1887
Volume 1, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2589-7233
  • E-ISSN: 2589-7241
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Given the pressing issues that affect nursing education (e.g. higher attrition and plagiarism rates), this study aims to obtain initial insight on whether nursing textbooks meet the demands of their context of situation. These demands could be listed as: construing biomedical knowledge, establishing a pattern of evidence-based nursing practice and promoting the values of person-centred care. For this analysis, I draw on aspects of parameters of context developed by Hasan (2004)Butt (2004) and Matthiessen (2015), and relate them to their semantic and lexicogrammatical realisation across different metafunctions using corpus-based techniques and detailed manual analysis of short extracts. The results may suggest that nursing textbooks may be meeting the demands of nursing as a research-based discipline but failing to model empathetic communication.

This work is currently available as a sample.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/langct.00003.gar
2019-02-04
2019-10-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Australian Nursing Federation
    Australian Nursing Federation 2012 Fact sheet 2: A snapshot of nursing in Australia. anf.org.au/documents/reports/Fact_Sheet_Snap_Shot_Nursing.pdf (7 November, 2018)
  2. Baillie, Louise
    2009Developing practical nursing skills (3rd edition). London: Hodder Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Benner, Patricia
    1982 From novice to expert. The American Journal of Nursing82(3). 402–407.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Björnsdottir, Kristin
    2001 Language, research and nursing practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing33(2). 159–166. 10.1046/j.1365‑2648.2001.01648.x
    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01648.x [Google Scholar]
  5. Bloomfield, Jacqueline & Anne Pegram
    2015 Care, compassion and communication. Nursing Standard29(25). 45–50. 10.7748/ns.29.25.45.e7653
    https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.29.25.45.e7653 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bluhm, Robyn L.
    2014 The (dis)unity of nursing science. Nursing Philosophy15. 250–260. 10.1111/nup.12062
    https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12062 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bond, Loretta
    2012A Foucauldian discourse analysis of health disparities in nursing textbooks. Chicago, IL: Rush University PhD Thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bowles, Nick, Carolyn Mackintosh & Alison Torn
    2001 Nurses’ communication skills: An evaluation of the impact of solution-focused communication training. Journal of Advanced Nursing36(3). 347–354. 10.1046/j.1365‑2648.2001.01979.x
    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01979.x [Google Scholar]
  9. Brodie, David A., Gavin J. Andrews, Justin P. Andrews, Gail B. Thomas, Josephine Wong & Lorna Rixon
    2004 Perceptions of nursing: Confirmation, change and the student experience. International Journal of Nursing Studies41(7). 721–733. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.02.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.02.009 [Google Scholar]
  10. Brown, Diane, Helen Edwards, Leslie Seaton & Thomas Buckley
    2016Lewis’s medical-surgical nursing: Assessment and management of clinical problems (4th edition.). London: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Buchan, James & Lynn Calman
    2004The global shortage of registered nurses: An overview of issues and actions. International Council of Nurses, Geneva.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Butt, David
    2004Parameters of context: On establishing the similarities and differences between social processes. Unpublished mimeo, Macquarie University.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Carper, Barbara A.
    1978 Fundamental patterns of knowing in nursing. Advances in Nursing Science (1)1. 13–23. 10.1097/00012272‑197810000‑00004
    https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-197810000-00004 [Google Scholar]
  14. Chant, Simon, Tim Jenkinson, Jacqueline Randle & Graham Russell
    2002 Communication skills: Some problems in nursing education and practice. Journal of Clinical Nursing11(1). 12–21. 10.1046/j.1365‑2702.2002.00553.x
    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2702.2002.00553.x [Google Scholar]
