1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Language and Linguistics
  4. Volume 18, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 18, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1606-822X
  • E-ISSN: 2309-5067
PDF

Abstract

Abstract

Fake attributives in Chinese are the result of the interaction between syntax and prosody. For syntactic reasons, certain objects of complex verbal constructions and verbal quantifiers cannot be realized in situ; but they can be spelled out in some roundabout ways, one of which is to form fake attributives through -insertion. In the forming process of fake attributives, the clitic plays an important role, and -insertion is frequently resorted to in facilitating the correspondence between the phonological structure and the syntactic structure, with the aim of ensuring meaning conveyance. It is concluded that fake attributives are initiated, to some extent, by mismatches between syntactic and phonological structure and derived when is inserted to enhance their correspondence.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
This work is currently available as a sample.Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lali.18.1.05zhu
2017-01-12
2024-12-11

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/lali.18.1.05zhu
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lali.18.1.05zhu.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/lali.18.1.05zhu&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Ackema, Peter
    1999 Issues in Morphosyntax. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/la.26
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.26 [Google Scholar]
  2. Avrutin, Sergey
    1999 Development of the Syntax-Discourse Interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi:  10.1007/978‑94‑017‑1239‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1239-2 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker, Mark C.
    1988 Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Casielles-Suárez, Eugenia
    2004 The Syntax-Information Structure Interface: Evidence from Spanish and English. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203501719
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203501719 [Google Scholar]
  5. Chao, Yuen-Ren
    1968 A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen, Guohua
    2009 Cong ‘de’ kan zhongxinyu gouzao yu zhongxinuyu de cilei [Centre construction and the word class of its centre: an analysis of zhe ben shu de chuban]. Waiyu Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [Foreign Language Teaching and Research]41.2:92–98.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, Qiongzan
    1955 Xiushiyu he mingci zhijian de ‘de’ zi de yanjiu [An investigation of de between modifier and noun]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language]101:22–27.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Cheng, Gong
    1999 Yuyan Gongxing Lun [ Linguistic Universalism]. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Cheng, Gong , Jianguo Xiong , & Guanglei Zhou
    2015 Fenbushi xintaixue kuangjia xia de hanyu zhun dingyu ju yanjiu [A distributed morphology-based approach to clauses with quasi-attributives in Chinese]. Yuyan Kexue [Linguistic Sciences]14.3:225–236.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen
    2007 Verb copying in Mandarin Chinese. The Copy Theory of Movement, ed. by Norbert Corver & Jairo Nunes , 151–174. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/la.107.07che
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.107.07che [Google Scholar]
  11. Cheng, Lisa L.-S. , & Rint Sybesma
    2009 De as an underspecified classifier: first explorations. Yuyanxue Luncong [Essays on Linguistics]391:123–156.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Chomsky, Noam
    1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Chomsky, Noam , & Morris Halle
    1968 The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. de Vries, Mark
    2002 The Syntax of Relativization. Utrecht: LOT.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Elordieta, Gorka
    1997 Morphosyntactic Feature Chains and Phonological Domains. Los Angeles: University of Southern California dissertation.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Erteschik-Shir, Nomi
    2007 Information Structure: The Syntax-Discourse Interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Feng, Shengli
