1887
Volume 2, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2589-7233
  • E-ISSN: 2589-7241
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper explores one aspect of the operationalisation of a patient-centred ideology of care by examining an oncologist’s answers to questions asked by her patient and his companion during a palliative oncology consultation and comparing her answers to the markedly different answers of another oncologist. Halliday’s concept of register and Hasan’s semantic networks are used to examine the oncologists’ answers. Patients’ questions create the semiotic environment for clinicians to provide the information patients need for informed decision-making – an important aspect of patient-centredness. The answers clinicians provide construe their position towards this ideology of care. Findings suggest that one way patient-centredness can be operationalised, at the level of semantics, is through providing elaborated answers that explicitly display the reasoning employed by the oncologist.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/langct.00024.kar
2020-01-29
2020-04-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bernstein, Basil
    1971Class, codes and control, volume I: Theoretical studies towards a sociology of language. London: Routlege & Kegan Paul. 10.4324/9780203014035
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203014035 [Google Scholar]
  2. 1990Class, codes and control, volume IV: The structuring of pedagogic discourse. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203011263
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203011263 [Google Scholar]
  3. Cherny, Nathan I. & Stein Kaasa
    2015 The oncologist’s role in delivering palliative care. InNathan I. Cherny, Marie Fallon, Stein Kaasa, Russell K. Portenoy & David C. Currow (eds.), Oxford textbook of palliative medicine (5th edition), 749–764. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:  10.1093/med/9780199656097.003.0121
    https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199656097.003.0121 [Google Scholar]
  4. Chu, Celine P. Y.
    2011 Picture book reading in a new arrival context: a multimodal perspective on teaching reading. Adelaide: University of Adelaide PhD dissertation.
  5. Cloran, Carmel
    1989 Learning through language: The social construction of gender. InRuqaiya Hasan & James R. Martin (eds.), Language development: Learning language, learning culture: Meaning and choice in language: Studies for Michael Halliday, 111–151. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 1994Rhetorical units and decontextualisation: An enquiry into some relations of context, meaning and grammar. (Monographs in Systemic Linguistics). Nottingham: University of NottinghamPhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 2000 Socio-semantic variation: Different wordings, different meanings. InLen Unsworth (ed.), Researching language in schools and communities: Functional linguistic perspectives, 152–183. London & New York: Cassell.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Fung, Andy
    2016 Hasan’s semantic networks revisited: A Cantonese systemic functional approach. InWendy L. Bowcher & Jennifer Y. Liang (eds.), Society in language, language in society: Essays in honour of Ruqaiya Hasan, 115–140. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:  10.1057/9781137402868_5
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137402868_5 [Google Scholar]
  9. Hall, Philip
    2004 Prone to distortion? Undue reliance on unreliable records in NSW Police Service formal interview model. InJohn Gibbons, V. Prakasam, K. V. Tirumalesh & Hemalatha Nagrajan (eds.), Language in the law, 44–81. New Delhi: Orient Longman Private Limited.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Halliday, Michael A. K.
    1978Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 1985 Part A. InMichael A. K. Halliday & Ruqaiya Hasan (eds.), Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a aocial-aemiotic Perspective, 3–49. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 2002 [1977] Text as semantic choice in social context. InMichael A. K. Halliday, Linguistic studies of text and discourse, volume 2 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 23–81. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 2003 [1973] Towards a sociological semantics. InMichael A. K. Halliday, Language and linguistics, volume 3 in the collected works of M. A. K. Halliday, 223–354. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 2007 [2002] Applied linguistics as an evolving theme. InMichael A. K. Halliday, Language and education, volume 9 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 1–19. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. London & New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hasan, Ruqaiya
    1983A semantic network for the analysis of messages in everyday talk between mothers and their children. Sydney: Macquarie University.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 1996 Semantic networks: A tool for the analysis of meaning. InCarmel Cloran, David G. Butt & Geoff Williams (eds.), Ways of saying, ways of meaning: Selected papers of Ruqaiya Hasan, 104–131. London & New York: Cassell.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 2009 [1988] Language in the processes of socialisation: Home and school. InRuqaiya Hasan, Semantic variation: Meaning in society and in sociolinguistics, volume 2 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan, 119–179. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 2009 [1989] Semantic variation and sociolinguistics. InRuqaiya Hasan, Semantic variation: Meaning in society and in sociolinguistics, volume 2 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan, 180–230. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 2009 [1991] Questions as a mode of learning in everyday talk. InRuqaiya Hasan, Semantic variation: Meaning in society and in sociolinguistics, volume 2 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan, 231–268. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. London: Equibox.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 2009a [1992] Meaning in sociolinguistic theory. InRuqaiya Hasan, Semantic variation: Meaning in society and in sociolinguistics, volume 2 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan, 271–308. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 2009b [1992] Rationality in everyday talk: From process to system. InRuqaiya Hasan, Semantic variation: Meaning in society and in sociolinguistics, volume 2 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan, 309–352. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 2009cSemantic variation: Meaning in society and in sociolinguistics, volume 2 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 2013 Choice, system, realisation: Describing language as meaning potential. InLise Fontaine (ed.), Systemic functional linguistics: Exploring choice, 269–299. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9781139583077.018
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139583077.018 [Google Scholar]
