Volume 1, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2589-7233
  • E-ISSN: 2589-7241
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



As major world languages – Chinese, Spanish and Portuguese, for instance – become the medium of university networks, it may be the right time to take stock of the influence that English has had over the way the disciplines of humanities and sciences have been shaped, directed and evaluated, in particular in the second half of the 20th century. This paper is an attempt to understand some of the textual, linguistic and historical determinants of Disciplinary English (DE) specifically in the spectrum of technical subjects. DE is now a way of meaning which has become associated with objective authority. From this association, DE has shaped our disciplinary knowledge and spread across to registers of bureaucratic and political subject matter. The discussion also considers innovative potential in disciplinary discourses, in particular what Halliday regarded as the “knight’s move” in text: this is the related, analogical effect of Hasan’s “symbolic articulation” in verbal art and grammatical metaphor in the language of technical disciplines.

This work is currently available as a sample.

Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Bacciagaluppi, Guido & Antony Valentini
    2009Quantum theory at the crossroads: Reconsidering the 1927 Solvay conference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139194983
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139194983 [Google Scholar]
  2. Banks, David
    2008The development of scientific writing: Linguistic features and historical context. Sheffield: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 2017The birth of the academic article: Le Journal des Sçavans and the philosophical transactions1665–1700. Sheffield: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bateson, Gregory
    1979Mind and nature: A necessary unity. New York: E. P. Dutton.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Beer, Anna
    2008Milton: Poet, pamphleteer and patriot. New York & London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bell, John
    1993 [1986] Interview. InPaul C. W. Davies & Julian R. Brown (eds.), The ghost in the atom: A discussion of the mysteries of quantum physics, 45–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Berkeley, George
    2002 [1734]The analyst; Or, a discourse addressed to an infidel mathematician. London: Tonson in the Strand; reprinted byD. Wilkins in 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Brooks, Michael
    2011Free radicals: The secret anarchy of science. London: Profile Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Brown, Roger, Courtney Cazden & Ursula Bellugi
    1968 The child’s grammar from I to III. InJ. P. Hill (ed.), Minnesota symposia on child development, 28–73. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Butt, David G.
    2004 How our meanings change: School contexts and semantic evolution. InGeoff Williams & Annabelle Lukin (eds.), The development of language: Functional perspectives on species and individuals, 217–240. London & New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 2008a Whiteheadian and functional linguistics. InMichael Weber & Will Desmond (eds.), Handbook of Whiteheadian process thought, 21–32. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag. 10.1515/9783110333299.2.21
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110333299.2.21 [Google Scholar]
  12. 2008b The robustness of realizational systems. InJonathan J. Webster (ed.), Meaning in context: Implementing intelligent applications of language studies, 59–83. London & New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Crosby, Alfred W.
    1996The measure of reality: Quantification and western society 1250 – 1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781107050518
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107050518 [Google Scholar]
  14. Darwin, Charles
    1998 [1859]The origin of species by means of natural selection or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. New York: The Modern Library.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Deacon, Terrence W.
    2012Incomplete nature: How mind emerged from matter. London & New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Defoe, Daniel
    2003 [1722]A journal of the plague year. Based on a journal by HF from 1665. England: Penguin Classics.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Dolnick, Edward
    2011The clockwork universe: Isaac Newton, the royal society, and the birth of the modern world. New York: Harper Collins.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Edelman, Gerald M.
    1992Bright air, brilliant fire: On the matter of the mind. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 2006Second nature: Brain science and human knowledge. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Edelman, Gerald M. & Giulio Tononi
    2000A universe of consciousness: How matter becomes imagination. USA: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Firth, John R.
    1957 [1950]Papers in linguistics 1934–1951. London: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Grand, Edward
    1957 [1950]The foundations of modern science in the Middle Ages: Their religious, institutional, and intellectual contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Grant, Edward
    2007A history of natural philosophy: From the ancient world to the nineteenth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511999871
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511999871 [Google Scholar]
  24. Gilder, Louisa
    2008The age of entanglement: When quantum physics was born. New York: Vintage Books Random House.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Halliday, Michael A. K.
    1973 Towards a sociological semantics. InMichael A. K. Halliday, Explorations in the functions of language, 64–94. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 2002[1988] On the ineffability of grammatical categories. InMichael A. K. Halliday, On grammar, volume 1 in the collected works of M. A. K. Halliday. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. London & New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 2004 [1988] On the language of physical science. InMichael A. K. Halliday, The language of science, volume 5 in the collected works of M. A. K. Halliday, 140–158. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. London & New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 2004 [1998] Things and relations: Regrammaticizing experience as technical knowledge. InMichael A. K. Halliday, The language of science, volume 5 in the collected works of M. A. K. Halliday, 49–101. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. London & New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Halliday, Michael A. K. & James R. Martin
    1993Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London & Washington DC: Falmer.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Halliday, Michael A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    1999Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition. London: Cassell.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Halliday, Michael A. K., & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    2014Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th edition). London & New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203783771
