Theme as point of departure in English and Spanish academic writing and casual conversation

References

1. Alarcos Llorach, Emilio
   1987 Estudios de gramática funcional del español (3rd edition). Madrid: Gredos.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Andreau, Laura
   2020 Verbos derivados de saber y decir como marcadores discursivos en fragmentos descriptivos de la conversación coloquial. InLucas Gagliardi, Dolores Álvarez Garriga & Lucía Zanfardini (coords.), Punto de encuentro: Estudios sobre el lenguaje, 211–232. La Plata: Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Arús-Hita, Jorge
   2022a A contrastive look at Theme as point of departure in English and Spanish academic writing. English Text Construction15(1). 1–29. 10.1075/etc.00048.aru
   https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.00048.aru [Google Scholar]
4. Arús-Hita, Jorge
   2022b Theme as point of departure in English and Spanish casual conversation: A contrastive study. Language, Context and Text4(2). 197–226.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Arús-Hita, Jorge, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady
   2019 Looking into Theme: Three kinds of thematic meaning. Paper delivered at the29th European systemic functional linguistics conference. Universidad Politécnica de Leiria, Portugal, 3–5 July.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Banks, David
   2008 The development of scientific writing. Linguistic features and historical context. Sheffield: Equinox.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Banks, David
   2017 The extent to which the passive voice is used in the scientific journal article, 1985–2015. Functional Linguistics4(12). 1–17. 10.1186/s40554‑017‑0045‑5
   https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-017-0045-5 [Google Scholar]
8. Bartlett, Tom
   2016 Phasal dynamism and the unfolding of meaning as text. InBen Clarke & Jorge Arús-Hita (eds.), The dynamicity of communication below, around and above the clause, special issue ofEnglish Text Construction9(1). 143–164. 10.1075/etc.9.1.08bar
   https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.9.1.08bar [Google Scholar]
9. Bhatia, Vijay K.
   2014 A generic view of academic discourse. InJohn Flowerdew (ed.), Academic discourse, 31–49. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Biber, Douglas
    2006 University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written genres. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.23
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.23 [Google Scholar]
11. Bowen, Neil & Nathan Thomas
    2020 Manipulating texture and cohesion in academic writing: A keystroke logging study. Journal of Second Language Writing501. 100773. 10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100773 (26 December, 2023.)
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100773 [Google Scholar]
12. Briz Gómez, Antonio
    2001 El español coloquial en la conversación. Barcelona: Ariel.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Camps, Ana & Monserrat Castelló
    2013 La escritura académica en la universidad. Revista de Docencia Universitaria11(1). 17–36. 10.4995/redu.2013.5590
    https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2013.5590 [Google Scholar]
14. Davies, Mark
    2004 BYU-BNC. (Based on the British National Corpus from Oxford University Press). corpus.byu.edu/bnc/ (26 December, 2023.)
    [Google Scholar]
15. Diwakar Grandhi, Rama Satya
    2018 Every new beginning comes from some other beginning’s end. Weblog. https://diwakargrandhi.medium.com/every-new-beginning-comes-from-some-other-beginnings-end-958508f8502e (11 April, 2024.)
    [Google Scholar]
16. Eggins, Suzanne & Diana Slade
    1997 Analysing casual conversation. London: Cassell.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Fang, Zhihui
    2021 Demystifying academic writing: Genres, moves, skills, and strategies. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003131618
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003131618 [Google Scholar]
18. Ferrari, Carolina
    2020 Metáforas gramaticales y tipos textuales en la conversación coloquial. InLucas Gagliardi, Dolores Álvarez Garriga & Lucía Zanfardini (coords.), Punto de encuentro: Estudios sobre el lenguaje, 171–192. La Plata: Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Flores Figueroa, Claudia
    2005 Análisis sistémico-funcional de la estructura de conversaciones en inglés y en español. MA thesis. Universidad de Chile.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Flowerdew, John
    2014 Academic discourse. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315838069
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315838069 [Google Scholar]
21. Gordillo-Alfonso, Adriana
    2017 La escritura científica: Una revisión temática. Signo y Pensamiento36(71). 54–66.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Granato, Luisa
    2020 Introducción a la interacción verbal. InLucas Gagliardi, Dolores Álvarez Garriga & Lucía Zanfardini (coords.), Punto de encuentro: Estudios sobre el lenguaje, 67–94. La Plata: Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Granato, Luisa & Guillermina Piatti
    2010 Some remarks on thematic and information structure in casual conversation. InProceedings of V coloquio argentino de la IADA, 157–168. La Plata, Argentina.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Halliday, M. A. K.
    1985 An introduction to functional grammar (1st edition). London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Halliday, M. A. K.
