1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Language, Context and Text
  4. Volume 6, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 6, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2589-7233
  • E-ISSN: 2589-7241
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article addresses the underexplored topic of compassion in digital activism through linguistic research. Utilising corpus linguistics and the SFL appraisal framework, the study initially analyses the lemma “compassion” and its appraisal nature within The Coronavirus Corpus. It then models compassion development as a social discursive process, taking Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS-Australia) campaigns as a case study, drawing on “communion” and “tendering” strategies, and positioning theory-based morality by linking structure to agency. The analysis provides evidence that the concept of “compassion” extends beyond triggered emotions, expressing institutionalised feelings. Compassion also develops through a moral affiliation process: aligning identities, positioning others within shared moral and sociocultural frameworks, and exhorting people towards purposeful social actions as commodities. This research underscores compassion’s normative (i.e. moral orders) core and performative essence.

© 2024 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/langct.00066.eta
2024-08-20
2025-04-29

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/langct.00066.eta
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andrews, Crystal
    2022 BDS basics: What is the Boycott, Divest, Sanction Movement & how does it work in Australia?Zeefeed. https://zeefeed.com.au/bds-movement-australia/ (1 August, 2023.)
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bandura, Albert
    2016 Moral disengagement: How people do harm and live with themselves. New York: Worth Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Benford, Robert & David Snow
    2000 Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology261. 611–639. https://www.jstor.org/stable/223459. 10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611 [Google Scholar]
  4. Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad & Randi Reppen
    1998 Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511804489
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804489 [Google Scholar]
  5. Biber, Douglas, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan
    1999 Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bond, Carmel, Ada Hui, Stephens Timmons, Ellie Wildbore & Shane Sinclair
    2022 Discourses of compassion from the margins of health care: The perspectives and experiences of people with a mental health condition. Journal of Mental Health33(1). 31–39. 10.1080/09638237.2022.2118692
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2022.2118692 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bond, Carmel, Gemma Stacey, Sarah Field-Richards, Patrick Callaghan, Phillip Keeley, Joanne Lymn, Sarah Redsell & Helen Spiby
    2018 The concept of compassion within UK media-generated discourse: A corpus-informed analysis. Journal of Clinical Nursing271. 15–16. 10.1111/jocn.14496
     https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14496 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bucholtz, Mary
    2003 Sociolinguistic nostalgia and the authentication of identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics7(3). 398–416. 10.1111/1467‑9481.00232
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00232 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bucholtz, Mary & Kira Hall
    2005 Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies7(4–5). 585–614. 10.1177/1461445605054407
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407 [Google Scholar]
  10. Butler, Judith
    2021 Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. London & New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003146759
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003146759 [Google Scholar]
  11. Campbell, Richmond
    2019[2003] Moral epistemology. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-epistemology/
  12. Cap, Piotr
    2017 The language of fear: Communicating fear in public discourse. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑59731‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59731-1 [Google Scholar]
  13. Caple, Helen & Monica Bednarek
    2020 A nation remembers: Discourses of change, mourning and reconciliation on Australia day. InMichele Zappavigna & Shoshana Dreyfus (eds.), Discourses of hope and reconciliation: On J.R. Martin’s contribution to systemic functional linguistics, 205–220. London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781350116092.ch‑011
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350116092.ch-011 [Google Scholar]
  14. Carty, Victoria
    2010 Wired and mobilizing: Social movements, new technology, and electoral politics. London & New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203842768
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203842768 [Google Scholar]
  15. CIVICUS
    CIVICUS 2022 Palestine: Activism gone digital. https://lens.civicus.org/palestine-activism-gone-digital/ (1 August, 2023.)
