1887
Volume 1, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2589-7233
  • E-ISSN: 2589-7241
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Reflection literacy (Hasan 2011 [1996]) proposes that literacy education should orient learners towards critique and the creation of new knowledge. It is a vision for literacy education which deserves deeper consideration within the SFL community and beyond. A key component of reflection literacy is argued to be metalinguistic knowledge, which facilitates conscious reflection on meaning. This paper considers one way that reflection literacy might be enacted in elementary classrooms that are ‘tilted towards reflection’, arguing that dispositions of reflection can be developed from the early school years. Evidence is drawn from a series of case studies conducted in Sydney, Australia. Consideration is also given to how Hasan’s proposal might be used to develop future studies in the field.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/langct.00011.fre
2019-07-22
2019-10-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bernstein, Basil
    1990The structuring of pedagogic discourse. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203011263
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203011263 [Google Scholar]
  2. 2000Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. (revised edition). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bowcher, Wendy L.
    2015 An exceptional career, a lasting legacy: Professor Emeritus Ruqaiya Hasan (1931–2015). Functions of Language22(3). 289–296. 10.1075/fol.22.3.001obi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.22.3.001obi [Google Scholar]
  4. Browne, Anthony
    1986Piggybook. London: Julia MacRae Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Carter, Ronald
    (ed.) 1990Knowledge about language and the curriculum: The LINC reader. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chambers, Aidan
    1985 Tell me: Are children critics?InAidan Chambers (ed.), Booktalk: Occasional writing on literature and children, 138–174. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 1994Tell me: Children, reading and talk. Newtown, NSW, Australia: Primary English Teaching Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cloran, Carmel
    1994Rhetorical units and decontextualisation: An enquiry into some relations of meaning and grammar. Nottingham University, England: Department of English StudiesMonograph in Systemic Linguistics, No. 6.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cooper, Helen
    1998Pumpkin soup. London: Picture Corgi.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Doherty, Catherine
    2012 A review ofThe collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan, volume 3. Language and education: Learning and teaching in society. Language and Education26(6). 569–576.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Ferreira, Alfredo & Sandra Zappa-Holman
    2019 Disciplinary registers in a first-year program: A view from the context of curriculum. Language, context and text: The social semiotics forum1(1). 148–193. 10.1075/langct.00007.fer
    https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.00007.fer [Google Scholar]
  12. French, Ruth
    2009Pumpkin soup and grammatics: A critical literacy case study with Year 2. InTerrence Hays & Rafat Hussain (eds.), Bridging the gap between ideas and doing research – Proceedings of the 3rd annual postgraduate research conference, the faculty of the professions, University of New England, Armidale NSW, 69–84. Armidale, Australia: University of New England.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 2010 Primary school children learning grammar: Rethinking the possibilities. InTerry Locke (ed.), Beyond the grammar wars: A resource for teachers and students on developing language knowledge in the English/literacy classroom, 206–229. New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 2012 Learning the grammatics of quoted speech: Benefits for punctuation and expressive reading. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy35(2). 206–222.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 2013 Teaching and learning functional grammar in junior primary classrooms. Armidale, NSW: University of New England PhD thesis.
  16. Halliday, Michael A. K.
    2002 [1996] On grammar and grammatics. InMichael A. K. Halliday, On grammar, volume 1 in the collected work of M. A. K. Halliday, 384–417. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 2007 [1988] Some basic concepts of educational linguistics. InMichael A. K. Halliday, Language and education, volume 9 in the collected work of M. A. K. Halliday, 341–353. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 2007 [1996] Literacy and linguistics: A functional perspective. InMichael A. K. Halliday, Language and education, volume 9 in the collected work of M. A. K. Halliday, 97–129. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Halliday, Michael A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    2014Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th edition). London & New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203783771
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771 [Google Scholar]
  20. Harman, Ruth
    (ed.) 2018Bilingual learners and social equity: Critical approaches to systemic functional linguistics. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑60953‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60953-9 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hasan, Ruqaiya
    1989 Semantic variation and sociolinguistics. Australian Journal of Linguistics9(2). 221–275. 10.1080/07268608908599422
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07268608908599422 [Google Scholar]
  22. 1999 The disempowerment game: Bourdieu and language in literacy. Linguistics and Education10(1). 25–87. 10.1016/S0898‑5898(99)80104‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(99)80104-1 [Google Scholar]
  23. 2004 Reading picture reading: A study in ideology and inference. InJoseph A. Foley (ed.), Language, education and discourse: Functional approaches, 43–75. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 2011 [1996] Literacy, everyday talk, and society. InJonathan J. Webster (ed.), Language and education: Learning and teaching in society, 169–206. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 2011 On the process of teaching: A perspective from functional grammar. InJonathan J. Webster (ed.), Language and education: Learning and teaching in society, 7–47. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Janks, Hilary
    (ed.) 2014Doing critical literacy: Texts and activities for students and teachers. New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Luke, Allan
    2013 Defining critical literacy. InJessica Zacher Pandya & JuliAnna Ávila (eds.), Moving critical literacies forward: A new look at praxis across contexts, 37–49. New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Luria, Alexander R.
