Volume 1, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2589-7233
  • E-ISSN: 2589-7241
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



The paper first traces the history and elaboration of the tertiary discipline English Literature through the 19th and 20th centuries to the present day, with special focus on the axiology, the values, given to the discipline and with a brief account of literary criticism and literary theory. It then refers to the work on registerial cartography in systemic functional linguistics (SFL) and explores the register of the contemporary discipline in first-order field of activity and second-order field of experience, with examples from the language of webpages and exam papers of Australian universities. It continues with a brief overview of the author’s own work using SFL in the study of and in English poetry and prose fiction of different historical periods and concludes with a caveat on the central disciplinary process, that of interpretation.

This work is currently available as a sample.

Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Abbott, H. Porter
    2002The Cambridge introduction to narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ayers, David
    2008Literary theory, a reintroduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Brewton, Vince
    ed. n.d.Literary theory. RetrievedSeptember 23, 2017, fromwww.iep.utm.edu/literary/.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Christie, Michael J.
    1985Aboriginal perspectives on experience and learning: The role of language in aboriginal education. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Coleridge, Samuel T.
    (text of 1834) The rime of the ancient mariner. Retrievable fromhttps://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/43997/the-rime-of-the-ancient-mariner-text-of-1834.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dale, Leigh
    2012The enchantment of English, professing English literatures in Australian universities (2nd edition). Sydney: Sydney University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dolin, Tim, Jo Jones & Patricia Dowsett
    2017Required reading, literature in Australian schools since 1945. Clayton, Victoria: Monash University Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Eaglestone, Robert
    2009Doing English, a guide for literature students (3rd edition). London & New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Eagleton, Terry
    1983Literary theory: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fraser, Julius T.
    2007Time and time again, reports from a boundary of the universe. Leiden & Boston: Brill. 10.1163/ej.9789004154858.i‑433
    https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004154858.i-433 [Google Scholar]
  11. Goring, Paul, Jeremy Hawthorn & Domhnall Mitchell
    2001Studying literature, the essential companion. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hall, Donald E.
    (ed.) 2001Professions, conversations on the future of literary and cultural studies. Urbana & Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Halliday, Michael A. K.
    1964 The linguistic study of literary texts. InHorace Lunt (ed.), Proceedings of the ninth international congress of linguists, 302–307. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 1978Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 2002 The linguistic study of literary texts. InMichael A. K. Halliday’s Linguistic studies of text and discourse, 5–22. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. London & New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Halliday, Michael A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    1999Construing experience through meaning. London & New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 2004Introduction to functional grammar (3rd edition). London: Hodder Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 2014Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th edition). London & New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203783771
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hasan, Ruqaiya
    1985Linguistics, language and verbal art. Deakin, Victoria: Deakin University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Huisman, Rosemary
    1998 hb; 2000 pbThe written poem, semiotic conventions from Old to Modern English. London & New York: Cassell (hb); Continuum (pb).
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 2013 The origins of language and narrative temporalities. InRaji C. Steineck & Claudia Clausius (eds.), Origins and futures: Time inflected and reflected, 49–76. Leiden & Boston: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 2015 How do you write about what is not there? How do you record what is absent? Scraping the temporal palimpsest in Auster’s fiction. InArkadiusz Misztal (ed.), Time, narrative, and imagination: Essays on Paul Auster, 271–291. Gdansk: Gdansk University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 2016 Talking about poetry – using the model of language in systemic functional linguistics to talk about poetic texts. English in Australia51(2). 7–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 2017 Facing the eternal desert: Sociotemporal values in Old English poetry. Kronoscope17(2). 231–253. 10.1163/15685241‑12341378
    https://doi.org/10.1163/15685241-12341378 [Google Scholar]
  25. Huisman, Rosemary, Helen Fulton, Julian Murphet & Anne Dunn