  16. Coupland, Nikolas
    2003 Sociolinguistic authenticities. Journal of Sociolinguistics71. 417–31. 10.1111/1467‑9481.00233
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00233 [Google Scholar]
  17. 2007 Style: Language variation and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511755064
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755064 [Google Scholar]
  18. David, Susan
    2016 Emotional agility: Get unstuck, embrace change, and thrive in work and life. New York: Penguin.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Don, Alexanne
    2017 Stance-taking and the construal of textual persona in written contexts: Social contact revisited. Linguistics & the Human Sciences13(1). 70–95. 10.1558/lhs.30713
     https://doi.org/10.1558/lhs.30713 [Google Scholar]
  20. Doran, Yaegan
    2019 Axiology and affording attitude in Australia’s ‘invasion’. InJ. R. Martin, Karl Maton, & Y. J. Doran (eds.) Accessing academic discourse: Systemic functional linguistics and legitimation code theory, 151–176. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429280726‑6
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429280726-6 [Google Scholar]
  21. Doran, Yaegan, James Martin & Michele Zappavigna
    2024 Affiliation and systemic functional linguistics: Negotiating community. London: Equinox.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Ertimur, Burcak & Gokcen Coskuner-Balli
    2021 Brands expressing compassion and care through advertising. Journal of Advertising50(3). 230–239. 10.1080/00913367.2021.1925606
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2021.1925606 [Google Scholar]
  23. Etaywe, Awni
    2022a Exploring the grammar of othering and antagonism as enacted in terrorist discourse: Verbal aggression in service of radicalisation. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications91. 177. 10.1057/s41599‑022‑01178‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01178-5 [Google Scholar]
  24. 2022b Language as evidence: A discourse semantic and corpus linguistic approach to examining written terrorist threatening communication. PhD dissertation. University of New South Wales, Sydney.
  25. 2023a Heteroglossia and identifying victims of violence and its purpose as constructed in terrorist threatening discourse online. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law36(2). 907–37. 10.1007/s11196‑023‑09974‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-09974-1 [Google Scholar]
  26. 2023b The role of (de)bonding in the legitimation of violence in extremists’ public threatening communication. InVinh To, Thomas Amundrud & Sally Humphrey (eds.), Systemic functional linguistics theory and application in global contexts, 12–34. Tasmania: University of Tasmania.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. 2024 Moral disaffiliation in cyber incitement to hatred and violence: A discourse semantic approach. Routledge international handbook of online deviance, 100–125. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Etaywe, Awni & Michele Zappavigna
    2021 Identity, ideology, and threatening communication: An investigation of patterns of attitude in terrorist discourse. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict10(2). 315–350. 10.1075/jlac.00058.eta
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00058.eta [Google Scholar]
  29. 2023 The role of social affiliation in incitement: A social semiotic approach to far-right terrorists’ incitement to violence. Language in Society1–26. 10.1017/S0047404523000404
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404523000404 [Google Scholar]
  30. Faulkner, Nicholas
    2013 Guilt, anger and compassionate helping. InMichael Ure & Mervyn Frost (eds.), The politics of compassion, 107–120. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Firth, J. R.
    1957 Papers in linguistics (1934–1951) London: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. 1964 The tongues of men, and speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Fuentes, M. A.
    2023, January9. Digital activism. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/digital-activism (1 August, 2023.)
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Gladkova, Anna
    2010 Sympathy, compassion, and empathy in English and Russian: A linguistic and cultural analysis. Culture & Psychology16(2). 267–285. 10.1177/1354067X10361396
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X10361396 [Google Scholar]
  35. Goffman, Erving
    1974 Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Gordon, Cynthia & Deborah Tannen
    2023 Framing and related concepts in interactional sociolinguistics. Discourse Studies25(2). 237–246. 10.1177/14614456231155073
     https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456231155073 [Google Scholar]
  37. Hallahan, Kirk, Derina Holtzhausen, Betteke van Ruler, Dejan Verčič & Krishnamurthy Sriramesh
    2007 Defining strategic communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication1(1). 3–35. 10.1080/15531180701285244
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15531180701285244 [Google Scholar]