  24. 2014 Towards a paradigmatic description of context: Systems, metafunctions, and semantics. Functional Linguistics1(9). 1–54. doi:  10.1186/s40554‑014‑0009‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-014-0009-y [Google Scholar]
  25. 2016 [2014] Towards a paradigmatic description of context: Systems, metafunctions, and semantics. InRuqaiya Hasan, Context in the system and process of language, volume 4 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan, 389–469. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. Sheffield & Bristol: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hasan, Ruqaiya, Carmel Cloran, Geoff Williams & Annabelle Lukin
    2007 Semantic networks: The description of meaning in SFL. InRuqaiya Hasan, Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen & Jonathan J. Webster (eds.), Continuing discourse on language: A functional perspectivev (volume2), 697–738. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Jordens, Christopher
    2018 After dominance: The elastic politics of medicine. InKathleen Montgomery & Wendy Lipworth (eds.), Medical professionals: Conflicts and quandaries in medical practice, 107–124. New York & Oxon: Routledge. doi:  10.4324/9780203712221‑7
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203712221-7 [Google Scholar]
  28. Karimi, Neda, Annabelle Lukin, Alison R. Moore, Adam R. Walczak & Phyllis N. Butow
    2018 Advanced cancer patients’ construction of self during oncology consultations: A transitivity concordance analysis. Functional Linguistics5(6). 1–23. doi:  10.1186/s40554‑018‑0057‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-018-0057-9 [Google Scholar]
  29. Karimi, Neda, Alison R. Moore & Annabelle Lukin
    2018 Cancer care as an integrated practice, consultations between an oncologist and patients with advanced, incurable cancer. InLise Fontaine & Akila Sellami-Baklouti (eds.), Perspectives from systemic functional lnguistics, 317–339. New York & Oxon: Routledge. doi:  10.4324/9781315299877‑16
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315299877-16 [Google Scholar]
  30. Lukin, Annabelle
    2012a Evaluating questions in journalism: A case study of the Australian public broadcaster’s coverage of the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Journal of Applied Linguistics & Professional Practice9(1). 127–147. doi:  10.1558/japl.v9i1.127
    https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v9i1.127 [Google Scholar]
  31. 2012b Hasan’s semantic network as a tool in discourse analysis. InJohn Knox (ed.), To boldly proceed: Papers from the 39th international systemic functional congress, 141–146. Sydney: ISFC Organizing Committee.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Lukin, Annabelle, Alison R. Moore, Maria Herke, Rebekah Wegener & Canzhong Wu
    2011 Halliday’s model of register revisited and explored. Linguistics and the Human Sciences4(2). 187–213. doi:  10.1558/lhs.v4i2.187
    https://doi.org/10.1558/lhs.v4i2.187 [Google Scholar]
  33. Maley, Yon & Rhondda Fahey
    1991 Presenting the evidence: Constructions of reality in court. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law4(1). 3–17. 10.1007/BF01303504
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01303504 [Google Scholar]
  34. Matthiessen, Christian. M. I. M.
    1993 Register in the round: Diversity in a unified theory of register analysis. InMohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Register analysis: Theory and practice, 221–292. London: Pinter.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M.
    2012 Systemic functional linguistics as appliable linguistics: Social accountability and critical approaches. DELTA: Documentação de estudos em lingüística teórica e aplicada28(Sps). 435–471. 10.1590/S0102‑44502012000300002
    https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-44502012000300002 [Google Scholar]
  36. Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M., Annabelle Lukin, David G. Butt, Chris Cleirigh & Chris Nesbitt
    2005 A case study of multistratal analysis. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics19. 123–150. doi:  10.1075/aralss.19.08mat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aralss.19.08mat [Google Scholar]
  37. Moore, Alison R.
    2016a Can semantic networks capture intra-and inter-registerial variation? Palliative care discourse interrogates Hasan’s message semantics. InWendy L. Bowcher & Jennifer Y. Liang (eds.), Society in language, language in society: Essays in honour of Ruqaiya Hasan, 83–114. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:  10.1057/9781137402868_4
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137402868_4 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2016b Lovers, wrestlers, surgeons: A contextually sensitive approach to modelling body alignment and interpersonal engagement in surgical teams. InSarah J. White & John A. Cartmill (eds.), Communication in surgical practice, 257–285. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 2017 Register analysis in systemic functional linguistics. InTom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), The Routledge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 418–437. London: Routledge. doi:  10.4324/9781315413891
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315413891 [Google Scholar]
  40. 2019 Language and medicine. InGeoff Thompson, Wendy L. Bowcher, Lise Fontaine & David Schönthal (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 651–688. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/9781316337936.027
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316337936.027 [Google Scholar]
  41. Patten, Terry
    1988Systemic text generation as problem solving. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511665646
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511665646 [Google Scholar]
  42. Turner, Geoffrey J.
    1973 Social class and children’s language of control at age five and age seven. InBasil Bernstein (ed.), Class, codes and control, volume II: Applied studies towards a sociology of language, 135–201. Oxon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Wake, Barbara J.
    2006 Dialogic learning in tutorial talk: A case study of semiotic mediation as a learning resource for second language international students. Adelaide: University of Adelaide PhD thesis.
  44. Williams, Geoff
    1995 Joint book-reading and literacy pedagogy: A socio-semantic examination. Sydney: Macquarie University PhD thesis.
  45. 2001 Literacy pedagogy prior to schooling: Relations between social positioning and semantic variation. InBasil Bernstein, Ana Morais, Isabel Neves, Brian Davies & Harry Daniels (eds.), Towards a sociology of pedagogy: The contribution of Basil Bernstein to research, 17–45. New York: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. 2005 Semantic variation. InRuqaiya Hasan, Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen, & Jonathan J. Webster (eds.), Continuing discourse on language: A functional perspective (volume1), 457–480. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/langct.00024.kar
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/langct.00024.kar
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error