1887
Volume 1, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2589-7233
  • E-ISSN: 2589-7241
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Peter Carey’s short story (Carey 1994 [1974]) presents a recalibration of consciousness as a small Australian town gradually becomes Americanized. The text foregrounds epistemological concerns by demonstrating a clear tendency toward delayed understanding. For this reason, I argue that the story is an instance of modernist fiction: a label not previously applied to Carey’s stories. In contrast with popular modernist techniques such as free indirect discourse and stream of consciousness, the techniques presented in the text appear to be covert, which may at least partially explain why the story has managed to avoid being labelled modernist by literary critics until now. Using analytical tools grounded in systemic functional grammar and appraisal categories, I demonstrate how linguistic analysis can lay bare the covert modernist techniques at work in the story, indicating that such an approach can be a useful complement to non-linguistic literary criticism.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/langct.00013.til
2019-07-22
2019-09-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adami, Valentina
    2009 The role of the reader in Peter Carey’s and Frank Moorehouse’s 1970s short stories. Anglistik: International Journal of English Studies20(2). 177–184.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahearne, Kate, Stephen Williams & Kevin Brophy
    1980 An interview with Peter Carey. Going Down Swinging1. 43–55.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bell, Philip & Roger Bell
    1993Implicated: The United States in Australia. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 1998 Introduction: The dilemmas of ‘Americanisation’. InPhilip Bell & Roger Bell (eds.), Americanization and Australia, 1–14. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Carey, Peter
    1994 [1974]The fat man in history. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 1974 The wall that Gleason built. Nation Review, February1–7. 496–497.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Carter, David
    1984 Modernism and Australian literature. World Literature Written in English24(1). 158–169. 10.1080/17449858408588880
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17449858408588880 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cohen, Jacob
    1960 A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement20(1). 37–46. 10.1177/001316446002000104
    https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cohn, Dorrit
    1978Transparent minds: Narrative modes for presenting consciousness in fiction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fleiss, Joseph L.
    1971 Measuring nominal scale agreement among raters. Philosophical Bulletin76(5). 378–382.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fuoli, Matteo
    2015 A step-wise method for annotating appraisal. Functions of Language25(2). 1–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Halliday, Michael
    2003 [1964] The linguistic study of literary texts. InJonathan Webster (ed.), Linguistic studies of text and discourse, 7–22. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 2003 [1971] Linguistic function and literary style: An inquiry into the language of William Golding’s The Inheritors. InJonathan Webster (ed.), Linguistic studies of text and discourse, 88–125. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Halliday, Michael & Ruqaiya Hasan
    1976Cohesion in English. Essex: Pearson.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Halliday, Michael & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    2014Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th edition). Milton Park: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203783771
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hasan, Ruqaiya
    1985Linguistics, language, and verbal art. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hassall, Anthony J.
    1994Dancing on hot macadam: Peter Carey’s fiction. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Head, Dominic
    1992The modernist short story: A study in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511735356
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511735356 [Google Scholar]
  19. Herman, David
    2011Emergence of mind: Representations of consciousness in narrative discourse in English. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. 10.2307/j.ctt1df4fwq
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1df4fwq [Google Scholar]
  20. Huisman, Rosemary
    2013 The origins of language and narrative temporalities. InRaji C. Steinback & Claudia Clausius (eds.), Origins and futures: Time inflected and reflected, 49–78. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Jakobson, Roman
    1971 [1935] The dominant. InLadislav Matejka & Krystyna Pomorska (eds.), Readings in Russian poetics: Formalist and structuralist views, 82–87. Chicago: Dalkey Archive Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Lamb, Karen
    1992Peter Carey: The genesis of fame. Pymble: Angus & Robertson.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Leech, Geoffrey & Michael Short
    1981Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose (1st edition). Essex: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 2007Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose (2nd edition). New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lever, Susan
    1998 Fiction: Innovation and ideology. InBruce Bennett, Jennifer Strauss & Chris Wallace-Crabbe (eds.), The Oxford literary history of Australia, 308–331. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Lukin, Annabelle & Adriana Pagano
    2016 Inner and outer worlds: Speech and thought presentation in Mansfield’s Bliss. Journal of Literary Semantics45(2). 97–116. 10.1515/jls‑2016‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jls-2016-0007 [Google Scholar]
  27. Martin, James R. & Peter R. White
    2005The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
  28. McHale, Brian
    1987Postmodernist fiction. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203393321
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203393321 [Google Scholar]
  29. Munro, Craig
    1976 Building the fabulist extensions. Makar12(1). 3–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. O’Reilly, Nathaniel
    2002 The voice of the teller: A conversation with Peter Carey. Antipodes16(2). 164–167.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Ommundsen, Wenche
    1993Metafictions?: Reflexivity in contemporary texts. Carlton: Melbourne University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Rubik, Margarete
    2005 Provocative and unforgettable: Peter Carey’s short fiction: A cognitive approach. European Journal of English Studies9(2). 169–184. 10.1080/13825570500171986
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13825570500171986 [Google Scholar]
  33. Schulze, Cornelia
    2005 Peter Carey’s short stories: Trapped in a narrative labyrinth. InAndreas Gaile (ed.), Fabulating beauty: Perspectives on the fiction of Peter Carey, 117–136. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Shiach, Morag
    2012 Beyond autonomy: Political dimensions of modernist novels. InRobert L. Caserio & Clement Hawes (eds.), The Cambridge history of the English novel, 629–644. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CHOL9780521194952.041
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521194952.041 [Google Scholar]
  35. Sotirova, Violeta
    2011DH Lawrence and narrative viewpoint. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Tilney, Martin
    2018 Cohesive harmony and theme in Peter Carey’s ‘The last days of a famous mime’. Language and Literature27(1). 3–20. 10.1177/0963947017753535
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947017753535 [Google Scholar]
  37. White, Peter R.
    2015 Appraisal theory. InKaren Tracy, Cornelia Ilie & Todd Sandel (eds.), The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction, 1–7. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi041
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi041 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/langct.00013.til
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/langct.00013.til
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error