  38. Halliday, M. A. K.
    1973 Explorations in the functions of language. London: Edward Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. 2008 Working with meaning: Towards an appliable linguistics. InJonathan Webster (ed.), Meaning in context: Implementing intelligent applications of language studies, 7–23. London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    2014 Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th edition). Oxon: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203783771
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771 [Google Scholar]
  41. Heritage, John
    2012 Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction45(1). 1–29. 10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646684 [Google Scholar]
  42. Höijer, Birgitta
    2004 The discourse of global compassion: The audience and media reporting of human suffering. Media, Culture & Society26(4). 513–531. 10.1177/0163443704044215
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443704044215 [Google Scholar]
  43. Hughes, Jessica
    2018 Progressing positive discourse analysis and/in critical discourse studies: Reconstructing resistance through progressive discourse analysis. Review of Communication18(3). 193–211. 10.1080/15358593.2018.1479880
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2018.1479880 [Google Scholar]
  44. Human Rights Watch
    Human Rights Watch 2021 A threshold crossed: Israeli authorities and the crimes of apartheid and persecution. Human Rights Watch (online). https://www.hrw.org/report/2021/04/27/threshold-crossed/israeli-authorities-and-crimes-apartheid-and-persecution (1 August, 2023.)
  45. Jewish Voice for Peace
    Jewish Voice for Peace. 7February 2022 Israeli apartheid and the path to teshuvah – JVP Rabbinic Council. Https://Www.Jewishvoiceforpeace.Org/2022/02/Jvp-Rabbinic-Council-Apartheid/ (1 August, 2023.)
  46. Kádár, Daniel
    2017 Politeness, impoliteness and ritual. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781107280465
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107280465 [Google Scholar]
  47. Kádár, Dániel & Vahid Parvaresh
    (eds.) 2019 Morality and language aggression: A position paper. Special issue of theJournal of Language Aggression and Conflict7(1). 1–5. 10.1075/jlac.00017.kad
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00017.kad [Google Scholar]
  48. Knight, Naomi
    2008 ‘Still cool…and American too!’: An SFL analysis of deferred bonds in internet messaging humour. InN. Nørgaard (ed.), Systemic functional linguistics in use: Odense working papers in language and communication, 481–502. Odense: University of Southern Denmark.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. 2010 Wrinkling complexity: Concepts of identity and affiliation in humour. InMonika Bednarek & J. R. Martin (eds.), New discourse on language: Functional perspectives on multimodality, identity, and affiliation, 35–58. London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Litt, Eden & Eszter Hargittai
    2016 The imagined audience on social network sites. Social Media+ Society2(1). 1–29. 10.1177/2056305116633482
     https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116633482 [Google Scholar]
  51. Macionis, John & Linda Gerber
    2010 Sociology (7th Canadian edition). Toronto: Pearson.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Mandela, Nelson
    1997 Address by President Nelson Mandela at International Day of Solidarity with Palestinian People, Pretoria. www.mandela.gov.za/mandela_speeches/1997/971204_palestinian.htm (1 August, 2023.)
  53. Martin, J. R.
    1999 Grace: The logogenesis of freedom. InTeun van Dijk (ed.), Discourse Studies1(1). 31–58. London: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. 2004 Positive discourse analysis: Solidarity and change. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses491. 179–200.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. 2010 Semantic variation: Modelling system, text and affiliation in social semiosis. InMonika Bednarek & J. R. Martin (eds.), New discourse on language: Functional perspective on multimodality, identity, and affiliation, 1–34. London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Martin, J. R. & Peter White
    2005 The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
  57. McEnery, Tony & Andrew Hardie
    2011 Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511981395
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511981395 [Google Scholar]
  58. Miliband, Ed
    2013 Mandela healed the wounds of the past with compassion and generosity. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/dec/08/nelson-mandela-ed-miliband (1 August, 2023.)
  59. Monshipouri, Mahmood & Theodore Prompichai
    2017 Digital activism in perspective: Palestinian resistance via social media. International Studies Journal14(4). 42–63. https://www.isjq.ir/article_89793.html?lang=en (1 August, 2023.)
