1887
Volume 1, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2589-7233
  • E-ISSN: 2589-7241
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

While many aspects of disciplinary communication have been effectively illuminated by systemic functional linguistics, the ‘multimodal’ turn of communication requires some rethinking of old frameworks. In academic disciplines such as History, recent epistemological changes further highlight this need. From animations used by primary school students to doctoral theses, this paper draws on the systemic functional notion of register to explore how multimodal choices contribute to field, tenor and mode, just as linguistic choices do. Such multimodal examples may occur in forms which can be described as implicitly multimodal, explicitly multimodal or fully intersemiotic. All contribute to emerging forms of epistemology in the discipline and to new textual forms, with particular implications for educational practice.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/langct.00014.rav
2019-07-22
2019-12-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Banks, David
    2008The development of scientific writing: Linguistic features and historical context. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2017The birth of the academic article: Le Journal des Sçavans and the Philosophical Transactions. Sheffield: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bateman, John
    2014Text and image: A critical introduction to the visual/verbal divide. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315773971
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315773971 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bowcher, Wendy L.
    2018a The semiotic sense of context vs the material sense of context. Functional Linguistics, 5(5). https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186%2Fs40554-018-0055-y. doi: 10.1186/s40554‑018‑0055‑y‑1‑19
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-018-0055-y-1-19 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2018b Multimodality and incorporating the non-linguistic in SFL theory: A focus on context of situation and register. Paper presented to theThird Halliday-Hasan Forum on Language, Shenzhen, November 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Breuer, Franz
    2003 Subjectivity and reflexivity in the social sciences: Epistemic windows and methodical consequences. Forum qualitative sozialforchung/Forum: Qualitative social research [On-line Journal] 4(2). RetrievedDecember 2018, fromwww.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/698. doi:  10.17169/fqs‑4.2.698
    https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-4.2.698 [Google Scholar]
  7. Caple, Helen
    2013Photojournalism: A social semiotic approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137314901
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137314901 [Google Scholar]
  8. 2019 Doing critical discourse studies with multimodality: Reply to Ledin and Machin. Critical Discourse Studies. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17405904.2018.1556172. doi:  10.1080/17405904.2018.1556172
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2018.1556172 [Google Scholar]
  9. Coffin, Caroline
    1997 Constructing and giving value to the past: An investigation into secondary school education. InFrances Christie & James R. Martin (eds.), Genres and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school, 196–230. London: Cassell.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 2006Historical discourse: The language of time, cause and evaluation. UK: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 2009 Contemporary educational argumentation: A multimodal perspective. Argumentation23(4). 513–530. 10.1007/s10503‑009‑9161‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-009-9161-z [Google Scholar]
  12. Coffin, Caroline & Beverly Derewianka
    2009 Multimodal layout in school history books: The texturing of historical interpretation. InGeoff Thompson & Gail Forey (eds.), Text-type and texture, 196–230. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Derewianka, Beverly & Caroline Coffin
    2011 Time visuals in history textbooks: some pedagogic issues. InLen Unsworth (ed.), Multimodal semiotics: Functional analysis in contexts of education, 187–200. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Doughty, Peter, John Pearce & Geoffrey Thornton
    1971Language in use (Schools Council Programme in Linguistics and English Teaching). London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Doughty, Peter
    1972Exploring language. (Explorations in language study). London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Eggins, Suzanne
    1994An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London & New York: Pinter.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Eggins, Suzanne, James R. Martin & Peter Wignell
    1993 The discourse of history: Distancing the recoverable past. InMohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Register analysis: Theory and practice, 187–200. London & New York: Pinter.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Halliday, Michael A. K.
