1887
Volume 6, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2589-7233
  • E-ISSN: 2589-7241
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article reviews The new peace linguistics and the role of language in conflict

 

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/langct.00071.eta
2024-08-20
2024-09-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bell, Allan
    1984 Language style as audience design. Language in Society13(2). 145–204. 10.1017/S004740450001037X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450001037X [Google Scholar]
  2. Butler, Judith
    2010 Performative agency. Journal of Cultural Economy3(2). 147–161. 10.1080/17530350.2010.494117
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2010.494117 [Google Scholar]
  3. Castaño-Pulgarín, Sergio, Natalia Suárez-Betancur, Luz Vega & Harvey López
    2021 Internet, social media and online hate speech. Systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior581. 101608. 10.1016/j.avb.2021.101608
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2021.101608 [Google Scholar]
  4. Coupland, Nikolas
    2007Style: Language variation and identity. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511755064
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755064 [Google Scholar]
  5. Curtis, Andy
    2022The new peace linguistics and the role of language in conflict. Charlotte, North Carolina: Information Age Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Etaywe, Awni
    2022 Language as evidence: A discourse semantic and corpus linguistic approach to examining written terrorist threatening communication. PhD dissertation. University of New South Wales, Australia.
  7. . in press. Moral disaffiliation in cyber incitement to hatred and violence: A discourse semantic approach. InRoderick Graham ed Routledge Handbook on Criminology and Digital Deviance, 100–125. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Etaywe, Awni & Michele Zappavigna
    2023 The role of social affiliation in incitement: A social semiotic approach to far-right terrorists’ incitement to violence. Language in Society1–26. 10.1017/S0047404523000404
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404523000404 [Google Scholar]
  9. Global Peace Index
    Global Peace Index 2023 Institute for Economics and Peace. https://www.visionofhumanity.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/GPI-2023-Web.pdf (31 July, 2023).
  10. Halliday, M. A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan
    1985Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Geelong, Vic: Deakin University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Halliday, M. A. K.
    2008 Working with meaning: Towards an appliable linguistics. InJ. Webster (ed.), Meaning in context: Implementing intelligent applications of language studies, 7–23. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hodges, Adam
    (ed.) 2013Discourses of war and peace. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199937271.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199937271.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hodges, Adam & Chad Nilep
    (eds.) 2007Discourse, war and terrorism. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.24
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.24 [Google Scholar]
  14. Hughes, Jessica
    2018 Progressing positive discourse analysis and/in critical discourse studies: Reconstructing resistance through progressive discourse analysis. Review of Communication18(3). 193–211. 10.1080/15358593.2018.1479880
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2018.1479880 [Google Scholar]
  15. Love, Harold
    2002Attributing authorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511483165
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511483165 [Google Scholar]
  16. Lukin, Annabelle
    2019War and its ideologies: A social-semiotic theory and description. Singapore: Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑13‑0996‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0996-0 [Google Scholar]
  17. Martin, J. R.
    1999 Grace: the logogenesis of freedom. Discourse Studies1(1). 29–56. 10.1177/1461445699001001003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445699001001003 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2004 Positive discourse analysis: Solidarity and change. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses491. 179–200.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. White, Peter
    2011 Appraisal. InJan Zienkowski, Jan-Ola Östman & Jef Verschueren. (eds.), Discursive pragmatics, 14–36. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hoph.8.02whi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hoph.8.02whi [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/langct.00071.eta
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error