    1996 Lun Hanyu de ‘yunlüci’ [On prosodic words in Chinese]. Zhongguo Shehui Kexue [Social Sciences in China] 1996.11:161–176.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. 1997 Hanyu de Yunlü, Cifa yu Jufa [Interactions between Prosody, Morphology, and Syntax in Chinese]. Beijing: Peking University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. 1998 Lun Hanyu de ‘ziran yinbu’ [On natural foot in Modern Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language] 1998.11:40–47.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. 2000 Hanyu Yunlü Jufaxue [Prosodic Syntax in Chinese]. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. 2001 Cong yunlü kan Hanyu ‘ci’ ‘yu’ fenliu zhi dajie [Prosodically determined distinction between word and phrases in Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language] 2001.11:27–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. 2004 Dong bin daozhi yu yunlü goucifa [Verb-object inversion and prosodic morphology]. Yuyan Kexue [Linguistic Sciences]3.3:12–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Frascarelli, Mara
    2000 The Syntax-Phonology Interface in Focus and Topic Constructions in Italian. Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi:  10.1007/978‑94‑015‑9500‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9500-1 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hayes, Bruce
    1989 The prosodic hierarchy in meter. Phonetics and Phonology: Rhythm and Meter, Vol.11, ed. by Paul Kiparsky & Gilbert Youmans , 201–260. Orlando: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. He, Yuan-jian , & Ling-ling Wang
    2007 Lun hanyu zhong de mingwuhua jiegou [On nominalization in Chinese]. Hanyu Xuexi [Chinese Language Learning] 2007.11:13–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Hong, Zhou
    1999 Cognate objects in Chinese. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics171:263–284.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Huang, C.-T. James
    1982 Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. 1991 Verb movement, (in) definiteness, and the thematic hierarchy. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Chinese Languages and Linguistics, ed. by Paul Jen-kuei Li , Chu-Ren Huang & Ying-chin Lin , 481–498. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. 1994 Verb movement and some syntax-semantics mismatches in Chinese. Chinese Languages and Linguistics21:587–613.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. 1997 On lexical structure and syntactic projection. Chinese Languages and Linguistics31:45–89.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. 2008 Cong ‘ta de laoshi dang de hao’ tanqi [On ta de laoshi dang-de hao and related problems]. Yuyan Kexue [Linguistic Sciences]7.31:225–241.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Huang, C.-T. James ., Yen-Hui Audrey Li , & Yafei Li
    2009 The Syntax of Chinese. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9781139166935
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166935 [Google Scholar]
  33. Huang, Guoying
    1982 ‘De’ zi de jufa, yuyi gongneng [On the syntactic and semantic functions of de]. Yuyan Yanjiu [Studies in Language and Linguistics]11:101–129.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Huang, Yan
    1994 The Syntax and Pragmatics of Anaphora: A Study with Special Reference to Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9780511554292
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554292 [Google Scholar]
  35. Inkelas, Sharon , & Draga Zec
    1990 The Phonology-Syntax Connection. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. 1995 Syntax-phonology interface. The Handbook of Phonological Theory, ed. by John Goldsmith , 535–549. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Jackendoff, Ray
    2009 Compounding in the parallel architecture and conceptual semantics. The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, ed. by Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Stekauer , 105–128. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Kanerva, Jonni M.
    1990 Focusing on phonological phrases in Chichewa. The Phonology-Syntax Connection, ed. by Sharon Inkelas & Draga Zec , 145–161. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Kenesei, István , & Irene Vogel
    1995 Focus and Phonological Structure. Newark: University of Delaware. Available atwww.nytud.hu/kenesei/publ/kenesei_vogel_1995.pdf (accessed10 October 2014).
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Li, Charles N. , & Sandra A. Thompson
    1976 Subject and topic: a new typology of language. Subject and Topic, ed. by Charles N. Li , 457–489. London & New York: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. 1981 Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Li, Yafei
    2005 X0: A Theory of the Morphology-Syntax Interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Li, Yen-Hui Audrey
    2008 Duanyu jiegou yu yulei biaoji: ‘de’ shi zhongxinci? [Phrase structures and categorial labeling: de as a head?]. Dangdai Yuyanxue [Contemporary Linguistics]10.2:97–108.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. 2013 P-insertion and ellipsis. Studies in Chinese Linguistics34.2:99–128.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Li, Jinxi