    1978Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 2004The language of science, volume 6 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Halliday, Michael A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan
    1985Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Deakin: Deakin University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Halliday, Michael A. K. & Christian M. M. I. M. Matthiessen
    2014Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th edition). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203783771
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771 [Google Scholar]
  22. Hamilton, Jillian
    2014 The voices of the exegesis: Composing the speech genres of the practitioner-researcher into a connective thesis. InLouise Ravelli, Brian Paltridge & Sue Starfield (eds.), Doctoral writing in the creative and performing arts, 369–388. Faringdon, Oxfordshire: Libri Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hasan, Ruqaiya
    1995 The conception of context in text. InPeter Fries & Michael Gregory (eds.), Discourse in society: Systemic functional perspectives, 183–283. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 10.1075/cilt.118
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.118 [Google Scholar]
  24. 1996 Semantic networks. InWays of saying: Ways of meaning. Edited byCarmel Cloran, David Butt & Geoff Williams. 104–131. London: Cassell.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. He, Yufei
    2018a A functional perspective on the semiotics of science animation. Paper presented to theResearch symposium: Learning from viewing and creating animations in Science. Australian Catholic University, Sydney, November 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 2018b Animate your research exploring the affordances of animation. Paper presented to theSecond multimodality symposium: Researching visuals/visualizing research in the digital age: Multimodal insights. University of New South Wales, Sydney, December 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hodge, Bob
    1998 Monstrous knowledge: Doing Ph.Ds in the ‘new humanities’. InAllison Lee & Bill Green (eds.), Postgraduate studies: Postgraduate pedagogy, 113–128. Sydney: Centre for Language and Literacy, Faculty of Education, University of Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hood, Sue
    2010Appraising research: Evaluation in academic writing. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230274662
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230274662 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hyland, Ken
    2000Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Harlow & New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 2002 Options of identity in academic writing. ELT Journal56(4). 351–358. 10.1093/elt/56.4.351
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/56.4.351 [Google Scholar]
  31. Ivanič, Ros
    1998Writing and identity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/swll.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.5 [Google Scholar]
  32. Kress, Gunther
    2005 Gains and losses: New forms of text, knowledge, and learning. Computers and Composition5(22). 5–22. 10.1016/j.compcom.2004.12.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2004.12.004 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2010Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. 2015 Semiotic work: Applied Linguistics and a social semiotic account of IC: Multimodality. AILAReview28. 49–71. 10.1075/aila.28.03kre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.28.03kre [Google Scholar]
  35. 2018ICOM9 Plenary, University of Southern Denmark, Odense 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Kress, Gunther & Theo van Leeuwen
    2001Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. 2006Reading Images: The grammar of visual design. 2nd Edition. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203619728
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203619728 [Google Scholar]
  38. Martin, James R.
    1992English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.59
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.59 [Google Scholar]
  39. 1999 Modelling context: A crooked path of progress in contextual linguistics. InMohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Text and context in functional linguistics, 25–61. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.169.05mar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.169.05mar [Google Scholar]
  40. 2017 Revisiting field: Specialized knowledge in secondary school science and humanities discourse. Onomázein Número Especial LSF y TCL sobre educación y conocimiento, 111–148. doi:  10.7764/onomazein.sfl.05. onomazein.letras.uc.cl/04_NumeroDescarga/N-SFL/DescargaSFL_5.html
    https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.sfl.05 [Google Scholar]
  41. Martin, James R. & David Rose
    2007Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause (2nd edition). London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Martin, James R. & Peter R. White
    2005The Language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave MacMillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
  43. Martin, James R., Karl Maton & Erika Matruglio
    2010 Historical cosmologies: Epistemology and axiology in Australian secondary school history discourse. Revista Signos: Eestudios de Lengua y Literatura43(74). 433–463. 10.4067/S0718‑09342010000500003
    https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-09342010000500003 [Google Scholar]
  44. Matruglio, Erika
    2007 Values and attitudes in ancient and modern history. InBridging discourses: ASFLA 2007 online proceedings, 1–17. Australia: ASFLA.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. 2010 Evaluative stance in humanities: Expectations and performances. InAhmar Mahboob & Naomi Knight (eds.), Appliable linguistics, 168–184. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Myskow, Gordon
    2018 Calibrating the ‘right’ values: The role of critical inquiry tasks in social studies textbooks. Visual Communication18(1). 31–54. 10.1177/1470357218778876
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357218778876 [Google Scholar]
  47. National Curriculum Board
    National Curriculum Board 2009 National history curriculum: Framing paper. docs.acara.edu.au/resources/National_History_Curriculum_-_Framing_Paper.pdfAccessedNovember 1, 2017.