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hasan, Ruqaiya
    1999 Speaking with reference to context. InMohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Text and context in functional linguistics, 219–328. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.169.11has
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.169.11has [Google Scholar]
  33. 2005Language, society and consciousness: volume 1 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. 2009Semantic variation: Meaning in society and in sociolinguistics, volume 2 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 2011Language and education: Learning and teaching in society, volume 3 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 2011 [1985] The implications of semantic distance for language in education. InRuqaiya Hasan, Language and education: Learning and teaching in society, volume 3 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan, 73–99. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Heisenberg, Werner
    1973 Tradition in science: Science and public affairs. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. XXIX10. 4–11. 10.1080/00963402.1973.11455537
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.1973.11455537 [Google Scholar]
  38. Hoenigswald, Henry M. & Linda F. Wiener
    (eds.) 1987Biological metaphor and cladistic classification: An interdisciplinary approach. London: Frances Pinter. 10.9783/9781512802450
    https://doi.org/10.9783/9781512802450 [Google Scholar]
  39. Jones, Steve
    2000Almost like a whale: The origin of species updated. London: Transworld Publishing Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Kappagoda, Astika K.
    2004 Semiosis as the sixth sense: Theorising the unperceived in Ancient Greek. Doctoral Dissertation. Macquarie University.
  41. Kellogg, David J.
    2017 Narrative and dialogue in child development: Vygotsky’s pedology in systemic functional perspective. Doctoral Dissertation. Macquarie University
  42. Klemperer, Victor
    2002 [1957]The language of the Third Reich. LTI – Lingua Tertii Imperii: A philologist’s notebook. Translated by. Martin Brady. London & New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Kress, Gunther & Theo van Leeuwen
    1990Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Geelong: Deakin University Press
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Lamb, Sydney M.
    1984 Semiotics of language and culture: A relational approach. InRobin P. Fawcett, Michael A. K. Halliday, Sydney M. Lamb & Adam Makkai (eds.), The semiotics of culture and language, volume 2: Language and other semiotic systems of culture, 71–99. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Lewontin, Richard C.
    2000It ain’t necessarily so: The case of the human genome and other illusions. New York: New York Review of Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R.
    2002The ambitions of curiosity: Understanding the world in ancient Greece and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Martin, James R. & Robert Veel
    (eds.) 1998Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Ostler, Nicholas
    2007Ad infinitum: A biography of Latin. London: Harper Collins.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. O’Toole, Michael
    2011 [1994]The language of displayed art (2nd edition). Oxford & New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Popper, Karl R.
    1972Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Saussure, Ferdinand de
    (2011) Course in general linguistics. Translated byWade Baskin. Edited byP. Meisel & H. Saussy. Columbia University Press: New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Schrödinger, Erwin
    1944What is life? The physical aspect of the living cell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Shapiro, James A.
    2011Evolution: A view from the 21st century. New Jersey: FT Press Science.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Smitwick, Fiann M., Robert Nicholls, Innes C. Cuthill & Jakob Vinther
    2017 Countershading and stripes in the theropod dinosaur sinosauropteryx reveal heterogeneous habitats in the early cretaceous Jehol Biota. Current Biology. 27: 3337–3343.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Toulmin, Stephen
    1961Foresight and understanding: An enquiry into the aims of science. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Vygotsky, Lev S.
    1962Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.1037/11193‑000
    https://doi.org/10.1037/11193-000 [Google Scholar]
  57. Waddington, Conrad H.
    1977Tools for thought. London: Jonathan Cape.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Whittaker, Martin A.
    2006Einstein, Bohr and the quantum dilemma: From quantum theory to quantum information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511805714
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805714 [Google Scholar]
  59. Williams, Geoff
    2001 Literacy pedagogy prior to schooling: Relations between social and semantic variation. InAna Morais, Isabel Neves, Brian Davies & Henry Baillie (eds.), Towards a sociology of pedagogy: The contribution of Basil Bernstein to research, 17–45. New York & Oxford: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Whorf, Benjamin L.
    1956Language, thought and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Edited byJohn B. Carroll. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Christie, Frances
    1999 The pedagogic device and the teaching of English. InFrances Christie (ed.), Pedagogy and the shaping of consciousness: Linguistic and social processes, 165–184. London & New York: Cassell.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Christie, Frances & Mary Macken-Horarik
    2007 Building verticality in subject English. InFrances Christie & James R. Martin (eds.), Language, knowledge and pedagogy: Functional and sociological perspectives, 156–184. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Christie, Frances & Beverly Derewianka
    2008School discourse: Learning to write across the years of schooling. London: Continuum. (Some chapters in this book are on English).
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Christie, France & Mary Macken-Horarik
    2011 Disciplinarity and school subject English. InFrances Christie & Karl Maton (eds.), Disciplinarity: Functional and sociological perspectives, 175–196. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Macken-Horarik, Mary, Kristina Love, Carmel Sandiford & Len Unsworth
    2018Functional grammatics: Re-conceptualising knowledge about language and image for school English. London & New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Rothery, Joan, & Maree Stenglin
    1997 Entertaining and instructing: Exploring experience through story. InFrances Christie & James R. Martin (eds.), Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school, 231–264. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Williams, Geoff
    2000 Children’s literature, children and uses of language description. InLen Unsworth (ed.), Researching language in schools and communities, 111–129. London: Cassell.
    [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error