Volume 3, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2589-7233
  • E-ISSN: 2589-7241
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


This article reviews Describing language: Form and function, volume 5 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan



Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Bernstein, Basil
    1999 Vertical and horizontal discourse: An essay. British Journal of Sociology of Education20 (2). 157–173. 10.1080/01425699995380
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01425699995380 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bylund, Emanuel & Panos Athanasopoulos
    (eds.) 2015The language and thought of motion in second language speakers. Modern Language Journal99 (Supplement 2015) 1–164.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Canagarajah, A. Suresh
    2018 Materializing ‘competence’: Perspectives from international STEM scholars. Modern Language Journal102 (2). 268–291. doi:  10.1111/modl.12464
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12464 [Google Scholar]
  4. Carroll, John B.
    (ed.) 1956Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cloran, Carmel , David Butt & Geoffrey Williams
    (eds.) 1996Ways of saying: Ways of meaning. Selected papers of Ruqaiya Hasan. London: Cassell. Republished in 2015 in hardback. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Derrida, Jacques
    1974Of grammatology. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 1981Positions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Douglas Fir Group
    Douglas Fir Group 2016 A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. Modern Language Journal100 (Supplement 2016) 19–47. doi:  10.1111/modl.12301
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12301 [Google Scholar]
  9. Ellis, Nick C. & Diane Larsen-Freeman
    2009 Constructing a second language: Analyses and computational simulations of the emergence of linguistic constructions from usage. Language Learning59 (Supplement). 90–125. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00537.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00537.x [Google Scholar]
  10. Ellis, Nick C. , Ute Römer & Matthew B. O’Donnell
    2016Usage-based approaches to language acquisition and processing: Cognitive and corpus investigations of construction grammar. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fabb, Nigel , Derek Attridge , Alan Durant & Colin MacCabe
    (eds.) 1987The linguistics of writing: Arguments between language and literature. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fontaine, Lise , Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady
    (eds.) 2013Systemic functional linguistics: Exploring choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139583077
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139583077 [Google Scholar]
  13. García, Ofelia & Wei Li
    2014Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137385765
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137385765 [Google Scholar]
  14. Goldberg, Adele E.
    2013 Constructionist approaches. In Thomas Hoffman & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Construction grammar handbook, 15–31. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gumperz, John J. & Stephen C. Levinson
    (eds.) 1996Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hall, Joan K.
    2019 The contributions of conversation analysis and interactional linguistics to a usage-based understanding of language: Expanding the transdisciplinary framework. Modern Language Journal103 (Supplement 2019) 80–94. doi:  10.1111/modl.12535
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12535 [Google Scholar]
  17. Halliday, Michael A. K.
    1961 Categories of the theory of grammar. In Michael A. K. Halliday , On grammar, volume 1 in the collected works of M. A. K. Halliday. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster , 37–94. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 1967 Notes on transitivity and theme in English (Part 1). Journal of Linguistics3 (1). 37–81. doi:  10.1017/S0022226700012949
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700012949 [Google Scholar]
  19. 1967 Notes on transitivity and theme in English (Part 2). Journal of Linguistics3 (2). 199–244. doi:  10.1017/S0022226700016613
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700016613 [Google Scholar]
  20. 1968 Notes on transitivity and theme in English (Part 3). Journal of Linguistics4 (2). 179–215. doi:  10.1017/S0022226700001882
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700001882 [Google Scholar]
  21. 1987 Language and the order of nature. In Nigel Fabb , Derek Attridge , Alan Durant & Colin MacCabe (eds.), The linguistics of writing: Arguments between language and literature, 135–154. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 2009 Preface to Continuum companion to systemic functional linguistics. In Michael A. K. Halliday & Jonathan J. Webster (eds.), Continuum companion to systemic functional linguistics, vii–viii. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Halliday, Michael A. K. , Angus McIntosh & Peter Strevens
    1964The linguistic sciences and language teaching. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Halliday, Michael A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    2014Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th edition). London: Routledge. doi:  10.4324/9780203783771
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hasan, Ruqaiya
    2005 Introduction: Language, society and consciousness: Transdisciplinary orientations and the tradition of specialisation. In Ruqaiya Hasan , Language, society and consciousness, volume 1 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster . 3–17. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hawkins, Margaret & Junko Mori
    2018 Considering ‘trans-’ perspectives in language theories and practices. Applied Linguistics39 (1). 1–8. doi:  10.1093/applin/amx056
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx056 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hilpert, Martin
    2019 (2nd edition). Construction grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hult, Francis M.