    1924 Xinzhu Guoyu Wenfa [New Grammar of the Chinese National Language]. Shanghai: Commercial Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Liu, Lijin
    2009 Yetan “NP1 de NP2 + V de R” de shengcheng [The derivation of “NP1 de NP2 + V DE R” reexplored]. Waiguoyu (Shanghai Waiguoyu Daxue Xuebao) [Journal of Foreign Languages]32.3:44–51.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Liu, Zhenqian , & Huibin Zhuang
    2011 ‘Ta de lao shi dang DE hao’ ji xiangguan jushi: hanyu weidingyu de chansheng jizhi wenti bianzheng [On ta de laoshi dang-de hao and related constructions: mechanism of fake attributives in Chinese]. Dangdai Waiyu Yanjiu [Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies] 2011.71:7–12.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Lu, Jianming
    2003 Dui ‘NP de VP’ jiegou de chongxin renshi [A new approach to analysis on the Chinese ‘NP de VP’ construction]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language] 2003.51:387–391.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Lü, Shuxiang
    1965 Yuwen zhaji [A note on Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language] 1965.41:287–292.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Nespor, Marina
    1993 Fonologia. Bologna: Il Mulino.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Nespor, Marina , & Irene Vogel
    1983 Prosodic structure above the word. Prosody: Models and Measurements, ed. by Anne Cutler & D. Robert Ladd , 123–140. Berlin: Springer. doi:  10.1007/978‑3‑642‑69103‑4_10
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69103-4_10 [Google Scholar]
  52. 2007 Prosodic Phonology: With A New Foreword. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi:  10.1515/9783110977790
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110977790 [Google Scholar]
  53. Ning, Chunyan
    1996  De as a functional head in Chinese. UCI Working Papers in Linguistics 1, ed. by B. Agbayani , K. Takeda & Sze-Wing Tang , 63–69. Irvine: University of California at Irvine.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Pan, Haihua , & Jingquan Han
    2005 Xianxing feibinge dongci jiegou de jufa yanjiu [The syntax of surface unaccusative constructions]. Yuyan Yanjiu [Studies in Language and Linguistics]25.3:1–13.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Pan, Haihua , & Jianhua Hu
    2008 A semantic-pragmatic interface account of (dangling) topics in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics40.11:1966–1981. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2008.03.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.03.005 [Google Scholar]
  56. Pullum, Geoffrey K. , & Arnold M. Zwicky
    1988 The syntax-phonology interface. Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey (VolumeI1), ed. by Frederick J. Newmeyer , 255–280. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Radford, Andrew
    1997 Syntax: A Minimalist Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9781139166898
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166898 [Google Scholar]
  58. Ren, Ying
    2008 ‘Zhebenshu de chuban’ fenxi zhong de jige yidian: cong ‘zhebenshu de chuban’ yu xiangxin jiegou lilun nanti shuo qi [Fresh queries about the word class of chuban in the phrase zhe ben shu de chuban]. Dangdai Yuyanxue [Contemporary Linguistics] 2008.41:320–328.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Rizzi, Luigi
    1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. Elements of Grammar, ed. by Liliane Haegeman , 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi:  10.1007/978‑94‑011‑5420‑8_7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7 [Google Scholar]
  60. 2001 On the position ‘int(errogative)’ in the left periphery of the clause. Current Issue in Italian Syntax, ed. by Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi , 287–296. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. 2004 Locality and left periphery. Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol1. 31, ed. by Adriana Belletti , 223–251. New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Selkirk, Elisabeth
    1984 Phonology and Syntax: The Relation Between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. 1986 On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology3.1:371–405. 10.1017/S0952675700000695
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675700000695 [Google Scholar]
  64. 2001 The syntax-phonology interface. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, ed. by Neil J. Smelser & Paul B. Baltes , 15407–15412. Oxford: Pergamon. doi:  10.1016/B0‑08‑043076‑7/02958‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/02958-2 [Google Scholar]
  65. Shen, Jiaxuan
