistics28.2: 337–354. doi: 10.1515/ling.1990.28.2.337
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1990.28.2.337 [Google Scholar]
  74. 1990bChinese Phrase Structure and the Extended X’-theory. Ithaca: Cornell University dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. 2005 Nouns or classifiers: a non-movement analysis of classifiers in Chinese. Language and Linguistics6.3:431–472.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Tsai, Hui-Chin
    2011 On Chinese ordinal constructions. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics9.1: 89–122.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. van Driem, George
    2003 Tibeto-Burman vs. Sino-Tibetan. Language in Time and Space: A Festschrift for Werner Winter on the Occasion of His 80th Birthday, ed.by Brigitte L. M. Bauer & Georges-Jean Pinault , 101–120. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110897722.101
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110897722.101 [Google Scholar]
  78. 2007 The diversity of the Tibeto-Burman language family and the linguistic ancestry of Chinese. Zhongguo Yuyanxue Jikan [Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics]1.2:211–270.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. 2011 Tibeto-Burman subgroups and historical grammar. Himalayan Linguistics10.1:31–39.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. van Riemsdijk, Henk
    1998 Categorial feature magnetism: the endocentricity and distribution of projections. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics2.1:1–48. doi: 10.1023/A:1009763305416
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009763305416 [Google Scholar]
  81. Vos, Riet
    1999A Grammar of Partitive Constructions. Tilburg: Tilburg University dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Wang, Hanwei
    2004 Liangci de fenlei yu duiwai Hanyu liangci jiaoxue [Classification of classifiers and teaching classifiers in Chinese as a second language]. Jinan Xuebao [Journal of Jinan University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)]2:113–116.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Watanabe, Akira
    2006 Functional projections of nominals in Japanese: syntax of classifiers. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory24.1:241–306. doi: 10.1007/s11049‑005‑3042‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-005-3042-4 [Google Scholar]
  84. Wu, Fuxiang , Shengli Feng , & C.-T. James Huang
    2006 Hanyu shu+lianhg+ming geshi de laiyuan [On the origin of the construction of ‘numeral+classifier+noun’ in Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language] 20065:387–400.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Yang, Jiangling
    2005 Zhangmianyu shuliang duanyu cong CN dao NC xing de yanbian jizhi [The mechanism of change in classifier phrases from CN to NC within Tibeto-Burman]. Hanzangyuxi Liangci Yanjiu [Studies of Classifiers in Sino-Tibetan], ed.by Jingfang Li & Suhua Hu , 29–46. Beijing: Central University for Nationalities Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Yang-Drocourt, Zhitang
    2004Evolution Syntaxique du Classificateur en Chinois, du XIIIe Siècle av. J.-C. au XVIIe Siècle. Paris: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales.
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Yi, Byeong-Uk.
    2009 Chinese classifiers and count nouns. Journal of Cognitive Science 10:209–225. doi: 10.17791/jcs.2009.10.2.209
    https://doi.org/10.17791/jcs.2009.10.2.209 [Google Scholar]
  88. 2011 What is a numeral classifier?Philosophical Analysis23:195–258.
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Zhang, Jingni
    2005 Maonanyu de liangci duanyu [The classifier phrase in Maonan]. Hanzangyuxi Liangci Yanjiu [Studies of Classifiers in Sino-Tibetan], ed.by Jingfang Li & Suhua Hu , 296–308. Beijing: Central University for Nationalities Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Zhang, Niina Ning
    2009 Syntactic properties of numeral classifiers in Mandarin Chinese. Talk given onApril 10, 2009, at the Graduate Institute of Linguistics. Taipei: National Chung Cheng University.
  91. 2011 The constituency of classifier constructions in Mandarin Chinese. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics9.1:1–50.
    [Google Scholar]
  92. 2012 De and the functional expansion of classifiers. Language and Linguistics13.3:569–582.
    [Google Scholar]
  93. 2013Classifier Structures in Mandarin Chinese. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110304992
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110304992 [Google Scholar]
  94. Zhang, Yachu
    (ed.) 2001Yin-Zhou Jinwen Jicheng Yinde [Index to Collection of Inscriptions of the Yin-Zhou Period]. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Zimmermann, Malte
    2008 Quantification in Hausa. Quantification: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective, ed.by Lisa Matthewson , 415–475. Bingley: Emerald.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lali.18.1.02her
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lali.18.1.02her
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): classifier , constituency , head-parameter , measure word , multiplication and numerals
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error