    2009 The history and development of educational linguistics. In Bernard Spolsky & Francis M. Hult (eds.), The handbook of educational linguistics, 10–24. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 2019 Toward a unified theory of language development: The transdisciplinary nexus of cognitive and sociocultural perspectives on social activity. Modern Language Journal103 (Supplement 2019) 136–144. doi:  10.1111/modl.12527
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12527 [Google Scholar]
  30. Langacker, Ronald W.
    2008Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  31. Larsen-Freeman, Diane
    1997 Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics18 (2). 141–165. doi:  10.1093/applin/18.2.141
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/18.2.141 [Google Scholar]
  32. 2017 Complexity theory: The lessons continue. In Lourdes Ortega & Zhao Honghan (eds.), Complexity theory and language development: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman, 11–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.48.02lar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.48.02lar [Google Scholar]
  33. Li, Wei
    2018 Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics39 (1). 9–30. doi:  10.1093/applin/amx039
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx039 [Google Scholar]
  34. Lucy, John A.
    1996 The scope of linguistic relativity: An analysis and review of empirical research. In John J. Gumperz & Stephen C. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity, 37–69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 2010 Language structure, lexical meaning, and cognition: Whorf and Vygotsky revisited. In Barbara C. Malt & Phillip Wolff (eds.), Words and the mind: How words capture human experience, 266–286. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195311129.003.0014
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195311129.003.0014 [Google Scholar]
  36. Mathesius, Vilem
    1964 On the potentiality of the phenomena of language. In Josef Vachek (ed.), A Prague School reader in linguistics, 1–32. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Mazak, Catherine
    2017 Introduction: Theorizing translanguaging practices in higher education. In Catherine M. Mazak & Kevin S. Carroll (eds.), Translanguaging in higher education: Beyond monolingual ideologies, 1–10. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Pawley, Andrew & Frances H. Syder
    1983 Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In Jack C. Richards & Richard W. Schmidt (eds.), Language and communication, 191–226. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Peng, Xuanwei & Geoff Williams
    2019 Editorial. Language, Context and Text: The Social Semiotics Forum1 (1). 1–3.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Pennycook, Alastair
    2018 Posthumanist applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics39 (4). 445–461. doi:  10.1093/applin/amw016
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw016 [Google Scholar]
  41. Römer, Ute
    2009 The inseparability of lexis and grammar: Corpus linguistic perspectives. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics7. 140–162. doi:  10.1075/arcl.7.06rom
    https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.7.06rom [Google Scholar]
  42. Taguchi, Naoko & Carsten Roever
    2017Second language pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Taylor, John R.
    2012The mental corpus: How language is represented in the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199290802.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199290802.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  44. Tyler, Andrea E.
    2010 Usage-based approaches to language and their applications to second language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics30. 270–291. doi:  10.1017/S0267190510000140
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190510000140 [Google Scholar]
  45. Widdowson, Henry G.
    2000a Object language and the language subject: On the mediating role of applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics20. 21–33. doi:  10.1017/S0267190500200020
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500200020 [Google Scholar]
  46. 2000b On the limitations of linguistics applied. Applied Linguistics21 (1). 3–25. doi:  10.1093/applin/21.1.3
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.1.3 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error