  15. Choi, Liza L. S.
    2005 Literature review: Issues surrounding education of English-as-a-second language (ESL) nursing students. Journal of Transcultural Nursing16(3). 263–268. 10.1177/1043659605274966
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659605274966 [Google Scholar]
  16. CRICO Strategies
    CRICO Strategies 2015Malpractice risk in communication failures: 2015 annual benchmarking report. Boston, Massachusetts: The Risk Management Foundation of the Harvard Medical Institutions.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Dante, Angelo, Sónia Ferrão, Darja Jarosova, Loreto Lancia, Carla Nascimento, Venetia Notara, Andrea Pokorna, Lubica Rybarova, Brigita Skela-Savič & Alvisa Palese
    2016 Nursing student profiles and occurrence of early academic failure: Findings from an explorative European study. Nurse Education Today38. 74–81. 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.12.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.12.013 [Google Scholar]
  18. Davies, Mark
    2012 Word and phrase. Info. https://www.wordandphrase.info/academic/analyzeText.asp (3July 2018).
  19. Donaldson, Sue K. & Dorothy M. Crowley
    1978 The discipline of nursing. Nursing Outlook26(2). 113–120.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Edwards, Deborah, Philip Burnard, Kim Bennett & Una Hebden
    2010 A longitudinal study of stress and self-esteem in student nurses. Nurse Education Today30 (1). 78–84. 10.1016/j.nedt.2009.06.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2009.06.008 [Google Scholar]
  21. Eick, Susan A., Graham R. Williamson & Val Heath
    2012 A systematic review of placement-related attrition in nurse education. International Journal of Nursing Studies49(10). 1299–1309. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.12.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.12.004 [Google Scholar]
  22. Fairus Nor Mohamad, Alif & Ng Yu Jin
    2013 Corpus-based studies on nursing textbooks. Advances in Language and Literary Studies4(2). 21–28. 10.7575/aiac.alls.v.4n.2p.21.
    https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.4n.2p.21 [Google Scholar]
  23. Freddi, Maria
    2005 Arguing linguistics: Corpus investigation of one functional variety of academic discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes4(1). 5–26. 10.1016/j.jeap.2003.09.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2003.09.002 [Google Scholar]
  24. Gardner, Dee & Mark Davies
    2013 A new academic vocabulary list. Applied Linguistics35(3). 305–327. 10.1093/applin/amt015
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt015 [Google Scholar]
  25. Glossop, Christine
    2001 Student nurse attrition from pre-registration courses: investigating methodological issues. Nurse Education Today21(3). 170–180. 10.1054/nedt.2000.0525
    https://doi.org/10.1054/nedt.2000.0525 [Google Scholar]
  26. Halliday, Michael A. K.
    1998 Language and knowledge: The ‘unpacking’ of text. InDesmond Allison, Lionel Wee, Bao Zhiming & Sunita Anne Abraham (eds.), Text in education and society, 157–178. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 2003On language and linguistics, volume3in the collected works ofM. A. K. Halliday. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 2016Aspects of language and learning. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 10.1007/978‑3‑662‑47821‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47821-9 [Google Scholar]
  29. Halliday, Michael A. K. & James R. Martin
    1993Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: The Falmer Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Hasan, Ruqaiya
    1985 The structure of a text. InMichael A. K. Halliday & Ruqaiya Hasan. Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective, 52–68. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. 2004 Analysing discursive variation. InLynn Young & Claire Harrison (eds.), Systemic functional linguistics and critical discourse analysis: Studies in social change, 15‒52. London & New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 2009 The place of context in a systemic functional model. InMichael A. K. Halliday & Jonathan J. Webster. Continuum companion to systemic functional linguistics, 166–189. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Hoogewerf, Cornelis J., Margriet E. van Baar, Jenda M. Hop, Marianne K. Nieuwenhuis, Irma M. M. H. Oen & Esther Middelkoop
    2011 Topical treatment for facial burns. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (1): 37 (Suppl 1). 18–S19; CD008058.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. House, Sharon L.
