Review of Clark (2019): Developing language and literacy in English across the secondary school curriculum: An inclusive approach & Gebhard (2019): Teaching and researching ELLs’ disciplinary literacies: Systemic functional linguistics in action in the context of U.S. school reform & Harman (2018): Bilingual learners and social equity: Critical approaches to systemic functional linguistics & Tajino (2018): A new approach to English pedagogical grammar: The order of meanings

References

1. Accurso, Kathryn & Meg Gebhard
   2021 SFL praxis in U.S. teacher education: A critical literature review. Language and Education35 (5). 402–428.   10.1080/09500782.2020.1781880
   https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2020.1781880 [Google Scholar]
2. Bloor, Thomas & Meriel Bloor
   2013 The functional analysis of English: A Hallidayan approach (3rd edition). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203538098
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203538098 [Google Scholar]
3. Bourdieu, Pierre
   1973 Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. InRichard K. Brown (ed.), Knowledge, education, and cultural change, 71–84. London: Tavistock Publications.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Butler, Christopher S.
   2013 Systemic functional linguistics, cognitive linguistics and psycholinguistics: Opportunities for dialogue. Functions of Language20 (2). 185–218.   10.1075/fol.20.2.03but
   https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.20.2.03but [Google Scholar]
5. Butt, David, Rhondda Fahey, Susan Feez & Sue Spinks
   2012 Using functional grammar: An explorer’s guide. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Byrnes, Heidi
   2021 Book review: Jonathan J. Webster & Carmel Cloran (eds.). Describing language: Form and function, volume 5 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan. Language, Context and Text: The social semiotics forum, 3 (1). 174–198.   10.1075/langct.00033.byr
   https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.00033.byr [Google Scholar]
7. Clark, Urszula
   2019 Developing language and literacy in English across the secondary school curriculum: An inclusive approach. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑93239‑2
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93239-2 [Google Scholar]
8. Coffin, Caroline, Jim Donohue & Sarah North
   2009 Exploring English grammar: From formal to functional. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
9. de Oliveira, Luciana C. & Mary J. Schleppegrell
   2015 Focus on grammar and meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Feez, Susan
    1999 Text-based syllabus design. TESOL in Context9 (1). 11–14.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Freire, Paolo
    1993 Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Gardner, Sheena
    2017 Systemic functional linguistics and genre studies. InTom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), The Routledge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 473–488. London & New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Gebhard, Meg
    2019 Teaching and researching ELLs’ disciplinary literacies: Systemic functional linguistics in action in the context of U.S. school reform. London & New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315108391
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315108391 [Google Scholar]
14. Halliday, Michael A. K.
    1994 An introduction to functional grammar (2nd edition). London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Harman, Ruth
    (ed.) 2019 Bilingual learners and social equity: Critical approaches to systemic functional linguistics. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑60953‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60953-9 [Google Scholar]
16. Hasan, Ruqaiya
    1996 Literacy, everyday talk and society. InRuqaiya Hasan & Geoff Williams (eds.), Literacy in society, 377–424. New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Humphrey, Sally & Lucy Macnaught
    2016 Functional language instruction and the writing growth of English language learners in the middle years. TESOL Quarterly50 (4). 792–816.   10.1002/tesq.247
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.247 [Google Scholar]
18. Jones, Rodney H. & Graham Lock
    2011 Functional grammar in the ESL classroom: Noticing, exploring and practising. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230297524
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230297524 [Google Scholar]
19. Macken-Horarik, Mary
    1996 Literacy and learning across the curriculum: Towards a model of register from secondary school teachers. InRuqaiya Hasan & Geoff Williams (eds.), Literacy in society, 232–278. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Martin, James R. & Peter R. R. White
    2005 The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
21. Mohan, Bernard A.
    1986 Language and content. New York: Addison-Wesley.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Moore, Jason & Mary J. Schleppegrell
    2014 Using a functional linguistics metalanguage to support academic language development in the English language arts. Linguistics and Education26. 92–105.   10.1016/j.linged.2014.01.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2014.01.002 [Google Scholar]
23. New London Group
    New London Group 1996 A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review66 (1). 60–91.   10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
    https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u [Google Scholar]
24. Quirk, Randolph, Sydney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
    1985 A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Harlow, Essex: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Tajino, Akira
    (ed.) 2018 A new approach to English pedagogical grammar: The order of meanings. London/New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315396668
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315396668 [Google Scholar]
26. Webster, Jonathan J.
    2015 Understanding verbal art: A functional linguistic approach. Heidelberg: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑55019‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55019-5 [Google Scholar]
27. White, Peter R. R., Guiseppe Mammone & David Caldwell
    2015 Linguistically based inequality, multilingual education and a genre-based literacy development pedagogy: Insights from the Australian experience. Language and Education29 (3). 256–271.   10.1080/09500782.2014.994527
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2014.994527 [Google Scholar]