Volume 2, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2589-7233
  • E-ISSN: 2589-7241
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This article examines whether the incorporation of prosody within register studies can lead to a richer description of what speakers can mean in a specific environment. In order to situate how prosody resets the probabilities of contextual variables, a number of texts are examined and it is argued that prosodic systems at and above the rank of tone group are meaningful and situated on the content plane. The article concludes by suggesting some redrawing of the standard SFL stratification model by arguing that the view that needs some revision to incorporate the higher units of the phonological rank scale being situated on the content plane.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Bache, Carl
    2010 Hjelmslev’s glossematics: A source of inspiration for systemic functional linguistics. Journal of Pragmatics42. 2562–2578. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.03.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.03.005 [Google Scholar]
  2. Berry, Margaret
    2013 Towards a study of the differences between formal written English and informal spoken English. InLise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), Systemic functional linguistics: Exploring choice, 365–383. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139583077.022
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139583077.022 [Google Scholar]
  3. 2016 Dynamism in exchange structure. English Text Construction9. 33–55. 10.1075/etc.9.1.03ber
    https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.9.1.03ber [Google Scholar]
  4. Boersma, Paul & David Weenick
    2013Praat doing phonetics by computer. Computer programme Version 5.3.52.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brazil, David
    1997The communicative value of intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Canalis, Stefano
    2007 A note on the influence of Louis Hjelmslev’s suprasegmental phonology. ICPhS XVI Saarbrücken.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cauldwell, Richard T.
    1999 Openings rhythm and relationships: Philip Larkin reads Mr Bleaney. Language and Literature8(1). 35–48. 10.1177/096394709900800102
    https://doi.org/10.1177/096394709900800102 [Google Scholar]
  8. Corballis, Michael C.
    2017The truth about language: What it is and where it came from. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226287225.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226287225.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  9. Elsen, Hike
    2017 The two meanings of sound symbolism. Open Linguistics3. 491–499. 10.1515/opli‑2017‑0024
    https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2017-0024 [Google Scholar]
  10. Firth, John R.
    1957Papers in linguistics 1934–1951. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Garvin, Paul L.
    1954 Review of a prolegomena to a theory of language by Louis Hjelmslev. Language30(1). 69–96. 10.2307/410221
    https://doi.org/10.2307/410221 [Google Scholar]
  12. Halliday, Michael A. K.
    1967Intonation and grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783111357447
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111357447 [Google Scholar]
  13. 1975Learning how to mean. London: Edward Arnold. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑443701‑2.50025‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-443701-2.50025-1 [Google Scholar]
  14. 1978Language as a social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 2002 How do you mean?InMichael A. K. Halliday, On grammar, volume 1 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 352–368. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 2003On language and linguistics, volume 3 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 2005The language of science, volume 5 in the collected works of M. A. K. Halliday. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Halliday, Michael A. K. & William S. Greaves
    2008Intonation in the grammar of English. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Halliday, Michael A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan
    1989Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Halliday, Michael A. K., Angus McIntosh & Peter Strevens
    1964The linguistic sciences and language teaching. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Halliday, Michael A. K. & James R. Martin
    1993Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Falmer Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Halliday, Michael A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    2014An introduction to functional grammar (4th edition). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203783771
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hasan, Ruqaiya
    1996 Semantic networks: A tool for the analysis of meaning. InCarmel Cloran, David Butt & Geoff Williams (eds.), Ways of saying, ways of meaning, 104–127. London: Cassell.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hjelmslev, Louis
    1963Prolegomena to a theory of language. Madison Wisc: University of Wisconsin Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 1975Resume to a theory of language. Madison, Wisc: University of Wisconsin Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Lemke, Jay
    1995Textual politics: Discourse and social dynamics. London: Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Martin, James R. & Peter R. R. White
    2005The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
  28. Martin, James R. & David Rose
    2007Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause (2nd edition). London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M.
    1995Lexicogrammatical cartography. Tokyo: International Language Sciences.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Forthcoming. The architecture of phonology according to systemic functional linguistics. InThe collected works of Christian Matthiessen. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Moore, Alison
    2017 Register analysis in systemic functional linguistics. InTom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), The Routledge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 418–437. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Muntigl, Peter
    2009 Knowledge moves in conversational exchanges: Revisiting the concept of primary vs. secondary knowers. Functions of Language16. 225–263. 10.1075/fol.16.2.03mun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.16.2.03mun [Google Scholar]
  33. O’Grady, Gerard
    2010A grammar of spoken English: The intonation of increments. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. 2012Key concepts in phonetics and phonology. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 2014 An investigation of how intonation helps signal information structure. InWendy S. Bowcher & Bradley Smith (eds.), Systemic phonology: Recent studies in English, 27–52. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 2017a Intonation and systemic functional linguistics: The way forward. InTom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), The Routledge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 146–162. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. 2017b Theme and prosody: Redundancy and meaning making. English Text Construction10(2). 274–297. 10.1075/etc.10.2.05ogr
    https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.10.2.05ogr [Google Scholar]
  38. Taverniers, Miriam
    2011 The syntax–semantics interface in systemic functional grammar: Halliday’s interpretation of the Hjelmslevian model of stratification. Journal of Pragmatics43. 1100–1126. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  39. Tench, Paul
    1996The intonation systems of English. London: Cassell.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 2003 Processes of semogenesis in English. Functions of Language10(2). 209–234. 10.1075/fol.10.2.04ten
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.10.2.04ten [Google Scholar]
  41. Thibault, Paul
    2004Brain, mind and the signifying body. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Tomasello, Michael
    2008Origins of human communication. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/7551.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7551.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  43. Wichmann, Anne
    2000Intonation in text and discourse: Beginnings middles and ends. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Willett, Michael
    2015 A study in the productivity of 12 onset English phonaesthemes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Cardiff University.

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error