    2015 Psychological distress and its impact on wound healing: An integrative review. Journal of Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nursing: Official Publication of the Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society42 (1). 38–41. 10.1097/WON.0000000000000080
    https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000080 [Google Scholar]
  35. Hyland, Ken
    2000Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. New York & Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Lai, Chinyuan
    2016 Training nursing students’ communication skills with online video peer assessment. Computers & Education97. 21–30. 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.017
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.017 [Google Scholar]
  37. Leufer, Therese & Joanne Cleary-Holdforth
    2009 Evidence-based practice: Improving patient outcomes. Nursing Standard23(2). 35–39. 10.7748/ns.23.32.35.s46
    https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.23.32.35.s46 [Google Scholar]
  38. Love, Alison
    2014 Introductory concepts and ‘cutting edge’ theories: Can the genre of the textbook accommodate both?InJohn Flowerdew (ed.), Academic discourse, 86–102. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Lynch, Joan, Bronwyn Everett, Lucie M. Ramjan, Renee Callins, Paul Glew & Yenna Salamonson
    2017 Plagiarism in nursing education: An integrative review. Journal of Clinical Nursing26. 2845–2864. 10.1111/jocn.13629
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13629 [Google Scholar]
  40. Martin, James R.
    1986 Intervening in the process of writing development. InClaire Painter & James R. Martin (eds.), Writing to mean: Teaching genres across the curriculum (9), 11–43. Wollongong, NSW: University of Wollongong.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 1991 Critical literacy: The role of a functional model of language. Australian Journal of Reading14(2). 117–132.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 1993 Literacy in science: Learning to handle text as technology. InMichael A. K. Halliday & James R. Martin. Writing science: Literacy and discursive power, 166–202. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Martin, James R. & David Rose
    2008Genre relations: Mapping culture. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M.
    2015 Register in the round: Registerial cartography. Functional Linguistics2. 1–48. 10.1186/s40554‑015‑0015‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-015-0015-8 [Google Scholar]
  45. Moore, Tim
    2002 Knowledge and agency: A study of ‘metaphenomenal discourse’ in textbooks from three disciplines. English for Specific Purposes21(4). 347–366. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(01)00030‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(01)00030-8 [Google Scholar]
  46. Mukundan, Jayakaran & Ng Yu Jin
    2012 Development of a technical nursing education word list (NEWL). International Journal of Innovation in English Language Teaching and Research1(2). 105–124.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Nightingale, Florence
    2012[1860]Notes on nursing: What it is, and what it is not. Newbury Port: Dover Publication.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Parodi, Giovanni
    2014 Genre organization in specialized discourse: Disciplinary variation across university textbooks. Discourse Studies16(1). 65–87. 10.1177/1461445613496355
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613496355 [Google Scholar]
  49. Price-Glynn, Kim & Stacy Missari
    2017 Perspectives on violence against women: A study of United States nursing textbooks. Journal of Nursing Education56(3). 164–169. 10.3928/01484834‑20170222‑08
    https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20170222-08 [Google Scholar]
  50. Shea, Nina
    1988 The language of junior secondary science textbooks. Sydney, NSW: The University of Sydney BA Hons Thesis.
  51. Tarrier, Nicholas, Lynsey Gregg, Jackie Edwards & Ken Dunn
    2005 The influence of pre-existing psychiatric illness on recovery in burn injury patients: The impact of psychosis and depression. Burns31(1). 45–49. 10.1016/j.burns.2004.06.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2004.06.010 [Google Scholar]
  52. Taylor, Charles
    1979The English of high school textbooks. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Watson, Roger
    2005 Editorial: The global shortage of registered nurses. Journal of Clinical Nursing14(4). 409–409. 10.1111/j.1365‑2702.2005.01133.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01133.x [Google Scholar]
  54. Wignell, Peter, James R. Martin & Susan Eggins
    1989 The discourse of geography: Ordering and explaining the experiential world. Linguistics and Education1(4). 359–391. 10.1016/S0898‑5898(89)80007‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(89)80007-5 [Google Scholar]
  55. Yang, Xinzhang
    2017 The linguistic features of knowledge construction in chemistry textbooks. InJonathan J. Webster & Xuan wei Peng (eds.), Applying systemic functional linguistics: The state of the art in China today, 337–350. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/langct.00003.gar
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/langct.00003.gar
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error