Review of Miller (2021): Verbal art and systemic functional linguistics

References

1. Birch, David & L. Michael O Toole
   1988 (eds.). Functions of style. London and New York: Pinter.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bowcher, Wendy L. & Jennifer Y. Liang
   (eds.) 2016 Society in language, language in society: Essays in honour of Ruqaiya Hasan. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137402868
   https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137402868 [Google Scholar]
3. Butt, David
   2004 How our meanings change: School contexts and semantic evolution. InGeoff Williams & Annabelle Lukin (eds.), The development of language: Functional perspectives on species and individuals, 217–240. London: Continuum.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Cloran, Carmel
   1994 Rhetorical units and decontextualization: An enquiry into some relations of context, meaning, and grammar. Nottingham: Department of English Studies, University of Nottingham.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Firth, John R.
   1957 [1951] Modes of meaning: Essays and studies. InPapers in linguistics: 1934–1951. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Gregory, Richard
   1981 Mind in science: A history of explanations of psychology and physics. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Halliday, Michael A. K.
   1967 Intonation and grammar in British English. The Hague and Paris: Mouton. 10.1515/9783111357447
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111357447 [Google Scholar]
8. Halliday, Michael A. K.
   1971 Linguistic function and literary style: An enquiry into the language of William Golding’s ‘The Inheritors’. InSeymour Chatman (ed.), Literary style: A symposium, 330–368. New York: Oxford University Press. Reprinted inMichael A. K. Halliday, Linguistic studies of text and discourse, volume 2 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 88–125. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. London & New York: Continuum.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Halliday, Michael A. K.
   1973 Towards a sociological semantics. Explorations in the functions of language. London: Edward Arnold. Reprinted inMichael A. K. Halliday, On language and linguistics, volume3in the collected works ofM.A.K. Halliday, 323–354. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. London & New York: Continuum.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Halliday, Michael A. K.
    2002a The linguistic study of literary texts. InProceedings of the ninth international congress of linguistics, 302–307. Edited byHorace Lunt. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter. Reprinted inMichael A. K. Halliday, Linguistic studies of text and discourse, volume 2 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 5–22. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. London & New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Halliday, Michael A. K.
    2002b The de-automatization of grammar: from Priestley’s An Inspector Calls. InMichael A. K. Halliday, Linguistic studies of text and discourse, volume 2 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 126–148. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. London & New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Halliday, Michael A. K. and William S. Greaves
    2008 Intonation in the grammar of English. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Hasan, Ruqaiya
    1964 A linguistic study of contrasting features in the style of two contemporary English prose writers. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hasan, Ruqaiya
    1968a Linguistics and the study of literature. Etudes de Linguistique Appliquée5.106–121.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hasan, Ruqaiya
    1968b Grammatical cohesion in spoken and written English, part one. Programme in Linguistics and English teaching Paper 7. London: University College London and Longmans.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hasan, Ruqaiya
    1971 Rime and reason in literature. InSeymour Chatman (ed.), Literary style: A symposium, 299–329. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Hasan, Ruqaiya
    1975 The place of stylistics in the study of verbal art. InHåkan Ringbom (ed.), Style and text: Studies presented to Nils Erik Enkvist, 4–62. Amsterdam: Skriptor.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hasan, Ruqaiya
    1985 Linguistics, language and verbal art. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hasan, Ruqaiya
    1988 The analysis of one poem: Theoretical issues in practice. InDavid Birch & Michael O’Toole (eds.), Functions of style, 45–73, London, New York: Pinter.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hasan, Ruqaiya
    1996 On teaching literature across cultural distances. InJoyce E. James (ed.), The language – culture connection, 34–63. Singapore: RELC.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hasan, Ruqaiya
    1999 Speaking with reference to context. InMohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Text and context in functional linguistics: Systemic perspectives, 219–328. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Reprinted inRuqaiya Hasan, Context in the system and process of language, volume 4 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan, 247–354. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. Sheffield: Equinox. 10.1075/cilt.169.11has
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.169.11has [Google Scholar]
22. Hasan, Ruqaiya
    2005a Language, society and consciousness, volume 1 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. Sheffield: Equinox eBooks Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Hasan, Ruqaiya
    2005b Semiotic mediation and three exotropic theories: Vygotsky, Halliday and Bernstein. InRuqaiya Hasan, Language, society and consciousness, volume 1 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan, 130–156. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. Sheffield: Equinox eBooks Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Hasan Ruqaiya