  48. O’Halloran, Kay L.
    2003 Intersemiosis in mathematics and science: Grammatical metaphor and semiotic metaphor. InAnne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen, Miriam Taverniers & Louise Ravelli (eds.), Grammatical metaphor: Views from systemic functional linguistics, 337–365. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.236.18oha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.236.18oha [Google Scholar]
  49. 2008 Systemic-functional multimodal discourse analysis (SF-MDA): Constructing ideational meaning using language and visual imagery. Visual Communication7(4). 443–475. 10.1177/1470357208096210
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357208096210 [Google Scholar]
  50. Oteíza, Teresa
    2003 How contemporary history is presented in Chilean middle school textbooks. Discourse & Society14(5). 639–660. 10.1177/09579265030145005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265030145005 [Google Scholar]
  51. Oteíza, Teresa, Rodrigo Henríque & Claudio Pinuer
    2015 History classroom interactions and the transmission of the recent memory of human rights violations in Chile. Journal of Educational Media, Memory, and Society7(2). 44–67. 10.3167/jemms.2015.070204
    https://doi.org/10.3167/jemms.2015.070204 [Google Scholar]
  52. Oteíza, Teresa & María E. Merino
    2012 Am I a genuine Mapuche? Tensions and contradictions in the construction of ethnic identity in Mapuche adolescents from Temuco and Santiago. Discourse and Society23(3). 297–317. 10.1177/0957926511433455
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511433455 [Google Scholar]
  53. Oteíza, Teresa & Derrin Pinto
    2008 Agency, responsibility and silence in the construction of contemporary history in Chile and Spain. Discourse and Society19(3). 333–358. 10.1177/0957926508088964
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088964 [Google Scholar]
  54. Oteíza, Teresa & Claudio Pinuer
    2016 De/legitimation of historical memories: Appraisal in intermodal pedagogical discourse of Chilean primary education. Revista signos. Estudios de Linguistica49(92). 377–402.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Painter, Clare, James R. Martin & Len Unsworth
    2013Reading visual narratives: Image analysis of children’s picture books. Equinox: Sheffield.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Poynton, Cate
    1985Language and gender: Making the difference. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Ravelli, Louise
    2018 Multimodal English. InPhilip Seargeant, Ann Hewings & Stephen Pihlaja (eds.). Routledge handbook of English Language studies, 434–466. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781351001724‑30
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351001724-30 [Google Scholar]
  58. Ravelli, Louise J.
    2000 Beyond shopping: Constructing the Sydney Olympics in three-dimensional text. Text – Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse20(4). 489–515. 10.1515/text.1.2000.20.4.489
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.2000.20.4.489 [Google Scholar]
  59. Ravelli, Louise J. & Robert J. McMurtrie
    2016Multimodality in the built environment: Spatial discourse analysis. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Ravelli, Louise & Sue Starfield
    2008 Typography and disciplinary identity in academic writing. Information Design Journal16. 133–147. 10.1075/idj.16.1.06rav
    https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.16.1.06rav [Google Scholar]
  61. Royce, Terry
    2007 Intersemiotic complementarity: A framework for multimodal discourse analysis. InTerry Royce & Wendy L. Bowcher (eds.), New directions in the analysis of multimodal discourse, 63–110. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Sawaki, Tomoko
    2014 Construing stance in History theses: Dynamic interactions among ideology, generic structure, and engagement. Unpublished PhD thesis, School of the Arts and Media, University of New South Wales.
  63. 2016Analysing structure in academic writing. London: Palgrave MacMillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑54239‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54239-7 [Google Scholar]
  64. Schleppegrell, Mary
    2004The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 10.4324/9781410610317
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410610317 [Google Scholar]
  65. Starfield, Sue & Louise Ravelli
    2006 The writing of this thesis was a process that I could not explore with the positivistic detachment of the classical sociologist: Self and structure in New Humanities research theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes5. 222–243. 10.1016/j.jeap.2006.07.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.07.004 [Google Scholar]
  66. Stern, Steven
    2006Remembering Pinochet’s Chile: On the eve of London 1988. North Carolina: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Tang, Ramona & Suganthi Johns
    1999 The ‘I’ in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first person. English for Specific Purposes18. S23–S39. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(99)00009‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00009-5 [Google Scholar]
  68. Unsworth, Len
    2001Teaching multiliteracies across the curriculum: Changing contexts of text and image in classroom practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Van Leeuwen, Theo
    1998 Taste in the framework of the semiotics of materiality. InAnn Piroëlle (ed.), La représentation sociale du goût, 149–162. Dijon: PRIsM.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. 2011 Multimodality. InSimpson James (ed.), The Routledge handbook of applied linguistics, 668–682. London: Taylor and Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/langct.00014.rav
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/langct.00014.rav
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error