    2005Narrative and media. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511811760
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811760 [Google Scholar]
  26. Humphrey, Sally, Louise Droga & Susan Feez
    2012Grammar and meaning. Sydney: Primary English Teaching Association Australia (PETAA).
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Jakobson, Roman
    1960 Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. InThomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in language, 350–377. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 1985Verbal art, verbal sign, verbal time. Edited byKrystyna Pomorska & Stephen Rudy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Kent, Hannah
    2013Burial rites. Sydney: Picador.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Kramer-Dahl, Anneliese
    1999 The ‘slender technique’ of reproducing educational disadvantage: the discourse of English literature examiners’ reports. Journal of. Intercultural Studies20(2). 125–148. 10.1080/07256868.1999.9963476
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.1999.9963476 [Google Scholar]
  31. Krishnan, Armin
    2009What are academic disciplines? Some observations on the disciplinarity vs. interdisciplinarity debate. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, NCRM Working Paper Series 03/09. Retrieved fromeprints.ncrm.ac.uk/783/1/what_are_academic_disciplines.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Kusch, Celena E.
    2009Literary studies and interpreting literary texts. Retrieved fromhttps://www.uscupstate.edu/.../guide-to-literary-studies-and-interpreting-literature.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 2016Literary analysis: The basics. Abingdon & New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Lukin, Annabelle, Alison R. Moore, Maria Herke, Rebekah Wegener & Canzhong Wu
    2008 Halliday’s model of register revisited and explored. Linguistics and the Human Sciences4(2).187–213.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Lowry, Howard F.
    (ed.) 1932The letters of Matthew Arnold to Arthur Hugh Clough, letter51, 1853: 146. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/actrade/9780198124016.book.1
    https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198124016.book.1 [Google Scholar]
  36. Marshall, Donald G.
    1992 Literary interpretation. InJoseph Gibaldi (ed.), Introduction to scholarship in modern languages and literatures (2nd edition), 159–182. New York: Modern Languages Association of America.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Martin, James R.
    2003 Making history, grammar for interpretation. InJames R. Martin & Ruth Wodak (eds.), Re/reading the past: Critical and functional perspectives on time and value, 19–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.8.03mar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.8.03mar [Google Scholar]
  38. Martin, James R. & David Rose
    2008Genre relations: Mapping culture. London & Oakville: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M.
    2009 Ideas and new directions. InMichael A. K. Halliday & Jonathan J. Webster (eds.), Continuum companion to systemic functional linguistics, 12–58. London and New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 2015a Register in the round: registerial cartography. Functional Linguistics2(9): 1–48. 10.1186/s40554‑015‑0015‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-015-0015-8 [Google Scholar]
  41. Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. & Kazuhiro Teruya
    2015b Grammatical realizations of rhetorical relations in different registers. Word61(3). 232–281. 10.1080/00437956.2015.1071963
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2015.1071963 [Google Scholar]
  42. McMurty, Jo
    1985English language, English Literature, the creation of an academic discipline. London: Mansell Publishing Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Poetry Foundation
    Poetry Foundation ed. Matthew Arnold. Retrieved fromhttps://www.poetryfoundation.org/poets/matthew-arnold.
  44. Study English at ANU: Literature, film, drama and creative writing
    Study English at ANU: Literature, film, drama and creative writing 2017 RetrievedSeptember 21, 2017, fromslll.anu.edu.au/news-events/news/study-english-anu-literature-film-drama-and-creative-writing.
  45. Underwood, Ted
    2013Why literary periods mattered, historical contrast and the prestige of English studies. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Vacca, Raffaele
    2015 Co-citations in social networks and network science. Under webpage headingWhat is an academic field? Using co-citation networks to map scientific literature over time. Retrieved fromhttps://www.bebr.ufl.edu/networks/website-article/what-academic-field-using-co-citation-networks-map-scientific-literature.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Willatt, Edward
    2010Defining a discipline. Retrieved fromedwardwillatt.yolasite.com/blog/defining-a-discipline.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Wisker, Gina
    2007Key concepts in postcolonial literature. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑0‑230‑20879‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-20879-7 [Google Scholar]
  49. Young, Tory
    2008Studying English Literature, a practical guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511816147
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816147 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error