1887
Volume 18, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1606-822X
  • E-ISSN: 2309-5067
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

The word ‘maternal grandmother’ presents irregular modern forms in Tai languages. It is in most Northern Tai (NT) varieties, in most Central Tai (CT) varieties, in most Southwestern Tai (SWT) varieties, and in Standard Thai. Li ( 1971 ) reconstructs the proto-form of this word as * , positing that the later forms changed by analogy with semantically similar words. This paper discusses two alternative hypotheses * and *, and argues that the proto-form was . The analysis indicates that the sound changes of this word in Tai languages are caused by the “contamination” in kinship terms with paired semantic contents in CT/SWT, and by dissimilation from the otherwise homophonous word ‘to die’ in SWT. As a result, the proto-form of ‘maternal grandmother’ is preserved in the vast majority of NT and a cluster of CT. In most CT/SWT the original tone changed to tone, and then in SWT the initial - underwent further change to - in order to avoid homophony with the taboo word ‘to die’. This issue of homophony arose only in this branch due to the merger of - and - (or -). This proto-form is supported by historical evidence and other non-Tai languages in the Daic family. Other exceptional irregularities in some CT languages are also discussed as they are crucial to the determination of the * hypothesis. Analogous examples from several Tai varieties also support the occurrence of aberrant development due to taboo avoidance.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lali.18.1.04lia
2017-01-12
2019-10-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Diller, Anthony
    1998 The Tai language family and the comparative method. Proceedings of the International Conference on Tai Studies, July 29–31, 1998, ed.by Somsonge Burusphat , 1–32. Nakhon Pathom: Institute of Language and Culture for Rural Development, Mahidol University.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2008 Introduction. The Tai-Kadai Languages, ed.by Anthony V. N. Diller , Jerold A. Edmondson & Yongxian Luo , 3–8. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Gedney, William J.
    1989 Future directions in comparative Tai linguistics. Selected Papers on Comparative Tai Studies, ed.by Robert J. Bickner , John Hartmann , Thomas J. Hudak & Patcharin Peyasantiwong , 7–116. Ann Arbor: Center for Southeast Asian Studies, the University of Michigan.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Google Maps
    Google Maps 2015 [Southern China and South East Asia]. Retrieved from: https://www.google.com/maps/@19.1970154,100.6800581,6.5z
  5. Jackson, Eric M. , Emily H. S. Jackson , & Shuh Huey Lau
    2012 A sociolinguistic survey of the Dejing Zhuang dialect area. SIL Electronic Survey Report2012–036. Available atwww.sil.org/system/files/reapdata/16/88/62/168862758610347680380311799600141807207/silesr2012_036.pdf (assessed9 October 2015).
  6. Li, Fang-Kuei
    1971 On Siamesejaai. Zhongyanyuan Lishiyuyansuo Jikan [Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica]42.3:337–340.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 1977A Handbook of Comparative Tai. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Liang, Min , & Junru Zhang
    1996Dongtai Yuzu Gailun [Introduction to the Kam-Tai Languages]. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Matisoff, James A.
    1992 Siamese jaai revisited, or ¡Ay, Madre!: a case study in multiple etymological possibilities. Papers on Tai Languages, Linguistics, and Literatures: in Honor of William J. Gedney on His 77th Birthday, ed.by Carol J. Compton & John F. Hartmann . 111–117. DeKalb: Center for Southeast Asian Studies, Northern Illinois University.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Pittayaporn, Pittayawat
    2009The Phonology of Proto‑Tai. Ithaca: Cornell University dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Sampson, Geoffrey
    2013 A counterexample to homophony avoidance. Diachronica 30.4:579–591.
  12. Simons, Gary F.
    1982 Word taboo and comparative Austronesian linguistics. Papers from the Third International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, Vol. 3 : Accent on Variety , ed.by Amran Halim , Lois Carrington & Stephan A. Wurm , 157–226. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Tai, Chung-pui
    2006 Songdai Lingnan wenxian zhong de Dongtaiyuci [Kam-Dai words in documents on Lingnan area in Song dynasty]. Minzu Yuwen [Minority Languages of China] 2006.3:21–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Wyatt, David K.
    1984Thailand: A Short History. London: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhang, Junru , Min Liang , Jueya Ouyang , Yiqing Zheng , Xulian Li , & Jianyou Xie
    1999Zhuangyu Fangyan Yanjiu [Studies on Zhuang Dialects]. Chengdu: Sichuan Nationalities Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lali.18.1.04lia
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lali.18.1.04lia
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): analogy , phonological contamination , Proto‑Tai , reconstruction and taboo avoidance
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error