    1992 The child and his behavior. InAlexander R. Luria & Lev S. Vygotsky (eds.), Ape, primitive man, and child: Essays in the history of behavior, 87–164. Hemel Hempstead, England: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Macken-Horarik, Mary, Kristina Love, Carmel Sandiford & Len Unsworth
    2018Functional grammatics: Re-conceptualizing knowledge about language and image for school English. Abingdon, England: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Macquarie dictionary online
    Macquarie dictionary online (7th edition) 2017 Sydney, Australia: Macquarie Dictionary Publishers, an imprint of Pan Macmillan Australia.
  31. Martin, James R.
    1999 Grace: The logogenesis of freedom. Discourse Studies1(1). 29–56. 10.1177/1461445699001001003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445699001001003 [Google Scholar]
  32. 2004 Positive discourse analysis: Solidarity and change. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses49(November). 179–202.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Paris, Scott G.
    2005 Reinterpreting the development of reading skills. Reading Research Quarterly40(2). 184–202. 10.1598/RRQ.40.2.3
    https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.40.2.3 [Google Scholar]
  34. Rose, David & James R. Martin
    2012Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School. Bristol, CT: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Schleppegrell, Mary & Jason Moore
    2018 Linguistic tools for supporting emergent critical language awareness in the elementary school. InRuth Harman (ed.), Bilingual learners and social equity: Critical approaches to systemic functional linguistics, 23–43. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑60953‑9_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60953-9_2 [Google Scholar]
  36. Unsworth, Len
    2001Teaching multiliteracies across the curriculum: Changing contexts of text and image in classroom practice. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Vygotsky, Lev S.
    1978Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 1987 Thinking and speech. InRobert W. Rieber & Aaron S. Carton (eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Volume 1: Problems of general psychology, 37–285. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Whittaker, Rachel, Mick O’Donnell & Anne McCabe
    (eds.) 2006Language and literacy: Functional approaches. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Williams, Geoff
    1995 Joint book-reading and literacy pedagogy: A socio-semantic examination. Sydney, Australia: Macquarie University PhD thesis.
  41. 1995 Learning systemic–functional grammar in primary schools. InPamela H. Peters (ed.), Australian English in a pluralist Australia: Proceedings of Style Council 95, 147–162. North Ryde, Australia: Dictionary Research Centre, Macquarie University.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 1996 Reading and literacy. InPeter Hunt (ed.), International companion encyclopedia of children’s literature, 573–583. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. 1998 Children entering literate worlds: Perspectives from the study of textual practices. InFrances Christie & Ray Misson (eds.), Literacy and schooling, 18–46. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. 1999 Grammar as a metasemiotic tool in child literacy development. InChristopher Ward & Willy Renandya (eds.), Language teaching: New insights for the language teacher, 89–124. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. 2000 Children’s literature, children and uses of language description. InLen Unsworth (ed.), Researching language in schools and communities: Functional linguistic perspectives, 111–129. London: Cassell.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. 2004 Ontogenesis and grammatics: Functions of metalanguage in pedagogical discourse. InGeoff Williams & Annabelle Lukin (eds.), The development of language: Functional perspectives on species and individuals, 241–267. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. 2005 Grammatics in schools. InRuqaiya Hasan, Christian Matthiessen & Jonathan J. Webster (eds.), Continuing discourse on language: A functional perspective, 281–310. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. 2016 Reflection literacy in the first years of schooling: Questions of theory and practice. InWendy L. Bowcher & Jennifer Yameng Liang (eds.), Society in language, language in society: Essays in honour of Ruqaiya Hasan, 333–356. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137402868_14
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137402868_14 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/langct.00011.fre
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error