Is there a role for prosody within register studies

References

1. Bache, Carl
   2010 Hjelmslev’s glossematics: A source of inspiration for systemic functional linguistics. Journal of Pragmatics42. 2562–2578. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.03.005
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.03.005 [Google Scholar]
2. Berry, Margaret
   2013 Towards a study of the differences between formal written English and informal spoken English. InLise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), Systemic functional linguistics: Exploring choice, 365–383. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139583077.022
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139583077.022 [Google Scholar]
3. Berry, Margaret
   2016 Dynamism in exchange structure. English Text Construction9. 33–55. 10.1075/etc.9.1.03ber
   https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.9.1.03ber [Google Scholar]
4. Boersma, Paul & David Weenick
   2013 Praat doing phonetics by computer. Computer programme Version 5.3.52.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Brazil, David
   1997 The communicative value of intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Canalis, Stefano
   2007 A note on the influence of Louis Hjelmslev’s suprasegmental phonology. ICPhS XVI Saarbrücken.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Cauldwell, Richard T.
   1999 Openings rhythm and relationships: Philip Larkin reads Mr Bleaney. Language and Literature8(1). 35–48. 10.1177/096394709900800102
   https://doi.org/10.1177/096394709900800102 [Google Scholar]
8. Corballis, Michael C.
   2017 The truth about language: What it is and where it came from. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226287225.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226287225.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
9. Elsen, Hike
   2017 The two meanings of sound symbolism. Open Linguistics3. 491–499. 10.1515/opli‑2017‑0024
   https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2017-0024 [Google Scholar]
10. Firth, John R.
    1957 Papers in linguistics 1934–1951. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Garvin, Paul L.
    1954 Review of a prolegomena to a theory of language by Louis Hjelmslev. Language30(1). 69–96. 10.2307/410221
    https://doi.org/10.2307/410221 [Google Scholar]
12. Halliday, Michael A. K.
    1967 Intonation and grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783111357447
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111357447 [Google Scholar]
13. Halliday, Michael A. K.
    1975 Learning how to mean. London: Edward Arnold. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑443701‑2.50025‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-443701-2.50025-1 [Google Scholar]
14. Halliday, Michael A. K.
    1978 Language as a social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Halliday, Michael A. K.
    2002 How do you mean?InMichael A. K. Halliday, On grammar, volume 1 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 352–368. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Halliday, Michael A. K.
    2003 On language and linguistics, volume 3 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Halliday, Michael A. K.
    2005 The language of science, volume 5 in the collected works of M. A. K. Halliday. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Halliday, Michael A. K. & William S. Greaves
    2008 Intonation in the grammar of English. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Halliday, Michael A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan
    1989 Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Halliday, Michael A. K., Angus McIntosh & Peter Strevens
    1964 The linguistic sciences and language teaching. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Halliday, Michael A. K. & James R. Martin
    1993 Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Falmer Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Halliday, Michael A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    2014 An introduction to functional grammar (4th edition). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203783771
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771 [Google Scholar]
23. Hasan, Ruqaiya
    1996 Semantic networks: A tool for the analysis of meaning. InCarmel Cloran, David Butt & Geoff Williams (eds.), Ways of saying, ways of meaning, 104–127. London: Cassell.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Hjelmslev, Louis
    1963 Prolegomena to a theory of language. Madison Wisc: University of Wisconsin Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Hjelmslev, Louis
    1975 Resume to a theory of language. Madison, Wisc: University of Wisconsin Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Lemke, Jay
    1995 Textual politics: Discourse and social dynamics. London: Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Martin, James R. & Peter R. R. White
    2005 The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
28. Martin, James R. & David Rose
    2007 Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause (2nd edition). London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M.
    1995 Lexicogrammatical cartography. Tokyo: International Language Sciences.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M.
    Forthcoming. The architecture of phonology according to systemic functional linguistics. InThe collected works of Christian Matthiessen. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Moore, Alison
    2017 Register analysis in systemic functional linguistics. InTom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), The Routledge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 418–437. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Muntigl, Peter
    2009 Knowledge moves in conversational exchanges: Revisiting the concept of primary vs. secondary knowers. Functions of Language16. 225–263. 10.1075/fol.16.2.03mun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.16.2.03mun [Google Scholar]
33. O’Grady, Gerard
    2010 A grammar of spoken English: The intonation of increments. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
34. O’Grady, Gerard
    2012 Key concepts in phonetics and phonology. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
35. O’Grady, Gerard
    2014 An investigation of how intonation helps signal information structure. InWendy S. Bowcher & Bradley Smith (eds.), Systemic phonology: Recent studies in English, 27–52. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
36. O’Grady, Gerard
    2017a Intonation and systemic functional linguistics: The way forward. InTom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), The Routledge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 146–162. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
37. O’Grady, Gerard
    2017b Theme and prosody: Redundancy and meaning making. English Text Construction10(2). 274–297. 10.1075/etc.10.2.05ogr
    https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.10.2.05ogr [Google Scholar]
38. Taverniers, Miriam
    2011 The syntax–semantics interface in systemic functional grammar: Halliday’s interpretation of the Hjelmslevian model of stratification. Journal of Pragmatics43. 1100–1126. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.003 [Google Scholar]
39. Tench, Paul
    1996 The intonation systems of English. London: Cassell.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Tench, Paul
    2003 Processes of semogenesis in English. Functions of Language10(2). 209–234. 10.1075/fol.10.2.04ten
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.10.2.04ten [Google Scholar]
41. Thibault, Paul
    2004 Brain, mind and the signifying body. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Tomasello, Michael
    2008 Origins of human communication. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/7551.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7551.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
43. Wichmann, Anne
    2000 Intonation in text and discourse: Beginnings middles and ends. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Willett, Michael
    2015 A study in the productivity of 12 onset English phonaesthemes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Cardiff University.