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Nist, John
    1966 Language: Communication and communion. College Composition and Communication17(2). 50–54. 10.2307/354668
     https://doi.org/10.2307/354668 [Google Scholar]
  61. Nussbaum, Martha
    2013 Compassion and terror. InMichael Ure & Mervyn Frost (eds.), The politics of compassion, 189–207. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Parsloe, Sarah & Avery Holton
    2018 #Boycottautismspeaks: Communicating a counternarrative through cyberactivism and connective action. Information, Communication & Society21(8). 1116–1133. 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1301514
     https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1301514 [Google Scholar]
  63. Searle, John
    1999 Mind, language and society. New York: Basic Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. 2010 Making the social world: The structure of civilisation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780195396171.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780195396171.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  65. Silver, Eric & Leslie Abell
    2016 Beyond harm and fairness: A study of deviance and morality. Deviant Behavior37(5). 496–508. 10.1080/01639625.2015.1060746
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2015.1060746 [Google Scholar]
  66. Sinclair, John
    1991 Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Stenglin, Maree Kristen
    2004 Packaging curiosities: Towards a grammar of three-dimensional space. PhD dissertation. University of Sydney, Australia.
  68. Swatos, William
    1998 Encyclopedia of religion and society. London: Altamira Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Sznaider, Natan
    2015 Compassion, cruelty, and human rights. InRonald Anderson (ed), World suffering and quality of life – Social indicators research series, 561. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑017‑9670‑5_4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9670-5_4 [Google Scholar]
  70. Tann, Ken
    2010 Imagining communities: A multifunctional approach to identity management in texts. InMonika Bednarek & J. R. Martin (eds.), New discourse on language: Functional perspectives on multimodality, identity, and affiliation, 163–94. London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Tester, Keith
    2001 Compassion, morality and the media. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. United Nations Human Rights Council
    United Nations Human Rights Council 2023 Human Rights Council. https://www.ohchr.org/en/news/2023/03/human-rights-council-hears-current-israeli-plan-double-settler-population-occupied#:~:text=The​%20Human​%20Rights​%20Council​%20this,living​%20illegally​%20in​%20the​%20occupied (1 August, 2023.)
  73. United Nations News
    United Nations News 2022 Israel’s occupation of Palestinian Territory is ‘apartheid’: UN rights expert. United Nations. https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/03/1114702 (1 August, 2023.)
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Ure, Michael & Mervyn Frost
    2013 The politics of compassion. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Van Langenhove, Luk
    2017 Varieties of moral orders and the dual structure of society: A perspective from positioning theory. Frontiers in Sociology21. 9. 10.3389/fsoc.2017.00009
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2017.00009 [Google Scholar]
  76. van Leeuwen, Theo
    2008 Discourse and practice: New tools for critical analysis. London: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  77. White, Peter
    2006 Evaluative semantics and ideological positioning in journalistic discourse. InInger Lassen (ed.), Mediating ideology in text and image: Ten critical studies, 37–69. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.18.05whi
     https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.18.05whi [Google Scholar]
  78. Zappavigna, Michele
    2014 Enacting identity in microblogging through ambient affiliation. Discourse and Communication, 8(2). 209–228. 10.1177/1750481313510816
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481313510816 [Google Scholar]
  79. 2017 Evaluation. InChristian Hoffmann & Wolfram Bublitz (eds.), Pragmatics of Social Media, 435–458. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110431070‑016
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110431070-016 [Google Scholar]
  80. 2018 Searchable talk: Hashtags and social media metadiscourse. London & New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Zhao, Wenchao
    2020 Building axiological affiliation in televised Chinese job interviews: Attitudinal evaluations and their communication. Text & Talk40(2). 241–67. 10.1515/text‑2020‑2057
     https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2020-2057 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/langct.00066.eta
Loading
Compassion as appraisal, performative identity and moral affiliation
Language, Context and Text 6, 88 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.00066.eta
/content/journals/10.1075/langct.00066.eta
/content/journals/10.1075/langct.00066.eta
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): compassion; corpus linguistics; deviant persona; digital activism; discourse of resistance; framing; identity processes; moral affiliation; peace; stance-taking

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error