oa Is it syntactic or pragmatic?

References

1. Baker, C. L.
   1970 Double negatives. Linguistic Inquiry1.2: 169–186.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Beck, Sigrid
   2006 Intervention effects follow from focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics14.1: 1–56. doi:  10.1007/s11050‑005‑4532‑y
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-005-4532-y [Google Scholar]
3. Fox, Danny
   2000 Economy and Semantic Interpretation. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Funakoshi, Kenshi , & Masahiko Takahashi
   2014  lf intervention effects and nominative objects in Japanese. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics20.1: 101–110.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Goro, Takuya
   2006 Positive polarity as a syntactic phenomenon. Paper presented at the133rd Meeting of the Linguistic Society of Japan, November 18–19, 2006. Sapporo: Sapporo Gakuin University.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Goro, Takuya
   2007 Language-Specific Constraints on Scope Interpretation in First Language Acquisition. College Park: The University of Maryland dissertation.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Hasegawa, Nobuko
   1991 Affirmative polarity items and negation in Japanese. Interdisciplinary Approaches to Language: Essays in Honor of S.-Y. Kuroda, ed. by Carol Perkins Georgopoulos & Roberta Ishihara , 271–285. Netherlands: Springer. doi:  10.1007/978‑94‑011‑3818‑5_14
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3818-5_14 [Google Scholar]
8. Hoji, Hajime
   1985 Logical Form Constraints and Configurational Structures in Japanese. Seattle: University of Washington dissertation.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Hoji, Hajime
   1986 Scope interpretation in Japanese and its theoretical implications. WCCFL 5: Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. by Mary Dalrymple , Jeffrey Goldberg , Kristin Hanson , Michael Inman , Christopher Piñon & Stephen Wechsler , 87–101. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Hirotani, Masako
    2004 Prosody and lf: Processing Japanese Wh-questions. Amherst: University of Massachusetts at Amherst dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Ishihara, Shinichiro
    2002 Invisible but audible wh-scope marking: wh-constructions and deaccenting in Japanese. WCCFL 21: Proceedings of the 21st West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. by Line Mikkelsen & Christopher Potts , 180–193. Somerville: Cascadilla.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Kato, Takaomi
    2007 The CSC as an lf condition: evidence from neg-raising in Japanese. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics13.1: 113–126.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Kato, Yasuhiko
    1994 Negative polarity and movement. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Volume 24: Formal Approaches to Japanese Linguistics: Proceedings of FAJL 1, ed. by Masatoshi Koizumi & Hiroyuki Ura , 101–120. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Kato, Yasuhiko
    2000 Interpretive asymmetries of negation. Negation and Polarity: Syntactic and Semantic Perspectives, ed. by Laurence R. Horn , & Yasuhiko Kato , 62–87. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Kim, Shin-Sook
    2002 Intervention effects are focus effects. Japanese/Korean Linguistics, Vol.101, ed. by Noriko Akatsuka & Susan Strauss , 615–628. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Kitagawa, Yoshihisa
    2005 Wh-scope puzzles. NELS 35: Proceedings of the Thirty-fifth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, Vol.21, ed. by Leah Bateman & Cherlon Ussery , 335–349. Amherst: GLSA.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Kuno, Susumu
    1973 The Structure of the Japanese Language. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kuno, Masakazu
    2008 Negation, focus, and negative concord in Japanese. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics281: 195–211.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Kuroda, S.-Y.
    1988 Whether we agree or not: A comparative syntax of English and Japanese. Lingvisticæ Investigationes12.1: 1–47. doi:  10.1075/li.12.1.02kur
    https://doi.org/10.1075/li.12.1.02kur [Google Scholar]
20. Kuroda, S.-Y.
    1992 Whether we agree or not: a comparative syntax of English and Japanese. Japanese Syntax and Semantics: Collected Papers, ed. by S.-Y. Kuroda , 315–357. Netherlands: Springer. doi:  10.1007/978‑94‑011‑2789‑9_11
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2789-9_11 [Google Scholar]
21. Krifka, Manfred
    2001 For a structured meaning account of questions and answers. Audiatur Vox Sapientiae: A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow, ed. by Caroline Féry & Wolfgang Sternefeld , 287–319. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Nagahara, Hiroyuki
    1994 Phonological Phrasing in Japanese. Los Angeles: University of California Dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Nishigauchi, Taisuke
    1990 Quantification in the Theory of Grammar. Berlin: Kluwer. doi:  10.1007/978‑94‑009‑1972‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1972-3 [Google Scholar]
24. Nomura, Masashi
    2005 Nominative Case and AGREE(ment). Storrs: University of Connecticut Dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Progovac, Ljiljana
    2005 Negative and positive feature checking and the distribution of polarity items. Negation in Slavic, ed. by Sue Brown & Adam Przepiorkowski , 179–217. Bloomington: Slavica Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Tada, Hiroaki
    1992 Nominative objects in Japanese. Journal of Japanese Linguistics141: 91–108. 10.1515/jjl‑1992‑0105
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jjl-1992-0105 [Google Scholar]
27. Tomioka, Satoshi
    2007 Pragmatics of lf intervention effects: Japanese and Korean wh-interrogatives. Journal of Pragmatics39.9: 1570–1590. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2007.03.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.03.002 [Google Scholar]
28. Tomioka, Satoshi
    2009 Why questions, presuppositions, and intervention effects. Journal of East Asian Linguistics18.4: 253–271. doi:  10.1007/s10831‑009‑9053‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-009-9053-0 [Google Scholar]
29. Vallduví, Enric
    1992 A preverbal landing site for quantificational operators. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics21: 319–343.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Vallduví, Enric
    1995 Structural properties of information packaging in Catalan. Discourse Configurational Languages, ed. by Katalin É. Kiss , 122–152. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Watanabe, Akira
    1992 Subjacency and s-structure movement of wh-in-situ. Journal of East Asian Linguistics1.3: 255–291. doi:  10.1007/BF00130554
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00130554 [Google Scholar]
32. Watanabe, Akira
    2013 Ingredients of polarity sensitivity: bipolar items in Japanese. Strategies of Quantification, ed. by Kook-Hee Gil , Stephen Harlow & George Tsoulas , 189–213. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:  10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199692439.003.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199692439.003.0010 [Google Scholar]