    1996 On grammar and grammatics. InRuqaiya Hasan, Carmel Cloran & David Butt (eds.), Functional descriptions: Theory into practice, 1–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.121.03hal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.121.03hal [Google Scholar]
26. Halliday, M. A. K. & J. R. Martin
    2003 Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203209936
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203209936 [Google Scholar]
27. Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    2014 Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th edition). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203783771
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771 [Google Scholar]
28. Hyland, Ken
    2009 Academic discourse: English in a global context. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Hyland, Ken & Marina Bondi
    (eds.) 2006 Academic discourse across disciplines [Linguistic insights. Studies in linguistics and communication, vol. 42]. Bern: Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑3‑0351‑0446‑2
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0351-0446-2 [Google Scholar]
30. Ignatieva, Natalia
    2008 Descripción sistémico-funcional de la escritura académica estudiantil en español. Núcleo251. 173–195.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Ignatieva, Natalia, Daniel Rodríguez Vergara, Victoria Zamudio Jasso & Guillermo Jiménez Sánchez
    2023 ¿Cómo escriben los estudiantes universitarios en las humanidades? Un estudio sistémico funcional de la escritura académica. Mexico: UNAM.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Knight, Naomi K.
    2010 Laughing our bonds off: Conversational humour in relation to affiliation. PhD dissertation. University of Sydney, Australia.
33. Laboratorio de Lingüística Informática
    Laboratorio de Lingüística Informática 1992 CORLEC, Corpus Oral de Referencia del Español Contemporáneo. Departamento de Lingüística, Lenguas Modernas, Lógica y Filosofía de la Ciencia, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Lavid, Julia, Jorge Arús-Hita & Juan R. Zamorano
    2010 Systemic functional grammar of Spanish: A contrastive study with English. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Leong, Alvin Ping
    2005 Talking themes: The thematic structure of talk. Discourse Studies7(6). 701–732. 10.1177/1461445605055423
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605055423 [Google Scholar]
36. Leong, Alvin Ping, Audrey Lin Lin Toh & Soo Fun Chin
    2018 Examining structure in scientific research articles: A study of thematic progression and thematic density. Written Communication35(3). 286–314. 10.1177/0741088318767378
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088318767378 [Google Scholar]
37. Lucantonio, Damian
    2007 Developing diversity in oral communication. Bulletin of the University of Electro-Communications20(1–2). 55–66.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Martin, J. R.
    1992a Theme, method of development and existentiality: The price of reply. Occasional Papers in Systemic Linguistics61. 147–184.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Martin, J. R.
    1992b English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.59
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.59 [Google Scholar]
40. Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M.
    1992 Interpreting the textual metafunction. InMartin Davies & Louise Ravelli (eds.), Advances in systemic linguistics: Recent theory and practice, 37–81. London & New York: Pinter.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M.
    1995 Lexicogrammatical cartography: English systems. Tokyo: International Language Sciences Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M.
    2004 Descriptive motives and generalisations. InAlice Caffarel, J. R. Martin & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen (eds.), Language typology: A functional perspective, 537–673. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.253.12mat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.253.12mat [Google Scholar]
43. Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. & Diana Slade
    2010 Analysing conversation. InRuth Wodak, Barbara Johnstone & Paul Kerswill (eds.), The Sage handbook of sociolinguistics, 375–395. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore & Washington DC: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
44. McEnery, Tony & Andrew Wilson
    2001 Corpus linguistics (2nd edition). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Montemayor-Borsinger, Ann
    2009 Tema: Una perspectiva funcional de la organización del discurso. Buenos Aires: Eudeba.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Moore, Nicholas
    2011 Modelling the flow of discourse in a corpus of written academic English. InNicholas Groom (ed.), Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics 2011 Conference ‘Discourse and Corpus Linguistics’. https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/documents/college-artslaw/corpus/conference-archives/2011/Paper-11.pdf (26 December, 2023.)
