Engineering registers in the 21st century

References

1. Ackermann, Kirsten & Yuhua Chen
   2013 Developing the Academic Collocation List (ACL) – A corpus-driven and expert-judged approach. Journal of English for Academic Purposes12. 235–247. 10.1016/j.jeap.2013.08.002
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.08.002 [Google Scholar]
2. Alsop, Siân & Hilary Nesi
   2013 The summarising function of university Engineering lectures: A cross-cultural perspective. InAlasdair N. Archibald (ed.), Multilingual theory and practice in applied linguistics, 11–14. London: Scitsiugnil Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Anthony, Laurence
   2014 AntConc (version 3.4.3) [computer software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available fromwww.laurenceanthony.net.
4. Anthony, Laurence
   2017 AntCorGen (version 1.1.0) [computer software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available fromwww.laurenceanthony.net/
5. Biber, Douglas & Frederica Barbieri
   2007 Lexical bundles in university spoken and written register. English for Specific Purposes26. 263–286. 10.1016/j.esp.2006.08.003
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.08.003 [Google Scholar]
6. Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad, Randi Reppen, Pat Byrd & Marie Helt
   2002 Speaking and writing in the university: A multidimensional comparison. TESOL Quarterly36. 9–48. 10.2307/3588359
   https://doi.org/10.2307/3588359 [Google Scholar]
7. Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad
   2009 Register, genre, and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511814358
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814358 [Google Scholar]
8. Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan
   1999 Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Björkman, Beyza
   2008 English as a lingua franca of engineering: The morphosyntax of academic speech events. Nordic Journal of English Studies7. 103–122.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Canagarajah, Suresh
    2018 English as a spatial resource and the claimed competence of Chinese STEM professionals. World Englishes37. 34–50. 10.1111/weng.12301
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12301 [Google Scholar]
11. Conrad, Susan
    2017 From a plate of spaghetti to a cable-stayed bridge: Increasing the impact of corpus linguistics in disciplinary education. Plenary presentation, Corpus Linguistics 2017, Birmingham: University of Birmingham. Available athttps://www.birmingham.ac.uk/research/activity/corpus/events/2017/cl2017/index.aspx.
12. Cortes, Vivian
    2004 Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes23. 397–423. 10.1016/j.esp.2003.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2003.12.001 [Google Scholar]
13. Durrant, Philip
    2017 Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation in university students’ writing: Mapping the territories. Applied Linguistics38. 165–193. 10.1093/applin/amv011
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv011 [Google Scholar]
14. Flowerdew, John
    2015 John Swales’s approach to pedagogy in genre analysis: A perspective from 25 years on. Journal of English for Academic Purposes19. 102–112. 10.1016/j.jeap.2015.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.02.003 [Google Scholar]
15. Gardner, Sheena
    2012 Genres and registers of student report writing: An SFL perspective on texts and practices. Journal of English for Academic Purposes11. 52–63. 10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.002.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.002 [Google Scholar]
16. Gardner, Sheena
    2016 A genre-instantiation approach to teaching English for specific academic purposes: Student writing in business, economics and engineering. Writing and Pedagogy8. 117–144. 10.1558/wap.v8i1.27934.
    https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.v8i1.27934 [Google Scholar]
17. Gardner, Sheena, Hilary Nesi & Douglas Biber
    2018 Discipline, level, genre: Integrating situational perspectives in a new MD analysis of university student writing. Applied Linguistics. 10.1093/applin/amy005
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy005 [Google Scholar]
18. Halliday, Michael A. K.
    2004 The Language of science, volume 5 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. London/New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Halliday, Michael A. K. & James R. Martin
    (eds.) 1993 Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Bristol & London: Falmer.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Huang, Pingyu
    2017 Academic collocations in computer science research articles: A corpus-based study. Paper presented atCorpus Linguistics 2017, University of Birmingham.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hyland, Ken
    2000 Disciplinary discourses: Social interaction in academic writing. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Hyland, Ken
    2004 Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing13. 133–151. 10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001 [Google Scholar]
23. Hyland, Ken
    2008 As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes27. 4–21. 10.1016/j.esp.2007.06.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2007.06.001 [Google Scholar]
24. Kanoksilapatham, Budsaba
    2015 Distinguishing textual features characterizing structural variation in research articles across three engineering sub-discipline corpora. English for Specific Purposes37. 74–86. 10.1016/j.esp.2014.06.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.06.008 [Google Scholar]
25. Koutsantoni, Dimitra
    2006 Rhetorical strategies in engineering research articles and research theses: Advanced academic literacy and relations of power. Journal of English for Academic Purposes5. 19–36. 10.1016/j.jeap.2005.11.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.11.002 [Google Scholar]
26. Kress, Gunter
    2000 Multimodality: Challenges to thinking about language. TESOL Quarterly34. 337–340. 10.2307/3587959
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587959 [Google Scholar]
27. Martin, James R.
    1990 Literacy in science: Learning to handle text as technology. InFrances Christie (ed.), Literacy for a changing world, 166–202. Hawthorn, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Martin, James R. & Robert Veel
    (eds.) 1998 Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. & Michael A. K. Halliday
    2009 Systemic functional grammar: A first step into the theory. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Mudraya, Olga
    2006 Engineering English: A lexical frequency instructional model. English for Specific Purposes25. 235–256. 10.1016/j.esp.2005.05.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.05.002 [Google Scholar]
31. Nesi, Hilary & Sheena Gardner
    2006 Variation in disciplinary culture: University tutors’ views on assessed writing tasks. British Studies in Applied Linguistics21. 99–117.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Pan, Fan, Randi Reppen & Douglas Biber
    2016 Comparing patterns of L1 versus L2 English academic professionals: Lexical bundles in telecommunications research journals. Journal of English for Academic Purposes21. 60–71. 10.1016/j.jeap.2015.11.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.11.003 [Google Scholar]
33. Rezoug, Fares & Benet Vincent
    2018 Exploring lexical bundles in the Algerian Corpus of Engineering (ACE). Arab Journal of Applied Linguistics3. 47–77.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Rozycki, William & Neil H. Johnson
    2013 Non-canonical grammar in best paper award winners in engineering. English for Specific Purposes32. 157–169. 10.1016/j.esp.2013.04.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2013.04.002 [Google Scholar]
35. Sun, Yuchih
    2013 Do journal authors plagiarize? Using plagiarism detecting software to uncover matching text across disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes12. 264–272. 10.1016/j.jeap.2013.07.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.07.002 [Google Scholar]
36. Wang, Simon & John Flowerdew
    2016 Participatory genre analysis of statements of purpose: An identity focused study. Writing and Pedagogy8. 33–57. 10.1558/wap.v8i1.29699
    https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.v8i1.29699 [Google Scholar]
37. Wood, Alistair
    2001 International scientific English. InJohn Flowerdew & Matthew Peacock (eds.), Research perspectives on English for academic purposes, 71–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524766.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524766.008 [Google Scholar]