    2005c The implication of semantic distance for language in education. InAnvita Abbi (ed.), Studies in bilingualism. New Delhi: Bahri Publications. Reprinted inRuqaiya Hasan, Language and education, volume 3 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan, 73–98. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. Sheffield: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Hasan, Ruqaiya
    2007 Private pleasure, public discourse: Reflections on engaging with literature. InDonna R Miller and Monica Turci (eds.). Language and verbal art revisited: Linguistic approaches to the study of literature, 13–40. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Hasan, Ruqaiya
    2011 Language and education: Learning and teaching in society, volume 3 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Jakobson, Roman
    1987 Language in literature. Edited byKrystyna Pomorska & Stephen Rudy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Jakobson, Roman
    2014 [1973] Main trends in the science of language (revised edition). London & New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Kellogg, David
    2016 Metaphoric, metonymic, eclectic, or dialectic? A commentary on “Neoformation: A dialectical approach to developmental change”. Mind, Culture, and Activity24 (4). 381–387. 10.1080/10749039.2016.1179328
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2016.1179328 [Google Scholar]
30. Kellogg, David
    2017 Thinking of feeling: Hasan, Vygotsky, and some ruminations on the development of narrative sensibility in children. Language and Education31 (4). 374–387. 10.1080/09500782.2017.1306074
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2017.1306074 [Google Scholar]
31. Kozulin, Alex
    1999 Vygotsky’s psychology. A biography of ideas. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Kress, Gunther & Theo van Leeuwen
    1996 Reading images: the grammar of visual design. London & New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Lukin, Annabelle
    2002 Examining poetry: A corpus based enquiry into literary criticism. PhD thesis. Department of Linguistics, Macquarie University.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Matejka, Ladislev and Krystyna Pomorska
    (eds.) 1978 Readings in Russian poetics: Formalist and structuralist views. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Miller, Donna R. & Monica Turci
    (eds.) 2007 Language and verbal art revisited: Linguistic approaches to the study of literature. Sheffield: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Miller, Donna R. & Paul Bayley
    (eds.) 2016 Hybridity in systemic functional linguistics: Grammar, text and discursive context. Sheffield: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Miller, Donna R.
    2017 Language as purposeful: Functional varieties of text (2nd edition). InFunctional grammar studies for non-native speakers of English. Bologna: AMSActa/AlmaDL. amsacta.unibo.it/id/eprint/5504
    [Google Scholar]
38. Mukařovský, Jan
    1977 The word and verbal art. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. O’Toole, Michael L.
    1982 Structure, style and interpretation in the Russian short story. New Haven: Yale University Press. 10.2307/1772015
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1772015 [Google Scholar]
40. O’Toole, Michael L.
    2001 Russian literary theory: From the formalists to Lotman. InNeil Cornwell (ed.), The Routledge companion to Russian literature, 163–173. London & New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
41. O’Toole, Michael L.
    2011[1994] The language of displayed art (2nd edition). London & New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
42. O’Toole, Michael L. & Ann Shukman
    (eds.) 1975–1981 Russian poetics in translation, volumes1–8. Oxford: Holden Books Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
43. O’Toole, Michael L. & Ann Shukman
    (eds.) 1977 Russian poetics in translation, volume 4: Formalist theory. Oxford: Holdan Books Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Shklovsky, Viktor
    1925 [1990] Theory of prose. Elmwood Park: Dalkey Archive Press.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Steiner, Peter
    1984 Russian formalism: A metapoetics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Stevens, Wallace
    1984 [1960] The necessary angel. Essays on reality and the imagination. London: Faber & Faber.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Striedter, Jurij
    1989 Literary structure, evolution and value: Russian formalism and Czech structuralism reconsidered. Cambridge, MA. & London: Harvard University Press. 10.4159/harvard.9780674418677
    https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674418677 [Google Scholar]
48. Tynjanov, Jurij
    1978 On literary evolution. InLadislav Matejka and Krystyna Pomorska (eds.), Readings in Russian poetics: Formalist and structuralist views. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Vachek, Josef
    1966 The linguistic school of Prague. An introduction to its theory and practice. Bloomington & London. Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Vaihinger, Hans
    1924 [1911] The philosophy of ‘as if’: A system of the theoretical, practical and religious fictions of mankind. Translated byCharles K. Ogden. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Wegener, Rebekah, Stella Neumann and Antje Oesterle
    (eds.) 2018 On verbal art. Ripples in a timeless world: Essays in honour of Ruqaiya Hasan. Sheffield: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Williams, Geoff
    2004 Ontogenesis and grammatics: Functions of metalanguage in pedagogical discourse. InGeoff Williams & Annabelle Lukin (eds.), The development of language: Functional perspectives on species and individuals, 241–267. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Williams, Geoff
    2005 Grammatics in schools. Continuing discourse on language: Functional perspectives (volume1). Ruqaiya Hasan, Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen & Jonathan J. Webster (eds.), 281–310. Sheffield: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Williams, Geoff & Annabelle Lukin
    (eds.) 2004 The development of language: Functional perspectives on species and individuals. London & New York. Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Wittegenstein, Ludwig
    1953 Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]