    2007 Ye tan ‘ta de laoshi dang de hao’ ji xiangguan jushi [Revisiting ta de laoshi dang de hao and related problems]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language]91:1–12.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. 2012 ‘Ling ju’ he ‘liushui ju’ — wei Zhao Yuanren xiansheng danchen 120 zhounian er zuo [On minor sentences and flowing sentences in Chinese: in commemoration of the 120th birthday of Yuen Ren Chao]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language] 2012.51:403–415.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Shi, Dingxu
    2009 Wuding daici yu duli ‘de’ zi jiegou [Indefinite pronouns and independent de construction]. Waiyu Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [Foreign Language Teaching and Research]41.2:83–91.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Shi, Yuzhi
    2001 Hanyu de zhuyu yu huati zhi bian [The distinction between subject and topic in Chinese]. Yuyan Yanjiu [Studies in Language and Linguistics] 2001.21:82–91.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Si, Fuzhen
    2002 Hanyu de biaojuci ‘de’ ji xiangguan de jufa wenti [On the Chinese complementizer de and some related syntactic problems]Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies] 2002.21:35–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. 2004 Zhongxinyu lilun he hanyu de DeP [Head theory and DeP in Chinese]. Dangdai Yuyanxue [Contemporary Linguistics]6.1:26–34.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. 2006 Zhongxinyu lilun he Bulongfeierde nanti [The head theory and the Bloomfieldian puzzle]. Dangdai Yuyanxue [Contemporary Linguistics]8.1:60–70.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Simpson, Andrew
    2002 On the status of modifying De and the structure of the Chinese DP . On the Formal Way to Chinese Language, ed. by Sze-Wing Tang & Chen-sheng Liu , 74–101. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Spencer, Andrew
    1991 Morphological Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Tang, Chih-Chen Jane
    1990 Chinese Phrase Structure and the Extended X-Bar Theory. Ithaca: Cornell University dissertation.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Tang, Sze-Wing
    2008 Xingyi cuopei yu mingwuhua de canshu fenxi [On ‘syntax-semantics mismatches’ and a parametric analysis of nominalization]. Hanyu Xuebao [Chinese Linguistics] 2008.41:72–79.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. 2009 ‘Ta de laoshi dang de hao’ ji hanyu fangyan de mingwuhua [Ta-de laoshi dang-de hao and nominalization in Chinese dialects]. Yuyan Kexue [Linguistic Sciences]8.3:239–247.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. 2010 ‘Xingyi cuopei’ yu hanying de chayi: zaitan ‘ta de lao shi dang de hao’ [Syntax-semantics mismatches and their variation in Chinese and English: Ta-de laoshi dang-de hao revisited]. Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies] 2010.31:51–56.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Tokizaki, Hisao
    1999 Prosodic phrasing and bare phrase structure. Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 29, Vol.11, ed. by P. N. Tamanji , M. Hirotani & N. Hall , 381–395. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. 2005 Pause and hierarchical structure in sentence and discourse. Proceedings of the IDP05 International Symposium on Discourse-Prosody Interfaces, ed. by C. Auran , R. Bertrand , C. Chanet , A. Colas , A. Di Cristo , C. Portes , A. Reynier & M. Vion , 1–16. Aix-en-Provence: Universite de Provence. Available atgoo.gl/sphb4R (assessed9 October 2014).
     [Google Scholar]
  80. 2007 Intrasentential prosody: conjunction, speech rate and sentence length. Nouveaux Cahiers de Linguistique Française281:359–367.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Truckenbrodt, Hubert
    2007 The syntax-phonology interface. The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology, ed. by Paul de Lacy , 435–456. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9780511486371.019
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486371.019 [Google Scholar]
  82. Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan
    1994 On Economizing the Theory of A-Bar Dependencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Van Valin, Robert D., Jr
    2005 Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9780511610578
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610578 [Google Scholar]
  84. Vogel, Irene
    2009 The status of the Clitic group. Phonological Domains: Universals and Deviations, ed. by Janet Grijzenhout & Bariş Kabak , 15–46. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi:  10.1515/9783110219234.1.15
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219234.1.15 [Google Scholar]
  85. Wang, Mao-lin
    2005 Hanyu ziran huayu yunlü zukuai de youxuanlun fenxi [An OT analysis of the prosodic chunking of Chinese spontaneous speech]. Jinan Xuebao (Zhexue Shehui Kexue Ban) [Journal of Jinan University (Philosophy and Social Sciences)]27.4:85–87.