    [Google Scholar]
47. Moyano, Estela
    2016 Theme in English and Spanish: Different means of realisation for the same textual function. InBen Clarke & Jorge Arús-Hita (eds.), The dynamicity of communication below, around and above the clause, special issue ofEnglish Text Construction9(1). 190–219. 10.1075/etc.9.1.10moy
    https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.9.1.10moy [Google Scholar]
48. Moyano, Estela
    2021 La función de Tema en español: Sus medios de realización desde la perspectiva trinocular de la Lingüística Sistémico-Funcional. Revista Signos56(106). 487–517. 10.4067/S0718‑09342021000200487
    https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-09342021000200487 [Google Scholar]
49. Narbona Jiménez, Antonio
    2015 Sintaxis del español coloquial. Sevilla: Editorial Universidad de Sevilla. 10.12795/9788447221615
    https://doi.org/10.12795/9788447221615 [Google Scholar]
50. O’Grady, Gerard
    2016 Given/New: what do the terms refer to? A first (small) step. InBen Clarke & Jorge Arús-Hita (eds.), The dynamicity of communication below, around and above the clause, special issue ofEnglish Text Construction9(1). 9–32.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Parodi, Giovanni
    (ed.) 2008 Géneros académicos y géneros profesionales. Accesos discursivos para saber y hacer. Valparaíso: Ediciones Universitarias de Valparaíso.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Parodi, Giovanni & Gina Burdiles
    (eds.) 2015 Leer y Escribir en contextos académicos y profesionales: géneros, corpus y métodos. Santiago: Ariel.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Pérez-Guerra, Javier
    2021 Theme as a proxy for register categorisation. InElena Seoane & Douglas Biber (eds.), Corpus-based approaches to register variation, 85–110. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.103.04per
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.103.04per [Google Scholar]
54. Piatti, Guillermina
    2020 Oralidad y sintaxis. InLucas Gagliardi, Dolores Álvarez Garriga & Lucía Zanfardini (coords.), Punto de encuentro: Estudios sobre el lenguaje, 121–153. La Plata: Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Placci, Graciela & Andrea Garófolo
    2015 Análisis del discurso académico desde una perspectiva sistémico-funcional: Una propuesta didáctica para cursos disciplinares en la universidad. InActas del Congreso Nacional Cátedra UNESCO Subsede Rosario: La lectura y la escritura en las sociedades del siglo XXI. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/61704557.pdf (26 December, 2023.)
    [Google Scholar]
56. Quiroz, Beatriz
    2018 Negotiating interpersonal meanings in Spanish: Reasoning about mood. Functions of Language25(1) (Special Issue on Interpersonal Meaning). 130–158.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Rodríguez Medina, María Jesús
    2002 Los anglicismos de frecuencia sintácticos en español: estudio empírico. RAEL. Revista Electrónica de Lingüística Aplicada, 149–170.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Salager-Meyer, F., M. Ángeles Alcaraz Ariza & Nahirana Zambrano
    2003 The scimitar, the dagger and the glove: Intercultural differences in the rhetoric of criticism in Spanish, French and English medical discourse (1930–1995). English for Specific Purposes221. 223–247. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(02)00019‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(02)00019-4 [Google Scholar]
59. Silva-Corvalán, Carmen
    1981 The diffusion of Object-Verb agreement in Spanish. Papers in Romance31. 163–176.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne Marie
    2014 Systemic-functional approaches to discourse. InKlaus P. Schneider & Anne Barron (eds.), Pragmatics of discourse, 125–164. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110214406‑006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214406-006 [Google Scholar]
61. Slade, Diana
    1996 The texture of casual conversation in English. PhD dissertation. University of Sydney, Australia.
62. Taboada, María T.
    2004 Building coherence and cohesion: Task-oriented dialogue in English and Spanish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.129
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.129 [Google Scholar]
63. Teich, Elke, Stefania Degaetano-Ortlieb, Peter Fankhauser, Hannah Kermes & Ekaterina Lapshinova-Koltunski
    2016 The linguistic construal of disciplinarity: A data-mining approach using register features. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology67(7). 1668–1678. 10.1002/asi.23457
    https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23457 [Google Scholar]
64. Teruya, Kazuhiro
    2007 A systemic functional grammar of Japanese. London & New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Thompson, Geoff & Susan Thompson
    2009 Theme, subject and the unfolding of text. InGail Forey and Geoff Thompson (eds.), Text type and texture, 45–69. Sheffield: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Valero-Garcés, Carmen
    1996 Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Spanish-English economics texts. English for Specific Purposes15(4). 279–294. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(96)00013‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00013-0 [Google Scholar]
67. Val.Es.Co
    Val.Es.Co 1996[1994] Corpus de Conversación Coloquial — Universidad de Valencia/ /Universidad de Alicante.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Vázquez, Graciela E.
    2001 El discurso académico español: cuestiones preliminares de didactización a través de materiales multimedia y unidades didácticas para el autoaprendizaje. ELUA. Estudios de Lingüística, Anexo11. 337–347. 10.14198/ELUA2001.Anexo1.14
    https://doi.org/10.14198/ELUA2001.Anexo1.14 [Google Scholar]
69. Ventola, Eija
    1979 The structure of casual conversation in English. Journal of Pragmatics3(3–4). 267–298. 10.1016/0378‑2166(79)90034‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(79)90034-1 [Google Scholar]
70. Weil, Henri
    1844 De l’ordre des mots dans les langues anciennes comparées aux langues modernes. Paris: Didier Érudition.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Zárate Fabián, Mario Clemente
    2017 La escritura académica: Dificultades y necesidades en educación superior. Educación Superior2(1). 46–54.
    [Google Scholar]