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Wu, Changan
    2006 ‘Zhe ben shu de chuban’ yu xiangxin jiegou lilun nanti [Zhe ben shu de chuban: a challenge to Bloomfield’s theory of endocentric construction]. Dangdai Yuyanxue [Contemporary Linguistics]8.3:193–204.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Wu, Gang
    2000 Hanyu ‘de zi cizu’ de jufa yanjiu [The syntax of DeP in Chinese]. Xiandai Waiyu [Modern Foreign Languages]23.1:1–12.
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Wu, Huaicheng
    2008 ‘Zhundingyu + N + V de R’ jushi de chansheng jizhi [On the creation mechanism of the sentence pattern ‘para-attribute + N + V DE R’]. Yuyan Kexue [Linguistic Sciences]7.2:127–134.
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Xiong, Zhongru
    2005 Yi ‘de’ wei hexin de DP jiegou [A DP structure headed by de]. Dangdai Yuyanxue [Contemporary Linguistics]7.2:148–165.
     [Google Scholar]
  90. 2008 Yuyin jiegou yu mingci duanyu neibu gongneng fanchou de jufa weizhi [Phonological structures and the syntactic positions of functional categories in the nominal phrases]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language] 2008.61:523–534.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Yang, Da-ran
    2008 Lingyou mingci duanyu fenlie yu hanyu huati jiegou [Possessor phrase splitting and topic constructions in Chinese]. Jiefangjun Waiguoyu Xueyuan Xuebao [Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages]31.3:17–23.
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Yang, Yongzhong
    2008 ‘De’ de jufa diwei ji xiangguan lilun wenti [On the syntactic status of de and some related theoretical issues]. Hanyu Xuebao [Chinese Linguistics] 2008.31:51–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Zhang, Jing
    1980 Xinbian Xiandai Hanyu [Grammar on Contemporary Chinese]. Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Zhang, Nianwu
    2006 ‘De zi cizu’ de jufa fenxi [A syntactic analysis of de-phrases]. Waiyu Xuekan [Foreign Language Research]2006.2:71–76.
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Zhou, Guoguang
    2005 Dui ‘zhongxinyu lilun he hanyu de DeP’ yi wen de zhiyi [Head theory and DeP in Chinese revisited]. Dangdai Yuyanxue [Contemporary Linguistics]7.2:139–147.
     [Google Scholar]
  96. 2006 Kuohao beilun ‘de-X’ de yugan: yi “de” wei hexin de jiegou’ yinan qiujie [Revisiting the de-X structure: the bracketing paradox and linguistic intuition]. Dangdai Yuyanxue [Contemporary Linguistics]8.1:71–75.
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Zhu, Dexi
    1961 Shuo ‘de’ [On de]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language] 1961.121:1–15.
     [Google Scholar]
  98. 1982 Yufa Jiangyi [Lecture Notes on Grammar]. Bejing: Commercial Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Zhuang, Huibin
    2014a Daiti binyu de jufa yuyi yunzhun wenti [On licensing oblique objects in Chinese]. Aomen Yuyan Xuekan [Macau Journal of Linguistics] 2014.21:116–128.
     [Google Scholar]
  100. 2014b Yunlü yufa shijiao xia ‘de’ de yinxian yuanze [The rule of occurrence of de: a perspective from prosodic grammar]. Yuyan Yanjiu [Studies in Language and Linguistics]34.4:65–74.
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Zhuang, Huibin , & Zhenqian Liu
    2012 ‘De’ de yunlü yufa yanjiu [On de: a perspective in Chinese prosodic grammar]. Hanyu Xuexi [Chinese Language Learning] 2012. 31:34–42.
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Zhuang, Huibin , Wenlei Shi , Meihua Wang , & Zhenqian Liu
    2013 On DE: its nature and features. Chinese Lexical Semantics: 14th Workshop, ed. by Pengyuan Liu & Qi Su , 56–65. Heidelberg: Springer. doi:  10.1007/978‑3‑642‑45185‑0_7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45185-0_7 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lali.18.1.05zhu
Loading
Fake attributives in Chinese
Language and Linguistics 18, 141 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.18.1.05zhu
/content/journals/10.1075/lali.18.1.05zhu
/content/journals/10.1075/lali.18.1.05zhu
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): de; fake attributive; interface; mapping; prosodic grammar

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error